Innovative Rubrics for Online Discussions

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Analyzing Student Work
Advertisements

What Behaviors Indicate a Student is Meeting Course Goals and Objectives? “Indicators”
Designing Scoring Rubrics. What is a Rubric? Guidelines by which a product is judged Guidelines by which a product is judged Explain the standards for.
Rubric Workshop Los Angeles Valley College Fall 2008.
Parts taken from Human Relations – Lamberton & Minor TRI-COUNTY TECHNICAL COLLEGE PSY 103 Human Relations Professor Jackie Kroening
APS Teacher Evaluation A SMART Process for Student and Teacher Growth.
Team-Based Exercise Grading Rubrics
External Examiners’ Briefing Day Assessment Policy Tuesday 6 th January 2015.
Robert Reid Torri Ortiz Lienemann.  Session I: ◦ Introductions of group members, facilitators, and text ◦ Review format for the book study ◦ Choose partners/small.
Assessment Report School of The Arts, Humanities and Social Sciences________________ Department: Political Science and International Studies.
Central concepts:  Assessment can measure habits of mind or habits of recall.  Tests have their limits.  It is important to know the purpose the test.
Northcentral University The Graduate School February 2014
Academic Essays & Report Writing
What is the TPA? Teacher candidates must show through a work sample that they have the knowledge, skills, and abilities required of a beginning teacher.
TAKS Writing Rubric
Performance-Based Assessment Authentic Assessment
Record Keeping and Using Data to Determine Report Card Markings.
INACOL Standard D: CLEAR EXPECTATIONS PROMPT RESPONSES REGULAR FEEDBACK.
Online Facilitation Strategies: Panel Presentation and Discussion Stan Freeda Barbara Patterson Pam Waters.
SHOW US YOUR RUBRICS A FACULTY DEVELOPMENT WORKSHOP SERIES Material for this workshop comes from the Schreyer Institute for Innovation in Learning.
Information Literacy Module for FYI Available to any FYI Tony Penny, Research Librarian – Goddard Library Research & Library Instruction Services We support.
Subject-specific content: A Generic scoring guide for information-based topics 4 The student has a complete and detailed understanding of the information.
Instructional Design Course Design – Assignments & Assessment.
Setting Your Goals For TTESS Memorial HS Training September 11, 2015.
LEARNING GOALS AND PERFORMANCE SCALES PLC FOCUS FOR BVS
Learning Goals, Scales, and Learning Activities Clarity and Purpose.
NOTE: To change the image on this slide, select the picture and delete it. Then click the Pictures icon in the placeholder to insert your own image. COMMON.
AP Lang by the Numbers. Scoring Systems -When we talk about scores, there are two separate scoring systems that matter to you. What is my grade in class?
Designing Quality Assessment and Rubrics
Summative Evaluation Shasta Davis. Dimension: Preparation (Score- 4) Plans for instructional strategies that encourage the development of critical thinking,
The Rocket Science of Score Points Holistic Scoring and the New Jersey HSPA Writing Assessment.
Conceptual Change Theory
Designing Scoring Rubrics
Human Capital Accountability
Classroom Assessments Checklists, Rating Scales, and Rubrics
ICTA Grading Rubrics: Research
Providing High-Quality Written Feedback to Educators
PeerWise Student Instructions
INSTRUCTOR: Whitney Rose DuBose
Team-Based Exercise Grading Rubrics
Going Beyond Course Design: Implementing Online Delivery Standards
Classroom Assessment A Practical Guide for Educators by Craig A
Fullerton College SLOA Workshop:
Introduction to Assessment in PBL
Internal Assessment 2016 IB Chemistry Year 2 HL.
Planning for Social Studies Instruction
Writing Tasks and Prompts
Classroom Assessments Checklists, Rating Scales, and Rubrics
Designing for Engagement
Faculty Instructional Rubric
IB Environmental Systems and Societies
Using Action Research to Guide Student Learning Experiences & Assessments Exploring the synergistic activities of curriculum design/delivery and assessment.
PURPOSE/FOCUS/ORGANIZATION
Office of Education Improvement and Innovation
School Improvement Plans and School Data Teams
Socratic Seminar This PowerPoint is meant to be used with either teachers or students schoolwide to assist in implementing Socratic Seminar. It is written.
Designing online discussions
Big Idea 4: Synthesize Ideas — Moving from AP Seminar to AP Research
LAW112 Assessment 3 Haley McEwen.
Dr Claire Kotecki (STEM) & Dr Prithvi Shrestha (WELS)
Introduction to Assessment in PBL
Assessment of Learning in Student-Centered Courses
AET/515 Instructional Plan Template (Shirmen McDonald)
Introduction to Assessment
Curriculum Coordinator: D. Para Date of Presentation: Jan. 20, 2017
Designing Your Performance Task Assessment
Megan Poor Date: Grade level/course: 8th grade History
Interactive Peer Revision Tool
Prepared for EDTPA CONFERENCE MIDDLE TENNESSEE STATE UNIVERSITY
Instructional Plan and Presentation Cindy Douglas Cur/516: Curriculum Theory and Instructional Design November 7, 2016 Professor Gary Weiss.
Presentation transcript:

Innovative Rubrics for Online Discussions Douglas Hemphill Instructional Designer SUNY Oswego Focus on week long, module specific discussions.

Deconstructing the Discussion Art from Todd Mclellan

What is the Purpose of a Discussion Developing a Student Sense of Community Develop Communication Skills Analyzing Student Learning

What is the purpose of a rubric? Meant to communicate expectations. Provides consistent criteria for grading. Provides feedback to student. A scoring guide used to evaluate elevate the quality of student posts via modeling desired behavior.

Quantitative versus Qualitative Quantitative – How Much Qualitative – How Good

Quantitative Measuring the level of participation. How often do students post? How many primary posts, how many responses? How should student activity be spread out? The problem of the last day post. The seven day model: Sunday Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday Post Period 1 Post Period 2

Pure Quantitative Very simply Rubric. Binary Grading – Acceptable vs. Not Acceptable: Outline criteria outside Rubric. 5 – acceptable posts. 4 – Four acceptable posts. 3 – Three acceptable posts. 2 – Two acceptable posts. 1 – One acceptable post. 0 – No posts made.

Qualitative – Analyzing Student Learning Apply a pedagogical model aimed toward accomplishing the learning outcomes you want from the discussion. Image from: https://cft.vanderbilt.edu/guides-sub-pages/blooms-taxonomy/

Reflect on Course Content (Learning Outcome) Information and knowledge used in the post are accurate. It is very clear that the student understood course readings were understood by their incorporation into postings. The student demonstrates high level comprehension of the concepts from the course readings by connecting the appropriate reading concepts with the discussion question. The student demonstrates mastery of significant ideas relevant to the issue under discussion. This is indicated by correct use of terminology, precise selection of the pieces of information required to make a point, correct and appropriate use of examples and counterexamples, demonstrations of which distinctions are important to make, and explanations that are concise and to the point. Example Criteria for Learning Outcomes or Behaviors The basics.

Construct New Knowledge (Learning Outcome) Response goes beyond simply answering the prompt and attempts to stimulate further thought and discussion. The post shows original thought that goes far beyond the obvious and explores the implications of the discussion question. Demonstration of Higher Level Learning My definition: Demonstration of knowledge that goes beyond what is directly provided by course materials or external sources.

Use Citations (Learning Outcome and Desired Behavior) Sources are appropriately cited. Sources are integrated in a way that support’s a students point. External source choices show student’s efforts to go beyond the supplied course materials. Using and Moving beyond the course materials

Ask Questions (Desired Behavior) The student actively stimulates and sustains inquiry by asking thoughtful questions. The student generates questions that explore concepts not answered within the course materials. The student generates questions which will help other student’s in understanding of course materials. Encouraging Interactive Behavior and Metacognition

Adversarial Concepts (Overall Strategy) Develop Alternative Perspectives – The student is able to identify and address weaknesses in their own claims/statements/arguments and/or opinions. Evaluate and Challenge Alternative Positions - The student is able to identify and expose weaknesses in the claims/statements/arguments and/or opinions of others. Defend Positions –The student is able to adjust their claims/statements/arguments and/or opinions in the face of scrutiny, either by reinforcement or refinement. Structuring a Discussion Strategy

