O AK R IDGE N ATIONAL L ABORATORY U. S. D EPARTMENT OF E NERGY 1 NPTS Transferability Project: A Feasibility Study P. Hu, T. Reuscher, R. Schmoyer Oak.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
TWO STEP EQUATIONS 1. SOLVE FOR X 2. DO THE ADDITION STEP FIRST
Advertisements

You have been given a mission and a code. Use the code to complete the mission and you will save the world from obliteration…
Sampling: Theory and Methods
1 Inducements–Call Blocking. Aware of the Service?
Multistage Sampling.
Advanced Piloting Cruise Plot.
A Study of State and Local Implementation and Impact The Study of State and Local Implementation and Impact of the Individuals with Disabilities Education.
1 Impact of Changes in the Telephone Environment On RDD Telephone Surveys Mary Cay Murray Abt Associates Inc Erin Foster Abt Associates Inc Jessica Cardoni.
Chapter 1 The Study of Body Function Image PowerPoint
Copyright © 2011, Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 5 Author: Julia Richards and R. Scott Hawley.
1 Copyright © 2010, Elsevier Inc. All rights Reserved Fig 2.1 Chapter 2.
By D. Fisher Geometric Transformations. Reflection, Rotation, or Translation 1.
1 Progress report on Expert Groups on micro and macro household statistics WPNA meeting October 2011 Maryse FESSEAU (OECD – Statistic Directorate, National.
Knowledge Dietary Managers Association 1 DMA Certification Exam Blueprint and Curriculum Development.
Business Transaction Management Software for Application Coordination 1 Business Processes and Coordination.
Regional Routing Model Review: C) Model Formulation and Scenario Analysis Frank Southworth Oak Ridge National Laboratory Oak Ridge, TN NETS Program.
Jeopardy Q 1 Q 6 Q 11 Q 16 Q 21 Q 2 Q 7 Q 12 Q 17 Q 22 Q 3 Q 8 Q 13
Jeopardy Q 1 Q 6 Q 11 Q 16 Q 21 Q 2 Q 7 Q 12 Q 17 Q 22 Q 3 Q 8 Q 13
Title Subtitle.
My Alphabet Book abcdefghijklm nopqrstuvwxyz.
0 - 0.
DIVIDING INTEGERS 1. IF THE SIGNS ARE THE SAME THE ANSWER IS POSITIVE 2. IF THE SIGNS ARE DIFFERENT THE ANSWER IS NEGATIVE.
ADDING INTEGERS 1. POS. + POS. = POS. 2. NEG. + NEG. = NEG. 3. POS. + NEG. OR NEG. + POS. SUBTRACT TAKE SIGN OF BIGGER ABSOLUTE VALUE.
SUBTRACTING INTEGERS 1. CHANGE THE SUBTRACTION SIGN TO ADDITION
MULT. INTEGERS 1. IF THE SIGNS ARE THE SAME THE ANSWER IS POSITIVE 2. IF THE SIGNS ARE DIFFERENT THE ANSWER IS NEGATIVE.
FACTORING ax2 + bx + c Think “unfoil” Work down, Show all steps.
Addition Facts
Year 6 mental test 5 second questions
Multistage Sampling Module 3 Session 9.
1 Session 7 Standard errors, Estimation and Confidence Intervals.
SADC Course in Statistics Introduction to Non- Parametric Methods (Session 19)
SADC Course in Statistics Sampling design using the Paddy game (Sessions 15&16)
1 Table design Module 3 Session 2. 2 Objectives of this session By the end of this session, you will be able to: appreciate the different type of objectives.
ZMQS ZMQS
SE Florida FSUTMS Users Group Meeting FDOT Systems Planning Office
Richmond House, Liverpool (1) 26 th January 2004.
BT Wholesale October Creating your own telephone network WHOLESALE CALLS LINE ASSOCIATED.
Elementary Statistics
(This presentation may be used for instructional purposes)
ABC Technology Project
1 FY10 ACS Methods Panel Update Jennifer Guarino Tancreto Chief, ACS Data Collection Methods Staff Decennial Statistical Studies Division Presentation.
2 |SharePoint Saturday New York City
VOORBLAD.
Squares and Square Root WALK. Solve each problem REVIEW:
Created by Susan Neal $100 Fractions Addition Fractions Subtraction Fractions Multiplication Fractions Division General $200 $300 $400 $500 $100 $200.
© 2012 National Heart Foundation of Australia. Slide 2.
Lets play bingo!!. Calculate: MEAN Calculate: MEDIAN
Chapter 5 Test Review Sections 5-1 through 5-4.
GG Consulting, LLC I-SUITE. Source: TEA SHARS Frequently asked questions 2.
Addition 1’s to 20.
25 seconds left…...
Equal or Not. Equal or Not
Slippery Slope
Test B, 100 Subtraction Facts
June 10, Representative products In ICP 2005 price collectors were asked to identify “representative” products among all the products for household.
Daily mobility trends of Finnish people since 1986 and user segmentation according to daily mobility based on NTS Tuuli Järvi.
Januar MDMDFSSMDMDFSSS
Week 1.
We will resume in: 25 Minutes.
©Brooks/Cole, 2001 Chapter 12 Derived Types-- Enumerated, Structure and Union.
1 Unit 1 Kinematics Chapter 1 Day
PSSA Preparation.
Chapter 11: The t Test for Two Related Samples
How Cells Obtain Energy from Food
What Constitutes an Audit? Presenters: Diane Robichaud-Cormier, NB Terry Hing, ON Michele Snow, ON.
1 Volume measures and Rebasing of National Accounts Training Workshop on System of National Accounts for ECO Member Countries October 2012, Tehran,
Presentation transcript:

O AK R IDGE N ATIONAL L ABORATORY U. S. D EPARTMENT OF E NERGY 1 NPTS Transferability Project: A Feasibility Study P. Hu, T. Reuscher, R. Schmoyer Oak Ridge National Laboratory Research sponsored by FHWAs Office of Highway Policy Information

O AK R IDGE N ATIONAL L ABORATORY U. S. D EPARTMENT OF E NERGY 2 Although information rich, NPTS data were not recommended for drawing conclusions on travel in areas smaller than a Census division Extrapolating NPTS data within small areas could risk developing and subsequently using unreliable estimates Background

O AK R IDGE N ATIONAL L ABORATORY U. S. D EPARTMENT OF E NERGY 3 Currently, small and medium-sized communities use NPTS data in four ways: 1.Based on NPTS nation-wide estimates 2.Based on data from NPTS households that are from a same Census Region (4) 3.Based on data from NPTS households that are from a same Census Division (9) 4.Based on data from NPTS households that are from MSAs of similar size 3M+, 1-3M, 500K-1M,…., < 250K

O AK R IDGE N ATIONAL L ABORATORY U. S. D EPARTMENT OF E NERGY 4 Are there alternatives that better reflect the characteristics of small and medium-sized communities, and that maintain the reliability of the estimates?

O AK R IDGE N ATIONAL L ABORATORY U. S. D EPARTMENT OF E NERGY 5 Determine how NPTS data can be transferred to areas smaller than the NPTS sample design allows, and Determine the reliability of the transferred information. Objectives

O AK R IDGE N ATIONAL L ABORATORY U. S. D EPARTMENT OF E NERGY 6 Number of daily person trips (PT) and person miles traveled (PMT) per household, Number of daily vehicle trips (VT) and vehicle miles traveled (VMT) per household, and PT, PMT, VT and VMT categorized by Purpose (why), and Mode (how). Outcome

O AK R IDGE N ATIONAL L ABORATORY U. S. D EPARTMENT OF E NERGY 7 Majority of the households within a census tract are sufficiently homogenous with respect to travel determinants reported for each tract Census tracts can be grouped into homogeneous clusters with respect to travel determinants reported for each tract There are enough NPTS households assigned to each cluster, and NPTS households in a cluster are representative of all households within that cluster, with respect to travel determinants. Three Premises of Our Approach

O AK R IDGE N ATIONAL L ABORATORY U. S. D EPARTMENT OF E NERGY 8 Approach 1.Categorize all of the census tracts around the country into homogeneous clusters, with respect to travel determinants reported for each tract, 2.Assign NPTS households to these clusters based on the census tract where the household is located. 3.Calculate cluster-specific travel statistics based on data collected from NPTS households 4.Calculate total census tract-specific travel demand.

O AK R IDGE N ATIONAL L ABORATORY U. S. D EPARTMENT OF E NERGY 9 Step 1. Categorize Census Tracts into Clusters There are 61,258 tracts nationwide Manhattan tracts and tracts without any population were excluded (1,430 tracts). Clusters are developed in such a way that the variation within a cluster is minimized and the variation between clusters is maximized. Census tract characteristics, area type (urban, suburban, rural), median household income, vehicle ownership and employment rate, are the classifiers. The final clustering scheme results in 11 clusters of census tracts.

