Yu.N. Filatov, A.M. Kondratenko, M.A. Kondratenko

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Polarized Electron Beams In The MEIC Collider Ring At JLab Fanglei Lin Center for Advanced Studies of Accelerators (CASA), Jefferson Lab 2013 International.
Advertisements

CESR-c Status CESR Layout - Pretzel, Wigglers, solenoid compensation Performance to date Design parameters Our understanding of shortfall Plans for remediation.
The Siberian Snake Kai Hock Liverpool Group Meeting, 12 August 2008.
Accelerating Polarized Protons Mei Bai Collider Accelerator Department Brookhaven National Laboratory PHNIX Focus, Feb. 24,
Electron and Ion Spin Dynamics in eRHIC V. Ptitsyn Workshop on Polarized Sources, Targets and Polarimetry Charlottesville, VA, 2013.
Nov. 17, 2005Fermi Lab AP Seminar AC Dipole Based Diagnostics Mei Bai, C-A Department.
08/06/ FCC-ee with kinks Can we conserve polarized beams?
18 th International Spin Physics Symposium Polarized Beams at EIC V. Ptitsyn.
Ion Polarization Control in MEIC Rings Using Small Magnetic Fields Integrals. PSTP 13 V.S. Morozov et al., Ion Polarization Control in MEIC Rings Using.
Thomas Roser Snowmass 2001 June 30 - July 21, 2001 Polarized Proton Acceleration and Collisions Spin dynamics and Siberian Snakes Polarized proton acceleration.
Multiple spin resonance crossing in accelerators. A.M. Kondratenko (1), M.A. Kondratenko (1) and Yu. N. Filatov (2) (1) GOO “Zaryad”, Novosibirsk (2) JINR,
October 4-5, Electron Lens Beam Physics Overview Yun Luo for RHIC e-lens team October 4-5, 2010 Electron Lens.
Polarized deuterons and protons at NICA А.Коваленко NICA-SPIN_PRAGUE 2013 Charles University, Prague, July 7-12, 2013.
Simulation of direct space charge in Booster by using MAD program Y.Alexahin, A.Drozhdin, N.Kazarinov.
Plans for Polarized Beams at VEPP-2000 and U-70 Yu.Shatunov BINP, Novosibirsk P S IN 2006.
1 FFAG Role as Muon Accelerators Shinji Machida ASTeC/STFC/RAL 15 November, /machida/doc/othertalks/machida_ pdf/machida/doc/othertalks/machida_ pdf.
Control of Beam Polarization at the NICA Collider A.M. Kondratenko 2, A.D. Kovalenko 1, M.A. Kondratenko 2, Yu.N. Filatov 1,3 and V.A. Mikhaylov 1 1 Join.
ERHIC with Self-Polarizing Electron Ring V.Ptitsyn, J.Kewisch, B.Parker, S.Peggs, D.Trbojevic, BNL, USA D.E.Berkaev, I.A.Koop, A.V.Otboev, Yu.M.Shatunov,
EIC Users Meeting, SBU, 6/27/14 Polarized Electron Beams in the MEIC at JLab Fanglei Lin for MEIC Study Group EIC Users Meeting, Stony Brook University,
Polarization in ELIC Yaroslav Derbenev Center for Advanced Study of Accelerators Jefferson Laboratory EIC Collaboiration Meeting, January 10-12, 2010 Stony.
J-PARC Spin Physics Workshop1 Polarized Proton Acceleration in J-PARC M. Bai Brookhaven National Laboratory.
Thomas Roser SPIN 2008 October 10, 2008 The Future of High Energy Polarized Proton Beams Spin dynamics and depolarizing resonances Early multi-GeV polarized.
Synchronization Issues in MEIC Andrew Hutton, Slava Derbenev and Yuhong Zhang MEIC Ion Complex Design Mini-Workshop Jan. 27 & 28, 2011.
Thomas Roser Derbenev Symposium August 2-3, 2010 Polarized Beam Acceleration In their seminal paper “Radiative Polarization: Obtaining, Control, Using”
1 Polarized Proton Beam Acceleration at Nuclotron with the use of the Solenoid Siberian Snake Yu.N. Filatov 1,3, A.D. Kovalenko 1, A.V. Butenko 1, A.M.
Present MEIC IR Design Status Vasiliy Morozov, Yaroslav Derbenev MEIC Detector and IR Design Mini-Workshop, October 31, 2011.
About polarized protons acceleration at U-70 A.Otboyev, P.Shatunov, Yu.Shatunov BINP, Novosibirsk S.Ivanov, S.Nurushev IHEP, Protvino Dubna Spin-05.
Compensation of Detector Solenoid G.H. Wei, V.S. Morozov, Fanglei Lin JLEIC Collaboration Meeting Spring, 2016.
Thomas Roser SPIN 2006 October 3, 2006 A Study of Polarized Proton Acceleration in J-PARC A.U.Luccio, M.Bai, T.Roser Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton,
Ion Collider Ring: Design and Polarization
P. Chevtsov for the ELIC Design Team
Deuteron Polarization in MEIC
Energy calibration issues for FCC-ee I. Koop, BINP, Novosibirsk
Large Booster and Collider Ring
Acceleration of Polarized Protons and Deuterons at HESR/FAIR
Beam polarization in eRHIC
First Look at Nonlinear Dynamics in the Electron Collider Ring
Accelerating and injecting polarized beams into FCC-ee I
Preservation and Control of Ion Polarization in MEIC
Electron Polarization In MEIC
eRHIC with Self-Polarizing Electron Ring
Polarized Ion Beams with JLEIC
Other issues and concepts under study Conclusions References
Collider Ring Optics & Related Issues
Electron Rings Eduard Pozdeyev.
JLEIC Ion and Electron Polarization
Accelerator and Interaction Region
JLEIC Collaboration meeting Spring 2016 Ion Polarization with Figure-8
Spin Transparency Study and Test
RHIC Spin Flipper M. Bai, T. Roser Collider Accelerator Department
Update on Alternative Design of jleic ion injector Complex B
Racetrack Booster Option & Initial Spin Tracking Results
Update on MEIC Ion Polarization Work
JLEIC Weekly R&D Meeting
Update on MEIC Ion Polarization Work
Update on MEIC Ion Polarization Work
M.A. Kondratenko, V.S. Morozov, Y. Zhang
JLEIC Weekly R&D Meeting
Conventional Synchronization Schemes
Progress Update on the Electron Polarization Study in the JLEIC
Integration of Detector Solenoid into the JLEIC ion collider ring
First results of proton spin tracking in a figure-8 ring
More on MEIC Beam Synchronization
JLEIC Electron Ring Nonlinear Dynamics Work Plan
Upgrade on Compensation of Detector Solenoid effects
Status of Proton & Deuteron Spin Tracking in Racetrack Booster
Current Status of Ion Polarization Studies
Summary and Plan for Electron Polarization Study in the JLEIC
DYNAMIC APERTURE OF JLEIC ELECTRON COLLIDER
Report on Electron Polarization Study
Presentation transcript:

