JLEIC High-Energy Ion IR Design: Options and Performance

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Brain Gestorme: Status of the LHeC Ring-Ring / Linac- Ring Basic Parameters I appologise to talk about things you already know...
Advertisements

Full-Acceptance Detector Integration at MEIC Vasiliy Morozov for MEIC Study Group Electron Ion Collider Users Meeting, Stony Brook University June 27,
Yichao Jing 11/11/2010. Outline Introduction Linear lattice design and basic parameters Combined function magnets study and feasibility Nonlinear dynamics.
Operated by JSA for the U.S. Department of Energy Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility EIC Collaboration Meeting, Hampton University, May 19-23,
Flat-beam IR optics José L. Abelleira, PhD candidate EPFL, CERN BE-ABP Supervised by F. Zimmermann, CERN Beams dep. Thanks to: O.Domínguez. S Russenchuck,
D. Trbojevic, N. Tsoupas, S. Tepikian, B. Parker, E. Pozdeyev, Y. Hao, D. Kayran, J. Beebe-Wang, C. Montag, V. Ptitsyn, and V. Litvinenko eRHIC and MeRHIC.
Overview of IR Design V.S. Morozov 1, P. Brindza 1, A. Camsonne 1, Ya.S. Derbenev 1, R. Ent 1, D. Gaskell 1, F. Lin 1, P. Nadel-Turonski 1, M. Ungaro 1,
Current eRHIC IR Design  Important features  10 mrad crossing angle Needs to be integrated into the current STAR and upgrades Important for luminosity.
MEIC Detector and IR Integration Vasiliy Morozov, Charles Hyde, Pawel Nadel-Turonski MEIC Detector and IR Design Mini-Workshop, October 31, 2011.
Interaction Region Design and Detector Integration V.S. Morozov for EIC Study Group at JLAB 2 nd Mini-Workshop on MEIC Interaction Region Design JLab,
Detector / Interaction Region Integration Vasiliy Morozov, Charles Hyde, Pawel Nadel-Turonski Joint CASA/Accelerator and Nuclear Physics MEIC/ELIC Meeting.
P OSSIBILITIES FOR MAINTAINING AA AND PP CAPABILITIES IN PARALLEL WITH E RHIC V. Ptitsyn Collider-Accelerator Department BNL RHIC and AGS Users Meeting,
Present MEIC IR Design Status Vasiliy Morozov, Yaroslav Derbenev MEIC Detector and IR Design Mini-Workshop, October 31, 2011.
Compensation of Detector Solenoid G.H. Wei, V.S. Morozov, Fanglei Lin JLEIC Collaboration Meeting Spring, 2016.
E.C. AschenauerEIC INT Program, Seattle Week 81.
Full-Acceptance & 2 nd Detector Region Designs V.S. Morozov on behalf of the JLEIC detector study group JLEIC Collaboration Meeting, JLab March 29-31,
JLEIC MDI Update Michael Sullivan Apr 4, 2017.
Interaction Region and Detector
MDI and head-on collision option for electron-positron Higgs factories
Ion Collider Ring: Design and Polarization
JLEIC Forward Ion Detection Region
Large Booster and Collider Ring
Non-linear Beam Dynamics Studies for JLEIC Electron Collider Ring
Final Focus Synchrotron Radiation
First Look at Nonlinear Dynamics in the Electron Collider Ring
Electron collider ring Chromaticity Compensation and dynamic aperture
JLEIC Detector Simulation Forward Ion Detection
Forward (ion-SIDE) Tagging: Motivations, ConCepT, Performance
Error and Multipole Sensitivity Study for the Ion Collider Ring
Specifications for the JLEIC IR Magnets
Ion-Side Small Angle Detection Forward, Far-Forward, & Ultra-Forward
Interaction region design for the partial double ring scheme
LHC (SSC) Byung Yunn CASA.
Interaction Region Design Options e+e- Factories Workshop
Collider Ring Optics & Related Issues
HL-LHC operations with LHCb at high luminosity
Update on JLEIC Interaction Region Design
EIC Accelerator Collaboration Meeting
Ion Collider Ring Chromatic Compensation and Dynamic Aperture
Yuri Nosochkov Yunhai Cai, Fanglei Lin, Vasiliy Morozov
Progress on Non-linear Beam Dynamic Study
Feasibility of Reusing PEP-II Hardware for MEIC Electron Ring
Update on MEIC Nonlinear Dynamics Work
Main Design Parameters RHIC Magnets for MEIC Ion Collider Ring
Ion Collider Ring Using Superferric Magnets
Fanglei Lin, Yuhong Zhang JLEIC R&D Meeting, March 10, 2016
Status and plans for crab crossing studies at JLEIC
Alternative Ion Injector Design
Fanglei Lin, Yuri Nosochkov Vasiliy Morozov, Yuhong Zhang, Guohui Wei
Update on JLEIC Electron Ring Design
MEIC New Baseline: Part 7
Multipole Limit Survey of FFQ and Large-beta Dipole
G.H. Wei, V.S. Morozov, Fanglei Lin Y. Nosochkov, M-H. Wang (SLAC)
Compensation of Detector Solenoids
G.H. Wei, V.S. Morozov, Fanglei Lin Y. Nosochkov (SLAC), M-H. Wang
JLEIC Collider Rings’ Geometry Options (II)
Progress Update on the Electron Polarization Study in the JLEIC
MEIC New Baseline: Performance and Accelerator R&D
MEIC Alternative Design Part V
JLEIC Electron Ring Nonlinear Dynamics Work Plan
Upgrade on Compensation of Detector Solenoid effects
HE-JLEIC: Do We Have a Baseline?
Fanglei Lin JLEIC R&D Meeting, August 4, 2016
MEIC Alternative Design Part III
DYNAMIC APERTURE OF JLEIC ELECTRON COLLIDER
Optimization of JLEIC Integrated Luminosity Without On-Energy Cooling*
A TME-like Lattice for DA Studies
Option 1: 2257 m Electron Ring with Doglegs – Downstream of IP
Compensation of Detector Solenoid Coherent Orbit Correction
Option 1: Reduced FF Quad Apertures
Presentation transcript:

JLEIC High-Energy Ion IR Design: Options and Performance Vasiliy Morozov JLEIC Accelerator R&D Meeting January 10, 2019

100 GeV/c Ion IR Optics Pole-tip fields are limited to 6 T FFB Far-forward detection Geometric match and dispersion suppression ions 𝜎 𝑥/𝑦 =21.7/4.3 𝜇m 𝜎 𝑥 ′ / 𝑦 ′ =0.22 mrad 𝛽 𝑥/𝑦 =10/2 cm IP Secondary focus iBDS2 iBDS3 iBDS1 Δ 𝑥 𝑓𝑟 = 𝐷 𝑥 Δ(𝐵𝜌)/(𝐵𝜌) 𝜎 𝑥 ′ / 𝑦 ′ =16/50 𝜇rad 𝜎 𝑥/𝑦 =292/19 𝜇m 𝛽 𝑥/𝑦 =69/37 cm 𝐷 𝑥 =−0.95 m January 10, 2019 JLEIC Accelerator R&D Meeting

Modifying IR Design for 200 GeV/c Constraints Maximum pole-tip fields at 200 GeV/c of 6 T  4.6 T Minimum impact on the forward hadron tagging performance compared to the 100 GeV/c design Minimum impact on the luminosity performance compared to the 100 GeV/c design Minimum impact on the beam dynamics compared to the 100 GeV/c design Options explored Reduced FF Quad Apertures Doubled Detector Space and Halved Crossing Angle Doubled Quad Lengths 1.5x Quad Lengths and 2/3 Crossing Angle  January 10, 2019 JLEIC Accelerator R&D Meeting

Doubled Quad Lengths: pCDR Appendix Version (IR v1) Keep maximum 𝛽-functions at ~2500 m  same maximum beam size Quad apertures  6 T / 𝜕 𝐵 𝑦 𝜕𝑥 at 200 GeV/c = 85 / 152 / 196 mm (radius) 𝜃≡ Quad aperture / distance from IP to quad’s far end = 9.1 / 10.0 / 10.5 mrad 𝛽 𝑥,𝑦 ∗ = 18 / 2.15 cm  𝐿 𝐿 0 =0.72, 𝐷 𝑥 at roman pot = 0.97 m January 10, 2019 JLEIC Accelerator R&D Meeting

Performance Optimization at Lower Energies (IR v1) Cut first FFQ in half and use the halves as the first and second FFQs at lower energies Can run in this mode up to 65 GeV/c proton momentum 𝛽 𝑥,𝑦 ∗ = 7.5 / 2 cm  luminosity improvement by a factor of 𝐿 𝐿 0 = 1.15 (up to 𝑝 𝑝 = 65 GeV/c) January 10, 2019 JLEIC Accelerator R&D Meeting

200 GeV/c IR Design with 4.6 T Pole-Tip Fields (IR v2) 𝛽 𝑥,𝑦 ∗ 𝑜𝑙𝑑 = 10 2 cm  𝛽 𝑥,𝑦 ∗ 𝑛𝑒𝑤 = 𝟔 𝟏.𝟐 cm 𝛽 𝑥,𝑦 𝑚𝑎𝑥 𝑜𝑙𝑑 =2.5 km  𝛽 𝑥,𝑦 𝑚𝑎𝑥 𝑛𝑒𝑤 = 𝛽 𝑥,𝑦 ∗ 𝑜𝑙𝑑 𝛽 𝑥,𝑦 𝑚𝑎𝑥 𝑜𝑙𝑑 𝛽 𝑥,𝑦 ∗ 𝑛𝑒𝑤 =𝟒.𝟐 km Constraints 𝛽 𝑥,𝑦 𝑚𝑎𝑥 ≤4200 m  𝛽 𝑥,𝑦 ∗ =19/1.6 cm  𝐿 𝐿 0 =0.48 Secondary focus in both planes Quadrupole aperture: 𝜃≥10 mrad Quadrupole length ratios: 1:2:1 Quadrupole length adjustment: 𝐵 𝑝𝑜𝑙𝑒−𝑡𝑖𝑝 ≤4.6 T 𝐵 𝑑𝑖𝑝𝑜𝑙𝑒 ≤4.6 T Serious problem: forward detection region extends beyond figure-8 crossing point Figure-8 crossing point Quad L (m) 𝑩 𝒑−𝒕 (T) 𝝏 𝑩 𝒚 /𝝏𝒙 (T/m) 𝑹 (cm) 𝜽 (mrad) iQDS1a/b 2.11 4.6 −33.5 13.7 11.7 iQDS2 8.44 17.1 26.9 12.7 iQDS3 4.22 −16.3 28.2 10.7 January 10, 2019 JLEIC Accelerator R&D Meeting

200 GeV/c Downstream IR Design with 4.6 T Pole-Tip Fields (IR v3) Quadrupole doublet instead of a triplet Constraints 𝛽 𝑥,𝑦 𝑚𝑎𝑥 ≤4200 m  𝛽 𝑥,𝑦 ∗ =19.6/1.6 cm  𝐿 𝐿 0 =0.48 Secondary focus in both planes Quadrupole aperture: 𝜃≥10 mrad Equal quadrupole lengths Quadrupole length adjustment: 𝐵 𝑝𝑜𝑙𝑒−𝑡𝑖𝑝 ≤4.6 T 𝐵 𝑑𝑖𝑝𝑜𝑙𝑒2 ≤4.6 T, 𝐵 𝑑𝑖𝑝𝑜𝑙𝑒3 ≤6 T Quad L (m) 𝑩 𝒑−𝒕 (T) 𝝏 𝑩 𝒚 /𝝏𝒙 (T/m) 𝑹 (cm) 𝜽 (mrad) iQDS1a/b 2.23 4.6 −37.5 12.3 10.3 iQDS2 4.45 26.4 17.5 10.0 January 10, 2019 JLEIC Accelerator R&D Meeting

200 GeV/c Upstream IR Design with 4.6 T Pole-Tip Fields (IR v3) Doublet instead of a triplet Constraints 𝛽 𝑥,𝑦 ∗ =19.6/1.6 cm Quadrupole aperture: 4 cm radius Quadrupole length adjustment: 𝐵 𝑝𝑜𝑙𝑒−𝑡𝑖𝑝 ≤4.6 T Quad L (m) 𝑩 𝒑−𝒕 (T) 𝝏 𝑩 𝒚 /𝝏𝒙 (T/m) 𝑹 (cm) iQUS1 2.86 4.6 −115 4 iQUS2 2.04 115 January 10, 2019 JLEIC Accelerator R&D Meeting