O AK R IDGE N ATIONAL L ABORATORY U. S. D EPARTMENT OF E NERGY 10 All eligible tracts were grouped into 11 clusters Rural Sub Urban

O AK R IDGE N ATIONAL L ABORATORY U. S. D EPARTMENT OF E NERGY 11 Assignment of NPTS Households by Cluster Rural Sub Urban

O AK R IDGE N ATIONAL L ABORATORY U. S. D EPARTMENT OF E NERGY 12 In general, NPTS households are representative of the households in their corresponding clusters, with a few exceptions. Reflecting the nature of CATI Incompatible format

O AK R IDGE N ATIONAL L ABORATORY U. S. D EPARTMENT OF E NERGY 13 An Example of how this tool works

O AK R IDGE N ATIONAL L ABORATORY U. S. D EPARTMENT OF E NERGY 14 Estimating Travel Demand for City of Oak Ridge T. 201 T. 202 T. 203 T. 204 T. 205 T. 206 Rural high Rural mid Rural low Rural high T. 301Very high Rural low2,886 NPTS HHs 5,934 NPTS HHs 7,890 NPTS HHs 2,886 NPTS HHs 5,934 NPTS HHs 1,182 NPTS HHs

O AK R IDGE N ATIONAL L ABORATORY U. S. D EPARTMENT OF E NERGY 15 City of Oak Ridge (contd) Tract 201 Rural low2,886 NPTS HHs 632 HHs × person trips/HH = 2,272 total person trips 365 HHs × person trips/HH = 2,924 total person trips 174 HHs × person trips/HH = 2,092 total person trips 124 HHs × person trips/HH = 1,935 total person trips 72 HHs × 19.3 person trips/HH = 1,390 total person trips

O AK R IDGE N ATIONAL L ABORATORY U. S. D EPARTMENT OF E NERGY 16 Estimated Travel Demand for City of Oak Ridge T. 201 T. 202 T. 203 T. 204 T. 205 T. 206 T ,600 person trips 27,300 person trips 17,700 person trips 17,200 person trips 14,800 person trips 10,200 person trips 11,400 person trips = 109,200 Person Trips

O AK R IDGE N ATIONAL L ABORATORY U. S. D EPARTMENT OF E NERGY 17 The next question is: How good are these cluster-based estimates?

O AK R IDGE N ATIONAL L ABORATORY U. S. D EPARTMENT OF E NERGY 18 We conducted four separate assessments 1. Against New York NPTS add-on (random half of a sample of 11,004 HHs) 2. Against Oklahoma NPTS add-on (random half of a sample of 3,932 HHs) 3. Against Massachusetts NPTS add-on (random half of a sample of 7,801 HHs) 4. Against Baton Rough Household Survey (1,395 HHs)

O AK R IDGE N ATIONAL L ABORATORY U. S. D EPARTMENT OF E NERGY 19 If not contaminated by differences in survey methodology, cluster-based estimates are extremely close to the baselines.

O AK R IDGE N ATIONAL L ABORATORY U. S. D EPARTMENT OF E NERGY 20 Another Example of the Assessment

O AK R IDGE N ATIONAL L ABORATORY U. S. D EPARTMENT OF E NERGY 21 Assessment also suggests that cluster- based approach does not have advantages over MSA-size based approach. Then, why bother?

O AK R IDGE N ATIONAL L ABORATORY U. S. D EPARTMENT OF E NERGY 22 However, if estimating for areas smaller than an MSA, then the cluster-based approach provides more finely differentiated estimates than the MSA size-based approach.

O AK R IDGE N ATIONAL L ABORATORY U. S. D EPARTMENT OF E NERGY 23 Conclusions If resources are available, a locale-specific household survey is most likely to yield estimates that are more accurate than those based on other surveys. Otherwise, one has 5 ways to use the NPTS data Cluster based MSA-size based Census-Division based Census-Region based Nationwide

O AK R IDGE N ATIONAL L ABORATORY U. S. D EPARTMENT OF E NERGY 24 Conclusions (contd) Our results suggest that cluster-based estimates are more accurate than those derived from the other 4 approaches Although the percentage improvements are small (e.g., improving VMT estimate by less than 1%), the absolute improvements contributed by the cluster-based approach can not be ignored.