Erik Martínez-Hackert, Ann M Stock  Structure 

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Crystal Structure of the Tandem Phosphatase Domains of RPTP LAR
Advertisements

Crystal structure of the chemotaxis receptor methyltransferase CheR suggests a conserved structural motif for binding S-adenosylmethionine  Snezana Djordjevic,
Volume 13, Issue 6, Pages (March 2004)
Ross Alexander Robinson, Xin Lu, Edith Yvonne Jones, Christian Siebold 
Herpes Simplex Virus Glycoprotein D Bound to the Human Receptor HveA
Volume 105, Issue 4, Pages (May 2001)
Volume 8, Issue 3, Pages (March 2000)
Volume 9, Issue 5, Pages (May 2001)
Volume 3, Issue 9, Pages (September 1995)
Volume 5, Issue 1, Pages (January 1997)
Volume 124, Issue 2, Pages (January 2006)
Debanu Das, Millie M Georgiadis  Structure 
Volume 23, Issue 1, Pages (July 2006)
Molecular Basis of Box C/D RNA-Protein Interactions
Tom Huxford, De-Bin Huang, Shiva Malek, Gourisankar Ghosh  Cell 
Volume 8, Issue 2, Pages (August 2001)
UG Wagner, M Hasslacher, H Griengl, H Schwab, C Kratky  Structure 
Volume 6, Issue 6, Pages (December 2000)
Volume 15, Issue 1, Pages (January 2007)
Volume 12, Issue 5, Pages (May 2004)
Catalytic Center Assembly of HPPK as Revealed by the Crystal Structure of a Ternary Complex at 1.25 Å Resolution  Jaroslaw Blaszczyk, Genbin Shi, Honggao.
Chi-Hon Lee, Kalle Saksela, Urooj A Mirza, Brian T Chait, John Kuriyan 
A biosynthetic thiolase in complex with a reaction intermediate: the crystal structure provides new insights into the catalytic mechanism  Yorgo Modis,
David R Buckler, Yuchen Zhou, Ann M Stock  Structure 
Volume 6, Issue 12, Pages (December 1998)
Crystal Structure of an Inactive Akt2 Kinase Domain
Volume 11, Issue 5, Pages (May 2003)
Crystal Structure of PMM/PGM
Ross Alexander Robinson, Xin Lu, Edith Yvonne Jones, Christian Siebold 
N Khazanovich, KS Bateman, M Chernaia, M Michalak, MNG James  Structure 
Volume 4, Issue 5, Pages (November 1999)
Volume 5, Issue 3, Pages (March 2000)
Volume 11, Issue 2, Pages (August 1999)
Moosa Mohammadi, Joseph Schlessinger, Stevan R Hubbard  Cell 
Andrew H. Huber, W.James Nelson, William I. Weis  Cell 
Structure of the Catalytic Domain of Human DOT1L, a Non-SET Domain Nucleosomal Histone Methyltransferase  Jinrong Min, Qin Feng, Zhizhong Li, Yi Zhang,
Edith Schlagenhauf, Robert Etges, Peter Metcalf  Structure 
Crystal structure of the ternary complex of 1,3,8-trihydroxynaphthalene reductase from Magnaporthe grisea with NADPH and an active-site inhibitor  Arnold.
Crystallographic Analysis of the Recognition of a Nuclear Localization Signal by the Nuclear Import Factor Karyopherin α  Elena Conti, Marc Uy, Lore Leighton,
Yi Mo, Benjamin Vaessen, Karen Johnston, Ronen Marmorstein 
Volume 6, Issue 6, Pages (December 2000)
Volume 8, Issue 5, Pages (November 2001)
Volume 8, Issue 11, Pages (November 2000)
Volume 9, Issue 12, Pages (December 2001)
Francis K Athappilly, Wayne A Hendrickson  Structure 
Silvia Onesti, Andrew D Miller, Peter Brick  Structure 
Volume 4, Issue 5, Pages (May 1996)
Tertiary Structure of Destrin and Structural Similarity between Two Actin-Regulating Protein Families  H Hatanaka, K Ogura, K Moriyama, S Ichikawa, I.
Jeffrey J. Wilson, Rhett A. Kovall  Cell 
Volume 85, Issue 5, Pages (May 1996)
Solution Structure of a TBP–TAFII230 Complex
Structure of the Staphylococcus aureus AgrA LytTR Domain Bound to DNA Reveals a Beta Fold with an Unusual Mode of Binding  David J. Sidote, Christopher.
Volume 14, Issue 6, Pages (June 2006)
Crystal structures of reduced, oxidized, and mutated human thioredoxins: evidence for a regulatory homodimer  Andrzej Weichsel, John R Gasdaska, Garth.
Structure of a water soluble fragment of the ‘Rieske’ iron–sulfur protein of the bovine heart mitochondrial cytochrome bc1 complex determined by MAD phasing.
The structure of ribosomal protein S7 at 1
Volume 5, Issue 10, Pages (October 1997)
The Crystal Structure of an Unusual Processivity Factor, Herpes Simplex Virus UL42, Bound to the C Terminus of Its Cognate Polymerase  Harmon J Zuccola,
Hideki Kusunoki, Ruby I MacDonald, Alfonso Mondragón  Structure 
Volume 5, Issue 9, Pages (September 1997)
Luc Bousset, Hassan Belrhali, Joël Janin, Ronald Melki, Solange Morera 
Structure of an IκBα/NF-κB Complex
Structure of the Histone Acetyltransferase Hat1
Volume 7, Issue 12, Pages (January 1999)
Rachelle Gaudet, Andrew Bohm, Paul B Sigler  Cell 
Brett K. Kaiser, Matthew C. Clifton, Betty W. Shen, Barry L. Stoddard 
The Crystal Structure of an Unusual Processivity Factor, Herpes Simplex Virus UL42, Bound to the C Terminus of Its Cognate Polymerase  Harmon J Zuccola,
Crystal Structure of Escherichia coli RNase D, an Exoribonuclease Involved in Structured RNA Processing  Yuhong Zuo, Yong Wang, Arun Malhotra  Structure 
Volume 13, Issue 6, Pages (March 2004)
Volume 8, Issue 11, Pages (November 2000)
Presentation transcript:

The DNA-binding domain of OmpR: crystal structures of a winged helix transcription factor  Erik Martínez-Hackert, Ann M Stock  Structure  Volume 5, Issue 1, Pages 109-124 (January 1997) DOI: 10.1016/S0969-2126(97)00170-6

Figure 1 Stereoview showing a region of the final 1.95 Å ∣2Fo∣–∣Fc∣ electron-density map, contoured at 1 σ. Amino acid residues 151–153 of the refined model are superimposed. (Figure generated with MOLSCRIPT [70].) Structure 1997 5, 109-124DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(97)00170-6)

Figure 2 Stereoview showing the overall fold of OmpRc. (a) A Cα tracing of OmpRc. The N and C termini and every twentieth residue are labeled; Cα positions are marked by open circles. (b) A ribbon diagram of OmpRc in the same orientation as (a). Secondary structure elements and biologically relevant elements are labeled. (Figure generated with MOLSCRIPT [70].) Structure 1997 5, 109-124DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(97)00170-6)

Figure 3 Schematic representation of the secondary structure of OmpRc. Residues in β strands are enclosed in rectangular boxes and residues in α helices are encircled by ovals. Hydrogen bonds for mainchain atoms are represented by arrows from the hydrogen-bond donor to the acceptor and arrowheads mark hydrogen bonds involving loop residues. (Figure generated with PROMOTIF [71].) Structure 1997 5, 109-124DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(97)00170-6)

Figure 4 Stereoview of the helix-HTH-wing motifs of the biotin repressor BirA and hepatocyte nuclear factor HNF3-γ superimposed on the structure of OmpRc. A ribbon diagram of OmpRc is displayed in blue and cyan. (a) Superposition of OmpRc with the BirA DNA-binding domain [30]; the BirA domain is shown in red. The relative positions of the three helices and the C-terminal β hairpin are very similar, while the conformations of the loops preceding and following the recognition helix are dissimilar. The OmpRc loops are significantly larger than the respective loops found in other bacterial transcription factors. (b) Superposition of OmpRc with the HNF3-γ DNA-binding domain [31]; the HNF3-γ domain is shown in red. The simulataneous superposition of the three helices leaves little doubt of the more distant relationship between OmpRc and the HNF3-γ/histone H5 family of winged HTH proteins. (Figure generated with RIBBONS [72]; the structures were aligned using DALI [29] and SUPERPOSE [63].) Structure 1997 5, 109-124DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(97)00170-6)

