CMGC Overview SLAC Site Plan Systems Description Construction Schedule Cost Estimate ES&H CMGC SOW Summary

SLAC Site Plan SLAC Main Gate Pep Ring Road Bldg #081 - MMF Sector 25 Sector 20 Upstream LCLS General Work Boundary Research Yard

LCLS Site Plan Spear Future Office Space Pep Ring Road SLC Legend Baseline Future LCLS Site Plan Spear Future Office Space Pep Ring Road SLC Office Complex Undulator Hall Research Yard Survey Tower NEH Beam Transport Hall SLC Tunnel Beam Dump Front End Enclosure Future Beam Lines X-Ray Transport Pep Tunnel

LCLS CF Systems Description Includes a composition of renovations to existing SLAC infrastructure and new facilities for CMGC Research Yard Modifications Beam Transport Hall Undulator Hall Electron Beam Dump Front End Enclosure Near Experimental Hall X-Ray Transport & Diagnostics Tunnel Far Experimental Hall Central Lab Office Complex

New Facilities Beam Transport Hall – 227m long above grade facility to transport the electron beam through the existing RSY Undulator Hall – 175m long underground tunnel housing undulators and ancillary equipment Central Lab Office Complex – office facility to house ~ 300 LCLS researchers, engineers, technicians, administrative staff and visiting experimentalists Far Experimental Hall – underground cavern/tunnels to house 3 experimental hutches, prep and shop space Electron Beam Dump – 40m long underground facility used to separate the electron and x-ray beams Front End Enclosure – 30m long underground facility to house various diagnostic equipment in support of the photon beam Near Experimental Hall – underground facility whose primary function is to house 3 experimental hutches, prep and shops X-Ray Transport & Diagnostics Tunnel – 250m long underground tunnel used to transport photon beams from NEH to FEH

Below Grade Plan FEE Beam Dump Near Hall/CLOC Beam Transport Hall (at grade) Undulator Hall XRTDT Far Hall FG ~ 360’ FG ~ 320’ FG ~ 280’ FG ~ 245’

LCLS CF Construction Schedule LEGEND TI Design TII Design Preconstruction Construction Major construction phase FY 06 at 30 months duration Beneficial Occupancy dates are key to technical system interfaces Site-work at NEH is key! Increased duration of CM/GC procurement phase DOE SO approval for CM/GC SOW – (in progress)

WBS 1.09 TEC (BCWS x FY) $76.7M Construction Start Mar 06 LLP – S20, MMF, CMGC Phase 1

ES & H Risks Construction Safety – Is not a priority, but a VALUE! (priorities change from time to time, values remain consistent over time) All construction activities shall comply with Federal and State environmental, safety, health and building codes Subcontractor activities In-house activities LCLS will approve GC construction safety program prior to any start of construction activities Unique considerations to normal day-to-day construction projects at SLAC Tunnel construction Excavations Subsurface construction Weak ground conditions Naturally occurring asbestos Elevated work Heavy equipment Congested work areas (RSY)

CM/GC Plan SOW for CM/GC (LLP) has been developed and continues to have the highest priority in the CF group as largest stand-alone procurement in the LCLS project Reviewed by SLAC DOE SO Final comments updated and sent to proof reader for final corrections Once approved by SLAC DOE SO, plan will be submitted to DOE HQ for approval (Chicago → DC) With blanket approval, there will not be a need to return for multiple approvals for bid packages

CM/GC Plan – cont’d Advanced Procurement Plan (APP) approved Advertisement placed in construction periodical – ENR Magazine Jan/Feb Advanced Procurement Plan (APP) approved Meeting planned milestones are crucial!

CM/GC Plan – cont’d CM/GC services will be solicited with an award based on a best-value firm fixed price contract Phase 1 – preconstruction services Phase 2 – construction services of underground and major excavation effort, and construction services of above ground buildings Anticipating CM/GC award for Sept 05 CM/GC qualifications – partial list Technical competence Similar previous experience Successful history using second and third tier subcontractors Financial strength

CM/GC Plan – cont’d Outstanding safety record Experience Modification Rate (EMR) <.81 EMR 1.0 indicates that a company submits injury claims that are considered average among their industry group EMR > 1.0 indicated that the company files more claims than other similar companies EMR<0.81 indicates that the company had filed fewer claims than other similar companies Injury frequency and severity rates Safety Program evaluation and evaluations of the key personnel OSHA citation history References from previous projects Evaluation of the contractors’ integration of safety into their work practices LCLS has decided to place all contractors working on projects to have an EMR of <.81, go no-go

Summary SOW completed and is currently being reviewed (with RFP package) in collaboration with SLAC DOE SO, SLAC and LCLS project team Comments incorporated Complete CMGC package (RFP, SOW, T&C’s, etc) under review by technical writer DOE approval milestones are critical! CM services (interim phase) scheduled to commence in collaboration with 30% design review Cost validation Schedule review Constructability review Value Engineering

End of Presentation