Other Rubric Considerations Discrete Criteria versus Aggregate Criteria Not every criteria has to be worth the same. Negative Point Values (Penalties) Poor naming conventions Inappropriate Behavior (Breach of Netiquette) Late Submissions Other Considerations Negative Point Values exist outside the Rubric Proper

Customized Rubrics versus Generic Rubrics Is there a reason to customize? Minor customization can make management more complicated. Large scale changes of a rubric format can cause student confusion. Review the learning outcomes you desire from your discussions, then decide whether customization is appropriate. For example, consider the expectations and outcomes desired from an “Ice Breaker Discussion” versus an academically focused discussion within a module. Course specific discussions versus assignment level discussions. Customization can take place in the discussion question, rather than the rubric.

Pure Qualitative A detailed rubric that allows a discussion to be evaluated based on a student’s work throughout a module, rather on their individual posts. The focus is on the quality over the number of posts, though the number of posts could be part of the score calculation. Quality of Posts Grammar and Spelling Number of Posts Activity Conciseness Examples of types of Rubrics Pure Qualification

Simple Hybrid Provides for individual grading of posts within a single discussion. Any number of posts can be required. This rubric is based on a 4 point scale, which is easy to understand but can be somewhat harsh. 4 - The comment is accurate, original, and relevant; it teaches us something new, and is well written. Four point comments add substantial teaching presence to the course, and stimulate additional thought about the issue under discussion. 3 - The comment lacks at least one of the above qualities, but is above average in quality. A three point comment makes a significant contribution to our understanding of the issue being discussed. 2 - The comment lacks two or three of the required qualities. Comments which are based upon personal opinion or personal experience often fall within this category. 1 - The comment presents little or no new information. However, one point comments may provide important social presence and contribute to a collegial atmosphere. 0 - No post was made, or the comment adds no value to the discussion. Includes most “I agree” comments. Hybrid is a combination of Qualitative and Quantitative

Simple Hybrid – Friendlier Scoring Similar to the previous, but on a modified 10 point scale. 10 - The comment is accurate, original, and relevant; it teaches us something new, and is well written. Four point comments add substantial teaching presence to the course, and stimulate additional thought about the issue under discussion. 9 - The comment maintains all of the above qualities, but not as well as it potentially could have. This comment still adds substantial teaching presence to the course, and stimulates additional thought about the issue under discussion. 8 - The comment lacks at least one of the above qualities, but is above average in quality. A three point comment makes a significant contribution to our understanding of the issue being discussed. 7 - The comment lacks two or three of the required qualities. Comments which are based upon personal opinion or personal experience often fall within this category. 6 - The comment presents little or no new information. However, one point comments may provide important social presence and contribute to a collegial atmosphere. 0 - No post was made, or the comment adds no value to the discussion. Includes most “I agree” comments. Aligns with A+, A, B, C, D, E

First Post Worth More In this example, while a student is expected to make three posts, the student's first post is worth more than their response posts. 3 - The comment is accurate, original, and relevant; it teaches us something new, and is well written. Four point comments add substantial teaching presence to the course, and stimulate additional thought about the issue under discussion. 2 - The comment maintains all of the above qualities, but not as well as it potentially could have. This comment still adds substantial teaching presence to the course, and stimulates additional thought about the issue under discussion. 1 - The comment presents little or no new information. However, one point comments may provide important social presence and contribute to a collegial atmosphere. 0 - No post was made, or the comment adds no value to the discussion. Includes most “I agree” comments. Refer to not requiring all criteria to be worth the same amount.

Addative Rubric Take the required posts and use one of the other rubric models. Once the initial requirements have been met, each additional post will be worth additional posts, up to the maximum possible point value. Encourages posting beyond the minimal requirements.

https://tinyurl.com/RUBRICCIT2019 Rubric Examples https://tinyurl.com/RUBRICCIT2019 Plug for Crafting an Engaging Discussion at 8:45 in HUM 2043.