A direct comparison of orientation systems used in hydrography

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
HYSWEEP® HARDWARE.
Advertisements

3D Mobile Mapping Dave Henderson Topcon Positioning Systems
© Copyright 2011 MicroStrain Inc. High Performance Miniature Inertial Measurement Systems MicroStrain Inc Mike Robinson
Orbital Operations – 2 Rendezvous & Proximity Operations
1 DSN Network e-VLBI Calibration of Earth Orientation L. D. Zhang a,b, A. Steppe a, G. Lanyi a Presentation at 5-th International e-VLBI Workshop Westford,
HYPACK MULTIBEAM COURSE
HYPACK® Multibeam Training Seminar
Review of the module: History of Computing ANU Faculty of Engineering and IT Department of Computer Science COMP1200 Perspectives on Computing Chris Johnson.
Adaptive Signal Processing Class Project Adaptive Interacting Multiple Model Technique for Tracking Maneuvering Targets Viji Paul, Sahay Shishir Brijendra,
The Impact of GPS Radio Occultation Data on the Analysis and Prediction of Tropical Cyclones Bill Kuo UCAR.
Real-time Dense Visual Odometry for Quadrocopters Christian Kerl
Scope (18 slides) Summary Float and Fixed RTK Flying RTK
THALES GEOSOLUTIONS PACIFIC TGPI 11/2003 Precise Timing and TrueHeave® in Multibeam Acquisition and Processing Doug Lockhart, Thales GeoSolutions (Pacific)
VRS Network The Magic Behind the Scene
Ground Support Network operations for the GRAS Radio Occultation Mission R. Zandbergen, the GRAS GSN team (ESOC) and the Metop GRAS team (EUMETSAT) 09/09/2011.
Sérgio Ronaldo Barros dos Santos (ITA-Brazil)
Princeton University Prospect Eleven Nov. 17, 2005 System Architecture Event-Based –Modules “subscribe” to the information they need and receive it as.
Network Computing Laboratory Radio Interferometric Geolocation Miklos Maroti, Peter Volgesi, Sebestyen Dora Branislav Kusy, Gyorgy Balogh, Andras Nadas.
1 POS MV Vertical Positioning March Where we fit in! “Other sensors (notably modern heave-pitch-roll sensors) can contribute to achieving such.
Karman filter and attitude estimation Lin Zhong ELEC424, Fall 2010.
IMPROVE THE INNOVATION Today: High Performance Inertial Measurement Systems LI.COM.
Remote Landslide Observation System with Differential GPS 2012 International Conference on Structural Computation and Geotechnical Mechanics Author: Xing.
The Dark Side of Document Imaging: ‘The Hidden Cost of Capture’
GPS Workshop 2004 RTK-GPS Activity at the University of New Hampshire.
APPLICATION OF GPS TECHNOLOGY TO ARCHAEOLOGY GROUP PROJECT.
GPS Aided INS for Mobile Mapping in Precision Agriculture Khurram Niaz Shaikh Supervised by: Dr. Abdul Rashid bin Mohammad Shariff Dept. of Biological.
November 15 Timing is Everything A software approach for a generalized profilometer Dr. John B. Ferris Stephen Chappell Cameron Rainey.
Timing Augmented GPS Update Eddie Byrne, Symmetricom January 23, 2008.
These slides augment the FootSLAM ION GNSS 2009 and InsideGNSS (“SLAM Dance”) papers – we have made some minor improvements/corrections to notation Source:
GPS Services Group C&C Technologies, Inc., C-Nav GcGPS System Background and Accuracy.
Short-session Static and Kinematic Processing Short-session static: GAMIT processing, sessions 1-3 hours long Kinematic: TRACK processing, coordinates.
The Development of a Relative Point SLAM Algorithm and a Relative Plane SLAM Algorithm.
Current Works Corrected unit conversions in code Found an error in calculating offset (to zero sensors) – Fixed error, but still not accurately integrating.
1 SVY 207: Lecture 12 Modes of GPS Positioning Aim of this lecture: –To review and compare methods of static positioning, and introduce methods for kinematic.
INERTIAL AIDED POST PROCESSED KINEMATIC GPS FOR MARINE POSITIONING An Overview of POSPac MMS Lou Nash, Measutronics Corporation
Tracking Mobile Nodes Using RF Doppler Shifts
HYSWEEP® HARDWARE.
HYSWEEP ® HARDWARE. HYSWEEP ® Survey Configuring a Multibeam System Multibeam sonar GPS (via HYPACK hardware) Motion sensor Heading sensor Dynamic Draft.
HYSWEEP ® HARDWARE. HYSWEEP ® Survey Configuring a Multibeam System Multibeam sonar GPS (via HYPACK hardware) Motion sensor Heading sensor Dynamic Draft.
EE 495 Modern Navigation Systems Kalman Filtering – Part II Mon, April 4 EE 495 Modern Navigation Systems Slide 1 of 23.
10/31/ Simulation of Tightly Coupled INS/GPS Navigator Ade Mulyana, Takayuki Hoshizaki October 31, 2001 Purdue University.
Guidelines for Real Time GNSS Networks (RTN) Administration.
Teng Wei and Xinyu Zhang
0 Flying™ RTK Solution as Effective Enhancement of Conventional Float RTK Dmitry Kozlov, Gleb Zyryanov Magellan, Russia ION GNSS 2007 Session D1: Algorithms.
SE40 Meeting on Pseudolites JRC test results
Sub-nanosecond Time Synchronization Mechanism for Radio Interferometer Array
OpSim4 vs OpSim3 Francisco Delgado
ASEN 5070: Statistical Orbit Determination I Fall 2014
Thomas C.K. Fuller and May-Win Thein University of New Hampshire
Mac Keiser and Alex Silbergleit
SVY207: Lecture 16 GPS Field Procedures and Computations
Mekko Graphics-Based Professional Services Dashboard
System Architecture Event-Based Modular Hierarchical
Closing the Gaps in Inertial Motion Tracking
Inertial Measurement Units
ניווט רובוט נייד בעזרת שדה מגנטי
Mac Keiser and Alex Silbergleit
Geodetics RTD Software
Parallelizing the Condensation Algorithm for Visual Tracking
REF TEK Technology Overview
Texas Tech University Department of Physics and Astronomy
A Multi-static HF Radar Network for the
Fleet Survey Team, NAVOCEANO
A Performance Evaluation of Multiple GNSS-aided Inertial Navigation Systems Presented at US HYRO Conference 2019 Johnson Oguntuase
Suggested Guidance for OPUS Projects Processing
Joint Processing MU-MIMO – Update
Internal components of a computer.
Nome Sobrenome. Time time time time time time..
Jennifer Rhodes Dr. Anand Hiroji University of Southern Mississippi
Presentation transcript:

A direct comparison of orientation systems used in hydrography Anand Hiroji Anand.Hiroji@usm.edu

Previous studies Past studies This study 2005 Parker and Mallace What has changed? Pos-Processing algorithms Hardware quality improved This study Used the best possible means of post processing 8 different models 3 different manufacturers

GNSS attitude experiment View from stbd side Kongsberg Seatex Seapath 380 Applanix POS MV SBG Systems GNSS attitude experiment GNSS antenna splitters were used for Applanix and SBG Systems so one pair of antenna can be used with multiple Processing unit

Location of IMU box

The IMUs Applanix POS MV Kongsberg Seatex SBG System Elite OceanMaster WaveMaster SurfMaster Seapath 380 with MRU5+ Seapath 130 with MRU5 Equinox Apogee

Experiment setup Different environment Open sky Restricted sky Raw data collection at 200Hz IMU and GNSS Compare reported estimated accuracies to relative accuracies Restricted environment Open sky 2.5 hours Heading change Rolling

Post-processing the data Applanix POS MV systems processed with POSPack_MMS (Infusion Smart solution SM) SBG systems Processed with Qinertia (Tightly coupled solutions TC) Kongsberg Seatex systems processed with TerraPos (Network solutions NW) Real time motion Vs Post processed Under bridge. mPOS MV Show the picture of tracks Under the bridge.. Give idea of time duration, number of samples, Bin size for the histo

Comparing reported estimated accuracies Estimated accuracies from manufacturer suggested IMU performance profile +Kalman filter Restricted environment: Under bridge passes on August 15th , Site AUG15B ROLL PITCH HEADING POS_EL_SM POS_OM_SM POS_WM_SM POS_SM_SM SBG_EK_TC SBG_AP_TC SP_130_NW SP_380_NW Data from Aug 15B all best

Comparing reported estimated accuracies Estimated accuracies from manufacturer suggested IMU performance profile +Kalman filter Restricted environment: Under bridge passes on August 15th , Site AUG15B ROLL PITCH HEADING POS_EL_SM POS_OM_SM POS_WM_SM POS_SM_SM SBG_EK_TC SBG_AP_TC SP_130_NW SP_380_NW Data from Aug 15B all best

Comparing reported estimated accuracies Estimated accuracies from manufacturer suggested IMU performance profile +Kalman filter Restricted environment: Under bridge passes on August 15th , Site AUG15B ROLL PITCH HEADING POS_EL_SM POS_OM_SM POS_WM_SM POS_SM_SM SBG_EK_TC SBG_AP_TC SP_130_NW SP_380_NW Data from Aug 15B all best

