Characteristics of the children we place – what does the data say?

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Alistair Ross and Uvanney Maylor Institute for Policy Studies in Education London Metropolitan University Issues in recruitment, progression and careers.
Advertisements

ALB-3 Paper 1 Headline Measures and Business Intelligence Data Pack.
University as Entrepreneur A POPULATION IN THIRDS Arizona and National Data.
Adoption Leadership Board (ALB) Headline Measures and Business Intelligence Quarter update Please send any queries to:
How do LaSalle County Children Enter the Child Welfare System? LaSalle County Indicated reports FY 2010 SourceNumber Percent of total Law enforcement20755%
How do Morgan & Scott County Children Enter the Child Welfare System? Morgan and Scott Counties Indicated reports FY 2010 SourceNumber Percent of total.
Who lives in Rock Island County? Rock Island County Demographics by Race and/or Ethnic Group, 2009 estimate N = 148,826 White113, % Black or African.
How do McLean County Children Enter the Child Welfare System? McLean County Indicated reports FY 2010 SourceNumber Percent of total Law enforcement23350%
How do Peoria County Children Enter the Child Welfare System? Peoria County Indicated reports FY 2010 SourceNumber Percent of total Law enforcement19235%
How do Champaign County Children Enter the Child Welfare System? Champaign County Indicated reports FY 2010 SourceNumber Percent of total Law enforcement22548%
How do Sangamon County Children Enter the Child Welfare System? Sangamon County Indicated reports FY 2010 SourceNumber Percent of total Law enforcement21638%
Contra Costa County Disproportionality – Examples and Changes Ray Merritt; Dorothy Powell; Children and Family Services Research and Evaluation.
Child Welfare in North Carolina: Ethnic and Racial Disproportionality and Disparity by D. F. Duncan UNC-CH School of Social Work June 10, 2009.
NYS Office of Children & Family Services Race and Ethnicity: Path Through the Juvenile Justice System Deputy Commissioner Joyce Burrell March 2008.
Creating Racial Equity in Child Welfare: What Do We Know? Judith Meltzer, CSSP Jim Casey Youth Opportunities Initiative Fall Convening November 16, 2010.
Pathways to permanence for black, Asian and mixed ethnicity children Selwyn J., Harris, P. Quinton D., Nawaz, S., Wijedasa, D. and Wood, M.
What’s Race Got To Do With It? An Honest Conversation About the Impact of Racism on the Child Welfare System.
Constructing Safety Indicators from Child Welfare Events and Trajectories Fred Wulczyn, Bridgette Lery Center for State Foster Care and Adoption Data Chapin.
Patient Participation Survey Results. In general what is the quality of your health?
Is Britain fairer? Debbie Weekes-Bernard Head of Research Response by the Runnymede Trust.
British EDI attitudes part 1. 1.What percentage of people in the UK regard disability as a drain on resources ? 12%29%38%53% 2. What percentage of people.
EDUCATION IN BRITAIN By Alex Grinyer.
University College Cork 17 January 2013
Attainment, progress and context by disadvantage / pupil premium
Population and Labor Force Projections for New Jersey: 2014 to 2034
Introduction On the 5th and 6th October 2016 The Village School was inspected by OFSTED. This was a full inspection with a total of five inspectors over.
Mesfin S. Mulatu, Ph.D., M.P.H. The MayaTech Corporation
Effective factors that increase academic achievement among low SES youth Alex Anley November 30, 2016.
U S A QUESTION 1-10 The number of people living in poverty in the United States decreased from 2009 to 2011.
Health of Wisconsin: Report Card 2016
CHN Congregations 23 Level Level 3 48 Level 2
Gypsy Traveller Conducted by YouGov on behalf of the Traveller Movement Fieldwork Dates: 29th September - 2nd October 2017.
Workshop 2S (Secondary)
Congregate Care in Ohio
RAISEonline Data Analysis for Governors and Staff
Equity from the Start Disproportionality and Disparity Among Young Children in the CW System: What the Data Tell Us Wendy Wiegmann CCWIP May 10, 2017.
Enrollees by Race and Ethnicity in U.S. Dental Schools, 2000 to 2009
Applicants by Race and Ethnicity in U.S. Dental Schools,
POLICY AND LEGISLATIVE FRAMEWORK – ADOPTION AND FOSTERING
Equity from the Start Disproportionality and Disparity Among Young Children in the CW System: What the Data Tell Us Wendy Wiegmann CCWIP May 10, 2017.
Another Planned Permanent Living Arrangement (APPLA)
Neither likely or unlikely
“Whole Family Working: Making it Real for Young Carers”
  1. Date and time of screening Date:  AM/PM please circle
Older men were more likely to live with their spouse than were older women. In 2003, 73 percent of older men lived with their spouse while only one-half.
Applicants by Race and Ethnicity in U.S. Dental Schools, 2010 to 2016
State Superintendent’s Advisory Committee on 4-Year-Old Kindergarten May 15, 2017 FIND PICTURE!
Poverty in the UK today Based on 2006 figures.
Health Inequalities.
Disproportionality in Child Welfare
SCC Recent High School Graduates: Number & Ethnic Profile
Characteristics of All Students (N=20,822) Fall Census 2016
First Generation College Students:
Enrollees by Race and Ethnicity in U.S. Dental Schools, 2010 to 2017
Enrollees by Race and Ethnicity in U.S. Dental Schools, 2000 to 2015
Gender Total % Female Male
Applicants by Race and Ethnicity in U.S. Dental Schools, 2010 to 2018
Supplementary Data Tables, Community Health Indicators
Applicants by Race and Ethnicity in U.S. Dental Schools, 2000 to 2009
Enrollees by Race and Ethnicity in U.S. Dental Schools, 2010 to 2018
Enrollees by Race and Ethnicity in U.S. Dental Schools, 2010 to 2016
Did not have a usual source of care Went without care because of cost
Death & Dying.
SCC Student Ethnicity Profile (Fall 2012 to Fall 2016)
Citation: Cancer Care Ontario
Sociology Chapter 8 Section 4:
BAME Elders & Co-Housing
Health and Health Care for Blacks in the United States
Senior manager / professor Black / African / Caribbean
NEXT.
Presentation transcript:

Characteristics of the children we place – what does the data say?

Children are being adopted at a younger age…

…and are spending less time in care

Adoption timelines for children - by age group Timescales from child entering care to Adoption Order (Average number of days per stage) Adoption timelines for children - by age group Total = 743 days) Total = 670 days) Total = 1,181 days) This is drawn from ALB data collected over the last 3 years to Q3 2016-17. This slide shows the difference, by age, in the timelines of each stage in the adoption process – from entering care to a decision for adoption, through all the way to getting an Adoption Order. Children aged 5 or over account for about 20% of adoptions. It takes 76% longer on average for such children to move through the adoption system (from entering care through to their Adoption Order) compared to children aged under 5. There are 2 main stages where their adoption timelines are much longer – Decisions for adoption takes almost twice as long, whilst the matching stage is 2.5 times longer. Even the time it takes to get an Adoption Order is longer for older children. (A note for Annie: the ages refer to children of that age at each particular stage of adoption – eg aged 5+ when they got their placement order) It takes twice as long on average for a child aged 5+ to reach a decision for adoption after entering care, compared to a child aged under 5. It also takes 2.5 times longer to match these children. Source : ALB 3 years to Q3 2016-17

Adoption timelines for children - by ethnicity Timescales from child entering care to Adoption Order (Average number of days per stage) Adoption timelines for children - by ethnicity Total = 743 days) Total = 727 days) Total = 747 days) Total = 807 days) Total = 1,013 days) Children of a White British origin account for 81% of adoptions. Although children of African, Caribbean or other black ethnicity only account for a small proportion of adoptions (2%) their timescale is significantly longer – it takes 40% longer from entering care through to Adoption Order, compared to children of white British ethnicity. The greatest difference is in the matching stage, which takes 67% longer. Note for Annie - White but not British children = 3% of adoptions Mixed race children =11% of adoptions Asian children = 1% of adoptions Total = 836 days) The timescale from entering care to getting an Adoption Order is 40% longer for a child of African, Caribbean or other black ethnicity compared to a child of white British ethnicity. The greatest disparity is in the matching stage (it takes 67% longer). Source : ALB 3 years to Q3 2016-17

Adoption timelines for children - disability Timescales from child entering care to Adoption Order (Average number of days per stage) Adoption timelines for children - disability Total = 743 days) Total = 732 days) Total = 1,002 days) Disabled children account for 4% of adoptions. Their timescale compared to non-disabled children is much longer. It takes 9 months longer from entering care through to getting an Adoption Order – that’s nearly 40% longer The timescale from entering care to getting an Adoption Order Is 9 months longer on average for a child with a disability, compared to a non-disabled child. The matching stage takes over 6 months longer. Source : ALB 3 years to Q3 2016-17

Adoption timelines for children – placed in sibling groups Timescales from child entering care to Adoption Order (Average number of days per stage) Adoption timelines for children – placed in sibling groups Total = 743 days) Total = 835 days) Total = 703 days) 45% of adoptions were children placed in sibling groups. Their timeline from entering care to getting an Adoption Order was just 1 month longer than children placed individually. We know a lot about the journey time – but much less about what happens at the destination – the outcomes of different types of children. Matt Woolgar will say more about this… The timescale for chlldren placed in sibling groups is on average just 1 month longer overall compared to children placed individually. There is disparity at both the matching stage and the stage from placement to Adoption Order Source : ALB 3 years to Q3 2016-17

The profile of children placed by the voluntary sector The voluntary sector places many of these children – many older, sibling group, BME children.