Complete 200 GeV/c IR Design (IR v3) January 10, 2019 JLEIC Accelerator R&D Meeting

Optimization for Operation at up to 100 GeV (IR v4) 𝛽 𝑥 𝑚𝑎𝑥 is limited by the DA, 𝛽 𝑦 𝑚𝑎𝑥 is limited by HG effect Constraints 𝛽 𝑥,𝑦 𝑚𝑎𝑥 ≤4200 m  𝛽 𝑥,𝑦 ∗ =8.0/1.3 cm  𝑳 𝑳 𝟎 =𝟎.𝟖𝟑 up to 100 GeV Secondary focus in both planes Quadrupole aperture: 𝜃≥10 mrad Varied lengths of the first two quads Quadrupole length adjustment: 𝐵 𝑝𝑜𝑙𝑒−𝑡𝑖𝑝 ≤4.6 T at 100 GeV/c 𝐵 𝑑𝑖𝑝𝑜𝑙𝑒2 ≤4.6 T, 𝐵 𝑑𝑖𝑝𝑜𝑙𝑒3 ≤6 T at 200 GeV/c Quad L (m) 𝑩 𝒑−𝒕 (T) 𝝏 𝑩 𝒚 /𝝏𝒙 (T/m) 𝑹 (cm) 𝜽 (mrad) iQDS1a 2.21 4.6 −49.7 9.3 10.1 iQDS1b 2.27 38.4 12.0 10.0 January 10, 2019 JLEIC Accelerator R&D Meeting

Optimization for Operation at up to 100 GeV (IR v5) Adjusting quad length/aperture does not help to increase 𝐿, reached thin-lens limit, must adjust 𝛽 ∗ Approximation used to obtain 𝛽 𝑥 𝑚𝑎𝑥 = 𝛽 𝑦 𝑚𝑎𝑥 of 4.2 km is not very accurate because triplet is not a thin lens. Constraints 𝑳 𝑳 𝟎 =𝟏.𝟎 up to 100 GeV  𝜷 𝒙 𝒎𝒂𝒙 = 𝜷 𝒚 𝒎𝒂𝒙 ≤𝟓𝟎𝟖𝟓 m  𝛽 𝑥,𝑦 ∗ =6.6/1.1 cm (ratio is fixed for a doublet) Secondary focus in both planes 𝐵 𝑝𝑜𝑙𝑒−𝑡𝑖𝑝 ≤4.6 T at 100 GeV/c 𝐵 𝑑𝑖𝑝𝑜𝑙𝑒2 ≤4.6 T, 𝐵 𝑑𝑖𝑝𝑜𝑙𝑒3 ≤6 T at 200 GeV/c Quad L (m) 𝑩 𝒑−𝒕 (T) 𝝏 𝑩 𝒚 /𝝏𝒙 (T/m) 𝑹 (cm) 𝜽 (mrad) iQDS1a 2.21 4.6 −49.7 9.3 10.1 iQDS1b 2.27 38.4 12.0 10.0 January 10, 2019 JLEIC Accelerator R&D Meeting

200 GeV/c IR Design with 4.6 T Pole-Tip Fields (IR v6) Constraints 𝜷 𝒙,𝒚 𝒎𝒂𝒙 ≤𝟒.𝟐 km  𝛽 𝑥,𝑦 ∗ =15.2/1.5 cm  𝑳 𝑳 𝟎 =𝟎.𝟓𝟕 Secondary focus in both planes Quadrupole aperture: 𝜽≥𝟖 mrad Equal quadrupole lengths Quadrupole length adjustment: 𝐵 𝑝𝑜𝑙𝑒−𝑡𝑖𝑝 ≤4.6 T 𝐵 𝑑𝑖𝑝𝑜𝑙𝑒2 ≤4.6 T, 𝐵 𝑑𝑖𝑝𝑜𝑙𝑒3 ≤6 T Quad L (m) 𝑩 𝒑−𝒕 (T) 𝝏 𝑩 𝒚 /𝝏𝒙 (T/m) 𝑹 (cm) 𝜽 (mrad) iQDS1a/b 1.74 4.6 −51.4 9.0 8.2 iQDS2 3.49 37.1 12.4 8.0 January 10, 2019 JLEIC Accelerator R&D Meeting