Complete Baseline Scheme for Ion Polarization Preservation and Control in the MEIC Ion Complex Yu.N. Filatov, A.M. Kondratenko, M.A. Kondratenko Science and Technique Laboratory Zaryad, Novosibirsk, Russia translated and presented by V.S. Morozov JLab MEIC R&D meeting, February 19, 2015 F. Lin

… ~13 pages

Contents of the Report Introduction Colliders with “preferred spin axis” and “transparent to the spin” Strength of the zero-integer spin resonance in a figure-8 collider Ion polarization in the MEIC accelerator complex Preservation of the ion polarization in the prebooster and large booster Ion polarization control in the collider ring Calculation of the ion polarization in the collider’s experimental straight Spin flipping in the ion collider ring Conclusions

Introduction Polarization design requirements High polarization (over 70%) for protons or light ions (d, 3He++, and possibly 6Li+++) Both longitudinal and transverse polarization at all interaction points Sufficiently long polarization lifetime Spin flipping at a high frequency Figure 8 features advantageous for satisfying the design requirements The spin tune is energy independent but is equal to zero The figure-8 topology eliminates the effect of arcs on the spin motion Control the polarization of any particle species including deuterons, using longitudinal fields of small integrated strength (weak solenoids) Control the polarization at the interaction points without essentially any effect on the beam’s orbital characteristics Elegant solution to the problem of ion acceleration completely eliminating resonant beam depolarization Allows one to easily adjust the polarization in any direction at any orbital location necessary when transferring the beam from one ring into another or when measuring the polarization by polarimeters Allows for an easy manipulation of the spin direction at an interaction point during an experiment Spin-flipping system with a spin reversal time of less than a second Polarized beam studies in MEIC at an unprecedented precision level

Collider Types Colliders (accelerators) with preferred spin direction Conventional accelerator Collider with a single Siberian snake Collider with two Siberian snakes with their axes at 90 Colliders (accelerators) transparent to the spin Conventional accelerator (resonant case) Collider with two identical Siberian snakes Collider in the shape of a figure 8 The most natural representative of a collider “transparent to the spin” Unique opportunities with colliders (accelerators) transparent to the spin Efficient control of the ion polarization using small magnetic field integrals 10 Tm vs ~100 and 2500 Tm for protons and deuterons, respectively, at 100 GeV/c Polarization control at the interaction points during experiments Efficiently control using “weak” fields, which have essentially no effect on the beam’s orbital characteristics Spin reversal in less than a second

Zero-Integer Spin Resonance The frequency spectrum of the spin motion in a figure 8 consists of integer-multiple harmonics of the particle revolution frequency Zero-integer resonance strength determines polarization stability Resonance strength components Coherent part Due to additional dipole and longitudinal fields along the closed orbit Linear effect Can be compensated, compensation technique is well known and has been successfully used, for instance, at the AGS Incoherent part Nonlinear effect Much weaker than the coherent part

Ion Polarization in MEIC Polarization preservation during acceleration Ion source Ion linac Prebooster Large booster Ion collider ring Polarization control in the ion collider ring

Polarization in Prebooster and Large Booster Figure 8 eliminates spin resonance crossing during acceleration Polarization stabilized by a single weak solenoid Polarization is longitudinal in the solenoid straight, which can be used for polarization matching Spin tune shift by the solenoid must greatly exceed the zero-integer spin resonance strength Required solenoid field integral does not exceed 2 Tm, compare to a full Siberian snake of 75 and 250 Tm for protons and deuterons, respectively, at 20 GeV

Optical Effect of Solenoid Linear optics without solenoid Linear optics with solenoid Betatron tune shift

Ion Polarization Control in Collider Ring 3D spin rotator consisting of weak dipoles and solenoids Any polarization orientation No effect on the optics Three modules for control of the three polarization components Fixed orbit bumps of ~12 mm Spin rotations for a certain polarization direction

Ion Polarization Control in Collider Ring Field integrals as functions of energy for deuterons assuming 0.58 bends and a spin tune of 2.510-4 Field integrals as functions of energy for protons assuming 0.58 bends and a spin tune of 0.01 Lattice integration Each module is ~6 m long

Calculation of Deuteron Polarization Schematic of the experimental straight with bend locations Deuteron polarization along the collider ring

Calculation of Proton Polarization Proton polarization in the experimental straight

Spin Flipping The universal 3D spin rotator can be used to flip the polarization Consider e.g. longitudinal polarization at the IP at 100 GeV/c Polarization is flipped by reversing the fields of the solenoids in the radial and longitudinal spin control modules Polarization is preserved if The spin tune is kept constant No resonant depolarization The rate of change of the polarization direction is slow compared to the spin precession rate >0.1 ms for protons and >3 ms for deuterons

Conclusions Figure 8 design allows for use of weak solenoids for polarization control at high energies of any particle type including deuterons; seamless integration of the spin control elements into the collider lattice with fixed closed orbit and no optics distortion; elimination of the resonant depolarization at all stages of the beam acceleration from the linac to the collider ring; adjustment of any polarization orientation at any orbital location (spin matching at injection into the different accelerator complex components, polarimetry, spin flipping); manipulation of the particle spin during an experiment without affecting the beam orbital properties, which provides a capability of carrying out polarized beam experiments at a new precision level; compensation of the manufacturing and alignment errors of the lattice magnetic elements, which additionally substantially enhances the precision of polarized beam experiments; ease of adjusting the spin dynamics to meet any experimental requirements, which may arise in the future.