Direct Measurements of Drag Forces in C. elegans Crawling Locomotion

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 105, Issue 8, Pages (October 2013)
Advertisements

James Butler, Narla Mohandas, Richard E. Waugh  Biophysical Journal 
Low Frequency Entrainment of Oscillatory Bursts in Hair Cells
Mapping Three-Dimensional Stress and Strain Fields within a Soft Hydrogel Using a Fluorescence Microscope  Matthew S. Hall, Rong Long, Chung-Yuen Hui,
Volume 107, Issue 4, Pages (August 2014)
Characterizing Cell Adhesion by Using Micropipette Aspiration
Guang-Kui Xu, Xi-Qiao Feng, Huajian Gao  Biophysical Journal 
Bipedal Locomotion in Crawling Cells
Substrate Viscosity Enhances Correlation in Epithelial Sheet Movement
Volume 74, Issue 3, Pages (March 1998)
Differential Dynamics of Platelet Contact and Spreading
One-Dimensional Brownian Motion of Charged Nanoparticles along Microtubules: A Model System for Weak Binding Interactions  Itsushi Minoura, Eisaku Katayama,
Susanne Karsch, Deqing Kong, Jörg Großhans, Andreas Janshoff 
Maxim E. Dokukin, Nataliia V. Guz, Igor Sokolov  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 103, Issue 6, Pages (September 2012)
Apparent Subdiffusion Inherent to Single Particle Tracking
Volume 96, Issue 3, Pages (February 2009)
Worms under Pressure: Bulk Mechanical Properties of C
Anil K. Dasanna, Christine Lansche, Michael Lanzer, Ulrich S. Schwarz 
Volume 98, Issue 11, Pages (June 2010)
Quantitative Analysis and Modeling Probe Polarity Establishment in C
Anne Marie W. Bartosch, Rick Mathews, John M. Tarbell 
Volume 98, Issue 4, Pages (February 2010)
A Programmable Optical Angle Clamp for Rotary Molecular Motors
Anton Arkhipov, Wouter H. Roos, Gijs J.L. Wuite, Klaus Schulten 
Christopher Deufel, Michelle D. Wang  Biophysical Journal 
Traction Forces of Neutrophils Migrating on Compliant Substrates
Michael J. Rosenbluth, Wilbur A. Lam, Daniel A. Fletcher 
A 3-D Model of Ligand Transport in a Deforming Extracellular Space
Modulating Vesicle Adhesion by Electric Fields
Kinetic and Energetic Analysis of Thermally Activated TRPV1 Channels
Adaptive Response of Actin Bundles under Mechanical Stress
Cell Surface Topography Is a Regulator of Molecular Interactions during Chemokine- Induced Neutrophil Spreading  Elena. B. Lomakina, Graham Marsh, Richard E.
Volume 98, Issue 6, Pages (March 2010)
Volume 107, Issue 7, Pages (October 2014)
Confinement-Dependent Friction in Peptide Bundles
Volume 109, Issue 1, Pages (July 2015)
Samuel T. Hess, Watt W. Webb  Biophysical Journal 
Substrate Deformation Predicts Neuronal Growth Cone Advance
Statistics of Active Transport in Xenopus Melanophores Cells
Volume 99, Issue 12, Pages (December 2010)
Focal Adhesion Kinase Stabilizes the Cytoskeleton
In Situ Mechanical Analysis of Myofibrillar Perturbation and Aging on Soft, Bilayered Drosophila Myocardium  Gaurav Kaushik, Alexander Fuhrmann, Anthony.
Volume 101, Issue 4, Pages (August 2011)
Rheological Analysis and Measurement of Neutrophil Indentation
Aligning Paramecium caudatum with Static Magnetic Fields
Leukocyte Rolling on P-Selectin: A Three-Dimensional Numerical Study of the Effect of Cytoplasmic Viscosity  Damir B. Khismatullin, George A. Truskey 
Volume 112, Issue 4, Pages (February 2017)
Benchmarks of Biomembrane Force Probe Spring Constant Models
Dana N. Moses, Michael G. Pontin, J. Herbert Waite, Frank W. Zok 
Robust Driving Forces for Transmembrane Helix Packing
Volume 94, Issue 1, Pages (January 2008)
Volume 97, Issue 7, Pages (October 2009)
Interaction of Oxazole Yellow Dyes with DNA Studied with Hybrid Optical Tweezers and Fluorescence Microscopy  C.U. Murade, V. Subramaniam, C. Otto, Martin.
Bending and Puncturing the Influenza Lipid Envelope
John E. Pickard, Klaus Ley  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 95, Issue 6, Pages (September 2008)
Modeling Endoplasmic Reticulum Network Maintenance in a Plant Cell
Actin-Myosin Viscoelastic Flow in the Keratocyte Lamellipod
Volume 115, Issue 12, Pages (December 2018)
Bekele Gurmessa, Shea Ricketts, Rae M. Robertson-Anderson 
Volume 97, Issue 5, Pages (September 2009)
Single-Molecule Measurement of the Stiffness of the Rigor Myosin Head
Volume 74, Issue 3, Pages (March 1998)
The Role of Network Architecture in Collagen Mechanics
Anil K. Dasanna, Christine Lansche, Michael Lanzer, Ulrich S. Schwarz 
Jérémie Barral, Frank Jülicher, Pascal Martin  Biophysical Journal 
Quantitative Analysis and Modeling Probe Polarity Establishment in C
Volume 110, Issue 12, Pages (June 2016)
Head-Eye Coordination at a Microscopic Scale
Presentation transcript:

Direct Measurements of Drag Forces in C. elegans Crawling Locomotion Yegor Rabets, Matilda Backholm, Kari Dalnoki-Veress, William S. Ryu  Biophysical Journal  Volume 107, Issue 8, Pages 1980-1987 (October 2014) DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2014.09.006 Copyright © 2014 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Experimental setup for direct drag force measurements. (A and C) Suction applied through cantilevered micropipettes is used to hold worms by the tail or by both head and tail for tangential and normal drag, respectively. The vstage points in the direction of stage movement. (B and D) Raw video data of the worm before and after initiating stage translation at a fixed velocity. Displacement Δdt of the pipette tip in panel B and the pipette’s stiffness constant Δkt are used to calculate instantaneous forces during tangential drag. For normal drag in panel D, the resulting force is calculated from tip displacements Δdnl and Δdnr and stiffness constants knl and knr, corresponding to left and right pipettes, respectively. Biophysical Journal 2014 107, 1980-1987DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2014.09.006) Copyright © 2014 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Measurements of tangential and normal drag forces as a function of speed on gels with different agar concentrations. Error bars: SD. (Inset) Ratios of the normal to tangential drag coefficients as a function of drag speed. Biophysical Journal 2014 107, 1980-1987DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2014.09.006) Copyright © 2014 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Characterizing the settling of worms into viscoelastic substrates. (A) Worms leave wider grooves after resting on the surface longer. The left portion of the trace was left behind by a worm left at rest on an agar surface for >1 min. The middle (34-μm wide) portion of the trace was left within several seconds of capturing the image by the worm as it is translated to the right. (B) Anesthetized worms were dragged into the field of view with a micropipette and imaged horizontally. Scale bar: 200 μm. (C) On soft (1.0%) and standard (1.7%) agar gels, worms settle with time constants of several seconds; (shaded areas) SD. (Dashed lines) Fits using the Burger model and τ = η2/E2. (D) Schematic of the viscoelastic model for fits in panel C. Biophysical Journal 2014 107, 1980-1987DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2014.09.006) Copyright © 2014 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Experimental and theoretical estimates of adhesion force acting on crawling nematodes. (A) To measure the adhesion force, worms were aligned so that only the tip of the head contacted the liquid layer, and were slowly pulled off the agar while recording force on the lifting pipette. Scale bar: 50 μm. (B) Schematic cross section of a nematode sliding on a wet deformable surface. (C) Measurements of the depth of the liquid layer forming on an agar gel surface. Error bars: SD. (D) Adhesion force measurements and theoretically estimated values from geometry in panels A and B; error bars represent the uncertainty due to pipette calibration and estimation of angles from images. Biophysical Journal 2014 107, 1980-1987DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2014.09.006) Copyright © 2014 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Quantifying nonlinearities in drag force curves. 1−γ (where γ is the scaling exponent) yields the nonlinearity index for each data series. An index of 0 indicates a purely linear relationship; greater absolute values signify larger deviations from linearity (here, data with shallower slopes are less linear). Positive indices mean that curves are sublinear. 1−γt = {0.45, 0.42, 0.32, 0.23, 0.19} and 1−γn ={0.73, 0.69, 0.70, 0.66, 0.62} for agar concentrations of {1.0, 1.7, 3.0, 4.0, 6.0%}. Note that this is the same data from Fig. 2 but on a log-log scale. Biophysical Journal 2014 107, 1980-1987DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2014.09.006) Copyright © 2014 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 Reconstruction of forces exerted by a nematode during crawling. (A) Schematic of crawl force measurement and definition of speeds vn and vt in the normal (nn) and tangential (nt) coordinate axes, respectively. Worms were held by the tail, at i = 100. (B) Reconstruction of crawling forces from measured force-velocity relationships. (Shaded region) Uncertainty arising from the fits for force-velocity mapping parameters, and from calculating angles and velocities from worm images. Biophysical Journal 2014 107, 1980-1987DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2014.09.006) Copyright © 2014 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions