DFMEA, Thermal Derating CAF, VIA Fatigue

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
SBS FMEA Database FMEA Background SBS Database Features and Benefits
Advertisements

Sherlock and Abaqus October 16, 2014.
DESIGN FAILURE MODE EFFECTS ANALYSIS (DFMEA) PURPOSE OF DFMEA Identify, quantify, and reduce design risk (especially for critical systems) Provide a traceable.
Failure Mode and Effect Analysis
Failure Effect Mode Analysis
SMJ 4812 Project Mgmt and Maintenance Eng.
Failure Mode Effects Analysis Effects Analysis Risk Identification FMEA Risk Identification FMEA.
PURPOSE OF DFMEA (DESIGN FAILURE MODE EFFECTS ANALYSIS)
 Individually  Given your sample of M&Ms, build a Pareto diagram by color  Before you destroy the evidence, be sure you have an accurate count.
PTY (Ltd)Reg No: 2007/019351/07. FAILURE MODE & EFFECT ANALYSIS 4 th Edition (Including Control Plans) WHAT IS AN FMEA? FMEA is an analytical technique.
Failure Mode and Effect Analysis
Lucas Phillips Anurag Nanajipuram FAILURE MODE AND EFFECT ANALYSIS.
Chapter 11: Testing The dynamic verification of the behavior of a program on a finite set of test cases, suitable selected from the usually infinite execution.
F.M.E.A (Failure Mode and Effect Analysis)
4/11/2011Rui de Oliveira1.  Collection of the biggest PCB failures we’ve seen at CERN workshop since 10 years.  The PTH (plated through hole) is the.
Failure Mode and Effects Analysis FMEA
Presented to: [Date] By (Insert Name) Failure Mode and Effect Analysis (FMEA)
Failure Mode Effect and Criticality Analysis Adam Adgar School of Computing and Technology.
Quality Risk Management Methodology Anthony Cumberlege SAPRAA meeting - Randpark golf club, 20 March 2009.
Relex Reliability Software “the intuitive solution
Base Material for Printed Circuit Boards
Analyze Opportunity Part 1
Lecture: Reliability & FMECA Lecturer: Dr. Dave Olwell Dr. Cliff Whitcomb, CSEP System Suitability.
QUALITY RISK MANAGEMENT RASHID MAHMOOD MSc. Analytical Chemistry MS in Total Quality Management Senior Manager Quality Assurance Nabiqasim Group of Industries.
RCM Tools Histogram Pareto Chart Cause and Effect Diagram FMEA.
ASENT_THERMAL.PPT ASENT Thermal Analysis Last revised: 8/17/2005.
Failure Mode and Effect Analysis
Frame with Cutout Random Load Fatigue. Background and Motivation A thin frame with a cutout has been identified as the critical component in a structure.
1 Criteria for a Successful FMEA Design & Process.
Software Quality Assurance SOFTWARE DEFECT. Defect Repair Defect Repair is a process of repairing the defective part or replacing it, as needed. For example,
Using Total Quality Management Tools to Improve the Quality of Crash Data John Woosley Louisiana State University.
Failure Mode & Effect Analysis FMEA Lecture 11. What is FMEA? Failure mode and effect analysis is an Advanced Quality Planning tool that: examines potential.
Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (FMEA)
Effectiveness of risk management process towards error reduction in the laboratory at Sakra World Hospital AUTHORS: Dr. Shabnam Roohi Mr. Deepak Agarkhed.
© Food – a fact of life 2009 Hazard Analysis Critical Control Point (HACCP) HACCP is a system which looks for and prevents potential problems before they.
Failure Modes, Effects and Criticality Analysis
Concept Selection and DFMEA Heidi Ploeg Associate Professor Mechanical Engineering and Biomedical Engineering.
Lean Six Sigma: Process Improvement Tools and Techniques Donna C. Summers © 2011 Pearson Higher Education, Upper Saddle River, NJ All Rights Reserved.
Risk Assessment: A Practical Guide to Assessing Operational Risk
HDPUG Project Proposal Determining a better CAF acceleration equation
Six Sigma Greenbelt Training
Failure Mode & Effect Analysis (FMEA)
Software Configuration Management
WEBENCH® Coil Designer
IAEA E-learning Program
Task Analysis, Failure Modes and Effects Analysis
CAF Resistant, Low CTE FR-4 Dielectric Substrate
FMEA.
FMEA PROCESS FLOW Causes/ failure mechanisms Product definition
Improvement Selection:
FMEA of a CLIQ-based protection of D1
IENG 461 – System Safety I Lecture 8 – Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (FMEA) James R. Harris, Ph.D., P.E.
Failure mode and effect analysis
Quality Risk Management
Project Risk Management
SBS FMEA Database FMEA Background SBS Database Features and Benefits
University of Alabama in Huntsville
GE 6757 TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT
This presentation document has been prepared by Vault Intelligence Limited (“Vault") and is intended for off line demonstration, presentation and educational.
J1879 Robustness Validation Hand Book A Joint SAE, ZVEI, JSAE, AEC Automotive Electronics Robustness Validation Plan Robustness Diagram Trends and Challenges.
The Certified Quality Process Handbook Chapter 22: Preventive Action
Reliability Calculations
Failure Mode and Effect Analysis
Solder Fatigue Analysis
Failure Mode and Effect Analysis
Reliability Calculations
PDT 351 – Material Failure Analysis
Definitions Cumulative time to failure (T): Mean life:
A New Concept for Laboratory Quality Management Systems
PFMEA Summary Process Steps
Presentation transcript:

