By: Jennie Simpson and Dr. Frank Flanders

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Beef Grading Dr. Gretchen Hilton Assistant Professor Meat Judging Team Coach.
Advertisements

Grading Eggs for Interior Quality Practice #8 Poultry CDE Practice
Grading Individual Shell Eggs Practice #4 Poultry CDE Practice
Introduction to Live Animal Evaluation Kenneth Geuns Michigan State University Dept. of Animal Science.
Grading Shell Eggs Practice #3 Poultry CDE Practice
BEEF CARCASS YIELD AND QUALITY GRADING
Welcome to the Wonderful World of Meat!
Beef Grading J. Brad Morgan Oklahoma State University.
 While Quality grade deals with a prediction of the eating quality of the meat, Yield grade is a measurement of the amount of edible meat that the carcass.
Live Cattle Evaluation. What are we trying to determine? u Quality grade u Yield grade u Dressing percentage.
Live Animal Evaluation Sheep Nick Nelson Blue Mt. Community College ANS 231 Originated by Kenneth Geuns Michigan State University Revised 2009.
Poultry CDE Practice: Identification of Carcass Parts
Poultry CDE Practice: Carcass/Parts Grading 2 Georgia Agricultural Education Curriculum Office Catrina Kennedy and Dr. Frank Flanders Photos by Tim Savelle.
Quality and Yield Grading Beef Quality Grading  Used to predict the palatability (taste) of the meat.  Determined by the age and marbling (intramuscular.
Beef Carcass Evaluation AS101
U.S. Quality Grades Sex Class Maturity Marbling Firmness.
Live Beef Evaluation & Pricing. History 1916 Standards for U.S. grades developed 1924 Market classes and grades of dressed beef developed 1927 Voluntary.
Beef Evaluation: What you must estimate Actual 12th rib fat –nearest.01 inch REA –nearest.1 square inch –live weight, move decimal ( ) Yield.
Meat Science Jeopardy Jeopardy With your hosts, Mary Jo Manning, Mary Ellen Manning, and Peter Strom “Meat Science”
Beef Evaluation and Pricing continued. Estimating Yield Grade Visually evaluate animal for differences in fat and muscle Shape.
Broiler Breeder Selection Keep - Cull CDE Practice Based on the 2003 Georgia Poultry CDE By: Jennie Simpson and Dr. Frank Flanders Georgia Agricultural.
Poultry CDE Practice: Further Processed Meat Products Evaluation Georgia Agricultural Education Curriculum Office Catrina Kennedy, Dr. Frank Flanders,
Beef Quality Grading, Yield Grading and Pricing. Slaughter By-Products ($/cwt) $66/cwt$109/cwt Fab/Processing Credit Items: Fat $8.50/cwt Bone $5/cwt.
A Historical Review of 4-H and FFA Beef Carcass Information at the Box Elder County Fair 1974 To 2003 Extension Annual Conference Logan, Utah Tuesday,
Choose a category. You will be given the answer. You must give the correct question. Click to begin.
Beef Grading and Evaluation
Livestock Evaluation “MUST” Haves
Introduction to Breeding Livestock Judging and Evaluation
AnSc 1101 Meat Grading. Outline Retail yield Inspection vs. grading Carcass Anatomy Quality Grading Yield Grading.
Meats CDE Practice 2000 Photos of Meat Cuts with key Written by Dr. Fred Rayfield and Dr. Frank Flanders Georgia Agricultural Education, Curriculum Office.
EXTERNAL PARTS ID OF SWINE By: Jennie Simpson and Dr. Frank Flanders Georgia Agricultural Education Curriculum Office Georgia Department of Education April.
EXTERNAL PARTS ID OF SHEEP By: Jennie Simpson and Dr. Frank Flanders Georgia Agricultural Education Curriculum Office Georgia Department of Education April.
Live Animal Evaluation Sheep
By: Jennie Simpson, Dr. Frank Flanders, and Christina Akins
Beef Carcass Yield Grading CDE Practice Based on the 2003 Georgia State Meats CDE By: Jennie Simpson, Dr. Frank Flanders, and Tiffany Prather Georgia Agricultural.
Principles of Livestock/Poultry Evaluation and Showmanship
Poultry CDE Practice: Further Processed Meat Products Evaluation
Live Animal Evaluation Beef
Beef Carcass Yield Grading CDE Tutorial
BEEF CARCASS YIELD AND QUALITY GRADING
By: Jennie Simpson, Dr. Frank Flanders, and Tiffany Prather
By: Jennie Simpson and Dr. Frank Flanders
Horticulture Plant ID Photos by Keith Wall, Ware Co. High School
Grading Eggs for Interior Quality Practice #8 Poultry CDE Practice
Dairy Judging CDE 2003 Georgia FFA State Event
Poultry CDE Practice: Identification of Carcass Parts
By: Jennie Simpson, Dr. Frank Flanders, and Tiffany Prather
Poultry Parts ID Poultry CDE Practice #9
Poultry Parts ID Poultry CDE Practice #9
Poultry CDE Practice: Carcass/Parts Grading 2
Poultry CDE Practice: Identification of Carcass Parts
Grading Individual Shell Eggs Practice #6 Poultry CDE Practice
By: Jennie Simpson, Dr. Frank Flanders, and Tiffany Prather
Meats CDE Practice Ham Placing Classes Based on the 2003 Georgia State Meats CDE By: Dr. Frank Flanders,Tiffany Prather & Jennie Simpson Georgia Agricultural.
Grading Shell Eggs Practice #1 Poultry CDE
Greg Highfill Woods County Extension Educator, Ag/4-H
Grading Individual Shell Eggs Practice #4 Poultry CDE Practice
Placing Carton Eggs Georgia Poultry CDE 2003
 Click on a present to go to a question
Grading Individual Shell Eggs Practice #7 Poultry CDE Practice
Placing Carton Eggs Georgia Poultry CDE 2003
Poultry CDE Practice: Identification of Carcass Parts
Grading Individual Shell Eggs Practice #7 Poultry CDE Practice
Grading Shell Egg Cartons Practice #2
By: Jennie Simpson, Dr. Frank Flanders, and Rusty Prather
Placing Carton Eggs Georgia Poultry CDE 2003
Grading Individual Shell Eggs Practice #7 Poultry CDE Practice
Quality and Yield Grading
Given that {image} {image} Evaluate the limit: {image} Choose the correct answer from the following:
Presentation transcript:

Beef Carcass Yield Grading CDE Practice Based on the 2002 Georgia State Meats CDE By: Jennie Simpson and Dr. Frank Flanders Georgia Agricultural Education Curriculum Office Georgia Department of Education December 2004 Click Here to meet the authors Start

Before you begin…………. Carcass #1 Carcass #2 Carcass #3 Carcass #4 The objective of this exercise is to practice yield grading beef carcasses. Ribeye size and fat thickness over the ribeye must be estimated as well as the kidney, pelvic, and heart fat (KPH). KPH and the hot carcass weight are given in the following problems, which were taken from the 2002 State CDE competition in Athens, GA. Click on a carcass to START. Carcass #1 Carcass #2 Carcass #3 Carcass #4

Beef Carcass Yield Grading Evaluate yield grade and choose the correct answer in the box on the left. Yield Grade 1 High Average Low 2 High 3 High 4 High 5 High Given Values Hot Carcass Weight 772 lb. KPH 3 % Click on ribeye below to enlarge, view grid, and estimate fat thickness. Next Carcass Return to Menu

Beef Carcass Yield Grading Evaluate yield grade and choose the correct answer in the box on the left. Yield Grade 1 High Average Low 2 High 3 High 4 High 5 High Given Values Hot Carcass Weight 627 lb. KPH 2.5 % Click on ribeye below to enlarge, view grid, and estimate fat thickness. Next Carcass Return to Menu

Beef Carcass Yield Grading Evaluate yield grade and choose the correct answer in the box on the left. Yield Grade 1 High Average Low 2 High 3 High 4 High 5 High Given Values Hot Carcass Weight 575 lb. KPH 1.5 % Click on ribeye below to enlarge, view grid, and estimate fat thickness. Next Carcass Return to Menu

Beef Carcass Yield Grading Evaluate yield grade and choose the correct answer in the box on the left. Yield Grade 1 High Average Low 2 High 3 High 4 High 5 High Given Values Hot Carcass Weight 650 lb. KPH 4% Click on ribeye below to enlarge, view grid, and estimate fat thickness. Return to Menu END

Carcass #1 Answer Return FYG=3.15 High Step 1 FT=0.5 inches for carcass #1. Base=PYG 2.0 for 0.0 in. of fat Adj.= +1.25 (Each 0.1 increase in fat, add 0.25 to PYG) PYG= 3.25 Step 2 HCW=772 lb. for carcass #1 Base= 600 lb. and 11.0 in^2 REA RREA= 13.0 (Each 25 lb. increase, add 0.3 to RREA) Step 3 Has REA= 13.1 Each 0.3 inch deviation from RREA, adj. YG by 0.1 Adj. to YG= 0.0 Step 4 KPH= 3.0% for carcass #1 Base= 3.5%, for each 0.5% deviation, adj. YG by 0.1 Adj. to YG= -0.1 Final Step REA Adj.= 0.0 KPH Adj.= -0.1 FYG= 3.25-0.1= 3.15 FYG=3.15

Carcass #2 Answer Return FYG=2.55 Average Step 1 FT=0.3 inches for carcass #2. Base=PYG 2.0 for 0.0 in. of fat Adj.= +0.75 (Each 0.1 increase in fat, add 0.25 to PYG) PYG= 2.75 Step 2 HCW=627 lb. for carcass #2 Base= 600 lb. and 11.0 in^2 REA RREA= 11.3 (Each 25 lb. increase, add 0.3 to RREA) Step 3 Has REA= 11.4 Each 0.3 inch deviation from RREA, adj. YG by 0.1 Adj. to YG= 0.0 Step 4 KPH= 2.5% for carcass #2 Base= 3.5%, for each 0.5% deviation, adj. YG by 0.1 Adj. to YG= -0.2 Final Step REA Adj.= 0.0 KPH Adj.= -0.2 FYG= 2.75-0.2= 2.55 FYG=2.55

Carcass #3 Answer Return FYG=1.6 Average Step 1 FT=0.0 inches for carcass #3. Base=PYG 2.0 for 0.0 in. of fat Adj.= 0.0 (Each 0.1 increase in fat, add 0.25 to PYG) PYG= 2.00 Step 2 HCW=575 lb. for carcass #3 Base= 600 lb. and 11.0 in^2 REA RREA= 10.7 (Each 25 lb. increase, add 0.3 to RREA) Step 3 Has REA= 10.7 Each 0.3 inch deviation from RREA, adj. YG by 0.1 Adj. to YG= 0.0 Step 4 KPH= 1.5% for carcass #3 Base= 3.5%, for each 0.5% deviation, adj. YG by 0.1 Adj. to YG= -0.4 Final Step REA Adj.= 0.0 KPH Adj.= -0.4 FYG= 2.00-0.4= 1.6 FYG=1.6

Carcass #4 Answer Return FYG=4.25 High Step 1 FT= 0.9 inches for carcass #4. Base= PYG 2.0 for 0.0 in. of fat Adj.= +2.25 (Each 0.1 increase in fat, add 0.25 to PYG) PYG= 4.25 Step 2 HCW=650 lb. for carcass #4 Base= 600 lb. and 11.0 in^2 REA RREA= 11.6 (Each 25 lb. increase, add 0.3 to RREA) Step 3 Has REA= 12.0 Each 0.3 inch deviation from RREA, adj. YG by 0.1 Adj. to YG= -0.1 Step 4 KPH= 4% for carcass #4 Base= 3.5%, for each 0.5% deviation, adj. YG by 0.1 Adj. to YG= +0.1 Final Step REA Adj.= -0.1 KPH Adj.= +0.1 FYG= 4.25-0.1+0.1= 4.25 FYG=4.25

THE END Back to Start End Show