Approved by Project Sponsor

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Improving Client Retention in Primary Care QI Project Review Title I Case Management HIV Quality Learning Network June 28, 2007.
Advertisements

Performance management System
1 The Community College of Baltimore County. G RANTS C OMPLIANCE What is grants compliance? Adopting and consistently applying systematic procedures to.
After Core Strategies SDPI DP Grantee Meeting March 10, 2006 Denver, CO.
Orientation to Performance and Quality Improvement Plan
Community Planning Training 1-1. Community Plan Implementation Training 1- Community Planning Training 1-3.
Matching Grants. Address humanitarian conditions that benefit a community in need Direct Rotarian involvement Match at least two countries (host and international)
The mission of the Office of Migrant Education is to provide excellent leadership, technical assistance, and financial support to improve the educational.
Utilizing Quality Improvement Methods to Address Low Birth Weight Births in Pierce County Tutrecia Giles, Lea Johnson, and Susan Pfeifer Description of.
Do it pro bono. Strategic Scorecard Service Grant The Strategy Management Practice is presented by Wells Fargo. The design of the Strategic Scorecard Service.
1 Project Kick Off Briefing Cost Data Integrity Project August 30, 2007.
Addressing Maternal Depression Healthy Start Interconception Care Learning Collaborative Kimberly Deavers, MPH U.S. Department of Health & Human Services.
The CSEFEL and State Implementation Partnerships An Overview.
Improvement Model and PDSA Cycles. Organ Donation The Service Improvement Model provides a framework to test, implement and sustain change ideas to overcome.
Setting the scene 9 September 2010 Setting the scene Alan Willson 9 September 2010.
SACS/CASI District Accreditation  January 2007  April 2007  May 2007  January – April 2008  Board Approval for Pursuit of District Accreditation.
PLAN: Identify an Opportunity and Plan for Improvement Step One : Getting Started – Identify area, problem or opportunity – Estimate and secure resources.
HRSA Early Childhood Comprehensive Systems (ECCS) Impact 2016 Funding Opportunity Announcement (FOA) Barbara Hamilton, Project Officer Division.
Overview NIATx Model. NIATx History RWJF and SAMHSA Supported and Field Testing Development driven by proven methods and tools –Customer-focused –Use.
Wisconsin Personnel Development System Grant Click on the speaker to listen to each slide. You may wish to follow along in your WPDM Guide.
Planning & budgeting 25 th November, 2009 Eva Stevens Community Accounting Plus.
APS Teacher Evaluation System Preparing for Implementation May 2012.
Funded by HRSA HIV/AIDS Bureau Titles I & II Technical Assistance (TA) Webex January 11, 2007 Donna Yutzy, NQC Consultant Quality Management 101.
First Things First Grantee Overview.
Small Charities Challenge Fund (SCCF) Guidance Webinar
PPS Leave Audit Update Human Resources February 27, 2017
Ofsted Inspection of Children’s Services
Pre-planning Planning to plan (and adapt) Implementation starts Here!
Rapid Fire Team Presentation
MGT 461 Lecture #27 Project Execution and Control
Evaluation of Programs
Florida Department of Health in Seminole County Quality Improvement DMAIC Project 2016: Increasing Timeliness of CSR Entries into HMS Project Team: Crystal.
PRESENTATION OF FINDINGS GRANTEES NEED ASSESSMENT
THURSDAY TARGETED TRAINING: Reporting Regulations and Requirements
Performance Improvement Project Validation Process Outcome Focused Scoring Methodology and Critical Analysis Presenter: Christi Melendez, RN, CPHQ Associate.
Why participate in Accreditation?
Title: Scope/Boundaries: Team Executive Sponsor:
Working with your AoA Project Officer
Welcome Using SBAR in handovers Main title slide page
Journal Club Notes.
Implementation Strategy July 2002
Overview – Guide to Developing Safety Improvement Plan
Peg Bradke and Rebecca Steinfield
Measuring Project Performance: Tips and Tools to Showcase Your Results
Overview – Guide to Developing Safety Improvement Plan
Getting Started with Your Malnutrition Quality Improvement Project
Project Lead/Improvement Advisor:
Phase 4 Milestones.
Meeting Quality-Improvement Milestones #14(19), #15(20), #16(21)
2018 OSEP Project Directors’ Conference
Partnering for Success: Using Research to Improve the Lowest Performing Schools June 26, 2018 Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education.
2018 OSEP Project Directors’ Conference
Overview of Updated Proposal and Reporting Guidelines
Establish you aims from the outset
Trevor Smale Grant Manager, South West
McREL TEACHER EVALUATION SYSTEM
Portfolio, Programme and Project
Introduction to Quality Improvement Methods
Process Improvement Overview
[Organization Name]:[insert]Collaborative
Performance and Quality Improvement
Review of Progress in Year 1 Looking to Year 2
Module 3 Part 2 Developing and Implementing a QI Plan: Planning and Execution Adapted from: The Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) Quality.
Module 3: Part 1 Developing and Implementing a QI Plan: Understanding the QI Plan Adapted from: The Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA)
St Leonard’s CE Primary Academy
McREL TEACHER EVALUATION SYSTEM
Approved by Project Sponsor
Summit Hill Elementary School
Development and implementation of a multidisciplinary fall prevention plan within an inpatient behavioral health unit Nicole Van Kampen, BSN, RN Ferris.
Presentation transcript:

Approved by Project Sponsor Monthly Leadership Report Team: Monitoring for the XXX Program; July 2013; Sponsor XXX Approved by Project Sponsor ………………………………………………………………… Name/Signature/Date What are we trying to accomplish? Aim is to develop measures and redesign as needed by August 1st, 2013 the system of post-award grant monitoring for the XXX program to help grantees and project officers better understand and follow program requirements and deliver consistently high levels of service. Goals are: 1) 100% of grants have a record of at least one quarterly communication between project officer and grantee; 2) All site visits to grantees are timely documented ; 3) Barriers are documented monthly for at least 80% of grantees with difficulties drawing down allocated funds; 4) Percent of grantees satisfied with the grant monitoring process remains stable or increases by up to 25%. PDSA’s In Progress Now Develop change for goal 2: use of process map and fishbone (C&E) diagram to facilitate timely posting of site visit reports Changes We Plan to Test Test of change (under development) to the process of crafting and posting site visit reports in a timely manner(goal 2) Team Project Progress Score (0.5-5.0 Scale) and Reason Score: 4. Tests of changes have been completed for goals #1 and #2. The four project goals have an established measure to track progress. Baseline data have been collected for measures 1, 2, and 3 and 4. Implementation has started for measures 1, 2 and 3. Evidence of improvement noted for goal 1 (sustained) and goal 2 and initial level for goal 3 at 50% or more towards goal Barriers and Specific needs from Sponsor to Overcome Them. Unfilled vacancies (plus recent loss of staff due to retirement and maternal leave) continue to be a difficulty. The increased workload of regional and CO staff limits the time to focus on QI activities (e.g., new testing cycles). Filling these vacancies is a priority for our leadership: one was filled last month. Accordingly, we extended QI project for an additional six months. Why is it Important to work on now? Demonstration of effective grant monitoring for this highly visible national program is a priority for our leadership. Maintenance of funding and program credibility depend on the proper performance of administrative oversight and effective TA provision to grantees to improve services to at-risk families. Business Case: Evidence-based Improvements & Savings XXX senior leadership adopted QI as a strategy to increase effectiveness of internal operations and grantee support activities. Grant performance monitoring is critical to secure program continuity and funding. Goal #3 addresses barriers some grantees experience to drawing down funds in a timely manner. These high-risk grantees can forfeit funds, which may result in failure to meet client needs. Recommendations / Next Steps Continue data collection on all four measures Develop a change(s) for goal 2 Test the new change(s) for goal 2 Plan PDSA cycles as needed as we observe new processes associated w/ goals 3 and 4 Team A, B, C, D, Etc.

Approved by Project Sponsor Monthly Leadership Report Approved by Project Sponsor ………………………………………………………………… Name/Signature/Date How will we show improvement?(Project measures) 1) % of active grants that include documentation of at least one communication between project officer and grantee in the previous quarter 2) # of timely site visit reports (occurring between late site visit reports) 3) % of grantees with difficulty to draw down funds that have barriers identified and documented for the previous month 4) % of grantees somewhat satisfied or highly satisfied with the overall grant monitoring process Measurement Graphs: