Volume 4, Issue 2, Pages (February 1996)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 14, Issue 3, Pages (March 2006)
Advertisements

Structure-based design of peptide presentation on a viral surface: the crystal structure of a plant/animal virus chimera at 2.8 å resolution  Tianwei.
Volume 21, Issue 7, Pages (July 2013)
Volume 21, Issue 7, Pages (July 2013)
Volume 11, Issue 6, Pages (June 2003)
The structure of OmpF porin in a tetragonal crystal form
Volume 25, Issue 2, Pages (February 2017)
Toshiro Oda, Keiichi Namba, Yuichiro Maéda  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 97, Issue 4, Pages (May 1999)
Structure of the Yeast RNA Polymerase II Holoenzyme
Volume 22, Issue 6, Pages (June 2006)
Volume 6, Issue 2, Pages (February 1998)
The Fusion Glycoprotein Shell of Semliki Forest Virus
Volume 15, Issue 4, Pages (April 2007)
Volume 93, Issue 7, Pages (June 1998)
Volume 110, Issue 3, Pages (February 2016)
The Crystal Structure of the Human Hepatitis B Virus Capsid
Yeast RNA Polymerase II at 5 Å Resolution
Microtubule Structure at 8 Å Resolution
Human Leukotriene C4 Synthase at 4.5 Å Resolution in Projection
Volume 18, Issue 8, Pages (August 2010)
Volume 105, Issue 1, Pages (April 2001)
Volume 5, Issue 3, Pages (March 1997)
Volume 124, Issue 3, Pages (February 2006)
Volume 14, Issue 3, Pages (March 2006)
Rubén Díaz-Avalos, Donald L.D. Caspar  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 6, Issue 11, Pages (November 1998)
Subunit Folds and Maturation Pathway of a dsRNA Virus Capsid
Volume 26, Issue 2, Pages e3 (February 2018)
Not your average density
Microtubule Structure at 8 Å Resolution
DNA packaging intermediates of bacteriophage φX174
Volume 74, Issue 1, Pages (January 1998)
Structure of Dengue Virus
Volume 15, Issue 9, Pages (September 2007)
Elizabeth A Hewat, Emmanuelle Neumann, Dieter Blaas  Molecular Cell 
Volume 84, Issue 2, Pages (February 2003)
Volume 5, Issue 7, Pages (July 1997)
Stacy D Benson, Jaana K.H Bamford, Dennis H Bamford, Roger M Burnett 
The Dynamics of Signal Triggering in a gp130-Receptor Complex
Histone Octamer Helical Tubes Suggest that an Internucleosomal Four-Helix Bundle Stabilizes the Chromatin Fiber  Timothy D. Frouws, Hugh-G. Patterton,
15 Å Resolution Model of the Monomeric Kinesin Motor, KIF1A
Analysis of the Stability of Hemoglobin S Double Strands
Volume 23, Issue 9, Pages (September 2015)
Volume 13, Issue 12, Pages (December 2005)
The structure of coxsackievirus B3 at 3.5 å resolution
Zheng Liu, Fei Guo, Feng Wang, Tian-Cheng Li, Wen Jiang  Structure 
Volume 5, Issue 2, Pages (February 1997)
Volume 99, Issue 2, Pages (July 2010)
The structure of an RNA dodecamer shows how tandem U–U base pairs increase the range of stable RNA structures and the diversity of recognition sites 
Volume 6, Issue 2, Pages (February 1998)
Volume 13, Issue 3, Pages (March 2005)
Volume 16, Issue 3, Pages (March 2008)
Volume 2, Issue 4, Pages (April 1994)
Volume 5, Issue 3, Pages (March 2000)
Volume 23, Issue 9, Pages (September 2015)
Volume 110, Issue 3, Pages (February 2016)
Volume 94, Issue 6, Pages (March 2008)
The 4 Å X-Ray Structure of a Tubulin:Stathmin-like Domain Complex
Volume 2, Issue 7, Pages (July 1994)
Erika J Mancini, Felix de Haas, Stephen D Fuller  Structure 
The 2.0 å structure of a cross-linked complex between snowdrop lectin and a branched mannopentaose: evidence for two unique binding modes  Christine Schubert.
Volume 87, Issue 7, Pages (December 1996)
Volume 5, Issue 9, Pages (September 1997)
Stacy D Benson, Jaana K.H Bamford, Dennis H Bamford, Roger M Burnett 
Volume 54, Issue 4, Pages (May 2007)
Analysis of the Stability of Hemoglobin S Double Strands
Maturation Dynamics of a Viral Capsid
Demian Riccardi, Qiang Cui, George N. Phillips  Biophysical Journal 
Evidence of Cholesterol Accumulated in High Curvature Regions: Implication to the Curvature Elastic Energy for Lipid Mixtures  Wangchen Wang, Lin Yang,
Presentation transcript:

Volume 4, Issue 2, Pages 157-164 (February 1996) Structure determination of simian virus 40 and murine polyomavirus by a combination of 30-fold and 5-fold electron-density averaging  Youwei Yan, Thilo Stehle, Robert C Liddington, Haiching Zhao, Stephen C Harrison  Structure  Volume 4, Issue 2, Pages 157-164 (February 1996) DOI: 10.1016/S0969-2126(96)00019-6

Figure 1 Schematic representation of the T=7d icosahedral lattice of SV40. The six VP1 pentamers that project from the virion surface and make up the crystallographic asymmetric unit of the space group I23 are represented by small disks. One pentamer is centered at a strict icosahedral 5-fold symmetry axis (S5); the remaining five pentamers have only local 5-fold symmetry (L5). Axis S5 is valid for the entire particle, whereas axis L5 is only valid for the invariant (core) part of the pentamer centered on it. The icosahedral asymmetric unit (one-fifth of the crystallographic asymmetric unit) is shown shaded. It is a pyramidal volume, with its apex at the origin (white sphere) and with its edges defined by adjacent 5-fold, 3-fold, and 2-fold axes. The Patterson asymmetric unit is half this volume. Also outlined is the asymmetric unit of space group I222 (bold lines) that was used for computational purposes and contains 3×6=18 pentamers (one-quarter of the virion) in the asymmetric unit. I222 is a subgroup of the true SV40 space group, I23. Structure 1996 4, 157-164DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(96)00019-6)

Figure 2 Slab (∼10 å thick) taken from one icosahedral asymmetric unit of the Patterson sum function projected along the crystallographic 2-fold axis. The portion shown here is plotted from several sections normal to the 2-fold axis, between distances of 215 å and 225 å from the origin. The black dots mark the final refined heavy-atom positions. Peaks around the mirror planes that frame this triangle were suppressed when plotting the figure. Such peaks tend to accumulate at special positions in the sum function. Structure 1996 4, 157-164DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(96)00019-6)

Figure 3 Flow diagram for the averaging procedure combining 30-fold and 5-fold averaging. The invariant parts of pentamers were averaged 30-fold and the remaining volumes were averaged 5-fold. In step I, densities in the invariant part, defined by an envelope covering the invariant part of one pentamer, were averaged 30-fold and reconstructed on an arbitrary intermediate grid. In step II, the averaged density of the invariant part of a pentamer was expanded 18-fold. This expansion was carried out in two steps: a 6-fold expansion to generate the asymmetric unit of space group I23 (the true space group), and a further 3-fold expansion to generate the asymmetric unit of space group I222, which was used for computational purposes. In step III, the rest of the viral shell at radii >160 å was averaged 5-fold within the I23 asymmetric unit and expanded 3-fold into the I222 asymmetric unit. Finally, the two averaged maps were merged, and new phases were calculated based on the merged map. In practice, the algorithm was applied as follows. An envelope was defined to cover the clearly invariant parts of the pentamer, and an exactly complementary envelope was drawn to cover the remaining volumes of the viral shell. These envelopes were used for 30-fold averaging of the invariant regions and 5-fold averaging of the remaining parts. Fourier coefficients were calculated for the merged, averaged map, and the calculated phases were combined with Fobs, using a modified Sim weighting procedure [25], to start the next cycle. The first round of 30-fold averaging was carried out at 4.5 å, using the phases obtained from the final round of 5-fold averaging. The resolution was then extended stepwise to 3.8 å. At each resolution, reflections were added in shells of 2 Miller indices, and the procedure shown was iterated. Convergence at each step was monitored by calculating R-factors between Fobs and Fcalc from the averaged map and by the mean phase change at the end of each cycle. In general, five cycles were performed at each step, using Fobs coefficients for the first two cycles and (2Fobs–Fcalc) coefficients for the remaining three. Several cycles of 5-fold refinement were then carried out at 3.8 å, in order to relax the constraint of perfect identity between pentamers centered at L5 and S5. Structure 1996 4, 157-164DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(96)00019-6)

Figure 4 Results of the adjustment of the SV40 pentamers in the polyoma cell. Only the translation search is shown (the curves for the rotation search also show clear maxima). The best position for both strict and local pentamers is evident from the maximum correlation coefficient. The shifts indicated are along the 5-fold symmetry axis (S5 for strict pentamers and L5 for local pentamers). Structure 1996 4, 157-164DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(96)00019-6)

Figure 5 Schematic representation of pentamer packing in SV40 and polyoma, viewed in a cross section taken along a plane that contains both the strict (S5) and one of the neighboring local (L5) axes (see Figure 1). Pentamers are represented by large rectangles with those from polyoma shown shaded. The two particles share the same origin and have the same orientation in their unit cells. The local pentamers of SV40 and polyoma superimpose well at the so-called ‘two-helix contact’ (see [8]), but the polyoma pentamer swings out 2.6°, as indicated by the curved arrow. The strict pentamer of polyoma shifts, with respect to SV40, 5 å away from the origin, as indicated by straight arrows. The two hinge positions, A and B, which are discussed in the text, are indicated. Structure 1996 4, 157-164DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(96)00019-6)