Adjustment of the 3 reference tables at building 180 AT960 measurement

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Micro-triangulation for high accuracy short range measurements of dynamic objects Vasileios Vlachakis 1 st PACMAN Workshop February 2015 CERN, Geneva,
Advertisements

Manipulator Dynamics Amirkabir University of Technology Computer Engineering & Information Technology Department.
Standardized Test Practice EXAMPLE 2 SOLUTION Plot points P, Q, R, and S on a coordinate plane. Point P is located in Quadrant IV. Point Q is located in.
Use of a commercial laser tracker for optical alignment James H. Burge, Peng Su, Chunyu Zhao, Tom Zobrist College of Optical Sciences Steward Observatory.
Introduction What is this ? What is this ? This project is a part of a scientific research in machine learning, whose objective is to develop a system,
Creating Solid Models Parametric Modeling Concept
1/9 Hélène Mainaud Durand Sylvain GRIFFET, 28/11/2011 BE/ABP-SU/ Adjustment of 4 Drive Beam Quads positions on TM0 CLIC girders EDMS Document No
Measurement report of Boostec girders Control after receipt Sylvain GRIFFET, 13/12/2010 Measurements performed on the 1 st and 2 nd of December 2010 with.
Surveying I. Lecture 13. Tacheometry.
Theory of Machines Lecture 4 Position Analysis.
Measurement report of Boostec girders 1/13 Sylvain GRIFFET, 15/11/2010 Measurements performed on the 28th of October 2010 with the Laser Tracker LTD500.
H. MAINAUD DURAND, on behalf of the CLIC active pre-alignment team MDI alignment plans IWLC2010 International Workshop on Linear Colliders 2010.
Measurements and DB meeting 1 December, 2005, Elena Wildner AT/MAS 1 AC/GEO mole measurements Based on outcome from meeting 24/ and Installation.
1/12 Sylvain GRIFFET, 17/10/2011 BE/ABP-SU/ Simulations of laser tracker AT401 measurements on TM0 CLIC girders EDMS Document No
Drilling a Double Cosine-Theta Coil Hunter Blanton, Spencer L. Kirn, Christopher Crawford University of Kentucky Abstract: A double cosine theta coil is.
BEPCII Prealignment Installation Survey and Alignment Accelerator Center of IHEP Xiaolong Wang
Vertices, Edges and Faces By Jordan Diamond. Vertices In geometry, a vertices is a special kind of point which describes the corners or intersections.
ILC Main Linac Alignment Simulations John Dale 2009 Linear Collider Workshop of the Americas.
Survey, Alignment and Metrology Fiducials Requirements Fabien Rey ESS Survey, Alignment and Metrology Group ACCELERATOR TECHNICAL BOARD 23/09/2015.
Survey, Alignment and Metrology Fabien Rey Pawel Garsztka ESS Survey, Alignment and Metrology Group.
4.1 – 4.3 Review. Sketch a graph of the quadratic. y = -(x + 3) Find: Vertex (-3, 5) Axis of symmetry x = -3 y - intercept (0, -4) x - intercepts.
First Collision of BEPCII C.H. Yu May 10, Methods of collision tuning Procedures and data analysis Luminosity and background Summary.
Forward Analysis Problem Statement: given: constant mechanism parameters for example, for a 6R manipulator – link lengths a 12 through a 56 twist.
Saw Tooth Pattern Dipole Axis Measurements. Vertical Plane Natalia Emelianenko February 2006.
Warm Up. True or False? 1.A reflection preserves angle measure. 2.A reflection preserves segment length. 3.A reflection preserves orientation. False True.
The Coordinate Plane. We have worked with both horizontal and vertical number line s Horizontal
Survey for SPL Dominique Missiaen BE-ABP/SU. Outline 12/11/2008 Dominique Missiaen BE-ABP-SU, Survey for SPL 2  Scope & Main Parameters  Technical Description.
INTRO TO CONIC SECTIONS. IT ALL DEPENDS ON HOW YOU SLICE IT! Start with a cone:
Precalculus Functions & Graphs Notes 2.5A Graphs of Functions TerminologyDefinitionIllustration Type of Symmetry of Graph f is an even function f(-x) =
CEA - Irfu – Mois 2011 – 1 Cavity-string alignment experience in the EXFEL prototype cryomodule assembly Michel Fontaine CEA – SACLAY DSM/IRFU/SIS TTC.
Interference of Light Ø It is generally He-Ne type that generates stable coherent light beam of two frequencies. one polarized vertically and another.
Installation of the waveguides between MB T0#2 and DB T0#2
Distance Reductions.
David Urner Oxford University/JAI
Application and Research on the 3-D adjustment of control network in particle accelerator Luo Tao
Recent developments on micro-triangulation
Workshop on Tau-Charm at High Luminosity
Workshop 3.1 Sketching DesignModeler.
Graphing in Calculator
Stages for the SSW translation system for PACMAN
Introduction to Coordinate Grid
Detail Surveys, Tacheometry, Total Stations
Analysis Test Beam Pixel TPC
Section 1.1 The Distance and Midpoint Formulas; Graphing Utilities; Introduction to Graphing Equations.
Plane table surveying with contouring
Direct Manipulator Kinematics
Towards a common mechanical interface
Graphing Ordered Pairs
Contacts for underside connectors
Click the mouse or press the spacebar to continue.
The Storage Ring Control Network of NSLS-II
Chapter 2: Representing Motion
Section 3.1 – Vectors in Component Form
Chapter 2 Parametric Modeling Fundamentals
In this chapter, you will learn the following:
7.4 Translations and vectors
Introduction to Motion
Introduction Graphing in all four quadrants of a coordinate plane
Comparing Laser Fit to Barrel Fit University of Wisconsin-Madison
Plotting Points Guided Notes
1.5: Velocity-time graphs
Spatial Data Entry via Digitizing
Introduction to Functions
4/28/2019 Drawing in AutoCAD.
Surveying I. Lecture 13. Tacheometry.
Miniature Train Project
11.3 Coordinate Plane Math 1.
The COORDINATE PLANE The COORDINATE PLANE is a plane that is divided into four regions (called quadrants) by a horizontal line called the x-axis and a.
Simplified Procedure Draft
Presentation transcript:

Adjustment of the 3 reference tables at building 180 AT960 measurement EDMS : 2160177 Adjustment of the 3 reference tables at building 180 AT960 measurement Measurement : 2019-05-15 The goal of these measurements is the levelling of the 3 reference tables which will support the cold mass in building 180. The measurement was done the 15th May 2019.

INTRODUCTION

Synoptic (building 180) 3 reference tables Network of reference points The picture below shows : the different fiducials of the 180 network The 3 reference tables which must be levelled 3 reference tables Network of reference points

Coordinate systems (for information) Different coordinate systems have been used during the measurement and for the report. R-instrument (AT960 gravity) This coordinate system is the coordinate system of the instrument. It’s linked to the gravity (Z axis). The orientation of axis X and Y are dependent on the zero of the horizontal circle of the instrument. R-building 180 This coordinate system has been created for this report. The primary axis is defined by the gravity defined by the AT960. The secondary axis is determined by 2 points of the network (p1, p4). The origin is p1. X (mm) Y (mm) Z (mm) Primary Axis : Z : AT960 gravity Secondary axis : Y : p1  p4 X (radial) : cross-product Origine : p1 R-180

During this measurement, there is no old data A priori data During this measurement, there is no old data

AT 960 measurements The measurement took place on 15th May 2019. Vivien RUDE (VR) and Leonard Watrelot (LW) conducted these measurements. Vivien Rude analysed the data.

AT960 measurement (details) 1 offset support Detail of the measurements Day of measurement : 15 May 2019 Place : 180/R-V33 Operator : VR, LW Material 1 Laser Tracker Leica AT960 +accessories (borrowed by Michel Parent) 1 CCR PLX 1.5 inches 1 offset support (3 mm in radial, 25 mm in vertical) 1 portable metrology tripod (Carbon) 1 computer with Spatial Analyser software Measurement mode Static mode (1 circle, 0.5 sec) for the reference points Dynamic mode for the levelling of the reference tables Prism constants No prism constants have been used A priori precision of the measurements A 4h warming-up of the laser tracker has be done. Dynamic measurement (empirical value) Angles : 1.25 arc second = 6.1 microradians = 3.5 cc Distances : 0.015 mm +/- 1.5 ppm Fast measurement  1 circle and 0.5 sec (empirical value) Angles : 1 arc second = 4.8 microradians = 2.8 cc Distances : 0.015 mm +/- 1 ppm Precise measurement  2 circles and 5 sec (empirical value) Angles : 0.75 arc second = 3.6 microradians = 2.1 cc Distances : 0.008 mm +/- 1 ppm Closing point ST 1 : 14 µm (at 2.8 m) Temperature [22.5°C – 23 °C]

AT960 measurement Station AT960 Support 3 Support 2 Support 1 AT960 The sketch below (print screen from the Spatial Analyser) indicates the position of the instrument during these measurements. Support 3 Support 2 Support 1 AT960 Support 3 Support 2 Support 1

AT960 measurement Reference table On each support, the levelling will be done on the inner ring of the support (Blue area on the below picture). An offset support has been used.

AT960 measurement Precision (R-180) X (mm) Y (mm) Z (mm) R-180 1.6 m The 180 coordinate frame was used in order to display the precision of the measurements for each point. The precision depends on the distance of the laser tracker, the measurement mode and the geometry of the different stations. For the Support 1, the 3D-precision is around 85 microns. For the Support 2, the 3D-precision is around 40 microns For the Support 3, the 3D-precision is around 22 microns 1.6 m 4.0 m 9.4 m Support 3 Support 2 Support 1 Ø=228 mm Ø=228 mm Ø=228 mm Precision at 1.6 m x (mm) y (mm) z (mm) Support 3 0.010 0.017 Precision at 4.0 m x (mm) y (mm) z (mm) Support 2 0.024 0.021 Precision at 9.4 m x (mm) y (mm) z (mm) Support 1 0.056 0.029

RESULTS

Plane Fitting and plane orientation (after adjustment) Details R-180 X (mm) Y (mm) Z (mm) Plane Fitting and plane orientation (after adjustment) Details R-180 The tables below describe the plane fitting done for each support after the adjustment of the 3 support. The adjustment has been done with the tools Watch window from Spatial Analyser. The flatness of each support is below 20 µm (r.m.s.) and the plane orientation of each support with respect to the gravity is below 300 µrad. The plane orientation calculated with the 3 supports is below 60 µrad with respect to the AT960 gravity. Support 3 Support 2 Support 1 Support 1+2+3 Fitting result Fitting Plane Z-Offset 25 mm Nb point 42 points Removed points 2 points Flatness RMS 0.022 mm Normal vector A (Rx) = 0.000066 B (Ry) = -0.000005 C = 1.000000 Min Z -807.758 mm Max Z -807.626 mm Mean Z -807.688 mm Support 3 Fitting result Precision Sigma à priori 0.010 mm Fitting Plane Z-Offset 25 mm Nb point 41 points Removed points --- Flatness RMS FUV FUV = 1.01 Normal vector A (Rx) = 0.000046 +/- 0.000019 B (Ry) = 0.000091 C = 1.000000 Min Z -807.673 mm Max Z -807.626 mm Mean Z -807.653 mm Support 2 Fitting result Precision Sigma à priori 0.024 mm Fitting Plane Z-Offset 25 mm Nb point 39 points Removed points 1 point Flatness RMS 0.018 mm FUV FUV = 0.58 Normal vector A (Rx) = 0.000168 +/- 0.000050 B (Ry) = 0.000086 C = 1.000000 Min Z -807.758 mm Max Z -807.671 mm Mean Z -807.702 mm Support 1 Fitting result Precision Sigma à priori 0.056 mm Fitting Plane Z-Offset 25 mm Nb point 42 points Removed points 1 point Flatness RMS 0.016 mm FUV FUV = 0.09 Normal vector A (Rx) = -0.000039 +/-0.000114 B (Ry) = -0.000254 C = 1.000000 Min Z -807.756 mm Max Z -807.656 mm Mean Z -807.710 mm

Z values Support 3 Support 1 Support 2 Z (min-max) = 0.132 mm The graphic below represents the Z value of the measured points (with a shift of 25 mm in vertical in order to canceled the offset support) after the adjustment. All the Z values of the 3 supports are identical at 132 µm. Support 3 Support 1 Support 2 Z (min-max) = 0.132 mm

Z values X (mm) Y (mm) Z (mm) R-180 Support 3 Support 2 Support 1 The graphic below represents for each support the Z value of the measured points (with a shift of 25 mm in vertical in order to canceled the offset support) after the adjustment. R-180 Support 3 Support 2 Support 1 Support 3 Min Z -807.673 mm Max Z -807.626 mm Mean Z -807.653 mm Support 2 Min Z -807.758 mm Max Z -807.671 mm Mean Z -807.702 mm Support 1 Min Z -807.756 mm Max Z -807.656 mm Mean Z -807.710 mm Z (min-max) = 0.047 mm Z (min-max) = 0.087 mm Z (min-max) = 0.100 mm

CONCLUSION The goal of these measurements was the levelling of the 3 reference tables which will support the cold mass in building 180. The flatness of each support is below 20 µm (r.m.s.) and the plane orientation of each support with respect to the gravity is below 300 µrad. The plane orientation calculated with the 3 supports is below 60 µrad with respect to the AT960 gravity. All the Z values of the 3 supports are identical at 132 µm.