Nuclease Target Site Selection for Maximizing On-target Activity and Minimizing Off- target Effects in Genome Editing  Ciaran M Lee, Thomas J Cradick,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Jin-Soo Kim Dept. of Chemistry, Seoul National Univ. Center for Genome Engineering, Institute for Basic Science Genome Editing: Challenges and Opportunities.
Advertisements

Lecture-7 Genome editing CRISPR
Genome Editing by Matthew Porteus Department of Pediatrics,
WORKSHOP: CRISPR in insects
Genome editing to breed better plants
METHODS OF GENOME ENGINEERING: A NEW ERA OF MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
Presented by: Oyeyemi Ajayi, Prashant Kuntala, and Colin Kruse
CRISPR-Cas9 in development and genetic disease
Pluripotent stem cell based gene therapy for hematological diseases
Box Mutations in BRCA1/2 and Rad51 are associated with breast cancer
Expanding the Biologist’s Toolkit with CRISPR-Cas9
CRISPR-Cas Systems: Prokaryotes Upgrade to Adaptive Immunity
Genome-editing Technologies for Gene and Cell Therapy
Figure 2 Use of CRISPR/Cas9 for genome editing
162. Stability of Polymer/Plasmid DNA Complexes In Vitro and In Vivo
Figure 3 Endogenous repair of double-strand DNA breaks
Molecular Therapy - Nucleic Acids
Harnessing CRISPR–Cas systems for bacterial genome editing
Astrid Breitbart, Charles E. Murry  Cell Stem Cell 
CRISPR-Cas Systems: Prokaryotes Upgrade to Adaptive Immunity
The CRISPR/Cas9 system.1 Clustered regularly interspaced palindromic repeats (CRISPR) refers to sequences in the bacterial genome. The CRISPR/Cas9 system.1.
DNA Repair in Prostate Cancer: Biology and Clinical Implications
Donald B. Kohn, MD, Caroline Y. Kuo, MD 
Research Techniques Made Simple: The Application of CRISPR-Cas9 and Genome Editing in Investigative Dermatology  Joan Ramon Guitart, Jodi L. Johnson,
Mouse Genome Engineering via CRISPR-Cas9 for Study of Immune Function
HIV Receives a “One Two Knockout Punch”
Volume 7, Issue 1, Pages (April 2014)
Figure 1 Adaptive immune system of bacteria and archaea
Astrid Breitbart, Charles E. Murry  Cell Stem Cell 
Molecular Therapy - Nucleic Acids
Choosing the Right Tool for the Job: RNAi, TALEN, or CRISPR
CRISPR-Cas9 for in vivo Gene Therapy: Promise and Hurdles
Therapeutic editing of hepatocyte genome in vivo
USH2A Gene Editing Using the CRISPR System
Itai M. Pessach, MD, PhD, Luigi D. Notarangelo, MD 
The CRISPR/Cas9 system.1 Clustered regularly interspaced palindromic repeats (CRISPR) refers to sequences in the bacterial genome. The CRISPR/Cas9 system.1.
CRISPR genome-editing: A medical revolution
Andrew R. Bassett, Charlotte Tibbit, Chris P. Ponting, Ji-Long Liu 
Volume 154, Issue 6, Pages (September 2013)
Zinc Fingers, TAL Effectors, or Cas9-Based DNA Binding Proteins: What’s Best for Targeting Desired Genome Loci?  Annett Strauβ, Thomas Lahaye  Molecular.
Current Progress in Therapeutic Gene Editing for Monogenic Diseases
CRISPR-Based Technologies for the Manipulation of Eukaryotic Genomes
Genome-editing Technologies for Gene and Cell Therapy
ZFN, TALEN, and CRISPR/Cas-based methods for genome engineering
Beth Elliott, Christine Richardson, Maria Jasin  Molecular Cell 
Gang Wang, Na Zhao, Ben Berkhout, Atze T Das  Molecular Therapy 
Advances in Industrial Biotechnology Using CRISPR-Cas Systems
Genome Editing Technologies: Defining a Path to Clinic
Molecular Therapy - Methods & Clinical Development
521. Multiplex Genome Editing of TCR°/CD52 Genes as a Platform for “Off the Shelf” Adoptive T-Cell Immunotherapies    Molecular Therapy  Volume 22, Pages.
A CRISPR Approach to Gene Targeting
William T. Hendriks, Curtis R. Warren, Chad A. Cowan  Cell Stem Cell 
Ignazio Maggio, Manuel A.F.V. Gonçalves  Trends in Biotechnology 
Andres Canela, Andre Stanlie, André Nussenzweig  Molecular Cell 
Volume 23, Issue 3, Pages (March 2015)
Gene editing: modifying a gene that was already there
Ciaran M Lee, Thomas J Cradick, Gang Bao  Molecular Therapy 
740. Prevention of Radiation-Induced Lung Injury by Administration of Gene-Modified Mesenchymal Stem Cells    Molecular Therapy  Volume 20, Pages S285-S286.