Figure 5 Stereoview showing residues corresponding to mutation sites in OmpRc that affect transcriptional activation and DNA binding. The wild type amino acid sidechains are shown, with carbon atoms colored green, oxygen atoms red, nitrogen atoms blue and sulfur atoms yellow. (a) OmpR mutations Pro179→Leu, Ser181→Pro, Gly191→Ser, Glu193→Lys, Ala196→Val and Glu198→Lys fail to activate transcription. These mutant proteins are thought to lack the ability to interact with the α subunit of RNA polymerase. The α loop is highlighted in pink. (b) OmpR mutations Arg150→Ser, Thr162→Ile, Lys170→Glu, Arg182→Leu, Ser200→Phe, Val203→Met, Met211→Val, Val212→Ala, Arg220→Cys, Thr224→Ile and Gly229→Ser fail to bind DNA. The recognition helix, the C-terminal β hairpin and the W1 loop are highlighted in orange (for references see Table 1). (Figure generated using MOLSCRIPT [70].) Structure 1997 5, 109-124DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(97)00170-6)

Figure 6 Three views of the electrostatic surface potential of OmpRc. Red indicates a negatively charged region, blue indicates a positively charged region and white indicates a neutral or hydrophobic region. (a) The molecule is oriented similarly to Figure 5b, displaying the positive electrostatic surface potential of the DNA-binding surface. (b) The molecule is oriented similarly to Figure 5a. The α loop surface, that may interact with the α subunit of RNA polymerase, is rather neutral or hydrophobic. (c) This remarkable, negatively charged face of the protein lies at the C-terminal end of the recognition helix. (Figure produced using GRASP [73].) Structure 1997 5, 109-124DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(97)00170-6)

Figure 7 Sequence alignment of the DNA-binding domains of OmpR and several family members. The sequences of E. coli OmpR [74], Agrobacterium tumefaciens VirG [75], E. coli PhoB [76], Enterococcus faecium VanR [77] and Vibrio cholerae ToxR [78] DNA-binding domains are shown. The amino acid positions are indicated by the numbers in parentheses and a schematic diagram of the secondary structure of OmpRc is indicated above. Residues corresponding to the hydrophobic core of OmpRc are shaded, and positions of mutations that affect DNA binding of OmpR are indicated by asterisks above the OmpRc sequence. Structure 1997 5, 109-124DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(97)00170-6)

Figure 8 OmpR DNA recognition. (a) OmpR-binding sequences. The sequences of OmpR-binding sites located upstream of the ompF and ompC genes, designated F1–F4 and C1, are aligned with a dash separating the tandem ten base pair recognition sequences that comprise the twenty base pair site bound by two OmpR molecules. Strictly conserved bases are boxed. A mutated fragment studied by Pratt and Silhavy is aligned below [14]. The base pair substitutions that affected DNA binding and the number of mutations isolated at each site are indicated. At the bottom, is an alignment of the conserved sequences isolated by Harlocker et al. in an OmpR binding selection from a pool of oligonucleotides in which the bases shown in bold had been randomized [13]. (b) Correlation between residues in OmpRc and CAP. The amino acid sequences of the DNA-binding motifs of OmpRc and CAP are aligned according to the superposition of the tertiary structures as output by the program DALI [29]. The larger loop regions of OmpRc necessitate the insertion of gaps within the CAP sequence; residues that were not aligned by DALI are indicated in parentheses. The amino acid positions in OmpRc and CAP are indicated by numbers at the ends of the sequences and the secondary structure elements of OmpRc are diagrammed above. Asterisks above the OmpRc sequence mark positions at which mutations affect DNA binding and crosses below the CAP sequence indicate residues that are observed to directly interact with DNA in the crystal structure [36,37]. Structure 1997 5, 109-124DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(97)00170-6)

Figure 9 Stereoview superposition of the DNA-binding domains of the response regulators NarL and OmpRc. The three α helices of OmpRc were aligned with helices α7, α8 and α9 of the DNA-binding domain of NarL [57] using the program SUPERPOSE [63]. Residues 143–154, corresponding to the linker region of NarL, were not visible in the electron-density map and are not displayed. When the C-terminal DNA-binding domains of OmpRc and NarL (shown in blue and red, respectively) are aligned in this manner, the N-terminal regulatory domain of NarL (shown in yellow and orange) collides with the C-terminal β hairpin of OmpRc. The arrangement of the N-terminal domains, with respect to the recognition helices, must differ in the two families. (The figure was generated with RIBBONS [72].) Structure 1997 5, 109-124DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(97)00170-6)