National Standard Practice Manual for Benefit-Cost Analysis of Distributed Energy Resources (NSPM for DERs) Julie Michals - E4TheFuture NARUC Summer.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
DC Responses Received WA OR ID MT WY CA NV UT CO AZ NM AK HI TX ND SD NE KS OK MN IA MO AR LA WI IL MI IN OH KY TN MS AL GA FL SC NC VA WV PA NY VT NH.
Advertisements

Background Information on the Newspoets Total Number: 78 active newspoets. 26 (of the original 36) newspoets from returned this year.
NICS Index State Participation As of 12/31/2007 DC NE NY WI IN NH MD CA NV IL OR TN PA CT ID MT WY ND SD NM KS TX AR OK MN OH WV MSAL KY SC MO ME MA DE.
National Journal Presentation Credits Producers: Katharine Conlon Director: Afzal Bari House Committee Maps Updated: March 19, 2015.
MD VT MA NH DC CT NJ RI DE WA
Essential Health Benefits Benchmark Plan Selection, as of October 2012
Uninsured Non-Elderly Adult Rate Increased from 17. 8% to 20
House Price
House price index for AK
WY WI WV WA VA VT UT TX TN SD SC RI PA OR* OK OH ND NC NY NM* NJ NH
WY WI WV WA VA VT UT TX TN SD SC RI PA OR* OK OH ND NC NY NM* NJ NH
NJ WY WI WV WA VA VT UT TX TN SD SC RI PA OR OK OH ND NC NY NM NH NV
The State of the States Cindy Mann Center for Children and Families
Current Status of State Medicaid Expansion Decisions
BUSINESS DEVELPOMENT TEAM DIRECTOR, STRATEGIC MPS BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT
Comprehensive Medicaid Managed Care Models in the States, 2014
Medicaid Costs are Shared by the States and the Federal Government
Expansion states with Republican governors outnumber expansion states with Democratic governors, May 2018 WY WI WV◊ WA VA^ VT UT TX TN SD SC RI PA OR OK.
Expansion states with Republican governors outnumber expansion states with Democratic governors, January WY WI WV◊ WA VA VT UT TX TN SD SC RI PA.
Non-Citizen Population, by State, 2011
Status of State Medicaid Expansion Decisions
Share of Women Ages 18 – 64 Who Are Uninsured, by State,
Coverage of Low-Income Adults by Scope of Coverage, January 2013
Executive Activity on the Medicaid Expansion Decision, May 9, 2013
WY WI WV WA VA VT UT TX TN1 SD SC RI PA1 OR OK OH ND NC NY NM NJ NH2
WY WI WV WA VA VT UT TX TN1 SD SC RI PA OR OK OH1 ND NC NY NM NJ NH NV
WY WI WV WA VA* VT UT TX TN SD SC RI PA OR* OK OH ND NC NY NM* NJ NH
WY WI WV WA VA VT UT TX TN SD SC RI PA OR* OK OH ND NC NY NM* NJ NH
Mobility Update and Discussion as of March 25, 2008
Current Status of the Medicaid Expansion Decision, as of May 30, 2013
IAH CONVERSION: ELIGIBLE BENEFICIARIES BY STATE
WAHBE Brokers / QHPs across the country as of
619 Involvement in State SSIPs
Current Status of State Medicaid Expansion Decisions
State Health Insurance Marketplace Types, 2015
State Health Insurance Marketplace Types, 2018
HHGM CASE WEIGHTS Early/Late Mix (Weighted Average)
Status of State Medicaid Expansion Decisions
Status of State Participation in Medicaid Expansion, as of March 2014
Percent of Women Ages 19 to 64 Uninsured by State,
Status of State Medicaid Expansion Decisions
Current Status of State Medicaid Expansion Decisions
Medicaid Income Eligibility Levels for Parents, January 2017
Current Status of State Medicaid Expansion Decisions
State Health Insurance Marketplace Types, 2017
Current Status of State Medicaid Expansion Decisions
S Co-Sponsors by State – May 23, 2014
WY WI WV WA VA VT UT* TX TN SD SC RI PA OR* OK OH ND NC NY NM* NJ NH
Seventeen States Had Higher Uninsured Rates Than the National Average in 2013; Of Those, 11 Have Yet to Expand Eligibility for Medicaid AK NH WA VT ME.
Employer Premiums as Percentage of Median Household Income for Under-65 Population, 2003 and percent of under-65 population live where premiums.
Employer Premiums as Percentage of Median Household Income for Under-65 Population, 2003 and percent of under-65 population live where premiums.
Average annual growth rate
Percent of Children Ages 0–17 Uninsured by State
Executive Activity on the Medicaid Expansion Decision, May 9, 2013
Current Status of State Medicaid Expansion Decisions
Current Status of State Medicaid Expansion Decisions
How State Policies Limiting Abortion Coverage Changed Over Time
United States: age distribution family households and family size
Status of State Medicaid Expansion Decisions
Employer Premiums as Percentage of Median Household Income for Under-65 Population, 2003 and percent of under-65 population live where premiums.
Percent of Adults Ages 18–64 Uninsured by State
States including quality standards in their SSIP improvement strategies for Part C FFY 2013 ( ) States including quality standards in their SSIP.
Status of State Medicaid Expansion Decisions
WY WI WV WA VA VT UT* TX TN SD SC RI PA OR* OK OH ND NC NY NM* NJ NH
WY WI WV WA VA VT UT* TX TN SD SC RI PA OR* OK OH ND NC NY NM* NJ NH
States including their fiscal systems in their SSIP improvement strategies for Part C FFY 2013 ( ) States including their fiscal systems in their.
Current Status of State Individual Marketplace and Medicaid Expansion Decisions, as of September 30, 2013 WY WI WV WA VA VT UT TX TN SD SC RI PA OR OK.
Status of State Medicaid Expansion Decisions
Income Eligibility Levels for Children in Medicaid/CHIP, January 2017
WY WI WV WA VA VT UT TX TN SD SC RI PA OR OK OH ND NC NY NM NJ NH NV
Presentation transcript:

National Standard Practice Manual for Benefit-Cost Analysis of Distributed Energy Resources (NSPM for DERs) Julie Michals - E4TheFuture NARUC Summer Policy Summit - ERE Committee Revisiting Paradigms for Decision-Making About Customer Side Resources July 22, 2019

Overview Background – NSPM for EE NSPM for DERs (coming in 2020)

Background: NSPM for EE (May 2017) Universal Principles Resource Value Framework Primary Test: Resource Value Test (RVT) Align with applicable state policies Treat costs & benefits symmetrically Account for relevant impacts (even if hard to quantify) A state’s test may align with a traditional test…. or not

NSPM for Energy Efficiency State References and Application to Date WA OR CA MT ID NV AZ UT WY CO NM TX OK KS NE SD ND MN IA MO AR LA MS AL GA FL SC TN NC IL WI MI OH IN KY WV VA PA NY ME VT NH NJ DE MD Washington D.C MA CT RI AK HI MO! PUC Order on NSPM or use of RVT 2 Actively applying NSPM to review current test 4 In process of learning about the NSPM References have been made in PUC or legislative proceedings 30+ Number of States Referencing and Applying the NSPM *Numbers next to state abbreviations in map indicate number of NSPM references in state formal proceedings 4

Why an NSPM for DERs? Growing interest in range of DERs as grid resources and for distribution planning  regulators need further guidance to support BCA considerations and common framework for DER analyses States currently are using different techniques, methodologies, and assumptions for DER BCA, leading to inconsistency even within states NSPM for DERs - will generally apply principles from the NSPM for EE guidance to DERs to support consistent and economically sound BCA policies and practices

Key Audiences and Applications The NSPM for DERs purpose is to: Serve as a universal benefit-cost analysis (BCA) guidebook providing a common framework to support regulators, SEOs, utilities, and other stakeholders as DER investments expand and evolve. Help jurisdictions better understand range of potential DER benefit-cost impacts and associated key challenges – whether single or multiple-DER assessment, or non-wires. Provide forward looking guidance that addresses current considerations and practices but also valuation issues relevant to integrated, fuel-neutral DER investments. Inform state prioritization of DER investments that help to optimize building energy savings and energy use to support efficient and flexible building loads, including evolving EE as building technologies (e.g., advanced controls, sensors and data analytics) Help states address issues and investment decisions around electricity system reliability, energy affordability, and grid modernization.

NSPM for DERs Answering Key Questions Why a common framework for assessing the value of DERs? How should the Utility Cost test or Societal Cost test be used in assessing DERs? What costs and benefits should be accounted for? Should a different, state-specific test be used in assessing different types of DERs? If so, how should that test be designed? Should multiple tests be used to assess DERs? If so, how? Or should the same tests be used for all DERs? If not, why not? How should DER analyses account for revenue-shifting, cost-shifting, rate increases, or rate decreases? How should third party capital be assessed in valuing DERs (in particular for non-utility system impacts)?

NSPM for DERs - Advisory Committee

NSPM for DERs Project Team Project Coordinator: Julie Michals – Director of Valuation, E4TheFuture Project Consultants/Authors:

Three Tiers of DER Analyses Single-DER analysis; where one type of DER is assessed relative to a fixed (i.e., static) set of alternative resources. Multiple-DER analysis; where multiple DERs are assessed and optimized relative to a fixed set of alternative resources. Integrated-DER analysis; where all electric resources, both distributed and utility-scale, are optimized. NSPM for DERs will focus on #1-2

NSPM for DERs Table of Contents Executive Summary Introduction Common Framework for Benefit-Cost Analysis of DERs Energy Efficiency Resources Demand Response Resources Distributed Generation Resources Distributed Storage Resources Electrification Non-Wires Solutions Analysis of Multiple DERs Integrated DER Planning Tools and Techniques for DER BCAs

Project will Build on Past & Ongoing Projects State BCA DER efforts (NY, CA, MN, etc.) A framework for states to plan for and assess DER utility and non-utility impacts at the individual, multiple, and integrated levels. A Framework for Integrated Analysis of Distributed Energy Resources: Guide for States, LBNL+DOE 2018 A task force on comprehensive electricity planning (CEP) to align distribution system and resource planning processes NARUC-NASEO Task Force Comprehensive Electricity Planning 2019 Grid-interactive Efficient Buildings (GEB) addresses role of GEB in grid-mod efforts NASEO-NARUC Grid-interactive Efficient Buildings Working Group 2018-19 A review of what is necessary to develop a grid with integrated DERs and five common BCA test overviews Integrated Distribution Grid: Decision Guide, vol iii (DSPx), US DOE 2017 A framework for DER-grid integration planning, including a BCA methodology which considers Distribution System, Bulk System, Customer, and Societal Impacts. EPRI, 2014 + other Integrated Grid Projects

Summer 2020 NSPM for DERs publication Project Schedule July 2019 Project Starts Sept 2019 Detailed Outline Jan 2020 First Draft March 2019 Second Draft Summer 2020 NSPM for DERs publication

NSPM Resources NSPM for EE: https://nationalefficiencyscreening NSPM Resources NSPM for EE: https://nationalefficiencyscreening.org/the-national-standard-practice- manual-for-energy-efficiency/ NSPM Case Studies: https://nationalefficiencyscreening.org/resources/case-studies/ NSPM and BCA Modeling: https://nationalefficiencyscreening.org/resources/nspm-and-models/ Database of State Efficiency Screening Practices (DSESP): https://nationalefficiencyscreening.org/state-database-dsesp/ NSPM for DERs (Overview): https://nationalefficiencyscreening.org/the-national-standard-practice-manual-for-ders/ www.nationalefficiencyscreening.org

Thank you Julie Michals – E4TheFuture NSPM Project Coordinator jmichals@e4thefuture.org