Measuring College and Career Readiness

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
November 2006 Copyright © 2006 Mississippi Department of Education 1 Where are We? Where do we want to be?
Advertisements

Measuring College and Career Readiness PARCC RESULTS: YEAR ONE.
Measuring College and Career Readiness PARCC RESULTS: YEAR ONE ORANGE BOARD OF EDUCATION DECEMBER 8, 2015.
Measuring College and Career Readiness PARCC RESULTS: YEAR ONE River Edge School District December 16, 2015.
Measuring College and Career Readiness PARCC RESULTS: YEAR ONE HARDING TOWNSHIP SCHOOL DECEMBER 21, 2015.
Measuring College and Career Readiness PARCC RESULTS: YEAR ONE TINTON FALLS SCHOOL DISTRICT DECEMBER 14, 2015.
Measuring College and Career Readiness PARCC RESULTS: YEAR ONE ROXBURY SCHOOL DISTRICT JANUARY 4, 2016.
Measuring College and Career Readiness PARCC RESULTS: YEAR ONE ESSEX FELLS SCHOOL DISTRICT DECEMBER 16, 2016.
Measuring College and Career Readiness PARCC RESULTS: YEAR ONE POMPTON LAKES PUBLIC SCHOOLS JANUARY 5, 2016.
Measuring College and Career Readiness PARCC RESULTS: YEAR ONE HACKETTSTOWN PUBLIC SCHOOLS JANUARY 20, 2016.
Measuring College and Career Readiness 2015 PARCC RESULTS: YEAR ONE EDGEWATER SCHOOL DISTRICT ELEANOR VAN GELDER SCHOOL.
Measuring College and Career Readiness PARCC RESULTS: YEAR ONE LINDENWOLD PUBLIC SCHOOLS DECEMBER 14, 2015.
PARENT UNIVERSITY: Preparing Your Child for Success Presented by: Dr. Alicia Scelso, Principal, Pequannock Township High School Richard M. Hayzler, Principal,
2015 State PARCC Results Presented to the Board of Elementary and Secondary Education Robert Lee MCAS Chief Analyst and Acting PARCC Coordinator October.
Measuring College and Career Readiness PARCC Results: Year One Belleville Public schools January 25, 2016.
Measuring College and Career Readiness PARCC RESULTS: YEAR ONE JEFFERSON TOWNSHIP PUBLIC SCHOOLS DECEMBER 16, 2015.
Measuring College and Career Readiness PARCC RESULTS: YEAR ONE NETCONG SCHOOL DISTRICT DECEMBER 15, 2015 Dr. Gina Cinotti, CSA.
Measuring College and Career Readiness PARCC RESULTS: YEAR ONE Somerset Hills School District ____________.
KHS PARCC/SCIENCE RESULTS Using the results to improve achievement Families can use the results to engage their child in conversations about.
Measuring College and Career Readiness PARCC YEAR TWO RANDOLPH TOWNSHIP SCHOOLS.
Measuring College and Career Readiness PARCC RESULTS: SPRING 2015 AND SPRING 2016 ADMINISTRATIONS 1.
Measuring College and Career Readiness
Measuring College and Career Readiness
Measuring College and Career Readiness
Conversation about State Report Card November 28, 2016
Measuring College and Career Readiness
PARCC Results: Year One LINCOLN SCHOOL GARWOOD NJ DECEMBER 15, 2015
The Ethical Community Charter School
Measuring College and Career Readiness Prepared by: Joanne Decker
Paulsboro School District
Measuring College and Career Readiness
Measuring College and Career Readiness
Measuring College and Career Readiness
Measuring College and Career Readiness
PARCC Results: Orange Board of Education 2017
School District BOE Presentation
Measuring College and Career Readiness
Measuring College and Career Readiness Prepared by: Joanne Decker
Prepared by Dr. Toni Lehman Director of Curriculum and Instruction
Mount Holly Township School District September 2016
CHESTER SCHOOL DISTRICT
Measuring College and Career Readiness
2015 PARCC Results for R.I: Work to do, focus on teaching and learning
PARCC Results: Spring 2018 Administrations
Measuring College and Career Readiness
Measuring College and Career Readiness
Measuring College and Career Readiness
Measuring College and Career Readiness
Measuring College and Career Readiness
Measuring College and Career Readiness
Measuring College and Career Readiness
Assessment & Achievement |
Measuring College and Career Readiness
PARCC Results: Orange Board of Education 2018
Kearny School District •
PARCC Results Spring 2018 Administration
PARCC RESULTS: PRESENTATION FAIRVIEW SCHOOL DISTRICT OCTOBER 2, 2018
Glen Ridge District Testing Report
PARCC Results: Year TWO LINCOLN SCHOOL GARWOOD NJ OCTOBER 18, 2016
Office of Strategy, Innovation and Performance
Measuring College and Career Readiness
PARCC Results: Spring 2018 Administrations Maywood School District
Measuring College and Career Readiness
Measuring College and Career Readiness
Welcome Reporting: Individual Student Report (ISR), Student Roster Report, and District Summary of Schools Report Welcome to the Reporting: Individual.
Denville Township Parent Academy for Student Success (PASS) NJ Student Learning Assessment (NJSLA) Informational Webinar March 18, 2019 Presented by.
Measuring College and Career Readiness
Paulsboro School District
Measuring College and Career Readiness
Measuring College and Career Readiness
Presentation transcript:

Measuring College and Career Readiness PARCC Results: Spring 2018 Administration Kinnelon Public Schools Ivonne Ciresi Director of Curriculum, Assessment, & Instruction November 15, 2018

Assesses the New Jersey Student learning standards Reading Literature – Craft and Structure RL.3.6. Distinguish their own point of view from that of the narrator or those of the characters. RL.5.6. Describe how a narrator’s or speaker’s point of view influences how events are described. RL.7.6. Analyze how an author develops and contrasts the points of view of different characters or narrators in a text. RL.9-10.6. Analyze a particular point of view or cultural experience reflected in a work of literature from outside the United States, drawing on a wide reading of world literature. RL.11-12.6. Analyze a case in which grasping a point of view requires distinguishing what is directly stated in a text from what is really meant (e.g., satire, sarcasm, irony, or understatement). PARCC Released Item 2017 – Grade 5 You have read passages from Part 1 and Part 2 of Freddy in Peril. Explain how Freddy’s point of view influences how the events in the passages are described. Be sure to use details to support your answer from both Freddy in Peril, Part 1 and Part 2.

Instruction to assessment TO instruction WHAT? We teach students the foundational knowledge needed for them to master rigorous content, think critically, apply their knowledge in order to solve problems, and develop and communicate their point of view. WHY? These skills are critically important in college and the workplace. HOW IS IT MEASURED? PARCC is only one measure at one point in time in the school year. Formative Assessments Summative Assessments

PARCC Performance levels Level 1: Not yet meeting grade-level expectations Level 2: Partially meeting grade-level expectations Level 3: Approaching grade-level expectations Level 4: Meeting grade-level expectations Level 5: Exceeding grade-level expectations

Testing Time (Minutes) Spring 2018 testing times Subject(s) Unit Section Testing Time (Minutes) Math Grades 3, 4, 5 4 Units Non-Calculator 60 Math Grade 6 3 Units 80 Math Grade 7 Non-Calc/Calc Unit 1, Calc 2 & 3 Math Grade 8 Non-Calc Unit 1, Calc 2 & 3 Alg 1, Geometry, Alg II 90 ELA Grade 3 75 ELA Grades 4, 5 ELA Grades 6, 7, 8 ELA Grades 9, 10, 11

Change in Level 4 and 5 2016 to 2018** Comparison of Kinnelon’s Spring 2016, Spring 2017 & Spring 2018 PARCC Administrations English Language Arts/Literacy - Percentages Grade Level 1 2016 Level 1 2017 Level 1 2018 Level 2 2016 Level 2 2017 Level 2 2018 Level 3 2016 Level 3 2017 Level 3 2018 Level 4 2016 Level 4 2017 Level 4 2018 Level 5 2016 Level 5 2017 Level 5 2018 Change in Level 1 and 2 2016 to 2018 Change in Level 4 and 5 2016 to 2018** 3 4 15 8 9 31 25 16 46 51 60 13 ↓7 ↑23 1 5 10 17 22 14 61 44 23 27 ↓1 ↑4 2 7 12 57 64 20 ↑3 ↑9 6 19 24 58 53 55 ↑5 37 42 35 34 ↑1 50 33 ↓5 11 63 45 40 ↔0 41 48 ↓3 ↑17 11* 38 18 28 39 ↓12 *Grade 11 does not include students who took an AP/IB test. **Level 4 and Level 5 is an indication a student is on pace to be college and career ready. Percentages may not total 100 due to rounding.