Gene editing by CRISPR/Cas9 for gene inactivation and targeted sequence replacement. Gene editing by CRISPR/Cas9 for gene inactivation and targeted sequence.
CRISPR/Cas9: Transcending the Reality of Genome Editing
Thomas J Cradick, Peng Qiu, Ciaran M Lee, Eli J Fine, Gang Bao 
Chemical Biology Approaches to Genome Editing: Understanding, Controlling, and Delivering Programmable Nucleases  Johnny H. Hu, Kevin M. Davis, David R.
Molecular Therapy - Nucleic Acids
Volume 26, Issue 11, Pages (November 2018)
Off-target Effects in CRISPR/Cas9-mediated Genome Engineering
CRISPR in Parasitology: Not Exactly Cut and Dried!
Thomas Gaj, Benjamin E Epstein, David V Schaffer  Molecular Therapy 
New Tools for Genome Modification in Human Embryonic Stem Cells
CRISPR Craze to Transform Cardiac Biology
Presentation transcript:

Nuclease Target Site Selection for Maximizing On-target Activity and Minimizing Off- target Effects in Genome Editing  Ciaran M Lee, Thomas J Cradick, Eli J Fine, Gang Bao  Molecular Therapy  Volume 24, Issue 3, Pages 475-487 (March 2016) DOI: 10.1038/mt.2016.1 Copyright © 2016 Official journal of the American Society of Gene & Cell Therapy Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Classes of designer nucleases and gene-editing outcomes. Targeted double-strand breaks can be induced using ZFNs, TALENs, or CRISPR/Cas9. DNA breaks are repaired via endogenous repair pathways such as non-homologous end joining (NHEJ) and homologous recombination (HR). The NHEJ pathway results in short deletions or insertions at the target site that can result in a targeted gene knock-out. The HR pathway is a high fidelity pathway that uses the sister chromatid as a template to correct the DNA break. An exogenous DNA template may be provided for homology directed repair (HDR). This pathway can be exploited to repair mutations or modify DNA at the resolution of a single nucleotide. Molecular Therapy 2016 24, 475-487DOI: (10.1038/mt.2016.1) Copyright © 2016 Official journal of the American Society of Gene & Cell Therapy Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Comparison of off-target analysis by different methods. (a) The 38 heterodimeric bona fide off-target sites for CCR5 ZFNs42 found by four different experiment-based prediction methods and the refined “ZFN v2.0” PROGNOS algorithm. The PROGNOS sites are drawn from the top rankings spanning 3× the number of predictions by the Bayesian abstraction of the in vitro cleavage profile. (**) Note that only six of the sites found using ChIP-Seq were described,44 so the full degree of overlap of all ChIP-Seq sites with sites found by other methods remains unknown. Adopted from Fine et al.46. (b) A comparison of the off-target predictions by the MIT CRISPR Design Tool (solely bioinformatics-based) to the bona fide off-target sites found for nine different RGENs by the GUIDE-Seq method (experimental-based). (c) A comparison analogous to (b) but using the E-CRISP bioinformatics-based prediction tool. GUIDE-Seq figures adopted from Tsai et al.55. Molecular Therapy 2016 24, 475-487DOI: (10.1038/mt.2016.1) Copyright © 2016 Official journal of the American Society of Gene & Cell Therapy Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Gross chromosomal rearrangements as a consequence of genome editing. Multiplex gene targeting can result in targeted large deletions, inversions, or translocations. However, these gross chromosomal rearrangements can also occur between nuclease on- and off-target sites. Cut sites represented by red arrows. Molecular Therapy 2016 24, 475-487DOI: (10.1038/mt.2016.1) Copyright © 2016 Official journal of the American Society of Gene & Cell Therapy Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Outline of various methods for off-target site identification and validation. In silico prediction tools identify potential off-target (OT) sites that can be analyzed by next-generation sequencing (NGS). There are various experimental methods designed to identify OT sites in an unbiased manner. After OT site identification, a second round of NGS at these sites is required to verify if they are bona fide OT sites. Molecular Therapy 2016 24, 475-487DOI: (10.1038/mt.2016.1) Copyright © 2016 Official journal of the American Society of Gene & Cell Therapy Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Strategies to reduce off-target events. (a) Modification of the FokI domain to prevent homodimerization of ZFN or TALEN monomers. (b) Modification of the Cas9 nuclease to generate a nicking version of Cas9 (Cas9N). Cas9N can generate single-stranded DNA breaks. (c) Inactivation of the Cas9 endonuclease to create a dead Cas9. Fusion of the FokI domain creates a dCas9-FokI enzyme that requires a pair of dCas9-FokI to achieve dimerization of the FokI domain for DNA cleavage. (d) Cas9 orthologs with longer protospacer adjacent motif sequences can result in less potential off-target sites in the genome. Molecular Therapy 2016 24, 475-487DOI: (10.1038/mt.2016.1) Copyright © 2016 Official journal of the American Society of Gene & Cell Therapy Terms and Conditions