Japie van der Westhuizen & Colleagues SA Stud Book

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
West Virginia University Extension Service Genetics in Beef Cattle Wayne R. Wagner.
Advertisements

British Limousin Cattle Society Alison Glasgow. What’s been going on? Database development ~ Registrations & Perf. Recording Addition of Online Census.
Fokkerij in genomics tijdperk Johan van Arendonk Animal Breeding and Genomics Centre Wageningen University.
Bull selection based on QTL for specific environments Fabio Monteiro de Rezende Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco (UFRPE) - Brazil.
Level II Agricultural Business Operations.  Understand the reproduction cycle  Assess herd reproductive efficiency  Understand the decisions involved.
Colorado Agriscience Curriculum
BEEF GENETICS NEXT What color are Shorthorns? n A. White n B. Red n C. Roan n D. All the above A B C D NEXT.
Economic Feasibility of Adopting Genomic Selection in Beef Cattle Kenneth Poon & Getu Hailu University of Guelph CAES 2010, Niagara Falls June 18 th, 2010.
BEEF CATTLE GENETICS By David R. Hawkins Michigan State University.
How Genomics is changing Business and Services of Associations Dr. Josef Pott, Weser-Ems-Union eG, Germany.
But who will be the next GREAT one?. USA Bull Proofs * Bulls are ranked based upon their DAUGHTER’S (progeny) production and physical characteristics.
Extension of Bayesian procedures to integrate and to blend multiple external information into genetic evaluations J. Vandenplas 1,2, N. Gengler 1 1 University.
India Emerging Markets Conference, May 2009 (1) Leigh Walton Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA Beltsville,
Exploring the Beef Industry
Chuanyu Sun Paul VanRaden National Association of Animal breeders, USA Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory, USA Increasing long term response by selecting.
Principles of Selecting and Mating Farm Animals (Chapter 9) Genetic improvement of farm animals –Involves selection (choosing the best to be parents) –Involves.
December 2014 Proof Changes
Van Eenennaam 11/17/2010 Animal Genomics and Biotechnology Education Alison Van Eenennaam, Ph.D. Cooperative Extension Specialist Animal Biotechnology.
Jared E. Decker 1.
Straightbreeding – A simple way to reduce your bottomline D. A. Daley California State University, Chico NCBCEC Brown Bagger Session October 17, 2012.
Better business decisions start here 1 A Benchmarking Tool That Allows More Effective Decisions W.J. (Bill) Grexton Manager, Herd Management Services,
Using EPDs in Selection Stolen and edited by: Brandon Freel and Daniel Powell Originally compiled by Colorado Agriscience Curriculum.
Livestock and Poultry Evaluation Animal Science II.
George R. Wiggans Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD National Association.
EBLEX Better Returns Programme Material produced for EBLEX Beef BRP by Signet Breeding Services Genetic Improvement of Beef Cattle in the UK.
A.I. Management Manual Fifth Edition CHAPTER 15 HEIFER A.I.
 Selection & Culling Strategies Mario S. Mongeon; OMAFRA.
The Brown Bagger Beef Cattle Adaptability Current Tools of Assessment John L. Evans Oklahoma State University 1.
Selection for Disease Resistance Gert Pedersen Aamand Nordic Cattle Genetic Evaluation.
Brown Bagger – Beef Cattle Genetics: Fine Tuning Selection Decisions 1 How do I decide what traits are important ? Selection Indices Dorian Garrick Department.
AFGC Convention 2004 (1) 2004 Possibilities for Improving Dairy Cattle Performance Dr. H. Duane Norman Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural.
Animal Genomics and Biotechnology Education “Economic value of genomic information: Sire and commercial heifer selection" Van Eenennaam 10/19/2011.
B66 Heritability, EPDs & Performance Data. Infovets Educational Resources – – Slide 2 Heritability  Heritability is the measurement.
Selection of Breeding Program An S 426 Fall 2007.
Evaluating Longevity: 10 Years of Using Stayability EPD Larry Keenan Research & Special Projects Coordinator, RAAA.
 Objective 7.03: Apply the Use of Production Records.
2006 Mid-Atlantic Dairy Grazing Conference, 2006 (1) Is There a Need for Different Genetics in Dairy Grazing Systems? H. D. Norman, J. R. Wright, R. L.
XX International Grassland Conference 2005 (1) 2005 Genetic Alternatives for Dairy Producers who Practise Grazing H. D. Norman, J. R. Wright, R. L. Powell.
Beef Data & Genomics Programme Information Meetings 2015 Teagasc Beef Specialists.
How Does Additional Information Impact Accuracy? Dan W. Moser Department of Animal Sciences and Industry Kansas State University, Manhattan
ANIMAL BREEDING IN THE CONTEXT OF MODERN AGRICULTURE FROM SCIENCE TO PRACTICE May 2009 PERINATAL MORTALITY IN DAIRY CATTLE Szűcs, E., Gulyás, L.,
Selecting Herd Bull Beef Production Game. What is the job of our bull? Produce sperm Pass on quality genetics of rate of gain, muscling, structure Physically.
Selection & Judging of Beef Cattle
MANAGEMENT OF BULLS FOR REPRODUCTIVE AND ECONOMIC SUCCESS Cliff Lamb Beef Specialist University of Florida.
Genetics – Trait Selection An S 426 Fall Genetics – Trait Selection Has led to development of Economically Relevant Traits (ERT) and Indicator Trait.
Principles of Agricultural Science – Animal 1. 2 Expected Progeny Differences Principles of Agricultural Science – Animal Unit 7 – Lesson 7.2 Predicting.
Using EPDs in Selection Edited by: Jessica Hawley & Brandon Freel Originally compiled by Colorado Agriscience Curriculum.
Meori Rosen Past, Present, and Future Dairy Cattle Breeding in Israel.
Cow-Calf Enterprise Standardized Performance Analysis.
Evaluation & Use of Expected Progeny Differences in Beef Cattle Dr. Fred Rayfield Livestock Specialist Georgia Agricultural Education To accompany lesson.
Bull Selection: Beef Kay Farmer Madison County High School edited by Billy Moss and Rachel Postin July 2001.
Beef Genomics and Data Programme
Cattle Breeding in Ireland.
Sustainable Agriculture
Fundamentals of the Eurostar evaluations
Exploring the Beef Industry
Validation of €uro-Star Replacement Index.
Selection and Judging of Beef Cattle
Evaluation & Use of Expected Progeny Differences in Beef Cattle
Using EPDs in Selection
Exploring the Beef Industry
Experiences with genomic prediction
Selection Tools for Beef Cattle Improvement
Drought and fodder crisis What cows should I cull?
Using EPDs in Selection
A National Sire Fertility Index
Use of a threshold animal model to estimate calving ease and stillbirth (co)variance components for US Holsteins.
History of Selection From Phenotypes to Economic Indexes
Expected Progeny Differences
Expected Progeny Difference EPD
Presentation transcript:

Japie van der Westhuizen & Colleagues SA Stud Book Die toekoms: Nuwe tegnologie en moderne hulpmiddels in stoetteling The future: New technology & modern aids in stud breeding Japie van der Westhuizen & Colleagues SA Stud Book

Big effects from small decisions & actions

P = G + E

P = G + E Total variation of P in a population Variation of P in each contemporary group

P = G + E Total variation of P in each contemporary group Variation of P in each contemporary group due to genetic differences Variation of P in each contemporary group due to additive genetic differences

Principles: PHENOTYPE (P) PHENOTYPES that are TRUSTED and USEFUL Compliance to international standards of quality Conformity and harmonised to expected recording practices and international bodies Automated testing according to biological and logical norms Scrutiny and Rectification at source Expansion of phenotypes (traits) to include all of economic importance

Principles: ENVIRONMENT (E) Proper description and definition of ENVIRONMENTAL factors causing differences in performance Identification and quantifying non-genetic factors causing differences in performance among animals for each trait Correct definition of contemporary groups Defining common environments Linking environments with link-sires and related animals Standardisation of some specific test environments

Principles: GENETIC (G) Prediction of GENETIC merit making a difference in economic value of progeny in selection candidates Model specification based on scientific principles and global practices Isolating additive genetic differences among selection candidates Accounting for other random effects causing phenotypic differences Optimising prediction accuracy and frequency Incorporating of GENOMIC information in prediction of additive genetic merit

Using the Dairy Example Using PHENOTYPIC information in making a difference in the bottom line of livestock farmers Phenotypic expression assist in: Assessing management levels Benchmarking Animal response to management practices Suitability and profitability of farming system Needs for management interventions Using the Dairy Example

Logix Milk Automated Herd Health monitoring system Developed with Vets Benchmarking Producer’s choice of participation level Immediate action lists for animals to be treated Specialised Animal Science advice Interactive web based portal on logix.org.za

Automated diagnostics in dairy herds – a game changer

Restriction of financial loss in dairy herds

Action lists

Benchmarking against the breed and other herds Own herd Chosen herds Breed

Comparison and benchmarking against biological and economic norms Desired range Ideal for maximum profit

Saving on input costs Feeding excess energy

Long term sustainability is “all about GENETICS” Starts with proper recording & trait definition Continue with proper contemporary allocation Knowing what breeding value prediction means Using breeding values and their derivatives for selection Combining genomic information appropriately for prediction accuracy

GOAL Genetic merit prediction Selection index (value) Pedigree Economic value each trait Genetic covariance structure Objectives & Criteria Genetic merit of each animal for each trait Genetic Economic Merit (Each Animal) Selection & Mating plans Evaluation of effect GOAL Return on investment Environmental constraints Market needs Recordability of traits Payment systems Risk factors Other constraints Labour Infrastructure Other Genetic merit prediction Selection index (value) Pedigree Performance Genomic info

Genetic merit tools – a few examples Achieving GOALS Mating plans Ranking on Objectives Available selection candidates

Total herd analysis Economic values Individual traits

Genetic Windows, easy assessment of selection and mating strategies Herd 1: Top female fertility High wean, heavy birth weights Herd 2: Medium framed animals Milk low Herd 4: Medium framed, lower fertility Herd 3: Bigger framed animals

Combining genetic merit with profitability What makes a beef cow more profitable Early calving in season Regular calving Easy calving Milk Progeny growth rate Low maintenance Logix Cow Value (profit per Ha)

Logix Cow value distribution of cows and the impact when improved Stars Logix cow value Average Breeding Values: Rand per Ha 4½ R58.70 4 R46.86 3½ R34.85 3 R25.32 2½ R13.07 2 R2.02 1½ -R9.68 R44.66 R22.75 2 -> 4 1½ -> 2 ½

Less profitable (R/Ha) More profitable (R/Ha) LOWER PROFIT ENVIRONMENT HIGER PROFIT ENVIRONMENT Environment 1 Environment 2 Mate with star bulls Star Cow herd Star Cow herd Less profitable (R/Ha) More profitable (R/Ha) Environmental effect on profitability

Less profitable (R/Ha) More profitable (R/Ha) LOWER PROFIT ENVIRONMENT HIGHER PROFIT ENVIRONMENT Environment 1 Environment 2 Progeny of star bulls Star Cow herd Star Cow herd Star Cow herd Star Cow herd R22.50 difference R22.50 difference Less profitable (R/Ha) More profitable (R/Ha) Environmental effect on profitability

Genetic change for PROFIT in beef cattle Profit per Hectare

Informative Sales catalogues PROFIT breeding Cows Balanced PROFIT Components of PROFIT PROFIT Finishing progeny

Informative decision making from catalogues – Example 1 Corrective mating

Informative decision making from catalogues – Example 2 Mating best with best

Optimal matings – completing the plan Achieving GOALS Mating plans Ranking on Objectives Available selection candidates

Optimal achieving of goals

Real time ultra SOUND scanning as a predictor of carcass properties

RTU Locations scanned

Determining fat Subcutaneous fat Marbling RTU Image Eye Muscle (carcass) RTU Image

Marbling

Muscle on the carcass Eye muscle area Eye Muscle (carcass) RTU Image

GENOMICS Dairy cattle Beef Cattle Stud Book service via Interbull conversions Correct way = combining Parent Average with DGVs Dairy Genomic Program (DGP) onset Beef Cattle Initial steps by Bonsmara Beef Genomics Program (BGP)

Reliability of prediction Impact of Genomic Selection on reliability of genetic merit prediction in cattle. Example of MILK or Daughter fertility Age (Years) Reliability of prediction 2 4 6 8 10 12 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 DGV EBV GEBV 1st crop daughters 2nd crop daughters

How will Genomic Selection make a practical difference in genetic progress. The major advantage of genome based breeding values is for young animals without measurements or measured progeny. Many traits of economic importance are either sex limited, can only be verified at a late age or can only be measured on the carcass. Examples: Milk production contribution to birth and weaning weight, Calving Ease, Female Fertility, Productive herd life, Progeny retention, Carcase, Meat and other product characteristics.

Genetic Merit of Each Animal Breeding Value? Genetic Merit of Each Animal Difference Population Mean Progeny Mean Comparing each animal’s PROGENY PERFORMANCE relative to the population (breed) BREED Performance Progeny Performance

What would be the change from EBVs to GEBVs? EBVs of PARENTS Exact EBV from BLUP when no recordings from progeny (eg. too young or sex limited trait) Expected spread of EBVs of PROGENY Direct Genomic Value (DGV) relate the animal at DNA level to others with similar genomic building blocks GEBV (Genomic EBV) combine EBV and DGV according to information accuracy of both

Closing remarks

Tools of the trade Record correctly Set objectives and criteria Mate best with best and cull non profitable animals Scan the population Use phenotypes for the right reasons Management decisions Benchmarking Profitability of enterprise Use wisely

Embrace technology Draw direct lines to profitability No compromise to objective recording Start with breeding objective and goals Optimise mating plans Use all the relevant aids available Can still keep it simple

DANKIE Japie van der Westhuizen Binnekort! japie@studbook.co.za www.studbook.co.za www.SADairyBulls.com www.logix.org.za Binnekort! www.SABeefBulls.com DANKIE