Problems in π0 Reconstruction

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
CBM Calorimeter System CBM collaboration meeting, October 2008 I.Korolko(ITEP, Moscow)
Advertisements

P. Gay Energy flow session1 Analytic Energy Flow F. Chandez P. Gay S. Monteil CALICE Coll.
22/5/2011 Particle-ID and Tracking performance in CLIC_ILD1/27 CLIC_ILD particle identification and tracking performance J. Nardulli This talk in 2 parts:
MC Study of B°  S Jianchun Wang Syracuse University BTeV meeting 06/27/01.
University of Gaziantep Department of Engineering Physics August 2006 Page 1/18 A.Beddall, A.Beddall and A. Bingül Department of Engineering Physics University.
Search for B     with SemiExclusive reconstruction C.Cartaro, G. De Nardo, F. Fabozzi, L. Lista Università & INFN - Sezione di Napoli.
Exclusive D s Semileptonic decays using kinematic fitting.
Status of  b Scan Jianchun Wang Syracuse University Representing L b scanners CLEO Meeting 05/11/02.
Hot Topics from BaBar Fabrizio Bianchi INFN, Torino (on behalf of the BaBar Collaboration) Direct CP Violation in (hep-ex/ ) Observation of and search.
A Method to measure  + /   detection efficiency asymmetry at LHCb Liming Zhang 08/15/07.
Tau Jet Identification in Charged Higgs Search Monoranjan Guchait TIFR, Mumbai India-CMS collaboration meeting th March,2009 University of Delhi.
D 0 Measurement in Cu+Cu Collisions at √s=200GeV at STAR using the Silicon Inner Tracker (SVT+SSD) Sarah LaPointe Wayne State University For the STAR Collaboration.
 Production at forward Rapidity in d+Au Collisions at 200 GeV The STAR Forward TPCs Lambda Reconstruction Lambda Spectra & Yields Centrality Dependence.
Event Reconstruction in SiD02 with a Dual Readout Calorimeter Detector Geometry EM Calibration Cerenkov/Scintillator Correction Jet Reconstruction Performance.
1 Energy loss correction for a crystal calorimeter He Miao Institute of High Energy Physics Beijing, P.R.China.
1 Lead glass simulations Eliane Epple, TU Munich Kirill Lapidus, INR Moscow Collaboration Meeting XXI March 2010 GSI.
Study of exclusive radiative B decays with LHCb Galina Pakhlova, (ITEP, Moscow) for LHCb collaboration Advanced Study Institute “Physics at LHC”, LHC Praha-2003,
Year -2 topics simulations needs for these Barbara Jacak March 2, 2001.
Some remarks on (mis)identification: separation of pions from electrons Answer the question of the feasibility of p_bar p  e + e - Answer the question.
2012/7/231 Cosmic Ray at STAR Shuai Yang Center of Particle Physics and Technology University of Science and Technology of China STAR Regional Meeting.
AI in HEP: Can “Evolvable Discriminate Function” discern Neutral Pions and Higgs from background? James Cunha Werner Christmas Meeting 2006 – University.
Study of b quark contributions to non-photonic electron yields by azimuthal angular correlations between non-photonic electrons and hadrons Shingo Sakai.
IHEP/Protvino for FP420 R&D Collaboration 1 IHEP/Protvino Group: Igor Azhgirey Igor Bayshev Igor Kurochkin + one post-graduate student Tools:
Radia Sia Syracuse Univ. 1 RICH 2004 Outline:  The CLEO-III RICH Detector  Physics Requirements  CLEO-III RICH at work… Performance of the CLEO-III.
Status of Analysis Software Kanglin He For Analysis Software Group.
P. Ochoa, September Using Muon Removed files to assess the purity of the nubar-PID selection Pedro Ochoa MINOS Collaboration Meeting September 2006.
J/ψ simulations: background studies and first results using a compact RICH detector Alla Maevskaya INR RAS Moscow CBM Collaboration meeting September 2007.
BESIII offline software group Status of BESIII Event Reconstruction System.
LNF 12/12/06 1 F.Ambrosino-T. Capussela-F.Perfetto Update on        Dalitz plot slope Where we started from A big surprise Systematic checks.
Photon Selection Algorithm Ming Yang , Mingshui Chen BESIII Meeting
Quark Matter 2002, July 18-24, Nantes, France Dimuon Production from Au-Au Collisions at Ming Xiong Liu Los Alamos National Laboratory (for the PHENIX.
David Lange Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
Manoj B. Jadhav Supervisor Prof. Raghava Varma I.I.T. Bombay PANDA Collaboration Meeting, PARIS – September 11, 2012.
PANDA Software Trigger K. Götzen Dec Challenge Required reduction factor: ~1/1000 (all triggers in total) A lot of physics channel triggers → even.
Susanna Costanza - Pavia Group PANDA C.M., Stockholm – June 14, 2010
RADIATIVE CORRECTIONS TO IN PANDAROOT
Richard Petti For the PHENIX Collaboration
Effect of t42 algorithm on jets
Matteo Negrini Frascati, Jan 19, 2006
P0D reconstruction/analysis update
Converted photons efficiency
Huagen Xu IKP: T. Randriamalala, J. Ritman and T. Stockmanns
Studies of prompt photon identification and 0 isolation in first p-p collisions at √s=10 TeV May 20, 2009 Meeting Frascati Raphaëlle Ichou.
Charles F. Maguire Vanderbilt University
Converted photons efficiency
The Status of the Data Analysis of the Beam Test at FZJ
Panagiotis Kokkas Univ. of Ioannina
Detection of muons at 150 GeV/c with a CMS Preshower Prototype
E. Barbuto, C. Bozza, A. Cioffi, M. Giorgini
HARPO Analysis.
Venkat Kaushik, Jae Yu University of Texas at Arlington
ILC Software Meeting, Orsay 05/07
Introduction to DsJ Analysis and D(*)D(*) reconstruction at CDF
Search for Heavy Quark Resonances in Two-Photon collisions in the L3 detector Mikhail Levtchenko (INFN Milano) Search for c meson (status) Search for.
Marcin Zieliński Paweł Moskal Andrzej Kupść
Jessica Leonard Oct. 23, 2006 Physics 835
Λ 1520 Invariant Mass Analisys
GEANT Simulations and Track Reconstruction
Mini Tower Preliminary Results
MUC simulation and reconstruction
Missing B-tracks in L1 trigger
J/Y Simulations for Trigger
Samples and MC Selection
road – Hough transform- c2
Hough-D(mc)- ππJpsi(Data)
Update of
ZHH Analysis preliminary results on different detector models
Charmonium Group Meeting
Missing Mass Reconstruction of Ds*(2317)± in pp →Ds±Ds(2317)±
Status of the cross section analysis in e! e
Presentation transcript:

Problems in π0 Reconstruction September 5, 2017 | Albrecht Gillitzer, IKP Forschungszentrum Jülich PANDA Collaboration Meeting 17/3, Novosibirsk, Russia

Neutral Pion Modes in Ξ* Decays studied channel: 4.6 GeV/c 𝑝 𝑝→ Ξ + Ξ − 𝜋 0 PandaRoot release feb17p1  trunk 30122, all Geant4 simulated 2.4 M events (feb17p1), 2.7 M events (trunk 30122) this talk: analyzed 0.2 M events (trunk 30122) analysis task based on Xinying‘s code focus in analysis on π0 reconstruction found very low MC truth matching in rel. feb17p1  trunk high combinatorial background also induced by secondary particles other than photons

MC Truth Photon Energy Spectrum 100000 events log lin low energy threshold required 15 MeV 0 – 200 MeV 0 – 100 MeV

Multiplicity of Candidates 200000 events neutral cand‘s charged cand‘s neutral cand‘s E > 15 MeV 80 MeV < M < 180 MeV π0 cand‘s mostly more than one π0 candidate

Id of Neutral Candidates: all types of particles (incl. 𝝂 !) 𝜸: 52.4% all 𝜸: 44.3% E > 15 MeV π0 daugh‘s rec. π0 daugh‘s 𝜸: 55.7% 𝜸: 70.9%

# Hit EMC Crystals of Neutral Candidates 𝛾 N 𝑒 ± 𝜋 ±

# Hit EMC Crystals of Neutral Candidates (Rec. π0) 𝛾 in rec. π0 N in rec. π0 𝑒 ± in rec. π0 𝜋 ± in rec. π0 no parameter to cut on

Masses of π0 Candidates raw π0 pre-fit π0 true p.-f. π0 true p.-f. π0 ≥1 𝑒 ±

Masses of π0 Candidates true p.-f. π0 true p.-f. π0 ≥1 𝑒 ± ≥1 𝑒 ± true p.-f. π0 𝛾𝛾 &≥1 𝑒 ± fake p.-f. π0

𝑷 𝐫𝐞𝐜 − 𝑷 𝐌𝐂 of π0 Candidates raw π0 reco π0 true reco π0 true reco π0 ≥1 𝑒 ±

𝑷 𝐫𝐞𝐜 − 𝑷 𝐌𝐂 of π0 Candidates true reco π0 true reco π0 ≥1 𝑒 ± true reco π0 𝛾𝛾 &≥1 𝑒 ± fake reco π0

Origin of Neutral Candidates Where do the neutral candidates come from? Why are there so many charged particles in the list? The following slides show the start points of neutral candidate tracks: all neutral candidates photons neutrons all charged electrons ( 𝑒 ± ) pions ( 𝜋 ± ) protons (𝑝, 𝑝 )

Status Summary π0 reco efficiency too low: ~42% true π0 found (rel. to generated) Ratio of signal to combinatorial background too low: S/B ~ 1.3 MC truth match fraction improved in trunk 30122 compared to release feb17p1 (~30%) options to separate photons from other particles currently insuficient 4C fit removes part of the background but result is unsatisfactory (not discussed here)  need further effort to improve neutral particle reconstruction e.g. time information to suppress slow particles

Thank You for Your Attention ! spare

= 300000 = 280000 all cand’s 𝛾 n charged

charged 𝑒 ± = 18500 𝜋 ± 𝑝, 𝑝

= 280000 = 280000 all cand’s 𝛾 n charged

charged 𝑒 ± = 3700 𝜋 ± 𝑝, 𝑝