Deconstructing Standard Two, Element 2-b Dr

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
District Accreditation
Advertisements

Assessment & Technology UH-M COLLEGE OF EDUCATION COE Outreach & Technology.
Deconstructing Standard 2c Angie Gant, Ed.D. Truett-McConnell College 1.
UNIT TECHNOLOGY A NARRATED PRESENTATION (TURN ON YOUR SOUND) College of Education.
ASSESSMENT SYSTEMS FOR TSPC ACCREDITATION Assessment and Work Sample Conference January 13, 2012 Hilda Rosselli, Western Oregon University.
Coordinator of Assessment Coordinate assessment efforts on campus Maintain the NCCC General Education Assessment Plan Collect assessment results from course.
Office of Research, Evaluation, and Assessment April 19, 2008.
Assessing Candidates’ Impact on Student Learning The Don of the Georgia Teacher Preparation Family.
Standards and Guidelines for Quality Assurance in the European
1 ADEPT Training Module for Cooperating Teachers and Supervising Faculty Winthrop University.
 Description  The unit has a conceptual framework that defines how our programs prepare candidates to be well-rounded educators. Every course in the.
BY Karen Liu, Ph. D. Indiana State University August 18,
Becoming a Teacher Ninth Edition Forrest W. Parkay Chapter 13 Becoming a Professional Teacher Parkay ISBN: © 2013, 2010, 2007 Pearson Education,
Measuring Dispositions Dr. Sallie Averitt Miller, Associate Dean Office for Assessment and Accreditation Columbus State University GaPSC Regional Assessment.
Three Levels of Assessment: Portfolio Data, Curriculum Inventory, Standardized Assessment Results Dr. Kathleen DaBoll-Lavoie, PhD Department of Inclusive.
EVALUATION AND THE RESIDENCY PROGRAM Caroline C. Nielsen, Ph.D.
Streamlined NCATE Visits Donna M. Gollnick Senior Vice President, NCATE 2008 AACTE Annual Meeting.
2012 Regional Assessment Workshops Session 2 Dr. Maryellen Cosgrove, Dean School of Business, Education, Health and Wellness Gainesville State University.
Deconstructing Standard 2c Dr. Mike Mahan Gordon College 1.
 This prepares educators to work in P-12 schools (1)  It provides direction (1)  It is knowledge-based, articulated, shared, coherent, consistent with.
NCATE Standard 3: Field Experiences & Clinical Practice Monica Y. Minor, NCATE Jeri A. Carroll, BOE Chair Professor, Wichita State University.
March 26-28, 2013 SINGAPORE CDIO Asian Regional Meeting and Workshop on Engineering Education and Policies for Regional Leaders Programme Evaluation (CDIO.
Deconstructing Standard 2b Sharon Valente Savannah College of Art and Design May 14, 2012.
Standard Two: Understanding the Assessment System and its Relationship to the Conceptual Framework and the Other Standards Robert Lawrence, Ph.D., Director.
VT University Libraries: Identifying, Teaching, and Assessing What Matters Most Office of Academic Assessment Ray Van Dyke,
NCATE Vocabulary Candidates--university/college students
Sharon M. Livingston, Ph.D. Assistant Professor and Director of Assessment Department of Education LaGrange College LaGrange, GA GaPSC Regional Assessment.
Continuous Improvement. Focus of the Review: Continuous Improvement The unit will engage in continuous improvement between on-site visits. Submit annual.
ANNOOR ISLAMIC SCHOOL AdvancEd Survey PURPOSE AND DIRECTION.
Melanie DiLoreto.  Planning Committee ◦ Spring 2008 – Summer 2008 ◦ Internal & External Stakeholders – CAS, PCL, SoE, Academic Affairs, Supervising Teachers,
Staff All Surveys Questions 1-27 n=45 surveys Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree The relative sizes of the colored bars in the chart.
About District Accreditation Mrs. Sanchez & Mrs. Bethell Rickards Middle School
Writing a Professional Development Plan.  Step 1–Identify Indicators to be Assessed  Step 2 –Determine Average Baseline Score  Step 3 –Develop a Growth.
Office of Service Quality
Stetson University welcomes: NCATE Board of Examiners.
A Commitment to Continuous Improvement in Teaching and Learning Michaela Rome, Ph.D. NYU Assistant Vice Provost for Assessment.
Deconstructing Standard 2c Laura Frizzell Coastal Plains RESA 1.
Educational Quality Assurance Program (EQAP) - 11/14/2009 College of Computing & Information Technology Educational Quality Assurance Program (EQAP) November.
Standard Two Les Steele Executive Vice President.
Quality Online Preparation: Qualities of Faculty, Courses, and Preparation Programs By Dr. Erin O’Brien Valencia College League of Innovation Conference,
1 Establishing a New Gallaudet Program Review Process Pat Hulsebosch Office of Academic Quality CUE – 9/3/08: CGE – 9/16/08.
Action Research for School Leaders by Dr. Paul A. Rodríguez.
NCATE Unit Standards 1 and 2
School – Based Assessment – Framework
Presented by Deborah Eldridge, CAEP Consultant
Eastern’s Assessment System
Individual Development Plan
The assessment process For Administrative units
Standard I Systematic Planning.
Achieving the Dream Mark A. Smith.
Angelo State University College of Education August 17, 2011
Field Experiences and Clinical Practice
NCATE Standard 3: Field Experiences & Clinical Practice
Donna M. Gollnick Senior Vice President, NCATE April 2008
NCATE 2000 Unit Standards Overview.
Division of Talent and Performance
Strategic Enrolment Management Planning OVERVIEW
Middle States Update to President’s Cabinet October 8, 2018
Introduction to CPD Quality Assurance
Working with Student Success Data
Standard Four Program Impact
Unpacking Standard 2A: Assessment System Georgia Gwinnett College
Deconstructing Standard 2a Dr. Julie Reffel Valdosta State University
Developing a Rubric for Assessment
Vernon Martin, ASCCC Accreditation Committee, Sierra College
Deborah Anne Banker Committee Chair
preservice teacher education to beginning teacher induction
Marilyn Eisenwine Committee Chair
Deconstructing Standard 2b
TLQAA STANDARDS & TOOLS
Presentation transcript:

