Hall A Beam Parameters Table

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Chris Tennant Jefferson Laboratory March 15, 2013 “Workshop to Explore Physics Opportunities with Intense, Polarized Electron Beams up to 300 MeV”
Advertisements

Halo calculations in ATF DR Dou Wang (IHEP), Philip Bambade (LAL), Kaoru Yokoya (KEK), Theo Demma (LAL), Jie Gao (IHEP) FJPPL-FKPPL Workshop on ATF2 Accelerator.
C.Limborg-Deprey Beam Dynamics Justifying L01 November 3 rd 2004 Beam Dynamics Justifications of modification of.
F Specifications for the dark current kicker for the NML test facility at Fermilab S. Nagaitsev, M. Church, P. Piot, C.Y. Tan, J. Steimel Fermilab May.
Outline 1.ERL facility for gamma-ray production [A. Valloni] 2.ERL facility - Tracking Simulations [D. Pellegrini] 3.SC magnet quench tests [V. Chetvertkova]
Operated by the Southeastern Universities Research Association for the U.S. Department of Energy Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Page 1.
Simulation of direct space charge in Booster by using MAD program Y.Alexahin, N.Kazarinov.
3 GeV,1.2 MW, Booster for Proton Driver G H Rees, RAL.
The impact of undulators in an ERL Jim Clarke ASTeC, STFC Daresbury Laboratory FLS 2012, March 2012.
Transverse emittance Two different techniques were used to measure the transverse emittance. The multislit mask in the injector 9 MeV Quadrupole scan for.
Update of 3.2 km ILC DR design (DMC3) Dou Wang, Jie Gao, Gang Xu, Yiwei Wang (IHEP) IWLC2010 Monday 18 October - Friday 22 October 2010 Geneva, Switzerland.
Optics considerations for ERL test facilities Bruno Muratori ASTeC Daresbury Laboratory (M. Bowler, C. Gerth, F. Hannon, H. Owen, B. Shepherd, S. Smith,
1 Alternative ILC Bunch Compressor 7 th Nov KNU (Kyungpook National Univ.) Eun-San Kim.
The SPS as a Damping Ring Test Facility for CLIC March 6 th, 2013 Yannis PAPAPHILIPPOU CERN CLIC Collaboration Working meeting.
ILC EXTRACTION LINE TRACKING Y. Nosochkov, E. Marin September 10, 2013.
NON-INTERCEPTING DIAGNOSTIC FOR HIGH BRIGHTNESS ELECTRON BEAMS USING OPTICAL DIFFRACTION RADIATION INTERFERENCE (ODRI) A. Cianchi #1,2, M. Castellano 3,
Kiyoshi Kubo Electron beam in undulators of e+ source - Emittance and orbit angle with quad misalignment and corrections - Effect of beam pipe.
Parameter [units]Tune-up beam"low" chargehigh currenthigh charge Kin. injection energy [MeV]2.0 – Maximum beam energy [MeV]16 –
The Introduction to CSNS Accelerators Oct. 5, 2010 Sheng Wang AP group, Accelerator Centre,IHEP, CAS.
S. Bettoni, R. Corsini, A. Vivoli (CERN) CLIC drive beam injector design.
2 February 8th - 10th, 2016 TWIICE 2 Workshop Instability studies in the CLIC Damping Rings including radiation damping A.Passarelli, H.Bartosik, O.Boine-Fankenheim,
12 GeV CEBAF Transverse Emittance Evolution Todd Satogata / Center for Advanced Studies of Accelerators May WEBD1.
Present MEIC IR Design Status Vasiliy Morozov, Yaroslav Derbenev MEIC Detector and IR Design Mini-Workshop, October 31, 2011.
Estimates of required MPS reaction time In the merger (at the centers of respective 20deg dipoles and in between 2 lenses) rms R=250 um In the
Thomas Roser SPIN 2006 October 3, 2006 A Study of Polarized Proton Acceleration in J-PARC A.U.Luccio, M.Bai, T.Roser Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton,
