Training Programs in Management and Leadership

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

and Statistics, 2016, Vol. 4, No. 1, 1-8. doi: /ajams-4-1-1

Advertisements

Intermediate-level learner

Table 2. Result of Actual Technical Writing Needs

Research, 2015, Vol. 3, No. 6, doi: /education

Figure 3. Comparison of class performance

Table 3. Quran memorization students survey responses about App

Table 1. Sample Size No Category Sample Size (F) Percentage (%) 1

Table 6. Frequency of RTEC Consumption in Terms of Gender

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Source Sum of Squares (SS) df Mean Square (MS) F p-value

Table 1. Sociodemographic characteristics of the employees

Teachers Response (N= 11)

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Table 2. Showing mean and SD along with t- critical ratio

student achievement scores

Table 11. Chi-Square Analysis Based on Grade Shift for Study Group

No. 8, doi: /education Table 9. t-Test Analysis Based on Average Quiz Scores from Last Six Quizzes t-Test: Two-Sample Assuming Unequal.

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Test Mean Std. Dev. Mathematics English Language

Table 1. Student’s attitude towards technology (%)

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Significant (2- tailed)

Rating of Water Quality

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Contrast equality of group means

Table 2. Showing mean and SD along with t- critical ratio

Number of categories that are mentioned (0% < categories < 5%)

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Overall Average Female Overall Average Male/Female

Educational Attainment

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Table 1. Population by University

Table 1. LLC Academics Outcome Report ( )

Group Male Female Total Astrocytoma Grade 2 (%65)13 (%35)7 (%100)20

Table 1. Demographic Profile of the Respondents

Number of questionnaires sent out

Table 5. Organizational Procedures

Table 9. The proposed administrative procedures

Table 1. Descriptive Statistics

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Behavioral strategies

Table 4. Summary of Multi ways ANOVA results

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

t-test for Equality of Means

95% Confidence Interval for Mean

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

chemistry that are involved in peer group

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Table 3. (d) Summary of two way ANOVA for overall adjustment

Category Quantity Secondary school 3 Student participant

MASTERS DEGREE HOLDERS

Table 1. Illiteracy distribution by Gender and Place (No. in million)

Table 7. The Result of T Test After Treatment

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Educational Attainment

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Table 4. Independent Samples Test Application of ICT by Gender

Table 6. Range Comparisons amongst Subgroups and grade levels

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Gender N Mean S.D Df t-cal P

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Presentation transcript:

Training Programs in Management and Leadership Table 4. The sample of the interview Degree and job field Gender Nationality Years of Experience Training Programs in Management and Leadership degree % discipline gender Period number Professor 20.6 scientific 61.8 female 46.6 Saudi 69.5 less than 5 10.7 zero 6.1 Associate Professor 26 humanities 38.2 male 53.4 Non-Saudi 30.5 5 - less than 10 24.4 1 – less than 5 36.6 Assistant Professor 10 and above 64.9 33.6 23.7 Seham M. S. Kaki et al. Proposal for Administrative Staffing in Saudi Universities in the Light of Global Trends. American Journal of Educational Research, 2017, Vol. 5, No. 5, 493-515. doi:10.12691/education-5-5-6 © The Author(s) 2015. Published by Science and Education Publishing.