Comparing reported estimated accuracies Estimated accuracies from manufacturer suggested IMU performance profile +Kalman filter Restricted environment: Under bridge passes on August 15th , Site AUG15B ROLL PITCH HEADING POS_EL_SM POS_OM_SM POS_WM_SM POS_SM_SM SBG_EK_TC SBG_AP_TC SP_130_NW SP_380_NW Data from Aug 15B all best Add BAR CHART OF ESTIMATED STDVS

Comparing relative accuracies Relative to POS ELITE system Restricted environment: Under bridge passes on August 15th , Site AUG15B ROLL PITCH HEADING POS_EL_SM POS_OM_SM POS_WM_SM POS_SM_SM SBG_EK_TC SBG_AP_TC SP_130_NW SP_380_NW Data from Aug 15B all best Relative to POS ELITE system Restricted environment: Under bridge passes on August 15th , Site AUG15B Readoo

Comparing relative accuracies Relative to POS ELITE system Restricted environment: Under bridge passes on August 15th , Site AUG15B ROLL PITCH HEADING POS_EL_SM POS_OM_SM POS_WM_SM POS_SM_SM SBG_EK_TC SBG_AP_TC SP_130_NW SP_380_NW Data from Aug 15B all best Relative to POS ELITE system Restricted environment: Under bridge passes on August 15th , Site AUG15B

Comparing relative accuracies Relative to POS ELITE system Restricted environment: Under bridge passes on August 15th , Site AUG15B ROLL PITCH HEADING POS_EL_SM POS_OM_SM POS_WM_SM POS_SM_SM SBG_EK_TC SBG_AP_TC SP_130_NW SP_380_NW Data from Aug 15B all best Relative to POS ELITE system Restricted environment: Under bridge passes on August 15th , Site AUG15B

Comparing relative accuracies Relative to POS ELITE system Restricted environment: Under bridge passes on August 15th , Site AUG15B ROLL PITCH HEADING POS_EL_SM POS_OM_SM POS_WM_SM POS_SM_SM SBG_EK_TC SBG_AP_TC SP_130_NW SP_380_NW Data from Aug 15B all best Relative to POS ELITE system Restricted environment: Under bridge passes on August 15th , Site AUG15B

Comparing Reported estimated accuracies Open sky 2.5 hours of observations, mixed maneuvers on August 10th 2018, Site AUG10 ROLL PITCH HEADING POS_EL_SM POS_OM_SM POS_WM_SM POS_SM_SM SBG_EK_TC SBG_AP_TC SP_130_NW SP_380_NW Data from Aug 15B all best Relative to POS ELITE system Restricted environment: Under bridge passes on August 15th , Site AUG15B

Comparing Reported estimated accuracies Open sky 2.5 hours of observations, mixed maneuvers on August 10th 2018, Site AUG10 ROLL PITCH HEADING POS_EL_SM POS_OM_SM POS_WM_SM POS_SM_SM SBG_EK_TC SBG_AP_TC SP_130_NW SP_380_NW Data from Aug 15B all best Relative to POS ELITE system Restricted environment: Under bridge passes on August 15th , Site AUG15B

Comparing Reported estimated accuracies Open sky 2.5 hours of observations, mixed maneuvers on August 10th 2018, Site AUG10 ROLL PITCH HEADING POS_EL_SM POS_OM_SM POS_WM_SM POS_SM_SM SBG_EK_TC SBG_AP_TC SP_130_NW SP_380_NW Data from Aug 15B all best Relative to POS ELITE system Restricted environment: Under bridge passes on August 15th , Site AUG15B

Computing relative accuracies Open sky, 2.5 hours of observations, mixed maneuvers on August 10th 2018, Site AUG10 ROLL PITCH HEADING POS_EL_SM POS_OM_SM POS_WM_SM POS_SM_SM SBG_EK_TC SBG_AP_TC SP_130_NW SP_380_NW Data from Aug 15B all best Relative to POS ELITE system Restricted environment: Under bridge passes on August 15th , Site AUG15B

Computing relative accuracies :Static Angular Offsets Open sky, 2.5 hours of observations, mixed maneuvers on August 10th 2018, Site AUG10 ROLL PITCH HEADING POS_EL_SM POS_OM_SM POS_WM_SM POS_SM_SM SBG_EK_TC SBG_AP_TC SP_130_NW SP_380_NW Showing an offset

Comparing relative accuracies Open sky, 2.5 hours of observations, mixed maneuvers on August 10th 2018, Site AUG10 ROLL PITCH HEADING POS_EL_SM POS_OM_SM POS_WM_SM POS_SM_SM SBG_EK_TC SBG_AP_TC SP_130_NW SP_380_NW Data from Aug 15B all best Relative to POS ELITE system Restricted environment: Under bridge passes on August 15th , Site AUG15B