200 GeV/c IR Design with 4.6 T Pole-Tip Fields (IR v7) Constraints 𝜷 𝒙,𝒚 𝒎𝒂𝒙 ≤𝟓 km  𝛽 𝑥,𝑦 ∗ =12.8/1.2 cm  𝑳 𝑳 𝟎 =𝟎.𝟔𝟕 Secondary focus in both planes Quadrupole aperture: 𝜽≥𝟖 mrad Equal quadrupole lengths Quadrupole length adjustment: 𝐵 𝑝𝑜𝑙𝑒−𝑡𝑖𝑝 ≤4.6 T 𝐵 𝑑𝑖𝑝𝑜𝑙𝑒2 ≤4.6 T, 𝐵 𝑑𝑖𝑝𝑜𝑙𝑒3 ≤6 T Quad L (m) 𝑩 𝒑−𝒕 (T) 𝝏 𝑩 𝒚 /𝝏𝒙 (T/m) 𝑹 (cm) 𝜽 (mrad) iQDS1a/b 1.74 4.6 −51.4 9.0 8.2 iQDS2 3.49 37.1 12.4 8.0 January 10, 2019 JLEIC Accelerator R&D Meeting

200 GeV/c IR Design with 4.6 T Pole-Tip Fields (IR v8) To take advantage of the smaller 𝑦 emittance must flip polarities of the quads in the doublet, otherwise run into HG problem. Crab voltage 𝑉 𝑐𝑟𝑎𝑏 ∝ 1 𝛽 𝑥 𝑐𝑟𝑎𝑏 𝛽 𝑥 ∗ Constraints 𝜷 𝒙 𝒎𝒂𝒙 ≤𝟓 km, 𝜷 𝒚 𝒎𝒂𝒙 ≤𝟏𝟎 km,  𝛽 𝑥,𝑦 ∗ =1.3/8.2 cm  𝑳 𝑳 𝟎 =𝟎.𝟖𝟏 Secondary focus in both planes Quadrupole aperture: 𝜽≥𝟏𝟎 mrad Equal quadrupole lengths Quadrupole length adjustment: 𝐵 𝑝𝑜𝑙𝑒−𝑡𝑖𝑝 ≤4.6 T 𝐵 𝑑𝑖𝑝𝑜𝑙𝑒2 ≤4.6 T, 𝐵 𝑑𝑖𝑝𝑜𝑙𝑒3 ≤6 T Quad L (m) 𝑩 𝒑−𝒕 (T) 𝝏 𝑩 𝒚 /𝝏𝒙 (T/m) 𝑹 (cm) 𝜽 (mrad) iQDS1a/b 2.21 4.6 37.8 12.2 10.2 iQDS2 4.43 −26.5 17.4 10.0 January 10, 2019 JLEIC Accelerator R&D Meeting

JLEIC Accelerator R&D Meeting Summary Version # of quads L (m) 𝑩 𝒑−𝒕 (T) 𝝏 𝑩 𝒚 /𝝏𝒙 (T/m) 𝑹 (cm) 𝜽 (mrad) 𝜷 𝒙,𝒚 𝒎𝒂𝒙 (m) 𝑳/ 𝑳 𝟎 1 3 2.4/4.8/2.4 6 − 70.4 39.4 /−30.7 8.5/13.8/16.9 9.1 2,500 1.15 / 0.72 (65/200 GeV) 2 4.22/8.44/4.22 4.6 − 33.5 17.1 /−16.3 13.7/26.9/28.2 10.7 4,200 0.48 (200 GeV) 4.45/4.45 −37.5/26.4 12.3/17.5 10.0 4 (2.21,2.27)/4.45 −49.7/38.4 9.3/12.0 0.83 (100 GeV) 5 5,100 1.0/0.58 (100/200 GeV) 3.49/3.49 −51.4/37.1 9.0/12.4 8.0 0.57 (200 GeV) 7 5,000 0.67 (200 GeV) 8 4.43/4.43 37.8/−26.5 12.2/17.4 5,000/10,000 0.81 (200 GeV) January 10, 2019 JLEIC Accelerator R&D Meeting