LMS Transition to Canvas

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Managing Compliance Related to Human Subjects Research Review Joseph Sherwin, Ph.D. Office of Regulatory Affairs University of Pennsylvania Fourth Annual.
Advertisements

Quality Assurance / Institutional Effectiveness and Course Syllabi Requirements of the Commission for Academic Accreditation UAE Ministry of Higher Education.
PEER REVIEW OF TEACHING WORKSHOP SUSAN S. WILLIAMS VICE DEAN ALAN KALISH DIRECTOR, UNIVERSITY CENTER FOR ADVANCEMENT OF TEACHING ASC CHAIRS — JAN. 30,
Wayne Huebner, Chairman, MSE S&T Campus Project Leader Chris Weisbrook, Director of Academic Programs UM System Project Leader presented to: ITCC April.
2015 Workshop Permanent Status and Promotion Policy and Procedures Overview.
Computer Science Accreditation/Assessment Issues Bolek Mikolajczak UMass Dartmouth, CIS Department Chair IT Forum, Framingham, MA January 10, 2006.
TRAIN Policies An Overview Karen K. Ngowe, MA, MI-TRAIN Administrator Phone:
Technology Access In Post-Secondary Education Ron Stewart Managing Consultant AltFormat Solutions LLC.
PAC Enhancement Project Presentation Core Team: Mr. Richard Chandler, Dr. Polly Hoover, Dr. Maria Jaskot-Inclan, Dr. Ileo Lott, Dr. Pervez Rahman, and.
Achieving the Dream (AtD) The Key Performance Indicators: – Successful completion of developmental courses and advancement to college level courses – Successful.
PERIODIC ASSESSMENT OF PROGRAMS AT UNIVERSITÉ DE MONTRÉAL Office of the Provost Hélène David, associate vice-rector academic affairs Claude Mailhot, Professor.
Florida Tech’s University Assessment Committee For A Continuing Culture of Assessment.
SACS and The Accreditation Process Faculty Convocation Southern University Monday, January 12, 2009 Presented By Emma Bradford Perry Dean of Libraries.
Program Framework Review November 2011 Pamela Miller, Ph.D. AVP for Learning.
UWF SACS REAFFIRMATION OF ACCREDITATION PROJECT Presentation to UWF Board of Trustees November 7, 2003.
1 Addressing the Term “Foreign Equivalent” in OPTN/UNOS Bylaws Membership and Professional Standards Committee Fall 2015.
SACS Leadership Retreat 9/23/ Western Carolina University SACS Reaffirmation of Accreditation Frank Prochaska Executive Director, UNC Teaching.
Proposal Development by Faculty in an Academic Unit College, School, Department, or Program
Relationship with Program DirectorsRelationship with Program Directors New major ideas are generated at the department level Departments offer courses.
Distance Learning and Accreditation Heather G. Hartman, Ph.D. Brenau University Online Studies and SACS Liaison.
The Bologna Process at the University of Helsinki University of Helsinki
Academic Programs and Graduate Studies Office of Semester Conversion October 22, 2015 LI 2250 Get InFORMed: Support for Completing New Course Request Forms.
External Review Team: Roles and Responsibilities A Very Brief Training! conducted by JoLynn Noe Office of Assessment.
Part 1: Overview and Initial Steps. Compliance Certification (Report) Quality Enhancement (Plan) REAFFIRMATION.
Patricia Linton, Ph.D. Professor of English Senior Associate Dean for Academics College of Arts and Sciences Faculty Evaluation.
Promotion Equivalency Workshop. Overview What is a promotion equivalency? Who should pursue a promotion equivalency? What is a promotion equivalency plan?
Continuing Medical Education Guidance for Planners of Regularly Scheduled Series (RSS) To insert your company logo on this slide From the Insert Menu Select.
Ventura College Distance Education Program
Connecting the Dots to Create a Quality Map for Online Programs
Faculty Council Meeting February 7, 2017
SACSCOC Fifth-Year Readiness Audit
Promotion to Full Professor: Regulations and Procedures
Center For Faculty Excellence: Leadership and Faculty Development
New Program Director Workshop
New Program Director Workshop:
New Department Chair Workshop:
Faculty Senate Meeting September 20, 2016
Alternative Education Programs
Assessment Cycle and Academic Effect
Strategic Planning Committee 2017 Year End Update
Recent Standards Changes and Revised Site Report Template
Faculty Evaluation Plan
Guidelines for Tenure and Promotion
Nicole Tarr AAAT Meeting, September 2017
Promotion/Tenure Portfolio
Accreditation and curriculum
Accessibility Updates
Adjunct, newbies, and non-tenure track faculty – oh my!
ABOUT STUDENTS REGIONAL CONSORTIUM Meeting Presentation March 14, 2016
Program Review Teaching and learning committee Santa ana college
Provost Guidelines for Submission of Tenure on Hire Requests to the University Promotion and Tenure Committee.
Trying to get the Horse in Front of the Buggy
Promotion to Full Professor: Regulations and Procedures
Curriculum Committee Orientation
Fort Valley State University
Project Management Method and PMI ® PMBOK ® Roles
Aligning QM Standards with Higher Education Accreditation Hallmarks
Aligning QM Standards with Higher Education Accreditation Hallmarks
LMS Transition to Canvas
LMS Course Provisioning
LMS Transition to Canvas
LMS Transition to Canvas
Faculty Governance at NU
Quality Matters Overview
LMS Transition to Canvas
LMS Transition to Canvas
LMS Transition to Canvas
LMS Transition to Canvas
LMS Transition to Canvas
LMS Transition to Canvas
Presentation transcript:

LMS Transition to Canvas LMS Use Guidelines

LMS Use Guidelines Objective Deliverable Problem Statement Determine and propose the appropriate and allowable use of the Canvas LMS for Rutgers University Objective Proposal on the guidelines for the use of LMS Primary purpose of a Learning Management System for Rutgers University Allowable course types and/or use cases Governance or oversight process Exception process Common Glossary of Terms and Definitions Recommendations on alternative solutions Deliverable Lack of defined and enforced guidelines for the use of LMS systems have allowed the proliferation of non-traditional and non-academic implementations. Problem Statement

Learning Technology Glossary A collaborative document has been created and can be accessed at the following link for team members: Learning Techology Glossary.docx

Proposed Guidelines Primary purpose of the Learning Management System is to enhance the student's learning experience A primary consideration for a request to use the LMS will be whether students are the audience An exception process will be in place for determination and approval of the LMS for use cases outside of the "official list" Besides the instructional use of the LMS, course and template development, and testing of content and materials in support of future courses is (encouraged) allowed

Use Guidelines - Considerations / Discussion Points Who is / are the target audience(s)? Chancellors, deans, directors and department chairs Faculty members Academic administrators LMS Technology support What types of courses are being delivered? (Brainstorm) Should courses delivered in Canvas be restricted to credit based instructional use only? Can Canvas courses be used for internal use only purposes? One-off courses? Should there be an exception process to gain approval on use? Yes, to be developed.  Should be consistent but handled at the school, departmental or program level. Should there be a governance or oversight process? Yes, to be developed.

Types of Courses Staff and Faculty training Student training/tutorial Onboarding / orientation Community Groups Demographically based sites for students (i.e. graduation) Continuous Education (credit and non-credit) Professional development Services/Courses Certificate programs MOOC (Massively Open Online Course) Active/ Instructional learning courses (community sites) Compliance Training (RA training - student staff) Clinical rotation Assessments Student project sites Research sites Tenure tracking and promotion Accreditation Syllabi Repository Faculty forums Student governance RU Core reporting

Next Steps Meeting cadence / communication Collaborative document editing Setting target dates for completion Steering Committee review