NORTH EAST ATLANTIC GIG

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ECOSTAT meeting – Ispra (IT), July of 14 CBriv GIG Macrophyte Intercalibration.
Advertisements

Intercalibration in transitional waters (TW) Phase 2: Milestone 5 Reports (M5R) Presented by Nikolaos Zampoukas Joint Research Centre Institute for Environment.
Intercalibration Guidance: update Sandra Poikane Joint Research Centre Institute for Environment and Sustainability.
Presented by Sandra Poikane EC Joint Research Centre Institute for Environment and Sustainability Biological indicators of lakes and rivers and the Intercalibration.
1 Intercalibration in the Eastern Continental Region 1 Dr. Ursula Schmedtje International Commission for the Protection of the Danube River.
Lake Intercalibration Presented by Sandra Poikane Joint Research Centre Institute for Environment and Sustainability.
ECOSTAT 8-9 October 2007 River GIGs: Future intercalibration needs/plans Presented by Wouter van de Bund Joint Research Centre Institute for Environment.
Working Group A ECOSTAT Intercalibration Progress Coast GIGs JRC, Ispra, Italy, March 2005 Dave Jowett, Environment Agency (England and Wales), Coast.
Framework for the intercalibration process  Must be simple  Aiming to identify and resolve big inconsistencies with the normative definitions and big.
River Intercalibration Phase 2: Milestone 4 reports Presented by Wouter van de Bund Joint Research Centre Institute for Environment and Sustainability.
Intercalibration Option 3 results: what is acceptable and what is not ? Sandra Poikane Joint Research Centre Institute for Environment and Sustainability.
ECOSTAT 8-9 October 2007 Comparability of the results of the intercalibration exercise – MS sharing the same method Presented by Wouter van de Bund Joint.
Meeting of the Working Group 2A on Ecological Status (ECOSTAT) – 3+4 July 2006, Stresa (IT) Eastern Continental GIG Draft final report on the results of.
River Intercalibration Phase 2: Milestone 3 reports Presented by Wouter van de Bund Joint Research Centre Institute for Environment and Sustainability.
GIG plan updates GIG leads were requested to update their work plans
Marcel van den Berg / Centre for Water Management The Netherlands
NE ATLANTIC GEOGRAPHICAL INTERCALIBRATION GROUP (NEA GIG)
ECOSTAT, Bristol Hotel, Brussels,
Intercalibration results 2006/2007
Intercalibration Results 2006
Intercalibration progress: Central - Baltic GIG Rivers
Intercalibration in transitional waters (TW) Phase 2: Milestone 4 Reports (M4R) Presented by Nikolaos Zampoukas Joint Research Centre Institute for Environment.
CW-TW Intercalibration results
CW-TW Intercalibration work progress
Working Group A ECOSTAT October 2006 Summary/Conclusions
Results of the Coastal and Transitional Waters Metadata Analysis
Synthesis of the intercalibration process Working group 2.5.
Progress on Intercalibration COAST GIGs
Task 1 - Intercalibration WG 2A ECOSTAT - Intercalibration
RIVER GIG reports to ECOSTAT Central Baltic Rivers GIG
ECOSTAT, Stresa, Italy, 3-4 July 2006
Working Group 2A ECOSTAT Summary progress report River GIGs Wouter van de Bund Joint Research Centre Institute for Environment and Sustainability Inland.
Central-Baltic Rivers GIG progress
Working Group 2A ECOSTAT Intercalibration process - state of play Wouter van de Bund & Anna-Stiina Heiskanen Joint Research Centre Institute for Environment.
Working Group A Ecological Status - ECOSTAT WFD CIS Strategic Coordination Group meeting, October 2005 Progress in the intercalibration exercise.
Working Group A ECOSTAT Summary Milestone Reports: River GIGs Wouter van de Bund Joint Research Centre Institute for Environment and Sustainability.
The normal balance of ingredients
Ecostat meeting - Ispra March 2006
NE Atlantic GIG ECOSTAT April 2013 Summary of NE ATLANTIC GIG Workshop held in Lisbon (24th-25th January 2013) The Next Phase.
COAST Lisboa Feb Methods Discussion
Working Group A ECOSTAT Update on intercalibration Prepared by Wouter van de Bund Joint Research Centre Institute for Environment and Sustainability.
Working Group A Ecological Status - ECOSTAT State of play in the intercalibration exercise Water Directors Meeting, November 2005.
CW-TW IC Work progress Fuensanta Salas Herrero, CW-TW IC Coordinator
Progress Report Working Group A Ecological Status Intercalibration (1) & Harmonisation (3) Activities Presented by Anna-Stiina Heiskanen EC Joint Research.
Intercalibration Decision and Technical Report
CIS Working Group 2A ECOSTAT SCG Meeting in Brussels
confidence in classification
Working Group A ECOSTAT progress report on Intercalibration Presented by Wouter van de Bund Joint Research Centre Institute for Environment and Sustainability.
Working Group 2A ECOSTAT progress report Presented by Wouter van de Bund Joint Research Centre Institute for Environment and Sustainability.
ECOSTAT, Stresa, Italy, October 2005
Working Group 2A ECOSTAT Guidance for the intercalibration process Wouter van de Bund Joint Research Centre Institute for Environment and Sustainability.
River groups with extension
WG A ECOSTAT Intercalibration guidance : Annexes III, V, VI
Guidelines to translate the intercalibration results into the national classification systems and to derive reference conditions Presented by Wouter.
Baltic GIG Progress report
Working Group A Ecological Status - ECOSTAT WFD CIS Strategic Coordination Group meeting, 22 Febraury 2006 Progress Report.
River Fish Intercalibration group D. Pont,Cemagref, France)
Lake Intercalibration
Angel Borja Coordinator of the Group
Working Group 2A ECOSTAT progress report Presented by Wouter van de Bund Joint Research Centre Institute for Environment and Sustainability Inland.
Intercalibration round 2: finalisation and open technical issues – RIVERS ECOSTAT October 2012.
Fish intercalibration – rivers Progress and expected outcome
Baltic Sea GIG Status April 2009
Summary overview of methods used to define GEP in practice by countries represented in the ad-hoc group Dr. Ursula Schmedtje.
Working Group on Reference Conditions
WG A Ecological Status Progress report October 2010 – May 2011
Article 8 Guidance – Integration levels and methods
MED-GIG: Mediterranean Coastal
Baltic Sea GIG Status Ecostat 23 April 2013
Why are we reviewing reference conditions in intercalibration?
Presentation transcript:

NORTH EAST ATLANTIC GIG Milestone 6 Report, ECOSTAT, Stresa, Italy, 3-4 July 2006 Dave Jowett - GIG Co-ordinator

Types, participants and QEs

Types, participants and QEs Types NEA1/26, NEA3/4, NEA7, NEA 8/9/10 QEs benthic inverts, phytoplankton, macroalgae and angiosperms Type NEA11 as above + Fish Pressures: Organic enrichment, nutrient enrichment, morphological alteration and hazardous substances

Intercalibration Options Benthic Invertebrates Option 3, comparison of MS systems Phytoplankton Option 2 - selected metrics, chlorophyll, cell counts, cell counts (indicator taxa) Macroalgae and Angiosperms Hybrid options 2/3 (indicator metrics in some types + MS system comparison in others) Fish Option 3, comparison of MS systems (may move to option 1 in 2007)

Data Benthic Invertebrates MS datasets collated for testing by UK and DK Phytoplankton Data from common metrics collated by UK Macroalgae and Angiosperms Data collated by UK, NL and SE for agreed metrics in relevant types Fish GIG dataset collated by BE For details see Annex D in Milestone 6 report

National classification methods e.g. Benthic Invertebrates See Annexes A and C for details

Setting of Reference conditions No common criteria for setting reference values across all types for each Quality Element Data used from unimpacted (reference) sites for some types/QEs e.g. macroalgae/angiosperms in types NEA8/9/10 Utilisation of existing reference criteria e.g. OSPAR chlorophyll/nutrient offshore reference values Historic records e.g. fish datasets Data taken specifically for the intercalibration exercise e.g. pressure gradient sampling See main text, Annexes B and C for details

Setting of Boundaries e.g. Benthic Invertebrates

Setting of Boundaries e.g. Benthic Invertebrates

National boundaries e.g. Benthic Invertebrates NEA1/26 and 7 NEA8/9/10

Example of Regional boundaries within a type - chlorophyll

Workplan 2006/7 Benthic Invertebrates Example of a partially completed exercise - expect full completion in 2007

Workplan 2006/7 Phytoplankton - Chlorophyll metric NEA1/26 Example of an option that will be finalised by September 2006

Workplan 2006/7 Angiosperms - Saltmarsh NEA11 Example where output is not possible for 2006 - finalise 2007 Please see Annex E for the full list!

Summary of outputs 2006/7 Fully complete by September 2006 Partially complete September 2006 - full completion 2007 No result 2006 - completion expected in 2007

Issues MSs are still working on classification schemes Partial output only in 2006 - is that OK? Much better picture if allowed to continue into 2007 BUT……… Lets celebrate the successes NOW! Benthic Inverts intercalibration principle established Phytoplankton metrics completed! Partial intercalibration for macroalgae, angiosperms and fish and by mid 2007 we will have many more results!

THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION!