BACKGROUND Exploratory Practice Dick Allwright

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Vygotsky Additional Guided Participation. Sociocultural Activity Guided participation is a particular type of scaffolding studied by Rogoff et al. (1995).
Advertisements

T ell Me About Yourself! 中文四 Cheryl 鄭雅双.
Practitioner Research: Exploratory Practice workshop University of Leicester School of Education MA Applied Linguistics and TESOL / MA TESOL Continuing.
Harry and Rosemary Wong
School based task for month 4—task b Self evaluation and personal aims Author:Tao Chunmei Zhang Zhishuang Lai Yueduo.
What factors enhance student teacher understanding of tacit knowledge when working with experienced teachers? Nicola Warren-Lee Background – Ed D research.
Bringing it Back to School An Exercise in -Community Involvement -Group Work -Environmental Responsibility -Independent Learning.
APPROACHES to LEARNING: ORGANISATIONAL SKILLS PYP PARENTS FORUM 25 April 2014.
Vygotsky The zone of proximal development. The ZPD This was a term used by Vygotsky to refer to the distance between what a child can achieve alone, and.
The “Early Years Opportunity” Relationship and Serve and Return Interactions 1.
Professionally Speaking : Qualitative Research and the Professions. Using action research to gauge the quality of feedback given to student teachers while.
Long and Short Term Goals To develop a responsible and positive attitude we chose Respect for Self, Others and Learning for the long term goal. Our students.
Teachers Doing Research : Relationship Building with Students Holly Tuft  Professional Development School Student Teacher  Riverside Elementary School.
 Q 1 : What can children, at level one, from 5-7 years old do  They can talk about what they are doing?  They can tell you about what they have done.
© 2016 albert-learning.com. You will be asked 8 questions. Listen to each question and respond after the tone. Look at the timer to see how much time.
And Create a School Where Staff Want to Work Cadence Education
Welcome to our 6th Grade Parent Breakfast
Information for Parents Statutory Assessment Arrangements
ORAL WORK.
Discover your child’s Learning Style
Back to school - Making a fresh start
Supporting School Transformation
Information for Parents Statutory Assessment Arrangements
Laboratorio di lingua inglese 3
Read the scenario carefully and select the best response.
Dr.Soultana Lefkopoulou
Effective communication
ENTERPRISE FACULTY What is Enterprise?.
PUTTING THE PIECES TOGETHER
Laboratorio di lingua inglese 3
Welcome to Kindergarten!
Laboratorio di lingua inglese 3
Improvement 101 Learning Series
Welcome To Class! Would you rather be rich with no friends or poor but have a group of close friends?
co-teaching binder First steps and resources The real resources I use!
Accountable Talk with English learners
Ready for Day 3? Yay!.
Introduce as appropriate, and explain this assembly will be all about understanding our feelings and how we cope with them.
INTRODUCTION TO LESSON STUDY
I’ll take care of me… That’s my priority!.
A letter from a parent.
Integrating CSC into our Schedules
MY Friend has Autism.
Peer mentor training Session 1
:Let’s Bring Schools to XXI Century!
Building Learning Power
School of Education Home Involvement in Character Education: Lessons from the Narnian Virtues Dr Peter Hart, Dr Shirley-Anne Paul, Prof Mark Pike, & Prof.
Diversity Practicum Tonya M. Isabell EDU /2/14.
MY Friend has Autism.
Using Video and Technology in the Classroom - Conclusion
INTRODUCTION TO LESSON STUDY
Our Nurturing Approach
THE FOUR R’S FOR LIFE-LONG LEARNING
What is Teacher Challenge:
Delwyn L. Harnisch, University of Nebraska, Lincoln
A letter from a parent.
Effective Parent-Teacher Conferences
Use this presentation to introduce parents to EasyPeasy during an induction day workshop or even a dedicated EasyPeasy launch. It includes presenter notes,
Building Resilient people Through Critical and creative Thinking
Welcome back! I’m excited for you to look at Day 2 and 3 with me!
Laboratorio di lingua inglese V
My relationship to the capacities of this program
Use this presentation to introduce parents to EasyPeasy during an induction day workshop or even a dedicated EasyPeasy launch. It includes presenter notes,
Home-School Communication
B1-B2 Unit Three Lesson 1B Recreation survey.
Family Projects A New Approach to Homework
Welcome to the Parent Forum
George Mason University
Zhenghua Primary School Established in 1989
Faye Nicholson, P7 Class Teacher, Kingsland Primary School
Presentation transcript:

Participatory Research Proposal Final Anna Kurowska GPTE Cohort 2014/2015

BACKGROUND Exploratory Practice Dick Allwright ’What matters is that someone is interested enough in something to be seriously puzzled about it and so willing to work to try to understand it.’ [Allwright & Hanks, 2009: 146]

background Reflecting on situations and asking ’why’ questions about them rather then rushing into looking for ’solutions’. Social/individual activity Collegiality: learners and teachers working together to investigate what puzzles them Teacher’s and students’ joint experience in classrooms

background ’EP is work for understanding that problematises the notion of planning to control and introduces the alternative notion of planning for understanding.’ [Allwright, 2003] Control vs. understanding

background Quality of life vs. quality of work Understaning vs. problem-solving [Allwright & Hanks, 2009: 220-221]

Students’ communication needs The situation was that the students (6 year-olds, 26 in the class) were acting very lively/noisy just after the brake started. Some of them were naughty also during classes. The drawback of the situation was that the noise was unbearable for the mentee. I suspect it was a challenging situation for the teacher as well.

The students did not seem to rest after the class or enjoy each other company, but they took the chance and let go the energy that was stored in them. Their behaviour could suggest that their communication/kinaesthetic needs were not satisfied. Did they have to make up for the silent (or almost silent) 45 minutes? On the other hand, the teacher provided them with many opportunities to speak. Wasn’t it enough? [confusion]

Another challenge is that about 1/5 of the class time would be spend on keeping discipline or keeping the students calm so that the teacher could conduct what she had planned to do with them during the day.

The experience that lead to the puzzle Winter brake Practicum=observation+conducting classes CLIL unit It turned out to be a great surprise but also a major burden and a real challenge My mentor A primary state school 1000 students in the school

What have I done to narrow the the puzzle down? I answered a numer of questions which assisted my thinking Location (where do I locate the problem?) Viewpoint (is my viewpoint preventing me from seeing things clearly?) Interest Factors

What have I done to narrow the the puzzle down? I talked to my mentor throughout the whole practicum A talked to her after 2 months of being there during my practicum I talked to me colleague from my teaching practice A week ago another colleague suggested that I should not take the whole thing so personally

My mentor My mentor is the main teacher of the class I have been observing and teaching. It’s been 10 (?) years of her teaching practice. She also teaches English. She’s the kindest, warmest and most caring about her students, teacher. The programme she’s following is sort of experimenal. It’s an innovation. CLIL-does it actually work?

Ways of collecting data My main source of data was my mentor. The context: 2 boys who should not be in the same class Children at the age of 5/6 are not ready emotionally although cognitively they are eager and capable to learn Some of them have difficult situations at home Some of the parents are not cooperating

Ways of collecting data The teacher and the class are in constant movement: they change the rooms very often Lack of a one place The classroom is shared with another class/teacher Some of the classes they have classes in do not make it any easier

The questions Why are those students are so difficult to handle? Can students’ loud behaviour be eliminated/minimised through students’ cooperation? Is the number of factors that influence them so great and the factors are so deep that I’m not capable of investigating the puzzle?

The question Are their individual features influencing the situation so much that for the time being not much can be done in order to improve the quality of classes?

What have you done in order to: „bring people together..” „mutual development..” „make the work a continuous enterprise…” (Allwright,2005, p.360)