Universal soft robotic activation based on reversible assembly.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Demonstrations I, II, and III.
Advertisements

Soft robotic device applied to the RV in a pressure overload model of RHF. Soft robotic device applied to the RV in a pressure overload model of RHF. (A.
Degradation of MSP samples in 37°C DPBS solution.
Comparison of predicted and measured forces and moments.
Demonstrations integrated system tests.
Basic design concept of human mimetic humanoid.
TPAD controller schematic and testing for WPC.
TPAD controller performance for three force components.
Soft robotic VAD concept.
Cable-driven system diagram for structure matrix.
Demonstration of high-speed and precise actuation.
Three different types of transfer functions with a codomain of [0,1].
Robot surface tension experiments.
TPAD training protocol.
Force-strain characteristics of Peano-HASEL actuators using hydrogel and aluminum electrodes. Force-strain characteristics of Peano-HASEL actuators using.
Self-sensing of actuator position.
Workspace comparison of Delta robots.
T2-weighted cross-sectional MR imaging of MSP swarms inside SD rats.
Demonstration of aerial-aquatic locomotion and transition.
Ex vivo testing of the soft robotic devices.
Soft robotic device applied to the left side in a coronary ligation HF model. Soft robotic device applied to the left side in a coronary ligation HF model.
Soft robotic VAD implementations, control schemes, and HF models.
Gripper that grasps autonomously.
The foldable robotic arm with seven modules assembled in series.
Details of the soft, bistable valve.
Prosthesis grasping and control.
Comparison of repertoire distributions to baseline.
A novice user executing various subtasks from study 1.
A shared-control method for effective bimanual robot manipulation.
Tukey boxplots overlaid on data points from objective and subjective measures, displaying results from study 1. Tukey boxplots overlaid on data points.
Soft robotic VAD implementations, control schemes, and HF models.
Tactile features for prosthesis perception.
Quasi-static and dynamic trajectories.
Online verification using reachable occupancies.
Illustration of the addressable wireless folding concept.
Cell viability tests. Cell viability tests. SEM images of (A) MC3T3-E1 cells and (B) MSCs on days 1, 3, and 5 of culture. (C) Survival rates of MC3T3-E1.
Rolling soft robot driven by integrated ring oscillator.
T2-weighted cross-sectional MR imaging of MSP swarms inside SD rats.
Experimental results for tremor reduction.
Effect of slenderness on optimal shapes.
Soft robotic device applied to the left side in a coronary ligation HF model. Soft robotic device applied to the left side in a coronary ligation HF model.
Translation of a spherical object.
Self-sensing of actuator position.
Brain-computer interfaces.
Untethered kirigami-skinned soft crawlers.
Force-strain characteristics of Peano-HASEL actuators using hydrogel and aluminum electrodes. Force-strain characteristics of Peano-HASEL actuators using.
Degradation of MSP samples in 37°C DPBS solution.
Soft robotic device applied to the RV in a pressure overload model of RHF. Soft robotic device applied to the RV in a pressure overload model of RHF. (A.
Steady-state performance of the soft robotic device in LHF models.
Fig. 3 Rotation experiment, setup.
Fig. 1 Product lifetime distributions for the eight industrial use sectors plotted as log-normal probability distribution functions (PDF). Product lifetime.
Coadaptive movements of fully soft robotic design.
Potential applications of the light-induced actuator.
Simulation results of magnetic driving ability in hepatic artery, portal vein, and hepatic vein. Simulation results of magnetic driving ability in hepatic.
Comparison of predicted and measured forces and moments.
In vitro cell-release experiments on a glass substrate.
Object manipulations performed by our biohybrid robots.
Galloping-like gait with the design of a two-legged robot.
AEGIS autonomous targeting process.
Examples of organic sensing in robotics.
Growth enables a soft robot to move its tip through constrained environments and to form 3D structures defined by the path of its tip. Growth enables a.
Fragmented SHE design of e-skins for fine conformability.
Characterization of kirigami-skinned soft crawlers.
Laboratory tests. Laboratory tests. (A) Time lapse of the landing process, refilling process, and subsequent launch. (B) Comparison of position and velocity.
Kinematic and mechanical advantage trade-off study.
Floating microrobots with different preferred magnetization directions: Fabrication and control principles. Floating microrobots with different preferred.
Breakdown of incorrect participant responses.
Onboard sensors enable state feedback and closed-loop control of robotic skins. Onboard sensors enable state feedback and closed-loop control of robotic.
Skin-like soft driving system for wirelessly activated fully soft robots. Skin-like soft driving system for wirelessly activated fully soft robots. (A)
Comparison of children’s behavior between the three conditions.
Presentation transcript:

Universal soft robotic activation based on reversible assembly. Universal soft robotic activation based on reversible assembly. (A) Process flow of consecutive soft robotic activation by sequential lamination processes. Specifically, three different soft robotic hands with distinct finger designs (normal design for robot 1 and spread finger design for robots 2 and 3) and deformation states [placed onto the flat (robots 1 and 2) and curvilinear surface (robot 3) like a mannequin’s hand] were addressed. (B) Enlarged view of each soft robotic hand before the activating e-skin was mounted. (C) Photograph of the laminated controlling e-skin showing good skin conformability. (D) Enlarged view of wireless manipulation of soft robotic hands with distinct operation states. For comparison, different actuation states in response to the input types (C, D, and B states) were demonstrated for each robot. (E) Sequential photographs of the controlling e-skin in each input state (C, D, and B). Junghwan Byun et al. Sci. Robotics 2018;3:eaas9020 Copyright © 2018 The Authors, some rights reserved; exclusive licensee American Association for the Advancement of Science. No claim to original U.S. Government Works