Deconstructing Standard Two, Element 2-b Dr Deconstructing Standard Two, Element 2-b Dr. Sallie Averitt Miller Associate Dean for Assessment and Accreditation Columbus State University GaPSC Regional Assessment Workshops May 17, 2012, 1:30 – 3:00 p.m. Paine College, Augusta, Georgia

GaPSC AFI Frequency Report Results of a frequency count of AFIs cited for Standard Two from 2007 – 2011 as recorded in the PSC Decision Log 062211. Highest Number of Citations: Candidate assessment data are regularly and systematically collected, compiled, aggregated, summarized, and analyzed to improve candidate performance, preparation program quality, and professional education unit operations.

Workshop Participant Anticipation Guide What is Standard 2? What is Standard 2, Element 2-b? What are the key criteria for meeting the expectations of Element 2-b? Does your university meet the key criteria of Standard 2, Element 2-b? Discussion. Quick Project

Use of Data for Improvement Data Collection, Analysis & Evaluation Standard 2 Assessment System Element 2-a Use of Data for Improvement Element 2-c Data Collection, Analysis & Evaluation Element 2-b Standard 2: Assessment System and Unit Evaluation The unit has an assessment system that collects and analyzes data on applicant qualifications, candidate and graduate performance, and unit operations to evaluate and improve the performance of candidates, the unit, and its programs.

Standard 2, Element 2-b Element 2-b focuses on regular and systematic data collection, analysis, and evaluation for the purposes of improving candidate performance, program quality, and unit operations. Data Evaluation Data Analysis Data Collection

Standard 2, Element 2-b Data Collection, Analysis, and Evaluation –continued Multiple assessments from internal and external sources at transition points are documented through effective used of information technology. Induction for Graduates with Initial Certification Exit from Initial Program Entry to Student Teaching Entry to Teacher Education

Standard 2, Element 2-b Data Collection, Analysis, and Evaluation –continued Data are summarized, analyzed, and reported by discipline; and are disaggregated for alternate route, off-campus, and distance learning programs to ensure quality and consistency across offerings by the unit.

System uses multiple assessments. Standard 2, Element 2-b –Key Criteria Data Collection, Analysis, and Evaluation System uses multiple assessments. Internal Sources External Sources

Standard 2, Element 2-b –Key Criteria Data Collection, Analysis, and Evaluation –continued System is maintained and data are collected regularly from: Applicants Candidates Recent graduates Faculty Others in the professional community

Standard 2, Element 2-b –Key Criteria Data Collection, Analysis, and Evaluation –continued Data are regularly and systematically: Compiled, aggregated, summarized, and analyzed Maintained using information technology Disaggregated by discipline and for alternate route, off-campus, and distance learning programs Records of formal complaints are maintained and resolutions are documented.

Standard 2, Element 2-b Data Collection, Analysis, and Evaluation Does your university meet the key criteria? We mostly do well with data collection, aggregation, traditional assessments, and reporting. However, the challenge is to use assessment data to make meaningful plans for improvement, then implement and evaluate those plans.

Standard 2, Element 2-b Data Collection, Analysis, and Evaluation Quick Project Note: The first example of completed for workshop participant. Group Sharing and Discussion Provide a “fix it” plan so that unit can continue toward target Rate the seven Unit Program Report Areas and Provide Rationale

Standard 2, Element 2-b Data Collection, Analysis, and Evaluation Quick Project Questions, Comments, and Discussion