Reading by 3rd Grade Developing the Plan.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Vs. Attending a Different Training as a Site Team.
Advertisements

PLP Circle of Support: A prevention/intervention model December 12, 2003 Rhode Island Department of Education.
PERSONAL LITERACY PLANS AT THE SECONDARY LEVEL December 12, 2003.
Passport to Reading School Wide Differentiated Reading Instruction Oak Park District 97 Dr. Albert Roberts, Superintendent Longfellow School Angela Dolezal,
PAYS FOR: Literacy Coach, Power Hour Aides, LTM's, Literacy Trainings, Kindergarten Teacher Training, Materials.
Pennsylvania’s Continuous Improvement Process. Understanding AYP How much do you know about AYP?
1 Lodi Unified School District Monitoring and Accountability A District Program Improvement Update Board of Education Study Session August 19, 2008.
Delta Sierra Middle School Napa/Solano County Office of Education School Assistance and Intervention Team Monitoring Report #8 – July 2008 Mary Camezon,
1 Executive Summary Title I Delivery Model Title I Personnel Changes for English Language Arts Instructional Coaches Intervention Teachers.
1 Reading First at Oak Grove Elementary School Medford School District 549C Julie York – District Person Julie Evans – Principal Barbara Low – Reading.
READING FIRST Exemplary Schools Presentation Jefferson Elementary School Medford School District 549C April 2005.
Common Core Implementation Plan Whittier City School District Board of Education Meeting April 7, 2014.
Eugene Field Elementary School “Inspiring and empowering each other to positively impact our community and our world.” Our Journey to Responsive Intervention.
Coaching Framework Improving Teaching and Learning Literacy District More than Literacy.
Milwaukee Partnership Academy An Urban P-16 Council for Quality Teaching and Learning.
Professional Development Update February 12, 2013 Prepared by: Lisa Schwartz.
Silas Deane Middle School Steven J. Cook, Principal Cynthia Fries, Assistant Principal October 22, 2013 Wethersfield Board of Education.
Commitment to Student Improvement CSI-Pike County KRS (Interventions) KRS (Below or Above Benchmarks) KSI is a framework for providing.
CREEKSIDE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL DATA REVIEW FOR FY 2015.
AGENDA 1. Task Force Findings 3.Professional Development Reach Higher Shasta Action Items 5.Assessments, Interventions & Instruction 6.What.
RESPONSE TO INTERVENTION A schoolwide, systematic, collaborative process in which ALL school resources are seamlessly integrated and singularly focused.
What is Reading First This “program” focuses on putting proven methods of early reading instruction in classrooms. Through Reading First, states and districts.
Principal’s Forecast Tangipahoa Parish School System Leadership Focus Strategy June 2015 Gary T. Porter.
40 Performance Indicators. I: Teaching for Learning ST 1: Curriculum BE A: Aligned, Reviewed and Monitored.
Response to Intervention (RTI) at Mary Lin Elementary Principal’s Coffee August 30, 2013.
Who We Are The Center for Children and Technology (A division of the Education Development Center) A non-profit education research group
 Share draft PD Plan for SY Development Process District Priorities Draft District Learning Plans for 4 core content areas  Allow time for small.
1 **** Willowville Elementary Road Trip to Excellence
THE KEY TO CLOSING THE ACHIEVEMENT GAP The key to predictable results in improving student achievement requires connecting curriculum, assessment and instruction.
Results of Survey on Level Organization June 2012.
“Lessons learned” regarding Michigan’s state-wide implementation of schoolwide behavior and reading support Margie McGlinchey Kathryn Schallmo Steve Goodman.
Welcome to our Back to school Morning Benchmark School “Learning for All” OUR BELIEFS…  ALL CHILDREN CAN LEARN AND EXPERIENCE SUCCESS HOW…
Curriculum & Instructional Projects at the Florida Center for Reading Research Research Symposium November 6, 2006 FCRR.
Hastings Public Schools PLC Staff Development Planning & Reporting Guide.
1 The Oregon Reading First Model: A Blueprint for Success Scott K. Baker Eugene Research Institute/ University of Oregon Orientation Session Portland,
John Fuller Elementary School Pine Tree Elementary School &
Reading First Reading First M.W. Cuyler Elementary School September 17, 2004.
Rochester Area Math Science Partnership Our Mission: To support high student achievement through world class standards in math and science Continuous.
Keys to being an effective principal Mike Miles July 2009.
CURRICULUM RENEWAL EDD 7913 CRN BY JAMIE LEEDER, GENEVIEVE LEYDIG, KEITH MABE NOVA SOUTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY APRIL 4, 2013.
ANNOOR ISLAMIC SCHOOL AdvancEd Survey PURPOSE AND DIRECTION.
Interpreting data for program evaluation and planning.
Comprehensive K-12 Mathematics Improvement Plan Update May 9, 2013.
Response To Intervention “Collaborative Data Driven Instruction at Lewis & Clark Elementary” Owen Stockdill.
Deb Stover, Principal, EH Phillips Elementary, Central Dauphin School District Margee Ziegenfuss, Former Supervisor of Curriculum, East Pennsboro Area.
Where Do You Stand? Using Data to Size Up Your School’s Progress Michael C. McKenna University of Virginia.
Office of Service Quality
Zimmerly Response NMIA Audit. Faculty Response Teacher input on Master Schedule. Instructional Coaches Collaborative work. Design and implement common.
1 Oregon Reading First Institute on Beginning Reading: Evaluating and Planning Spring, 2006 Cohort A (C) 2006 by the Oregon Reading First Center Center.
Knowledge-Building and Instructional Practice in Georgia Reading First.
Response to Invention (RTI) A Practical Approach 2016 Mid-Level Conference.
Language Arts/Reading & Math Curriculum Plan Kindergarten Through Sixth Grade School Year Involved Departments: Elementary Curriculum Federal.
Rochester Community Schools Understanding Michigan’s 3rd Grade Reading Law Parent Presentation PA 306 of 2016 (HB 4822)
What does this mean for my child?
By: Alice Tackett and Jill Maynard
Documented District Support Needs
Literacy Development Plan
Monitoring of the Secondary Literacy Plan
Parkside Elementary School (Jackson Cluster)
Developing v. Measuring Teachers A Growth Model
Local Control Accountability Plan
Literacy Update Board of Education October 11, 2016
Comprehensive Planning
Diagnosis and Remediation of Reading Difficulties
Rochester Community Schools Understanding Michigan’s 3rd Grade Reading Law Parent Presentation PA 306 of 2016 (HB 4822)
Colchester Public Schools
TKES and SLO assessments
Results of Survey on Level Organization June 2012
Developing and sustaining a district and school literacy team
Initial Implementation Washington Unified School District
Presentation transcript:

Reading by 3rd Grade Developing the Plan

Executive Summary District 3rd grade Reading Claim Data 17/18 – 35% Below Standard 16/17 – 45% Below Standard 15/16 – 43% Below Standard Indicators for improvement based on successes in LUSD and experts in the field Good first instruction Consistency throughout system On-going professional development Differentiated instruction Consistent assessments: formative, summative, progress monitoring Additional student support Administrator support Grade to grade articulation Next steps Develop plan with input from teachers and principals to address Best instructional practices Identify common assessment tools and practices Professional development Additional student support measures

From the Field Principals Teachers Rafael Ceja – Oakwood Susan Petersen – Nichols Julie Vaz - Borchardt Teachers Adrienne Radich Drouin – Nichols/Live Oak Lisa Robinson - Nichols Sarah Schluter – Borchardt Maryann Seefried – Borchardt Jeanine Valencia – Live Oak Jennifer Wendt - Borchardt

Professional Development Systematic Instruction – Delivery of instruction is consistent throughout the district Preschool-3rd grade Assessments – What Formative and Summative Assessments are used and How? Data Analysis – Teachers and Administrators must learn how to analyze data Academic Conferencing – Teach teachers how to analyze data Progress Monitoring – Teach teachers how to monitor student progress Instructional coaches focus on K-3 reading PD for administrators on supporting reading instruction

Differentiated Instruction Journeys/i-Read Phonemic Awareness Phonics Sight Words Comprehension Enhanced curriculum for students at/above grade level

Assessments – Formative & Summative DIBELS – Formative Assessments Three times per year Reading Inventory – Formative Assessments Quarterly District Benchmarks – Summative Assessments Quarterly CAASPP – Summative Assessment One time per year

Progress Monitoring - Formative Assessments Teachers monitor student progress Teachers adjust instruction Additional Support to Remediate or Enrich

Additional Student Support After School Intervention focused on K-3 Additional Adult support during Universal Access as needed

Administrator Support Administrators must see themselves as a Learner and Literacy Coach Monitor and collect data Share data at staff meetings and discuss Sets School Wide Literacy Goals Organize Academic Conferences at least two times per year Plan collaboration time for teachers (Staff Meetings/Collaboration Time) Provide release time for teachers to observe others and exemplary programs Be visible in classrooms & provide positive constructive feedback to teachers