Xiaodong Pang, Huan-Xiang Zhou  Biophysical Journal 

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 107, Issue 9, Pages (November 2014)
Advertisements

Michael A. Geeves, Sherwin S. Lehrer  Biophysical Journal 
R.Ian Menz, John E. Walker, Andrew G.W. Leslie  Cell 
Volume 109, Issue 7, Pages (October 2015)
Dejun Lin, Alan Grossfield  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 6, Issue 7, Pages (July 1998)
by Andrew D. Ferguson, Eckhard Hofmann, James W
Olivier Fisette, Stéphane Gagné, Patrick Lagüe  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 108, Issue 1, Pages (January 2015)
Retinal Conformation Changes Rhodopsin’s Dynamic Ensemble
Daniel M. Freed, Peter S. Horanyi, Michael C. Wiener, David S. Cafiso 
Structural Insights into RNA-Dependent Ring Closure and ATPase Activation by the Rho Termination Factor  Emmanuel Skordalakes, James M. Berger  Cell 
Giovanni Settanni, Antonino Cattaneo, Paolo Carloni 
Supriyo Bhattacharya, Nagarajan Vaidehi  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 16, Issue 10, Pages (October 2008)
An Energetic Representation of Protein Architecture that Is Independent of Primary and Secondary Structure  Jason Vertrees, James O. Wrabl, Vincent J.
Jia Xu, Yingying Lee, Lesa J. Beamer, Steven R. Van Doren 
David Pulido, Sadaf-Ahmahni Hussain, Erhard Hohenester  Structure 
Volume 86, Issue 1, Pages (January 2004)
Volume 110, Issue 10, Pages (May 2016)
Monika Sharma, Alexander V. Predeus, Nicholas Kovacs, Michael Feig 
Volume 28, Issue 1, Pages (October 2007)
Dynamic Response of the C2 Domain of Protein Kinase Cα to Ca2+ Binding
Mechanism of the αβ Conformational Change in F1-ATPase after ATP Hydrolysis: Free- Energy Simulations  Yuko Ito, Mitsunori Ikeguchi  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 98, Issue 2, Pages (January 2010)
Volume 112, Issue 7, Pages (April 2017)
Brittny C. Davis, Jodian A. Brown, Ian F. Thorpe  Biophysical Journal 
Joe G. Greener, Ioannis Filippis, Michael J.E. Sternberg  Structure 
G. Fiorin, A. Pastore, P. Carloni, M. Parrinello  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 16, Issue 5, Pages (May 2008)
Conformational Recognition of an Intrinsically Disordered Protein
Molecular-Dynamics Simulations of the ATP/apo State of a Multidrug ATP-Binding Cassette Transporter Provide a Structural and Mechanistic Basis for the.
“DFG-Flip” in the Insulin Receptor Kinase Is Facilitated by a Helical Intermediate State of the Activation Loop  Harish Vashisth, Luca Maragliano, Cameron F.
Janin Glaenzer, Martin F. Peter, Gavin H. Thomas, Gregor Hagelueken 
Volume 109, Issue 6, Pages (September 2015)
Volume 10, Issue 10, Pages (October 2002)
Calcium Enhances Binding of Aβ Monomer to DMPC Lipid Bilayer
Daniel Peisach, Patricia Gee, Claudia Kent, Zhaohui Xu  Structure 
Till Siebenmorgen, Martin Zacharias  Biophysical Journal 
Microscopic Mechanism of Antibiotics Translocation through a Porin
Geometry-Based Sampling of Conformational Transitions in Proteins
Protein Collective Motions Coupled to Ligand Migration in Myoglobin
Aurélie Gouron, Anne Milet, Helene Jamet  Biophysical Journal 
Crystal Structure of the p53 Core Domain Bound to a Full Consensus Site as a Self- Assembled Tetramer  Yongheng Chen, Raja Dey, Lin Chen  Structure  Volume.
Volume 107, Issue 5, Pages (September 2014)
Masaru Goto, Rie Omi, Noriko Nakagawa, Ikuko Miyahara, Ken Hirotsu 
Activation of the Edema Factor of Bacillus anthracis by Calmodulin: Evidence of an Interplay between the EF-Calmodulin Interaction and Calcium Binding 
Volume 88, Issue 4, Pages (April 2005)
Protein Grabs a Ligand by Extending Anchor Residues: Molecular Simulation for Ca2+ Binding to Calmodulin Loop  Chigusa Kobayashi, Shoji Takada  Biophysical.
Volume 107, Issue 9, Pages (November 2014)
Structural Basis of Rab Effector Specificity
Dynamics of the BH3-Only Protein Binding Interface of Bcl-xL
Min Wang, Mary Prorok, Francis J. Castellino  Biophysical Journal 
Logan S. Ahlstrom, Osamu Miyashita  Biophysical Journal 
Conformational Transitions in Protein-Protein Association: Binding of Fasciculin-2 to Acetylcholinesterase  Jennifer M. Bui, Zoran Radic, Palmer Taylor,
Mechanism of Anionic Conduction across ClC
Structure of BamHI Bound to Nonspecific DNA
Christina Bergonzo, Thomas E. Cheatham  Biophysical Journal 
Chris Neale, Henry D. Herce, Régis Pomès, Angel E. García 
Nevra Ozer, Celia A. Schiffer, Turkan Haliloglu  Biophysical Journal 
Two Pathways Mediate Interdomain Allosteric Regulation in Pin1
Peter König, Rafael Giraldo, Lynda Chapman, Daniela Rhodes  Cell 
Insights from Free-Energy Calculations: Protein Conformational Equilibrium, Driving Forces, and Ligand-Binding Modes  Yu-ming M. Huang, Wei Chen, Michael J.
Volume 109, Issue 7, Pages (October 2015)
Shayantani Mukherjee, Sean M. Law, Michael Feig  Biophysical Journal 
Interactions of the Auxilin-1 PTEN-like Domain with Model Membranes Result in Nanoclustering of Phosphatidyl Inositol Phosphates  Antreas C. Kalli, Gareth.
Volume 98, Issue 2, Pages (January 2010)
Thomas Kampourakis, Yin-Biao Sun, Malcolm Irving  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 98, Issue 4, Pages (February 2010)
Volume 96, Issue 2, Pages L7-L9 (January 2009)
Presentation transcript:

Disorder-to-Order Transition of an Active-Site Loop Mediates the Allosteric Activation of Sortase A  Xiaodong Pang, Huan-Xiang Zhou  Biophysical Journal  Volume 109, Issue 8, Pages 1706-1715 (October 2015) DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2015.08.039 Copyright © 2015 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Structure of S. aureus sortase A. (A) Secondary structure of the catalytic domain. (B) The catalytic domain (colored in gold) bound with a sorting signal (sequence LPAT; in orange) and a Ca2+ ion (as green sphere), from model 1 of the NMR structure in PDB: 2KID (8). (C) Enlarged view of sorting signal binding site, displaying (as ball-and-stick) sorting signal-contacting residues around the C-termini of β4 and β7 and N-terminus of β8 and in the N-terminal region of the active site (i.e., β6/β7) loop. (D) Enlarged view of the Ca2+ binding site, displaying (as ball-and-stick) the three glutamates that coordinate the Ca2+ ion. (E) Superposition of the x-ray structure for apo SrtA (chain C in PDB: 1T2P,blue) (9) and the NMR structure for SrtAPep/Ca (gold). Conformational changes from apo to holo, especially prominent in the active-site loop (residues 159–177) and β7/β8 loop (residues 182–198), are illustrated by morphing calculated by the Yale Morph Server (36). The active-site loop in apo SrtA also exhibits significant structure disorder, as demonstrated by missing electron densities in chain B and large conformational differences between chains A and C (9). To see this figure in color, go online. Biophysical Journal 2015 109, 1706-1715DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2015.08.039) Copyright © 2015 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Comparison of conformational ensembles of apo SrtA sampled by the cMD and REST simulations. (A and B) Conformational differences represented by the first two principal components, PC1 (red arrows) and PC2 (green arrows), on a SrtA conformation with both PC1 and PC2 near 0. Four β-strands (cyan), β1, β2, β5, and β6, were used for superposition before PCA on the active-site loop. The view is rotated by ∼45° around a vertical axis from that for Fig. 1. (C and D) Free-energy surfaces, calculated from distributions of PC1 and PC2 in the cMD and REST simulations, respectively, on apo SrtA and contoured at 0.5 kcal/mol internals. PC coordinates are also displayed for chains A and C in the x-ray structure of apo SrtA (PDB: 1T2P) (green dots); 25 models in the NMR structure of SrtACa (PDB: 1IJA) (blue dots); and 20 models in the NMR structure of SrtAPep/Ca (PDB: 2KID) (red dots). One substate from the cMD simulation and three substates from the REST simulations are each illustrated by 10 conformations within the first contour around a free-energy local minimum, with only the active-site loop and β7/β8 loop displayed (in blue) along with chain C of 1T2P (gray with active-site loop in orange). To see this figure in color, go online. Biophysical Journal 2015 109, 1706-1715DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2015.08.039) Copyright © 2015 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Conformational ensembles of SrtA in three liganded forms. (A) SrtACa. (B) SrtAPep. (C) SrtAPep/Ca. The information presented is the same as in Fig. 2, C and D, except that the free-energy surfaces are calculated from the REST simulations on the three liganded forms. Each free-energy basin is illustrated by 10 conformations within the first contour (at 0.5 kcal/mol) around the minimum, with only the active-site loop displayed (in blue) along with model 1 of 2KID (gray with active-site loop in orange). To see this figure in color, go online. Biophysical Journal 2015 109, 1706-1715DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2015.08.039) Copyright © 2015 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Status of sorting signal and Ca2+ binding pockets, monitored by dPep and dCa, respectively. (A–D) Free-energy surfaces over dPep and dCa for apo SrtA, SrtACa, SrtAPep, and SrtAPep/Ca, respectively, contoured at 0.5 kcal/mol internals. The dPep and dCa values are also displayed for conformations in 1T2P (green dots); 1IJA (blue dots); and 2KID (red dots). (E and F) Distributions of dPep and dCa, respectively. To see this figure in color, go online. Biophysical Journal 2015 109, 1706-1715DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2015.08.039) Copyright © 2015 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Mechanistic model for allosteric activation of SrtA by Ca2+. β-barrel of SrtA (gray), active-site loop (blue), β7/β8 loop (orange), sorting signal (red), and Ca2+(green). In the apo form, the active-site loop undergoes conformational exchange among three substates, and the β7/β8 loop is mostly closed but can transiently open. Upon binding of the sorting signal, the active-site loop closes up but retains significant mobility, partly due to repulsion of Glu171 by anionic residues such as Glu105 and Glu108. The Ca2+ binding leads to closure of the entire active-site loop and increased open probability for the β7/β8 loop. The resulting preorganization of the binding pocket for the sorting signal facilitates the latter’s tight binding. To see this figure in color, go online. Biophysical Journal 2015 109, 1706-1715DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2015.08.039) Copyright © 2015 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions