Mahendra Kumar Prajapat, Kirti Jain, Supreet Saini  Biophysical Journal 

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Michail Stamatakis, Nikos V. Mantzaris  Biophysical Journal 
Advertisements

Volume 101, Issue 8, Pages (October 2011)
Pressure and Temperature Dependence of Growth and Morphology of Escherichia coli: Experiments and Stochastic Model  Pradeep Kumar, Albert Libchaber  Biophysical.
Jingkui Wang, Marc Lefranc, Quentin Thommen  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 112, Issue 10, Pages (May 2017)
Kinetic Hysteresis in Collagen Folding
Volume 107, Issue 7, Pages (October 2014)
Volume 107, Issue 1, Pages (July 2014)
Precision and Variability in Bacterial Temperature Sensing
Zhanghan Wu, Jianhua Xing  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 138, Issue 4, Pages (August 2009)
Spontaneous Synchronization of Coupled Circadian Oscillators
Transcription Stochasticity of Complex Gene Regulation Models
Kinetics of Genetic Switching into the State of Bacterial Competence
Volume 105, Issue 2, Pages (July 2013)
Andrés Jara-Oseguera, León D. Islas  Biophysical Journal 
Mechanics and Buckling of Biopolymeric Shells and Cell Nuclei
Volume 111, Issue 2, Pages (July 2016)
Systems Biophysics of Gene Expression
William J. Richardson, Jeffrey W. Holmes  Biophysical Journal 
Michail Stamatakis, Nikos V. Mantzaris  Biophysical Journal 
Is Aggregate-Dependent Yeast Aging Fortuitous
Volume 101, Issue 2, Pages (July 2011)
Electrodiffusion Models of Neurons and Extracellular Space Using the Poisson-Nernst- Planck Equations—Numerical Simulation of the Intra- and Extracellular.
Fundamental Constraints on the Abundances of Chemotaxis Proteins
Rainer Kurre, Berenike Maier  Biophysical Journal 
Tests of Continuum Theories as Models of Ion Channels. II
Mechanics and Buckling of Biopolymeric Shells and Cell Nuclei
Christina Vasalou, Erik D. Herzog, Michael A. Henson 
Kinetic and Energetic Analysis of Thermally Activated TRPV1 Channels
Colocalization of Multiple DNA Loci: A Physical Mechanism
Arijit Maitra, Ken A. Dill  Biophysical Journal 
Hao Yuan Kueh, Philipp Niethammer, Timothy J. Mitchison 
Critical Timing without a Timer for Embryonic Development
Paolo Mereghetti, Razif R. Gabdoulline, Rebecca C. Wade 
Modeling Diverse Range of Potassium Channels with Brownian Dynamics
Volume 103, Issue 2, Pages (July 2012)
Volume 110, Issue 1, Pages (January 2016)
Margaret J. Tse, Brian K. Chu, Mahua Roy, Elizabeth L. Read 
Volume 98, Issue 1, Pages 1-11 (January 2010)
Kinetic Hysteresis in Collagen Folding
Volume 105, Issue 1, Pages (July 2013)
Tests of Continuum Theories as Models of Ion Channels. I
Volume 101, Issue 8, Pages (October 2011)
Oriol Canela-Xandri, Francesc Sagués, Javier Buceta 
Volume 101, Issue 4, Pages (August 2011)
Gad Kimmel, Ron Shamir  The American Journal of Human Genetics 
Volume 104, Issue 5, Pages (March 2013)
Using a Single Fluorescent Reporter Gene to Infer Half-Life of Extrinsic Noise and Other Parameters of Gene Expression  Michał Komorowski, Bärbel Finkenstädt,
Tradeoffs and Optimality in the Evolution of Gene Regulation
Toshinori Namba, Masatoshi Nishikawa, Tatsuo Shibata 
Satomi Matsuoka, Tatsuo Shibata, Masahiro Ueda  Biophysical Journal 
Mathematical Modeling of the Heat-Shock Response in HeLa Cells
Chemically Mediated Mechanical Expansion of the Pollen Tube Cell Wall
Chien-Jung Lo, Mark C. Leake, Richard M. Berry  Biophysical Journal 
Theodore R. Rieger, Richard I. Morimoto, Vassily Hatzimanikatis 
Protein Self-Association Induced by Macromolecular Crowding: A Quantitative Analysis by Magnetic Relaxation Dispersion  Karim Snoussi, Bertil Halle  Biophysical.
Andrew E. Blanchard, Chen Liao, Ting Lu  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 90, Issue 10, Pages (May 2006)
The Role of Stretching in Slow Axonal Transport
Jose M.G. Vilar, Leonor Saiz  Biophysical Journal 
Eric D. Siggia, Jennifer Lippincott-Schwartz, Stefan Bekiranov 
Volume 101, Issue 3, Pages (August 2011)
Volume 101, Issue 8, Pages (October 2011)
S. Rüdiger, Ch. Nagaiah, G. Warnecke, J.W. Shuai  Biophysical Journal 
Joana Pinto Vieira, Julien Racle, Vassily Hatzimanikatis 
Ping Liu, Ioannis G. Kevrekidis, Stanislav Y. Shvartsman 
Paolo Mereghetti, Razif R. Gabdoulline, Rebecca C. Wade 
The Sonic Hedgehog Signaling System as a Bistable Genetic Switch
Volume 91, Issue 8, Pages (October 2006)
Presentation transcript:

Control of MarRAB Operon in Escherichia coli via Autoactivation and Autorepression  Mahendra Kumar Prajapat, Kirti Jain, Supreet Saini  Biophysical Journal  Volume 109, Issue 7, Pages 1497-1508 (October 2015) DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2015.08.017 Copyright © 2015 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 (A) Wild-type network design. MarR is an autorepressor (dark shaded). When bound to Inducer (light shaded), MarR is unable to control gene expression. MarA (solid) is an autoactivator. MarA also activates target gene expression. (B) Activator-only network design. Activator protein, A, is unable to control gene expression. When bound with inducer, A autoactivates and also activates target expression. (C) Repressor-only network design. Repressor protein, R represses its own and target expression. R bound with Inducer is unable to control gene expression. Biophysical Journal 2015 109, 1497-1508DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2015.08.017) Copyright © 2015 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Dose response curve. (A) Wild-type, activator-only, and repressor-only designs curves as obtained computationally; the x axis represents Inducer concentration in logarithmic terms and the y axis represents steady-state expression of target. (B) Wild-type Pmar and PinaA expression in the presence of varying concentrations of sodium salicylate obtained experimentally. Biophysical Journal 2015 109, 1497-1508DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2015.08.017) Copyright © 2015 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Dose response curves for (the three best) evolved activator-only and repressor-only network designs. Activator-only and repressor-only designs were evolved using a genetic algorithm and selected for to match the wild-type response. The x axis represents Inducer concentration in logarithmic terms and the y axis represents steady-state expression of Target. Biophysical Journal 2015 109, 1497-1508DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2015.08.017) Copyright © 2015 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Response time for transition of systems from one Inducer concentration to another. (A) Wild-type. (B–D) Best three evolved activator-only. (E–G) Best three evolved repressor-only designs. The x and z axes represent the start and end Inducer concentration, respectively, in a logarithm where a network moves from start to end during a switch. The y axis captures the response time required to switch (the scale for the y axis was kept same in all graphs to make comparisons between them easy). Biophysical Journal 2015 109, 1497-1508DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2015.08.017) Copyright © 2015 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Comparison of control cost of response between wild-type, evolved activator-only, and evolved repressor-only designs. (A) Inducer concentration profiles generated where both the Inducer levels and the time for which the level was sustained were randomly varied. (B) Average control cost (across the three profiles) in the evolved activator-only (solid) and evolved repressor-only (shaded) designs was computed (in multiples of control cost of the wild-type design) and plotted against % error in mimicking response of wild-type design. The time of these simulations is assumed to be much smaller than the cell cycle time of the bacteria. Biophysical Journal 2015 109, 1497-1508DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2015.08.017) Copyright © 2015 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 Comparison of control cost of response among activator-only, repressor-only, and evolved wild-type designs. Wild-type design was evolved to mimic response of activator-only and repressor-only design. Control cost in each evolved wild-type design was computed (in multiples of control cost of the activator-only and repressor-only designs) and plotted against % error in mimicking response of (A) activator-only and (B) repressor-only design. Biophysical Journal 2015 109, 1497-1508DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2015.08.017) Copyright © 2015 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 7 Comparison of memory storing capability in wild-type and all activator-only designs. (A) The x axis represents various designs (wild-type; the original activator-only design, A; and best three evolved activator-only designs, A1, A2, A3) and the y axis represents corresponding range of Inducer concentration in which they exhibit hysteresis. (B and C) The x axis represents the concentration of sodium salicylate (in mM) and the y axis represents the steady-state expression of (B) Pmar (square) and (C) PinaA (circle) during OFF to ON (solid) and ON to OFF (open) conditions. Biophysical Journal 2015 109, 1497-1508DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2015.08.017) Copyright © 2015 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 8 Dynamic behavior of wild-type design in three-dimensional parameter space. The x axis represents ratio of degradation constants of MarA and MarR, the y axis represents inducer concentration, and z axis represents basal fraction of total production of regulators. (Solid and shaded) Region where the end-point target expression is almost zero (<1) and the region where the steady-state target expression is ≥1, respectively. (Open) Region in the figure represents area with a sustained oscillatory target response. (Small solid square) Wild-type design; (small shaded square) a single point in the parameter space that lies in qualitatively different response types. Biophysical Journal 2015 109, 1497-1508DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2015.08.017) Copyright © 2015 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions