Experimental procedures.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Inductive reasoning and implicit memory: evidence from intact and impaired memory systems Authors: Luisa Girelli, Carlo Semenza and Margarete Delazer.
Advertisements

Task switching is not a unitary phenomenon: Behavioral and neuroimaging evidence S.M. Ravizza 1 & C.S. Carter 1,2 Depts. of 1 Psychology & 2 Psychiatry,
Dissociating Semantic and Phonological Processing in the Left Inferior Frontal Gyrus PM Gough, AC Nobre, JT Devlin* Dept. of Experimental Psychology, Uni.
The effects of working memory load on negative priming in an N-back task Ewald Neumann Brain-Inspired Cognitive Systems (BICS) July, 2010.
LOGO Change blindness in the absence of a visual disruption Professor: Liu Student: Ruby.
Temporary suppression of visual processing in an RSVP task: an attention blink? By Raymond, Shapiro, & Arnell JEP:HPP.
Journal of Vision. 2010;10(3):19. doi: / Figure Legend:
From: Low-level awareness accompanies “unconscious” high-level processing during continuous flash suppression Journal of Vision. 2016;16(1):3. doi: /
From: Cross-modal attention influences auditory contrast sensitivity: Decreasing visual load improves auditory thresholds for amplitude- and frequency-modulated.
Figure 1 Example of stimulus presented during semantic eye tracking experiment. The position of the target word was counterbalanced across trials. “Fatigue”
Journal of Vision. 2007;7(11):9. doi: / Figure Legend:
Bram-Ernst Verhoef, Rufin Vogels, Peter Janssen  Neuron 
Interacting Roles of Attention and Visual Salience in V4
Volume 54, Issue 5, Pages (June 2007)
Backward Masking and Unmasking Across Saccadic Eye Movements
A Source for Feature-Based Attention in the Prefrontal Cortex
Bram-Ernst Verhoef, Rufin Vogels, Peter Janssen  Neuron 
Perceptual Echoes at 10 Hz in the Human Brain
Caspar M. Schwiedrzik, Winrich A. Freiwald  Neuron 
Volume 23, Issue 18, Pages (September 2013)
Reaches to Sounds Encoded in an Eye-Centered Reference Frame
Minami Ito, Gerald Westheimer, Charles D Gilbert  Neuron 
Injecting Instructions into Premotor Cortex
Perirhinal-Hippocampal Connectivity during Reactivation Is a Marker for Object-Based Memory Consolidation  Kaia L. Vilberg, Lila Davachi  Neuron  Volume.
Neural Correlates of Knowledge: Stable Representation of Stimulus Associations across Variations in Behavioral Performance  Adam Messinger, Larry R. Squire,
Vincent B. McGinty, Antonio Rangel, William T. Newsome  Neuron 
Differential Impact of Behavioral Relevance on Quantity Coding in Primate Frontal and Parietal Neurons  Pooja Viswanathan, Andreas Nieder  Current Biology 
Feature- and Order-Based Timing Representations in the Frontal Cortex
Caspar M. Schwiedrzik, Winrich A. Freiwald  Neuron 
Volume 18, Issue 4, Pages (January 2017)
A Role for the Superior Colliculus in Decision Criteria
Volume 27, Issue 19, Pages e2 (October 2017)
Volume 49, Issue 3, Pages (February 2006)
Human Cortical Neurons in the Anterior Temporal Lobe Reinstate Spiking Activity during Verbal Memory Retrieval  Anthony I. Jang, John H. Wittig, Sara.
Liu D. Liu, Christopher C. Pack  Neuron 
Human Orbitofrontal Cortex Represents a Cognitive Map of State Space
Differences between Neural Activity in Prefrontal Cortex and Striatum during Learning of Novel Abstract Categories  Evan G. Antzoulatos, Earl K. Miller 
Human Striatal Responses to Monetary Reward Depend On Saliency
Attention Increases Sensitivity of V4 Neurons
Eye Position Affects Orienting of Visuospatial Attention
Neural Mechanisms of Speed-Accuracy Tradeoff
Uma R. Karmarkar, Dean V. Buonomano  Neuron 
Ethan S. Bromberg-Martin, Masayuki Matsumoto, Okihide Hikosaka  Neuron 
Ryo Sasaki, Takanori Uka  Neuron  Volume 62, Issue 1, Pages (April 2009)
Greg Schwartz, Sam Taylor, Clark Fisher, Rob Harris, Michael J. Berry 
The Social Dominance Paradox
Volume 22, Issue 5, Pages (March 2012)
Social Signals in Primate Orbitofrontal Cortex
Caudate Microstimulation Increases Value of Specific Choices
The Normalization Model of Attention
Attention Reorients Periodically
Encoding of Stimulus Probability in Macaque Inferior Temporal Cortex
Face Adaptation Depends on Seeing the Face
Localization of recording sites in OFC and task description.
Daniela Vallentin, Andreas Nieder  Current Biology 
Gijsbert Stoet, Lawrence H Snyder  Neuron 
John B Reppas, W.Martin Usrey, R.Clay Reid  Neuron 
Sound Facilitates Visual Learning
Anthony D. Wagner, Anat Maril, and Daniel L. Schacter
EEG-based classification accuracy for across- and within-expression discrimination of facial identity with temporally cumulative data (50–650 ms after.
A, Rewarded voluntary switch task, a combined risky decision-making and task-switching paradigm. A, Rewarded voluntary switch task, a combined risky decision-making.
Summary of our findings (top) and implications for the comprehensive connectionist model of visual word recognition (cf. Summary of our findings (top)
Repetition suppression: Interaction between trials without (prime) versus with (target) context (C) and repeated versus non-repeated context (i.e., repetition.
Learning rates and CR latency data for mice trained at trace 50–350 or trace 50–450. Learning rates and CR latency data for mice trained at trace 50–350.
Hippocampal-Prefrontal Theta Oscillations Support Memory Integration
Volume 99, Issue 1, Pages e4 (July 2018)
Localization behavior in ITD-alone condition and head turn analysis.
Behavioral task and performance.
Yuko Yotsumoto, Takeo Watanabe, Yuka Sasaki  Neuron 
Li Zhaoping, Nathalie Guyader  Current Biology 
Presentation transcript:

Experimental procedures. Experimental procedures. A, For the PW familiarization procedure of experiment 1, in each learning session, 60 PWs were presented until response, intermingled by novel filler PWs, in an old/new recognition task; 500 ms before stimulus onset, two vertical bars indicated the center of the screen where participants were asked to fixate. The intertrial interval was 2000 ms. B, During MEG recording, participants performed a repetition priming task. Each trial consisted of a sequence of two letter strings (prime and target) presented for 800 ms each, separated by an interval of 800 ms during which a string of five hash marks was presented. Letter strings could be words, familiarized PWs, or novel PWs (120 trials each regarding the prime); 75% of trials were repetition trials, i.e., prime and target were identical (left). The remaining 25% were non-repetition trials in which two different letter strings were presented (middle). In this case, prime and target could be from the same condition or from two different conditions, with all combinations of conditions appearing equally often. Participants were instructed to silently read presented letter strings and respond only to rare catch trials (right). Before onset of the prime, two black vertical bars presented for 800–1000 ms indicated the center of the screen where participants were asked to fixate. After presentation of the target, two gray vertical bars were presented for 1000 ms, indicating a blinking period of 1500 ms starting from onset of the bars. Before the onset of the next trial, a blank screen was presented for the remainder of the blinking period. C, In experiment 2, a paired-association task was used for familiarization of PWs with and without semantics. PWs were presented for 800 ms, followed by the presentation of an object image until button press (maximally 1500 ms). During the intertrial interval of 1000 ms, two vertical bars indicated the center of the screen where participants were asked to fixate. In the semantic condition, there was a reliable association between object and PW. In the familiarization only condition, in contrast, PWs and objects were randomly paired so that each pair occurred only once. D, In the subsequent naming task, each PW from the familiarization conditions with and without semantic associations was presented once. Participants named the object they associated with each PW, or responded “next” in case they did not associate a meaning with a PW. Before each PW presentation, two vertical bars framing the center of the screen were presented until button press by the experimenter. E, The repetition priming task involved in each trial a sequence of two letter strings presented for 800 ms each, separated by an interval of 800 ms during which five hash marks were displayed. The hash mark string was also presented for 800 ms before the onset of the first letter string. Letter strings could be words, familiarized PWs with and familiarized PWs without semantics, or novel PWs (180 trials each regarding the prime). Repetition probability was varied across blocks between 25%, 50%, and 75%. Participants were instructed to silently read presented letter strings and respond to the target whether they had an explicit semantic association with it, or not. During the intertrial interval of 800–1200 ms, two vertical bars indicated the center of the screen where participants were asked to fixate. Susanne Eisenhauer et al. eNeuro 2019;6:ENEURO.0321-18.2019 ©2019 by Society for Neuroscience