Comparing relative accuracies Open sky, 2.5 hours of observations, mixed maneuvers on August 10th 2018, Site AUG10 ROLL PITCH HEADING POS_EL_SM POS_OM_SM POS_WM_SM POS_SM_SM SBG_EK_TC SBG_AP_TC SP_130_NW SP_380_NW Data from Aug 15B all best Relative to POS ELITE system Restricted environment: Under bridge passes on August 15th , Site AUG15B

Comparing relative accuracies from different sites Site AUG15B : Bridge underpass , 0.5 hours of observations with GNSS outages on AUG 15th 2018 Site AUG10 : Open sky, 2.5 hours of observations, mixed maneuvers on August 10th 2018, ROLL PITCH HEADING POS_EL_SM POS_OM_SM POS_WM_SM POS_SM_SM SBG_EK_TC SBG_AP_TC SP_130_NW SP_380_NW Data from Aug 15B all best Relative to POS ELITE system Restricted environment: Under bridge passes on August 15th , Site AUG15B

Comparing relative accuracies from different Maneuver Site AUG10 : Open sky, Constant change of heading (Figure of 8 maneuvers) on August 10th 2018, ROLL PITCH HEADING POS_EL_SM POS_OM_SM POS_WM_SM POS_SM_SM SBG_EK_TC SBG_AP_TC SP_130_NW SP_380_NW Data from Aug 15B all best Relative to POS ELITE system Restricted environment: Under bridge passes on August 15th , Site AUG15B

Comparing relative accuracies from different Maneuver Site AUG10 : Open sky, Constant change of heading (Figure of 8 maneuvers) on August 10th 2018, ROLL PITCH HEADING POS_EL_SM POS_OM_SM POS_WM_SM POS_SM_SM SBG_EK_TC SBG_AP_TC SP_130_NW SP_380_NW Data from Aug 15B all best Relative to POS ELITE system Restricted environment: Under bridge passes on August 15th , Site AUG15B

Comparing relative accuracies from different Maneuver Site AUG10 : Open sky, Constant change of heading (Figure of 8 maneuvers) on August 10th 2018, Site AUG10 : Open sky, 2.5 hours of observations, mixed maneuvers on August 10th 2018, ROLL PITCH HEADING POS_EL_SM POS_OM_SM POS_WM_SM POS_SM_SM SBG_EK_TC SBG_AP_TC SP_130_NW SP_380_NW The system with shorter baseline vector suffered in heading accuracy. System with 4m baseline showed no degradation.

Comparing relative accuracies from different Maneuver Site AUG10 : Open sky, Constant change of Roll (Induced Roll Maneuver) on August 10th 2018, ROLL PITCH HEADING POS_EL_SM POS_OM_SM POS_WM_SM POS_SM_SM SBG_EK_TC SBG_AP_TC SP_130_NW SP_380_NW Data from Aug 15B all best Relative to POS ELITE system Restricted environment: Under bridge passes on August 15th , Site AUG15B

Comparing relative accuracies from different Maneuver Site AUG10 : Open sky, Constant change of Roll (Induced Roll Maneuver) on August 10th 2018, ROLL PITCH HEADING POS_EL_SM POS_OM_SM POS_WM_SM POS_SM_SM SBG_EK_TC SBG_AP_TC SP_130_NW SP_380_NW Data from Aug 15B all best Relative to POS ELITE system Restricted environment: Under bridge passes on August 15th , Site AUG15B

Comparing relative accuracies from different Maneuver Site AUG10 : Open sky, Constant change of Roll (Induced Roll Maneuver) on August 10th 2018, Site AUG10 : Open sky, 2.5 hours of observations, mixed maneuvers on August 10th 2018, ROLL PITCH HEADING POS_EL_SM POS_OM_SM POS_WM_SM POS_SM_SM SBG_EK_TC SBG_AP_TC SP_130_NW SP_380_NW All system suffered degradation in roll The system with shorter baseline vector suffered in heading accuracy. System with 4m baseline showed no degradation.

Summary of preliminary findings Roll, Pitch and Heading did not show any comparable degradation in restricted environment. The Heading solutions are substantially better for 4m baseline over a 1m baseline In some cases the reported accuracies may be worse then actual! The location of base station is important if using TC solutions Limitations of this study Different post processing software for different IMUS Possible IMU heading misalignment with vessel reference system

Acknowledgements Questions? USM startup funds USM Hydrographic science masters students USM Hydro Tech Applanix technical and sales support SBG Technical and Sales support Seapath Technical and Sales support TerraPos Technical and Sales support Questions?