DFMEA, Thermal Derating CAF, VIA Fatigue Dr. Nathan Blattau

DFMEA – Design Failure Mode Effects Analysis Potential failure modes of the components The effect that a failure of the component will have on the circuit Thermal Derating Component temperature ratings for storage and operation Comparison of those ratings to the applied thermal environments CAF – Conductive Anodic Filament Formation The potential for conductive filaments forming internal to the circuit board Typically due to drill damage and hole spacing VIA Fatigue Thermal cycling fatigue of the plated through holes of the PCB IMEC and IPC-TR-579 models

DFMEA Analyzes potential reliability problems early in the development cycle of a product, when it is easier to fix problems and therefore enhance overall reliability.  FMEA is used to Identify potential failure modes Determine their effect on the operation of the product Identify actions to mitigate the failures  Design Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (DFMEA) focuses on components and subsystems

What DFMEA is…. A systematic group of activities designed to: Recognize and evaluate potential failures of systems, products, or processes Identify the effects and outcomes of the failures Identify actions that could eliminate or mitigate the failures Provide a historical written record of the work performed

Why perform a DFMEA? Purpose of an DFMEA Study is to analyze: What might go wrong? How bad might the effect be? How might it be prevented, mitigated or detected at the earliest possible moment? With lowest cost, impact, safety risk…. Develop a DFMEA process for use in future designs

DFMEA Basics - Failure Mode And Effect Analysis DFMEA is a widely used and powerful analysis & design review technique. Extremely comprehensive element by element review of: What can go wrong What will happen How the situation can be improved For improving a design For each design component or element: List how failures can occur (Failure Mode, what can go wrong, how the failure manifests itself) List what could happen (Failure Effect, consequences of the mode). List how processes or the system itself can detect & prevent the problem Generate Recommendations for Improvements.

Some Key DFMEA Terms Failure: The loss of expected or intended function under stated conditions Failure mode: The way in which a failure is observed; generally describes the way the failure occurs. Failure effect: The immediate consequences of a failure on operation, function or functionality Failure cause: Defects in design, system, process, quality, or part application, the underlying cause of the failure or things which initiate a process which leads to failure. Severity: The consequences of a failure mode. Severity considers the worst case outcome of a failure as determined by the degree of injury, property damage, or harm that could ultimately occur.

