Satellite and Model Validation

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
UMD IT Planning April 2, IT Planning Council Wiki 2. Mission statement 3. IT Planning Council Update – Vision statement 4. Review of the UMD Strategic.
Advertisements

Collaboration, Coordination and Cooperation for Action Jacqueline N. Epping State Orientation Meeting 2008.
COMP8130 and 4130Adrian Marshall 8130 and 4130 VALIDATION & VERIFICATION PROCESSES OUTLINE Adrian Marshall.
1 SWE Introduction to Software Engineering Lecture 11 - Requirements Engineering Processes.
WGClimate Work Plan for John Bates, Chair WGClimate 4th Working Group on Climate Meeting.
Adding metadata to web pages Please note: this is a temporary test document for use in internal testing only.
S/W Project Management
©Ian Sommerville 2000 Software Engineering, 6th edition. Chapter 6 Slide 1 Requirements Engineering Processes l Processes used to discover, analyse and.
<Idea Title> Students : XXX, YYY (University)
1 Breakout Notes Session 3 Group 2 – (Global/Broad Scale/Regional) Integrated assessment models (socio-economic/biophysical) in relationship to land cover.
Process Assessment Method
Lunch & Learn – PMO April 2014 Summary April 1 st April – 30 th June 2014.
ACIAR project planning workshop - Hyderabad Introduction to workshop and scoping study Christian Roth 10 th February 2009 Climate Adaptation Flagship.
1 Identify Preferred Alternative and Finalize Plan Planning Steps 7 & 8.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Methodology and Responsibilities for Periodic Safety Review for Research Reactors William Kennedy Research Reactor.
NAPA Experiences First thoughts for the ECBI Workshop Naivasha, September 2006 Balgis Osman Elasha Tom Downing.
Requirements Engineering Process
Working Group 2 Climate information transfer to stakeholders Roma, 9 July 2013
CLIM-RUN Project ( ) aims at developing a protocol for applying new methodologies and improved modeling and downscaling tools for the provision.
Module 2: Safe Hospital Assessment Training on Safe Hospitals in Disasters.
An Agile Requirements Approach 1. Step 1: Get Organized  Meet with your team and agree on the basic software processes you will employ.  Decide how.
PARS This form is used for self appraisal after goal setting is approved FOR ALL USERS.
 The processes used for RE vary widely depending on the application domain, the people involved and the organisation developing the requirements.  However,
TGDC Meeting, Jan 2011 VVSG 2.0 and Beyond: Usability and Accessibility Issues, Gaps, and Performance Tests Sharon Laskowski, PhD National Institute of.
Department of Defense Voluntary Protection Programs Center of Excellence Development, Validation, Implementation and Enhancement for a Voluntary Protection.
Scientific, technical and socio-economic aspects of impacts of, and vulnerability and adaptation to, climate change SBSTA in-session workshop on Scientific,
1 Programmatic and M&E Risk Identification, Management, and Mitigation LFA M&E Training February 2014.
Capacity Assessment of Implementers February 2014.
There are three main screens, plus the summary page. The next three pages show each screen with instructions below. A symbol ( ) will appear on the picture.
1 Beyond Science and Decisions: From Problem Formulation to Dose-Response - Framework.
Understanding Standards: Nominee Event Practical Craft Skills
Short Contribution Title Goes Here
Gaps assessment in GAIA-CLIM
It’s All About the Data, Folks!
TIM 58 Chapter 3, continued: Requirements Determination Ch
Community Session - Next-Generation gTLD Registration Directory Service (RDS) to replace WHOIS
Converting Research Topics into Research Proposals
Evaluating Existing Systems
GAIA-CLIM project The GAIA-CLIM project ( )
Evaluating Existing Systems
(Additional materials)
AXIS critical Appraisal of cross sectional Studies
Change Control Module P5 LEARNING OBJECTIVES: LEARNING OUTCOMES
IBR Documentation Review
Version 0.1Assessment Method Overview - 1 Process Assessment Method An objective model-independent method to assess the capability of an organization to.
Summary (breakout session name) Science Opportunity #1
Principle 3: Develop DM Processes to Fit the Context and Business Environment in Which They Will Be Performed Learning Objectives: Understand how DM can.
DG Environment, Unit D.2 Marine Environment and Water Industry
CLINICAL INFORMATION SYSTEM
Short Contribution Title Goes Here
Linkage with recent AC-VC activities
Project Title 2018 UCSF Health Improvement Symposium Name
Succession/Replacement Planning
GAIA-CLIM Peter Thorne / Joerg Schulz 8/3/18
Online Catalogue of Gaps
Instrument PDR Summary of Objectives
Note: Text displayed in blue italics is included to provide guidance to the author and should be deleted or hidden before publishing the document.
Short Contribution Title on Advanced Method/Instrument
Two main areas identified
PREPARATION – DELETE BEFORE MEETING
Feasibility study and proposed solutions
European Commission, DG Environment Air & Industrial Emissions Unit
Introduction to Course Accessibility
Project Manager, EA, the REC
“Water Science meets Policy” Event - 30th September – Brussels
The Foundation of Capability:
Site (e.g., LARC Embakasi)
Project Manager, EA, the REC
PREPARATION – DELETE BEFORE MEETING
Concept Development Template
Presentation transcript:

Satellite and Model Validation GAID Breakout session 1 Please choose your breakout group from the three below (and delete the other names) Climate Research Climate Services Satellite and Model Validation

List of Questions Session 1 What is your perception of the bottom-up process of Gap Identification in GAIA-CLIM: Strengths / Weaknesses etc. How usefulness is the gap assessment process to users? Can we maybe improve? Do you agree that the current 88 gaps in the catalogue are actually gaps? (see the gap catalogue provided) Do you miss gaps or e.g. important elements in the current gaps? Would you like to see another structure of the document/ other cross sections / further analysis of the gaps / interactive tools for the on-line catalogue? Other points raised

What is your perception of the bottom-up process of Gap Identification in GAIA-CLIM: Strengths / Weaknesses etc. Enter in bullet points the key elements of your discussions …

2. How usefulness is the gap assessment process to users 2. How usefulness is the gap assessment process to users? Can we maybe improve? Enter in bullet points the key elements of your discussions …

3. Do you agree that the current 88 gaps in the catalogue are actually gaps? (see the gap catalogue provided) Enter in bullet points the key elements of your discussions …

4. Do you miss gaps or e.g. important elements in the current gaps? Enter in bullet points the key elements of your discussions …

5. Would you like to see another structure of the document/ other cross sections / further analysis of the gaps / interactive tools for the on-line catalogue? Enter in bullet points the key elements of your discussions …

6. Other points raised Enter in bullet points the key elements of your discussions …

Satellite and Model Validation GAID Breakout session 2 Please choose your breakout group from the three below (and delete the other names) Climate Research Climate Services Satellite and Model Validation

List of Questions Session 2 Which gaps do you specifically encounter when running your application? Are these listed / sufficiently well scoped and formulated? Which gaps have the most impact on your work? What would be needed to remedy? What is the risk for not resolving the gap on short / long term? Can you suggest any additional (future) workprogram / activity to resolve one of the current gaps? Can you assess feasibility and distinguish between amount of effort (costs?) expected? Other points raised w.r.t. prioritization, gap impacts, proposed remedies, costs?

1. Which gaps do you specifically encounter when running your application? Are these listed / sufficiently well scoped and formulated? Enter in bullet points the key elements of your discussions …

2. Which gaps have the most impact on your work 2. Which gaps have the most impact on your work? What would be needed to remedy? What is the risk for not resolving the gap on short / long term? Enter in bullet points the key elements of your discussions …

3. Can you suggest any additional (future) workprogram / activity to resolve one of the current gaps? Can you assess feasibility and distinguish between amount of effort (costs?) expected? Enter in bullet points the key elements of your discussions …

4. Other points raised w. r. t 4. Other points raised w.r.t. prioritization, gap impacts, proposed remedies, costs? Enter in bullet points the key elements of your discussions …