Japan’s proposal for EPPR-11-15e-Rev.1

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
WLTP OIL #6, annex 2, sections 3.2 and 3.3 Determination of engine speeds, calculation of available power.
Advertisements

Working group L-EPPR 07 June 2013
Proposal to EPPR-08-08e National Motorcycle Quality Supervisory & Testing Center (Tianjin) Test type III requirements: emissions of crankcase gases Tianjin.
EPPR-05-13e Summary of recent discussions on evaporative emissions and OBD.
Japan’s position and proposal on draft gtr of EVAPO and Crankcase Emission on draft gtr of EVAPO and Crankcase Emission Ministry of Land, Infrastructure,
Nicolas HAREL Sam TRIPATHY 23/10/2014 CONFIDENTIEL PROPRIÉTÉ RENAULT WLTP PEV Range test procedure : End of test criteria.
Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism (MLIT), Japan Japanese proposal on evapo –gtr 8 Sep JAPAN proposal on EVAP-GTR to add Japanese.
GTR amendments Japan #14 WLTP IWG at Paris WLTP-14-08e.
Japan’s proposal for EPPR (India comment for EPPR-14-06e) (India comment for EPPR-14-06e) 3/Mar/ 2016 JAPAN AUTOMOBILE STANDARDS INTERNATIONALIZATION.
India Comments on EPPR-16-05e Proposal for a new global technical regulation on the measurement procedure for two- or three-wheeled motor vehicles with.
Amendment proposals for Regulations Nos. 9, 63 and 92 On behalf of the European Commission Transmitted by the expert from the European Commission Informal.
TF#4 – Mechanical Integrity Approved Japanese proposal for addition of vehicle mechanical protection structure into mechanical integrity requirement. EVS-11-17e.
India’s Comments on EPPR-19-17(PART - B1)
Japan’s proposal for EPPR-16-10
India’s Comments on EPPR (Part-B2)
JAPAN AUTOMOBILE STANDARDS INTERNATIONALIZATION CENTER
India proposals on part B1 & B2 text
WLTP - GTR No. 15 WLTP-13-15e ECE-TRANS-WP29-GRPE e
Improvement of Wind tunnel Measurement Process Status report
The specified maximum speed of ACSF system
JAPAN AUTOMOBILE STANDARDS INTERNATIONALIZATION CENTER
Heavy Duty Vehicle Requirements in EVS-GTR for HFCV-GTR Discussions
Report and explanation document of SBR-TF
Status report of the cycle and gearshift issues task force (GSTF)
Tianjin Motorcycle Technical Center
JAPAN AUTOMOBILE STANDARDS INTERNATIONALIZATION CENTER
WLTP-21-04e Revision 1 Amendment proposals for annex 2 of GTR #15 from the cycle gearshift issues task force Heinz Steven
Positions on open points WLTP DTP subgroup LabProcICE
GTR Corrections, Open Points, Expert Proposals and Confirmations in GTR 15 1/2/2019.
01 General requirements Road load matrix family vehicle definition 02 Annex 4 Wind tunnel for road load matrix family 03 Annex 6 CO2 interpolation range.
WLTP Validation2 for RLD ~ Validation test plan by Japan ~
Transmitted by the IWVTA Informal Group
Tianjin Motorcycle Technical Center
UNECE IWG on EPPR for L-category vehicles State of play
GTR Corrections, Open Points, Expert Proposals and Confirmations in GTR 15 February 5, 2015.
Full load curve proposal
UN QRTV GTR Informal Working Group 6th session – Baltimore, USA, May 2018 Regulation (EU) No 540/2014: commonalities and differences with UN R
on propulsion of OBD2 gtr
Japan’s proposal on the wording for driving-selectable mode
Tianjin Motorcycle Technical Center
Tianjin Motorcycle Technical Center
Japan’s position and proposal on draft of -gtr 2
on the definitions of OBD2 gtr
Japanese position and proposal on draft of OBD-GTR
Japan’s proposal for EPPR-11-15e-Rev.1
Japan’s proposal for EPPR-11-15e-Rev.1
JAPAN AUTOMOBILE STANDARDS INTERNATIONALIZATION CENTER
Progress report of Sub Group EV (WLTP-12-19e) 1
India Additional Comments on
India Comments on EPPR
OBD2CG OBD2 Phase 1 consolidated draft
WLTP-26-03e - Revision 1 Final amendments for annex 2 and status report about the programming code development subgroup Heinz Steven
Adolfo Perujo (IWG chairman)
STATEMENT OF TECHNICAL RATIONALE AND JUSTIFICATION
IMMA proposal for rev. 1 of ASEP 2.0
GTR Corrections, Open Points, Expert Proposals and Confirmations in GTR 15 8/20/2019.
STATEMENT OF TECHNICAL RATIONALE AND JUSTIFICATION
Japan’s proposal on the wording for driving-selectable mode
CLEPA comments on OBD II GTR 18 Draft
JAPAN AUTOMOBILE STANDARDS INTERNATIONALIZATION CENTER
JAPAN AUTOMOBILE STANDARDS INTERNATIONALIZATION CENTER
Open Issue: Warm up Cycle and Temperatures Proposal By India
Japan’s proposal for EPPR-16-09
Additional discussion points from the gearshift issues task force
UNECE WLTP COP task-Force Revision on testing Frequency
Japan’s proposal for EPPR-11-15e-Rev.1
IMMA proposal for the next step
Japan’s proposal for EPPR-16-05
Request for Clarifications by IWG-IWVTA
India Comments on EPPR
Presentation transcript:

Japan’s proposal for EPPR-11-15e-Rev.1 7/Oct/ 2016 JAPAN AUTOMOBILE STANDARDS INTERNATIONALIZATION CENTER http://www.jasic.org

Japan’s proposals Engine capacity<150cm3 and vmax<100km/h Class1 NO 11-15e Rev.1 Japan proposal Justification 3.1 Vehicle sub-classification. Class1. Vehicles that fulfil the following specifications belong to class 1: 3.1.1. Vehicle sub-classification. Class0. Vehicles that fulfil the following specifications belong to class0: 3.1.2. Vehicle sub-classification. Class1. Vehicles that fulfil the following specifications belong to class 1: Define "Class 0". Need to add Category 3-1 vehicle to the classification of WMTC Class 0. The test methods for Category 3-1 vehicles differs depending on their engine capacity and vmax. Engine capacity<150cm3 and vmax<100km/h Class1 Engine capacity≦50cm3 and vmax≦25km/h   Class0-1 and 25km/h<vmax≦50km/h Class0-2 50cm3<engine capacity<150cm3 and vmax≦50km/h or engine capacity<150cm3 and 50km/h<vmax<100km/h Class1

Japan’s proposals NO 11-15e Rev.1 Japan proposal Justification 5.2 General requirements. Vehicles with a maximum design vehicle speed ≤ 25 km/h or ≤ 45 km/h or with a maximum net or continuous rated power ≤ 4 kW shall meet all the relevant requirements of this GTR applying to vehicles with a maximum vehicle design speed of > 25 km/h or maximum net or continuous rated power > 4 kW. Annex B.5.15. includes test cycles dedicated for such vehicles with a low maximum vehicle design speed or low maximum power. Delete the whole paragraph 5.2. No need to describe "classification" in "general requirements". Move the definition of Category 3-1 vehicle to 3.1.1.

Japan’s proposals NO 11-15e Rev.1 Japan proposal Justification 7 8 General requirements applicable for manufacturers requesting type-approval.. Delete the whole paragraph 7 and paragraph 8. Type approval is not needed in GTR. 9.1 Performance requirements for the type1 test of a two-wheeled motorcycle. For low displacement motorcycle. Delete the whole paragraph 9.1. -After the decision of the emission    limit, combine the sentence in 9.2. No need to describe each emission limit of Category 3-1 vehicle here. 9.2 The principal performance requirements for a two-wheeled motorcycle Fill in the emission limits later. The emission limits of each CP are under consideration. So revise the description of emission limits after making decisions about each emission limit.