Volume 19, Issue 4, Pages (April 2011)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Structural Basis of Substrate Methylation and Inhibition of SMYD2
Advertisements

Volume 7, Issue 10, Pages S1-S2 (October 1999)
Volume 21, Issue 1, Pages (January 2013)
Volume 13, Issue 7, Pages (July 2005)
Volume 14, Issue 3, Pages (March 2001)
Volume 21, Issue 5, Pages (May 2013)
Volume 15, Issue 8, Pages (August 2007)
Volume 109, Issue 4, Pages (August 2015)
Transformation Efficiency of RasQ61 Mutants Linked to Structural Features of the Switch Regions in the Presence of Raf  Greg Buhrman, Glenna Wink, Carla.
Volume 11, Issue 12, Pages (December 2003)
Volume 21, Issue 1, Pages (January 2013)
The Closing Mechanism of DNA Polymerase I at Atomic Resolution
Crystal Structure of a Continuous Three-Dimensional DNA Lattice
Volume 16, Issue 10, Pages (October 2008)
Volume 24, Issue 11, Pages (November 2016)
Volume 22, Issue 9, Pages (September 2014)
Volume 14, Issue 5, Pages (May 2007)
Volume 13, Issue 4, Pages (April 2005)
Volume 15, Issue 4, Pages (April 2007)
Volume 13, Issue 10, Pages (October 2006)
Structure of the E. coli DNA Glycosylase AlkA Bound to the Ends of Duplex DNA: A System for the Structure Determination of Lesion-Containing DNA  Brian.
Volume 26, Issue 3, Pages e3 (March 2018)
Rong Shi, Laura McDonald, Miroslaw Cygler, Irena Ekiel  Structure 
Structural Basis of DNA Loop Recognition by Endonuclease V
Structures of Minimal Catalytic Fragments of Topoisomerase V Reveals Conformational Changes Relevant for DNA Binding  Rakhi Rajan, Bhupesh Taneja, Alfonso.
Crystal Structures of Ral-GppNHp and Ral-GDP Reveal Two Binding Sites that Are Also Present in Ras and Rap  Nathan I. Nicely, Justin Kosak, Vesna de Serrano,
Improved Structures of Full-Length p97, an AAA ATPase: Implications for Mechanisms of Nucleotide-Dependent Conformational Change  Jason M. Davies, Axel.
Sebastiano Pasqualato, Jacqueline Cherfils  Structure 
Volume 17, Issue 3, Pages (March 2009)
Recognition of a TG Mismatch
The Monomeric dUTPase from Epstein-Barr Virus Mimics Trimeric dUTPases
Volume 23, Issue 12, Pages (December 2015)
Volume 90, Issue 1, Pages (July 1997)
Volume 16, Issue 5, Pages (May 2008)
Volume 17, Issue 5, Pages (May 2009)
Structural Insights into Ligand Recognition by a Sensing Domain of the Cooperative Glycine Riboswitch  Lili Huang, Alexander Serganov, Dinshaw J. Patel 
Structural Roles of Monovalent Cations in the HDV Ribozyme
DNA Minor Groove Sensing and Widening by the CCAAT-Binding Complex
Elizabeth J. Little, Andrea C. Babic, Nancy C. Horton  Structure 
Volume 26, Issue 4, Pages e3 (April 2018)
Volume 14, Issue 5, Pages (May 2006)
Combining Efficient Conformational Sampling with a Deformable Elastic Network Model Facilitates Structure Refinement at Low Resolution  Gunnar F. Schröder,
Volume 56, Issue 6, Pages (December 2007)
Crystal Structure of the Vanadate-Inhibited Ca2+-ATPase
Volume 20, Issue 10, Pages (October 2012)
Crystal Structure of the p53 Core Domain Bound to a Full Consensus Site as a Self- Assembled Tetramer  Yongheng Chen, Raja Dey, Lin Chen  Structure  Volume.
Volume 25, Issue 9, Pages e3 (September 2017)
Transformation of MutL by ATP Binding and Hydrolysis
Volume 17, Issue 10, Pages (October 2009)
Qun Liu, Qingqiu Huang, Xin Gen Lei, Quan Hao  Structure 
Volume 18, Issue 2, Pages (February 2010)
Volume 18, Issue 9, Pages (September 2010)
Structure of the Rho Family GTP-Binding Protein Cdc42 in Complex with the Multifunctional Regulator RhoGDI  Gregory R. Hoffman, Nicolas Nassar, Richard.
Volume 34, Issue 3, Pages (May 2009)
Volume 13, Issue 10, Pages (October 2005)
DNA Synthesis across an Abasic Lesion by Human DNA Polymerase ι
Structural Insight into AMPK Regulation: ADP Comes into Play
Structure of the Staphylococcus aureus AgrA LytTR Domain Bound to DNA Reveals a Beta Fold with an Unusual Mode of Binding  David J. Sidote, Christopher.
Crystal Structures of the Thi-Box Riboswitch Bound to Thiamine Pyrophosphate Analogs Reveal Adaptive RNA-Small Molecule Recognition  Thomas E. Edwards,
Structural Basis of Swinholide A Binding to Actin
Carl C. Correll, Betty Freeborn, Peter B. Moore, Thomas A. Steitz  Cell 
Ying Huang, Michael P. Myers, Rui-Ming Xu  Structure 
Alec E. Hodel, Paul D. Gershon, Florante A. Quiocho  Molecular Cell 
Structure of BamHI Bound to Nonspecific DNA
Michael M. Brent, Ruchi Anand, Ronen Marmorstein  Structure 
Volume 20, Issue 1, Pages (January 2012)
Egor Svidritskiy, Andrei A. Korostelev  Structure 
Peter König, Rafael Giraldo, Lynda Chapman, Daniela Rhodes  Cell 
Sang J. Chung, Gregory L. Verdine  Chemistry & Biology 
Volume 126, Issue 4, Pages (August 2006)
Presentation transcript:

Volume 19, Issue 4, Pages 523-533 (April 2011) Reintroducing Electrostatics into Macromolecular Crystallographic Refinement: Application to Neutron Crystallography and DNA Hydration  Timothy D. Fenn, Michael J. Schnieders, Marat Mustyakimov, Chuanjie Wu, Paul Langan, Vijay S. Pande, Axel T. Brunger  Structure  Volume 19, Issue 4, Pages 523-533 (April 2011) DOI: 10.1016/j.str.2011.01.015 Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Hydration Structure in B-DNA Zigzag spine in the minor groove of B-DNA (dGCGAATTCG) as determined from re-refinement with the 0.89 Å X-ray diffraction data set (PDB ID 1ENN) using the AMOEBA force field and PME electrostatics (Fenn et al., 2010). Structure 2011 19, 523-533DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2011.01.015) Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Neutron Diffraction-Based Hydration Structure in B-DNA (A) Minor groove of DNA resulting from the 2.5 Å refinement with neutron data (PDB ID 1WQZ, sequence dCCATTAATGG) and corresponding 1.6 Å X-ray data (PDB ID 1WQY) using the Repel force field (i.e., without the inclusion of electrostatics). (B) As in (A), but with electrostatics computed using the OPLS-AA-X force field (using a real space spherical cutoff of 8.5 Å). (C) As in (A) but using the AMOEBA force field. In all figures, the purple mesh represents X-ray σA weighted 2Fo-Fc electron density contoured at 2.0 σ and light blue mesh represents σA weighted 2Fo-Fc nuclear density contoured at 1.5 σ. Density is contoured around the water molecules only for the sake of clarity. Nucleotide bases in white are from the 5′→3′ strand, and those in black correspond to the partner 3′→5′ strand. Figures were generated with POVScript+ (Fenn et al., 2003) and rendered using POVRay. Structure 2011 19, 523-533DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2011.01.015) Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Guanosine N2-Phosphate Hydration in Z-DNA (A) Hydration pattern resulting from the joint refinement with the 1.4 Å neutron diffraction data (PDB ID X, sequence dCGCGCG) and with the corresponding X-ray diffraction data to 1.5 Å (PDB ID Y) using the Repel force field (i.e., without the inclusion of electrostatics). Covalent bonds from neighboring nucleotides to the respective phosphate groups (magenta) are omitted for clarity. (B) As in (A), but with electrostatics computed using the OPLS-AA-X force field (using a real space electrostatic cutoff of 8.5 Å). (C) Results from refinement using the AMOEBA force field (using a PME-based electrostatic implementation). In all figures, the cyan mesh represents X-ray σA weighted Fo-Fc electron density contoured at 2 σ and green mesh represents σA weighted Fo-Fc nuclear density contoured at 1.5 σ prior to the inclusion of these particular water molecules in the model phase calculations. Density is contoured around the water molecules only for the sake of clarity. See also Figure S1. Structure 2011 19, 523-533DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2011.01.015) Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Cytosine N4-Water and Phosphate Hydration in Z-DNA (A) to (C) follow the same order and density rendering as in Figure 3. Symmetry related molecules are colored in tan. Covalent bonds from neighboring nucleotides to the respective phosphate groups (magenta) are omitted for clarity. Structure 2011 19, 523-533DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2011.01.015) Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Hydration Spine in Z-DNA (A) to (C) follow the same order and density rendering as in Figure 3. See also Figure S2. Structure 2011 19, 523-533DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2011.01.015) Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 Difference in Hydrogen-Bonding Geometry in B-DNA (A, B) versus Z-DNA (C, D) Distance from the hydrogen/deuterium atom to the O2 position on thymines is given in Å. Structure 2011 19, 523-533DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2011.01.015) Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 7 Xylose Isomerase Active Site, with the Bound Perdeuterated Glucose Rendered in Black Active site metal ions are rendered in gold. (A) Result from joint refinement with the 2.0 Å neutron diffraction data (PDB ID 3KCL) and with corresponding X-ray data of the same resolution (PDB ID 3KBM) using the Repel force field (i.e., without electrostatics). (B) As in (A), but with the OPLS-AA-X force field (i.e., electrostatics computed using a real space cutoff of 8.5 Å). Light blue mesh represents σA weighted 2Fo-Fc nuclear density contoured at 1.5 σ. See also Figure S3. Structure 2011 19, 523-533DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2011.01.015) Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions