Results of a representative participant with multiple training sessions. Results of a representative participant with multiple training sessions. Average.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Demonstrations I, II, and III.

Advertisements

Soft robotic device applied to the RV in a pressure overload model of RHF. Soft robotic device applied to the RV in a pressure overload model of RHF. (A.

Force limits and layout design.

A battery-free microorigami robotic arm.

Self-folding triangular devices at two scales.

Degradation of MSP samples in 37°C DPBS solution.

Comparison of predicted and measured forces and moments.

Demonstrations integrated system tests.

Basic design concept of human mimetic humanoid.

Comparing previous simulation work with current study.

TPAD controller schematic and testing for WPC.

TPAD controller performance for three force components.

Cable-driven system diagram for structure matrix.

Three different types of transfer functions with a codomain of [0,1].

TPAD training protocol.

System setup and results of a representative participant in a single training session. System setup and results of a representative participant in a single.

Self-sensing of actuator position.

Examples of AEGIS autonomous target selection.

Workspace comparison of Delta robots.

Ex vivo testing of the soft robotic devices.

Soft robotic device applied to the left side in a coronary ligation HF model. Soft robotic device applied to the left side in a coronary ligation HF model.

Group data during free walking between sessions 1 and 16.

Distribution of the number of collisions and the average closest-neighbor distance as a function of communication range and delay. Distribution of the.

Soft robotic VAD implementations, control schemes, and HF models.

Power-free sterilization of culture plate.

The foldable robotic arm with seven modules assembled in series.

AEGIS intelligent targeting compared with blind targeting.

Prosthesis grasping and control.

Comparison of repertoire distributions to baseline.

A novice user executing various subtasks from study 1.

Tukey boxplots overlaid on data points from objective and subjective measures, displaying results from study 1. Tukey boxplots overlaid on data points.

Soft robotic VAD implementations, control schemes, and HF models.

Tactile features for prosthesis perception.

Online verification using reachable occupancies.

Illustration of the addressable wireless folding concept.

Force limits and layout design.

Experimental results for healthy participants.

Cell viability tests. Cell viability tests. SEM images of (A) MC3T3-E1 cells and (B) MSCs on days 1, 3, and 5 of culture. (C) Survival rates of MC3T3-E1.

Prosthesis system diagram.

Soft robotic device applied to the left side in a coronary ligation HF model. Soft robotic device applied to the left side in a coronary ligation HF model.

Translation of a spherical object.

Self-sensing of actuator position.

Brain-computer interfaces.

Details of an implementation of a mechanism within the control chambers for selective lengthening of the sides of the soft robot. Details of an implementation.

Untethered kirigami-skinned soft crawlers.

Degradation of MSP samples in 37°C DPBS solution.

Schematic representation of MT sorting under a given electric field.

Soft robotic device applied to the RV in a pressure overload model of RHF. Soft robotic device applied to the RV in a pressure overload model of RHF. (A.

Steady-state performance of the soft robotic device in LHF models.

Underwater observatory.

Simulation results of magnetic driving ability in hepatic artery, portal vein, and hepatic vein. Simulation results of magnetic driving ability in hepatic.

Comparison of predicted and measured forces and moments.

In vitro cell-release experiments on a glass substrate.

Object manipulations performed by our biohybrid robots.

Overhead snapshots. Overhead snapshots. (A to E) Mark I3, robot experiments (movie S1). (F) Mark I3, simulation (movie S2, side by side with a run on the.

Galloping-like gait with the design of a two-legged robot.

Technological framework of the multidirectional gravity-assist

AEGIS autonomous targeting process.

Examples of AEGIS autonomous target selection.

Laboratory tests. Laboratory tests. (A) Time lapse of the landing process, refilling process, and subsequent launch. (B) Comparison of position and velocity.

Jetting phase analysis.

Kinematic and mechanical advantage trade-off study.

Fig. 5. High burdens of AA signature mutations and predicted immunogenicity in Taiwan HCCs. High burdens of AA signature mutations and predicted immunogenicity.

The biomimetic pressure sensing ability.

Iron line orientation inside the PDMS matrix.

Floating microrobots with different preferred magnetization directions: Fabrication and control principles. Floating microrobots with different preferred.

Breakdown of incorrect participant responses.

Fig. 3 Performance of the generative model G, with and without stack-augmented memory. Performance of the generative model G, with and without stack-augmented.

Comparison of children’s behavior between the three conditions.

Setup used in the study. Setup used in the study. A child interacts with the robot tutor with a large touchscreen sitting between them, displaying the.

Presentation transcript:

Results of a representative participant with multiple training sessions. Results of a representative participant with multiple training sessions. Average and SE are presented for the data before and after 15 training sessions during free walking. (A) EMG of muscles. (B) Lower limb angles. (C) Pelvic translation ROM and the trunk angle. (D) Vertical GRFs (please refer to movie S1). J. Kang et al. Sci. Robotics 2017;2:eaan2634 Copyright © 2017 The Authors, some rights reserved; exclusive licensee American Association for the Advancement of Science. No claim to original U.S. Government Works