Morphogenetic Movements Underlying Eye Field Formation Require Interactions between the FGF and ephrinB1 Signaling Pathways  Kathryn B. Moore, Kathleen.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 94, Issue 4, Pages (August 1998)
Advertisements

STAT5 acts as a repressor to regulate early embryonic erythropoiesis
Single-cell internalization during zebrafish gastrulation
Volume 13, Issue 8, Pages (April 2003)
Christina D. Cota, Brad Davidson  Developmental Cell 
Amy Bellmeyer, Jessica Krase, Julie Lindgren, Carole LaBonne 
Volume 13, Issue 8, Pages (April 2003)
Volume 25, Issue 5, Pages (June 2013)
Iain Patten, Marysia Placzek  Current Biology 
Eliminating Zebrafish Pbx Proteins Reveals a Hindbrain Ground State
Volume 35, Issue 2, Pages (July 2002)
Klaus B. Rohr, K.Anukampa Barth, Zoltán M. Varga, Stephen W. Wilson 
Volume 16, Issue 4, Pages (April 2009)
The Neural Plate Specifies Somite Size in the Xenopus laevis Gastrula
Volume 19, Issue 2, Pages (August 2010)
Anne-Hélène Monsoro-Burq, Estee Wang, Richard Harland 
A Hedgehog-Insensitive Form of Patched Provides Evidence for Direct Long-Range Morphogen Activity of Sonic Hedgehog in the Neural Tube  James Briscoe,
Volume 14, Issue 2, Pages (February 2008)
All Mouse Ventral Spinal Cord Patterning by Hedgehog Is Gli Dependent and Involves an Activator Function of Gli3  C.Brian Bai, Daniel Stephen, Alexandra.
Volume 21, Issue 4, Pages (February 2011)
Volume 21, Issue 1, Pages (July 1998)
SoxE Factors Function Equivalently during Neural Crest and Inner Ear Development and Their Activity Is Regulated by SUMOylation  Kimberly M. Taylor, Carole.
TGF-β Signaling Regulates the Differentiation of Motile Cilia
Canonical Wnt Signaling Dynamically Controls Multiple Stem Cell Fate Decisions during Vertebrate Body Formation  Benjamin L. Martin, David Kimelman  Developmental.
Volume 9, Issue 4, Pages (October 2005)
Volume 44, Issue 2, Pages e5 (January 2018)
Amy Bellmeyer, Jessica Krase, Julie Lindgren, Carole LaBonne 
Volume 15, Issue 11, Pages (June 2005)
A Crucial Interaction between Embryonic Red Blood Cell Progenitors and Paraxial Mesoderm Revealed in spadetail Embryos  Laurel A. Rohde, Andrew C. Oates,
Volume 11, Issue 4, Pages (October 2006)
Volume 1, Issue 1, Pages (July 2001)
BMP Signaling Protects Telencephalic Fate by Repressing Eye Identity and Its Cxcr4- Dependent Morphogenesis  Holger Bielen, Corinne Houart  Developmental.
Neuropeptides: Developmental Signals in Placode Progenitor Formation
Volume 11, Issue 18, Pages (September 2001)
Intrinsic Differences between the Superficial and Deep Layers of the Xenopus Ectoderm Control Primary Neuronal Differentiation  Andrew D Chalmers, David.
Volume 11, Issue 6, Pages (December 2006)
SOX2 Functions to Maintain Neural Progenitor Identity
The LRR Proteins Capricious and Tartan Mediate Cell Interactions during DV Boundary Formation in the Drosophila Wing  Marco Milán, Ulrich Weihe, Lidia.
Nadine Peyriéras, Uwe Strähle, Frédéric Rosa  Current Biology 
Leah Vardy, Terry L. Orr-Weaver  Developmental Cell 
Sonic hedgehog and vascular endothelial growth factor Act Upstream of the Notch Pathway during Arterial Endothelial Differentiation  Nathan D. Lawson,
The BMP Signaling Gradient Patterns Dorsoventral Tissues in a Temporally Progressive Manner along the Anteroposterior Axis  Jennifer A. Tucker, Keith.
In Vivo Imaging Reveals Different Cellular Functions for FGF and Dpp Signaling in Tracheal Branching Morphogenesis  Carlos Ribeiro, Andreas Ebner, Markus.
Volume 12, Issue 22, Pages (November 2002)
Brian A Hyatt, H.Joseph Yost  Cell 
Xsox17α and -β Mediate Endoderm Formation in Xenopus
Stat3 Controls Cell Movements during Zebrafish Gastrulation
Bmp2 Signaling Regulates the Hepatic versus Pancreatic Fate Decision
E2a Is Necessary for Smad2/3-Dependent Transcription and the Direct Repression of lefty during Gastrulation  Andrea E. Wills, Julie C. Baker  Developmental.
Hitoshi Sawa, Hiroko Kouike, Hideyuki Okano  Molecular Cell 
Dian-Han Kuo, David A. Weisblat  Current Biology 
Won-Suk Chung, Didier Y.R. Stainier  Developmental Cell 
Julie E. Cooke, Hilary A. Kemp, Cecilia B. Moens  Current Biology 
FGF Signaling Controls Somite Boundary Position and Regulates Segmentation Clock Control of Spatiotemporal Hox Gene Activation  Julien Dubrulle, Michael.
Kathryn B. Moore, Meredith L. Schneider, Monica L. Vetter  Neuron 
The LRR Proteins Capricious and Tartan Mediate Cell Interactions during DV Boundary Formation in the Drosophila Wing  Marco Milán, Ulrich Weihe, Lidia.
Volume 18, Issue 3, Pages (March 1997)
Volume 8, Issue 4, Pages (April 2005)
Volume 93, Issue 6, Pages (June 1998)
Volume 47, Issue 1, Pages (July 2005)
Volume 13, Issue 8, Pages (April 2003)
Norihito Kishimoto, Ying Cao, Alice Park, Zhaoxia Sun 
Islet Coordinately Regulates Motor Axon Guidance and Dendrite Targeting through the Frazzled/DCC Receptor  Celine Santiago, Greg J. Bashaw  Cell Reports 
Volume 13, Issue 8, Pages (April 2003)
Single-cell internalization during zebrafish gastrulation
Ectodermal Syndecan-2 Mediates Left-Right Axis Formation in Migrating Mesoderm as a Cell-Nonautonomous Vg1 Cofactor  Kenneth L. Kramer, H.Joseph Yost 
Lefty-Dependent Inhibition of Nodal- and Wnt-Responsive Organizer Gene Expression Is Essential for Normal Gastrulation  William W. Branford, H.Joseph.
Volume 115, Issue 5, Pages (November 2003)
Volume 8, Issue 1, Pages (January 2005)
Shroom Induces Apical Constriction and Is Required for Hingepoint Formation during Neural Tube Closure  Saori L. Haigo, Jeffrey D. Hildebrand, Richard.
Presentation transcript:

Morphogenetic Movements Underlying Eye Field Formation Require Interactions between the FGF and ephrinB1 Signaling Pathways  Kathryn B. Moore, Kathleen Mood, Ira O. Daar, Sally A. Moody  Developmental Cell  Volume 6, Issue 1, Pages 55-67 (January 2004) DOI: 10.1016/S1534-5807(03)00395-2

Figure 1 Activation of FGFR2 Signaling Prevents Cells from Adopting Retinal Fates (A) Nomenclature of animal 32-cell blastomeres (Jacobson and Hirose, 1981). Dorsal is to the top. (B) GFP-labeled D1.1.1 descendants in retina of control embryo. L, lens; di, diencephalon. (C) Wild-type FGFR2-expressing D1.1.1 cells in retina. (D) cFGFR2-expressing D1.1.1 cells are not in retina. (E) Retinal volumes after expression of gfp or test mRNAs. Asterisk indicates significant difference (p < 0.05) from controls. (F) Anterior view showing β-gal-injected D1.1.1 clone (red) in eye field (rx1, blue). (G) In cFGFR2-injected embryo, rx1 expression (blue) is missing on the injected side (arrow). (H) In XFD-injected embryo, rx1 expression (pink) is larger on the injected side (arrow). Developmental Cell 2004 6, 55-67DOI: (10.1016/S1534-5807(03)00395-2)

Figure 2 Activation of FGFR2 Signaling Increases the Size of the Neural Tube and Changes Retinal Fates to Ventral Neural Fates (A and B) Neural tube is thicker on the cFGFR2-injected side (*). os, expanded optic stalk. (C) White lines indicate extent of sox3 expression on control (right) and cFGFR2-injected (*) sides of neural plate. (D) D1.1.1 clone (green) in stage 14 forebrain region of control. Arrow denotes midline. (E) D1.1.1 clone (green) in the same region of cFGFR2-injected embryo. (F) Expanded neural tube on cFGFR2-injected side (*). Brown stain indicates HNK-1 expression. (G) Expression of cFGFR2 in D1.1.1 clone (red) expands pax2 expression on the injected side (*) of neural plate. (H) Expression of cFGFR2 in D1.1.1 expands forebrain pax2 expression (white bracket) on the injected side (inj) of tail bud embryos. un, uninjected. (I) Number of dopamine cells in the hypothalamus of cFGFR2-injected embryos. *, p < 0.001. (J) The lengths of dorsal (black line) and ventral (Nkx2.4+; white line) forebrain domains in cFGFR2-injected and wild-type (wt) embryos. Developmental Cell 2004 6, 55-67DOI: (10.1016/S1534-5807(03)00395-2)

Figure 3 Gastrulation Movements Are Altered in Clones with Enhanced or Repressed FGF Signaling (A) Animal pole at stage 12 showing control D1.1.1 clone (red). (B) Stage 12 embryos expressing cFGFR2 in D1.1.1 clone (red). (C) Stage 12 embryo expressing XFD in D1.1.1 clone (red). (D) Anterior view at stage 14 showing control D1.1.1 clone (red). (E) Stage 14 embryos expressing cFGFR2 in D1.1.1 clone (red). (F) Control stage 15 embryo showing control D1.2.1 clone (bright blue) at lateral edge of eye field (rx1 expression). (G) Embryos expressing XFD in D1.2.1 clones that extensively populate the eye field. (H) Percentage of embryos with D1.1.1 progeny in retina after coexpression of cFGFR2 and anterior neural plate transcription factors. *, p < 0.05. Developmental Cell 2004 6, 55-67DOI: (10.1016/S1534-5807(03)00395-2)

Figure 4 ephrinB1 Rescues the cFGFR Retinal Phenotype (A) Anterior views at stage 16 show control expression domains of pax6, ephrinB1, and fgfr2. Asterisks indicate the anterior tip of the neural groove, allowing an anatomical comparison of the domains. (B) Blastomeres that contribute large numbers (D1.1.1, top) or very small numbers (V1.2.1, bottom) of cells to the retina were injected with β-gal mRNA, and the location of anterior descendants (red) compared to the expression domains of pax6, ephrinB1, and fgfr2 (blue patches, arrows). Top, frontal views; bottom, pax6 is frontal; ephrinB1 and fgfr2 are side views. (C) Animal poles at stage 12 showing D1.1.1 clone (red) coexpressing cFGFR2 and ephrinB1. (D) Anterior view at stage 16 showing D1.1.1 clone (red) coexpressing cFGFR2 and ephrinB1. (E) Coexpression of ephrinB1 rescues the cFGFR2 repression of D1.1.1 contribution to the retina in a dose-dependent manner. ephrinB1-60AA does not rescue. (F) Coexpression of ephrinB1 with cFGFR2 allows D1.1.1 progeny (green) to populate the retina. Developmental Cell 2004 6, 55-67DOI: (10.1016/S1534-5807(03)00395-2)

Figure 5 ephrinB1 Causes Epidermal Progenitors to Move into the Eye Field and Populate the Retina (A) Percentage of embryos in which progeny from ventral blastomeres populated the retina. GFP indicates control embryos. (B) Expression of ephrinB1(Y305, Y310) in V1.2.1 progeny (green) in retina. (C) Progeny of V1.1.2 (green) do not normally populate the retina. (D) Expression of ephrinB1(Y305, Y310) in V1.1.2 progeny (green) in retina. (E) Expression of XFD in V1.1.1 progeny (green) in retina. (F) Stage 12 embryos showing control V1.1.1 lineage (red). Asterisk indicates the animal pole. Dorsal is to the top. (G) Stage 12 embryos expressing ephrinB1(Y305, Y310) in the V1.1.1 lineage. (H) Stage 12 embryos expressing ephrinB1(–60AA) in the V1.1.1 lineage. (I) Stage 12 embryos expressing XFD in the V1.1.1 lineage. (J) Anterior view of stage 15 control V1.1.1 lineage (bright blue) ventral to eye field (rx1). (K) Stage 15 embryos showing XFD-expressing V1.1.1 cells (bright blue) within eye field. Developmental Cell 2004 6, 55-67DOI: (10.1016/S1534-5807(03)00395-2)

Figure 6 ephrinB1 Is Necessary for Retinal Progenitors to Move into the Eye Field (A) Embryos were injected with ephrinB1 mRNA alone, or plus an ephrinB1 morpholino (MO), inverted ephrinB1-MO (invert ctl), or standard control MO (std ctl), and analyzed by Western blot. The ephrinB1-MO does not block the translation of a 5′ truncated ephrinB1 (ephrinB1ΔUTR) or of ephrinB3, which is recognized by the same antibody. (B and C) ephrinB1-MO injected into D1.1.1 (green) represses population of retina. (D) Percentage of embryos with D1.1.1 clones in retina. ephrinB1-MO caused a dose-dependent reduction (p < 0.05 at all doses). (E) ephrinB1-MO injection into D1.1.1 represses pax6 expression (arrow). (F) Ectopic expression of pax6 (red) does not induce ectopic ephrinB1 (blue). (G) Expression of pax6 in an ephrinB1-MO-injected embryo restores D1.1.1 clone (green) to retina. (H) Ectopic expression of ephrinB1 (red) does not induce ectopic pax6 expression (blue). Developmental Cell 2004 6, 55-67DOI: (10.1016/S1534-5807(03)00395-2)