DFMEA Basics - Failure Mode And Effect Analysis Calculate a Risk Priority Number (RPN) for Each Line Item using 3 Criteria, Severity of the Failure Effect “S” (Scale of 1 (Low) - 10 (High)). Frequency of Failure Occurrence “O” (Scale of 1(Infrequent) -10 (Frequent)). Detectability/Preventability/Warning “D” (Scale or 1(Very Detectable) - 10 (Not Detectable)). RPN = S x O x D, range (1 (good) to 1000 High Risk). An unacceptable range is defined. Example: RPN’s > 150 are unacceptable and require a corrective action redesign. Often a Pareto Ranking of the RPN is performed and used to prioritize corrective action efforts.

DFMEA – The Old Way

DFMEA - Sherlock Ties the Netlist and the Sherlock Parts list automatically Generates template based worksheets that can be imported and exported into Excel using a custom markup language User configurable parameters to control failure modes, causes, effects Can group components into subcircuits

The Netlist, Subcircuits Sherlock will automatically extract it from the ODB++ For Gerbers a IPC netlist will need to be uploaded Subcircuit information PRP fields in the ODB++, need to specify this from your designers Manual entry

DFMEA Sherlock Input Configuration

DFMEA Sherlock Default Failure Modes

Populate the DFMEA Using the Partlist Multiple levels Safety critical applications Component and I/O level analysis Specify how far away to check for adjacent pins Ignore pins without connections, or adjacent pins on the same net Component failure only

DFMEA Inputs Input subcircuit details User should enter function and update the default information 0.5 mm pin to pin short distance

Formatting DFMEA Outputs

Generate DFMEA Output

Edit the Template

Output with New Template

Plated Through Hole Fatigue IPC-TR-579 Standard model IMEC PTH model – license enabled

IPC-TR-579 [Engelmaier Model for PTH fatigue] Beam model formulation, main concern is the effective area assumption of the PCB

IMEC [Model for PTH fatigue] Axisymmetric model formulation, better accounts for the area effect of the PCB around the PTH The effective PCB area Equation

IMEC Model Better captures the drop in strain as the hole size increases

PTH Fatigue Parameters Drill size, extracted from the drill file Z axis coefficient of thermal expansion (CTE) of the PCB computed in the stackup Temperature ranges from the Life Cycle Analysis Parameters PTH Quality Copper properties Hole size filter PTH wall thickness

Parameters There are two qualitative factors IST/HAT Qualification This doesn’t change the probability of failure prediction Limits the maximum score one can achieve based on qualification testing conducted PTH Quality Factor For the IMEC model this only changes the Weibull slope used to generate the prediction curve For the IPC model it changes the stress concentration factor and the Weibull slope parameter

Conductive Anodic Filament Formation (CAF) Conductive anodic filament formation (CAF), is a failure observed within the glass-reinforced epoxy printed wiring board (PWB) laminates It is an electrochemical process involving the ionic transport of metal under the influence of an electric field

CAF Failures Failures are typically the result of damage during drilling of the printed circuit board Drilling causes fracture of the laminate in which plating chemicals get entrapped Failures can occur very rapidly in the presence of humidity and electric bias Sherlock does a spacing analysis coupled with fiber direction to generate a score based on distance and overlap Qualitative analysis

Sherlock CAF Analysis Sherlock uses the drill file for hole locations and sizes Analysis user inputs Holes size filter, removes holes from the analysis Damage zone tells Sherlock how far out to look for intersections Qualification changes the score based on the qualification tests done

Sherlock CAF Results Scoring is based on a 15 mil wall to wall spacing Maximum score limited by qualification testing conducted (or not)

Thermal Derating Data check to compare the part temperature ratings to the thermal cycles defined in the life cycle Need to verify that parts have operating and storage parameters in the parts list

Thermal Parameters Set the Life Cycle State in the Thermal Event Editor Storage is assumed to be non-operating conditions Therm tab in the Part Properties

Temperatures Sherlock will look at temperature inputs from the Life Cycle or thermal inputs (images, csv files assigned to a temperature cycle) to compare against Margin above the minimum operating/storage temperature and margin below the maximum operating/storage temperature used for scoring Margin on the cold side is not as critical as the hot side