Change in Level 4 and 5 2016 to 2018** Comparison of Kinnelon’s Spring 2016, Spring 2017 & Spring 2018 PARCC Administrations Mathematics - Percentages Grade Level 1 2016 Level 1 2017 Level 1 2018 Level 2 2016 Level 2 2017 Level 2 2018 Level 3 2016 Level 3 2017 Level 3 2018 Level 4 2016 Level 4 2017 Level 4 2018 Level 5 2016 Level 5 2017 Level 5 2018 Change in Level 1 and 2 2016 to 2018 Change in Level 4 and 5 2016 to 2018** 3 1 11 5 2 24 22 12 48 49 47 16 21 39 ↓9 ↑22 4 6 9 8 26 20 15 59 63 65 7 ↑2 ↑11 19 64 61 56 ↑5 ↓8 25 23 58 10 ↑1 32 51 50 ↓4 ↑14 8* 17 27 30 43 46 40 ↑13 ↓2 ALG I 18 69 62 ↑3 GEO 14 13 60 52 ↓3 ALG II ↓27 ↑35 *Approximately 30,000 New Jersey students in grade 8 participated in the PARCC Algebra I assessment. Thus, PARCC Math 8 outcomes are not representative of grade 8 performance as a whole. **Level 4 and Level 5 is an indication a student is on pace to be college and career ready. Percentages may not total 100 due to rounding. ALG 1 Is Algebra 1; GEO is Geometry; ALG II is Algebra 2.

Comparison of Kinnelon’s 2016 to 2018 Spring PARCC Administrations English Language Arts/Literacy – Percentage Changes Grade Levels 1 & 2 District Trend State Level 3 Levels 4 & 5 District Trend 3 ↓ 7% 2.4% 15% 1.6% ↑ 23% 4.1% 4 1% 1.8% 3% 2.7% 4% 4.5% 5 1.9% 12% 2.9% 9% 4.7% 6 1.7% 2.2% 5% 3.9% 7 3.3% ↔ 0% 3.1% 6.3% 8 5.2% 9 5.7% 10 5.3% 13% 1.2% 17% 6.6% 11* 2.0% 6% 0.9% 1.1% *Grade 11 does not include students who took an AP/IB test. Notes: Percentages may not total 100 due to rounding. The up arrow indicates an increase of the % change from the previous year where a down arrow shows a decrease of the % change from the previous year. Side arrow indicates no change.

Comparison of Kinnelon’s 2016 to 2018 Spring PARCC Administrations Mathematics – Percentage Changes Grade Levels 1 & 2 District Trend State Level 3 Levels 4 & 5 District Trend 3 ↓ 9% 0.7% 13% 0.6% ↑ 22% 1.3% 4 2% 2.2% 11% 0.5% 2.8% 5 5% 0.2% 3% 1.5% 8% 1.6% 6 1.2% 1% 7 4% 1.1% 3.7% 14% 4.7% 8 2.1% 0.4% 2.6% Algebra I* 4.1% 6% 4.6% Algebra II 0.8% 35% 3.6% Geometry 27% 1.8% 2.5% *Some students in grade 8 participated in the PARCC Algebra I assessment in place of the 8th grade Math assessment. Thus, PARCC Math 8 outcomes are not representative of grade 8 performance as a whole. Notes: Percentages may not total 100 due to rounding. The up arrow indicates an increase of the % change from the previous year where a down arrow shows a decrease of the % change from the previous year. Side arrow indicates no change.

Difference between number of students tested in 2017 and 2018 Comparison of Kinnelon’s Number of Students Tested Spring 2017 & Spring 2018 PARCC Administrations English Language Arts/Literacy Grade Students Tested 2018 Students Tested 2017 Difference between number of students tested in 2017 and 2018 3 126 132 -6 4 131 140 -9 5 136 137 -1 6 142 165 -23 7 164 156 +8 8 155 161 9 151 159 -8 10 157 147 +10 11* 56 122 -66 TOTAL 1218 1319 -101 *Grade 11 does not include students who took an AP/IB test. Note: “Students Tested” represents individual valid test scores for English Language Arts/Literacy.

Difference between number of students tested in 2017 and 2018 Comparison of Kinnelon’s Number of Students Tested Spring 2017 & Spring 2018 PARCC Administrations Mathematics Grade Students Tested 2018 Students Tested 2017 Difference between number of students tested in 2017 and 2018 3 128 133 -5 4 131 138 -7 5 136 137 -1 6 142 166 -24 7 162 153 +9 8* 85 94 -9 Algebra I 170 157 +13 Algebra II 87 124 -37 Geometry 113 +24 TOTAL 1178 1215 *Some students in grade 8 participated in the PARCC Algebra I assessment in place of the 8th grade Math assessment. Thus, PARCC Math 8 outcomes are not representative of grade 8 performance as a whole. Notes: “Students Tested” represents individual valid test scores for Mathematics.

Comparison of Kinnelon’s Spring 2018 PARCC Administrations English Language Arts/Literacy to New Jersey Percentages for 2018 Grade Level 1, Kinnelon Level 1, State Level 2, Kinnelon Level 2, State Level 3, Kinnelon Level 3, State Level 4, Kinnelon Level 4, State Level 5, Kinnelon Level 5, State 3 3.2 13.5 8.7 15.9 21.4 59.5 43.5 12.7 8.1 4 3.1 7.6 5.3 12.3 13.7 22.1 51.1 39.1 26.7 18.9 5 0.7 6.9 9.6 12.6 13.2 22.4 60.3 47.2 16.2 10.8 6 4.2 6.2 6.3 13.6 14.8 24.0 54.9 41.3 19.7 14.9 7 3.0 8.6 4.9 10.2 14.0 18.5 43.9 34.1 28.6 8 1.9 6.5 11.1 12.9 19.8 45.8 39.9 32.9 20.4 9 0.0 4.0 12.5 11.3 21.1 45.0 38.0 39.7 16.1 10 4.5 18.3 12.8 3.8 19.0 44.6 31.8 18.1 11* 7.1 23.1 5.4 16.6 14.3 22.2 33.9 29.1 39.3 9.0 *Grade 11 does not include students who took an AP/IB test. Notes: Percentages may not total 100 due to rounding.

Comparison of Kinnelon’s Spring 2018 PARCC Administrations Mathematics to New Jersey - Percentages for 2018 Grade Level 1, District Level 1, State Level 2, District Level 2, State Level 3, District Level 3, State Level 4, District Level 4, State Level 5, District Level 5, State 3 0.8 8.0 1.6 15.3 11.7 23.7 46.9 37.8 39.1 15.2 4 1.5 7.5 7.6 16.8 14.5 26.3 64.9 41.8 11.5 5 0.7 6.6 17.0 21.3 26.7 55.9 38.5 15.4 10.4 6 3.5 8.5 7.7 20.1 21.8 27.9 47.2 35.6 19.7 7 1.2 4.9 20.3 20.4 28.6 64.2 36.0 9.3 7.4 8* 10.6 22.0 27.1 22.7 21.2 40.0 27.2 1.0 Algebra I 2.4 11.3 18.6 18.2 24.3 39.3 15.9 6.5 Algebra II 4.6 31.0 3.4 22.4 18.0 69.0 24.6 4.0 Geometry 9.4 13.1 31.5 32.1 29.6 51.8 2.2 *Some students in grade 8 participated in the PARCC Algebra I assessment in place of the 8th grade Math assessment. Thus, PARCC Math 8 outcomes are not representative of grade 8 performance as a whole. Notes: Percentages may not total 100 due to rounding.

Kinnelon’s 2018 Spring PARCC Subgroup Performance ELA Met or Exceeded Expectations - Percentages

Kinnelon’s 2018 Spring PARCC Subgroup Performance ELA Met or Exceeded Expectations - Percentages

Kinnelon’s 2018 Spring PARCC Subgroup Performance ELA Met or Exceeded Expectations - Percentages

Kinnelon’s 2018 Spring PARCC Subgroup Performance Math Met or Exceeded Expectations - Percentages

Kinnelon’s 2018 Spring PARCC Subgroup Performance Math Met or Exceeded Expectations - Percentages

Kinnelon’s 2018 Spring PARCC Subgroup Performance Math Met or Exceeded Expectations - Percentages

What does our data identify? Many areas of growth are two or three times the state average. ELA – overall improvement in all grades Percentage range of students who achieved Levels 4 & 5 from grades 3-11 72.2% to 88.5% Grade 3 up 23% from 2016 Math – improvement in many grades Percentage range of students who achieved Levels 4 & 5 from grades 3 – high school 41.2% to 85.9% Grade 3 up 22% from 2016 Grade 4 up 11% from 2016 Grade 5 down 5% from 2017, down 8% from 2016 Grade 7 up 14% from 2016 Grade 8 – 85 students tested; 70 students took Algebra I Geometry – down 12% from 2017, down 3% from 2016 Algebra II – up 35% from 2016 A continued focus is needed to support students with disabilities.

Interventions Supervisors (ELA, Math, Science) guide teachers in analyzing data from PARCC in addition to on-going unit and benchmark assessments Provide resources Unpack standards (look at all parts) Supplemental Instruction (Title I) at Kiel, Stonybrook, PRM Guided Study in all schools Professional development across all areas Build resilience and grit Mindfulness Self Regulation Strategies Conflict Resolution Procedures at each school for identifying students in need of assistance – I&RS

Resources for parents View Sample Report UnderstandTheScore.org

Some changes The online platform will remain. Will now be referred to as, New Jersey Student Learning Assessments – ELA (NJSLA-ELA) New Jersey Student Learning Assessment – Mathematics (NJSLA-M) Changes in time ELA reduced to 2 units in all grades Math reduced to 3 units in grades 3-5, units in grades 6-8 remain at 3 (minutes reduced to 60) Algebra I reduced to 2 units High School Assessment Component: ELA 9 and 10 End-of-course math in 9th and 10th (Algebra I and Geometry or Geometry and Algebra II) Graduation Requirements: Must take and pass ELA 10 and Algebra I Alternate pathways possible for those who do not pass

THANK YOU