IntraBeam Scattering Calculation T. Demma, S. Guiducci SuperB Workshop LAL, 17 February 09.
SABER Longitudinal Tracking Studies P. Emma, K. Bane Mar. 1, 2006
Show that the (beam size ^2) varies quadratically with distance in a drift section with no quadrupoles.
Primary estimation of CEPC beam dilution and beam halo
Beam-beam effects in eRHIC and MeRHIC
Linac possibilities for a Super-B
Large Booster and Collider Ring
IntraBeam Scattering Calculation
IntraBeam Scattering Calculation
1- Short pulse neutron source
Update of Damping Ring parameters
Experimental Overview
Beam-beam R&D for eRHIC Linac-Ring Option
Accelerator status after the 12 GeV upgrade
12 GeV CEBAF.
G0 Accelerator Planning Meeting (11/1/05)
F. Villa Laboratori Nazionali di Frascati - LNF On behalf of Sparc_lab
Accelerator Issues Raised in Hall A Parity Collaboration Meeting, April B-Team Meeting April 29, 2009.
Progress activities in short bunch compressors
Thoughts on why G0 needed position feedback and HAPPEX didn't
Thoughts on why G0 needed position feedback and HAPPEX didn't
ILC 3.2 km DR design based on FODO lattice (DMC3)
Advanced Research Electron Accelerator Laboratory
ILC 3.2 km DR design based on FODO lattice (DMC3)
Damping Ring parameters for the new accelerating structure
Why CeC is needed? High luminosity of US future electron-ion collider(EIC) is critical for success of its physics program 2018 NAS Assessment of U.S.-Based.
Injector Setup for G0 and HAPPEX & Lessons Learned
VELA – CLARA AP (Draft) Goals Software Goals
Modified Beam Parameter Range
Linac Physics, Diagnostics, and Commissioning Strategy P
CEPC Injector Linac beam dynamics
Low Energy Electron-Ion Collision
Damping Ring parameters for the new accelerating structure
Evgenij Kot XFEL beam dynamics meeting,
Comparison between 4K and 2K operation performance of CEBAF injector cryomodules Grigory Eremeev Monday, August 19, 2019.
CEPC injector beam dynamics
Damping Ring parameters with reduced bunch charge
Update on ERL Cooler Design Studies
MEIC New Baseline: Luminosity Performance and Upgrade Path
CDR2 – Injection System Injection system overview (Seeman) (2 pages)
HALLA APEL REPORT Yves Roblin Hall A colllaboration Meeting
Fanglei Lin, Yuhong Zhang JLEIC R&D Meeting, March 10, 2016
MEIC New Baseline: Performance and Accelerator R&D
Summary and Plan for Electron Polarization Study in the JLEIC
3.2 km FODO lattice for 10 Hz operation (DMC4)
Presentation transcript:

Hall A Beam Parameters Table Nominal Value/Range Temporal Stability Helicity Correlated Unbalance Emittance (geometric rms) Horizontal 3-5e-9 m-rad Vertical 1-3e-9 m-rad ~2e-9 m-rad (through retunes) N/A Spot size at target (rms) Horizontal <250.0 um Vertical <200.0 um Horizontal ~20 um Vertical ~20 um Angular divergence at target (rms) <20 urad <2 urad Charge per bunch 2e-16 to 1.6e-13 C 10%? Beam position +/- 2.5mm (for tgt centering) <40 um (slow lock) <20 um FFB (at 60Hz) Beam direction +/-300 urad (rasterized at 3x3) <2 urad (active coll lock) Average Energy (rms) 2303-10988 MeV <300 keV Energy Spread (rms) 0.2-0.3% <0.1% (linac crest) Background beam halo <0.1% stable Polarization Up to 85% Effective duty factor >60.0% (main machine) ? Bunch repetition rate 499 MHz, 249.5 MHz Stable

Transverse Emittance* and Energy Spread† Area p/p [x10-3] x [nm] y Chicane 0.5 4.00 Arc 1 0.05 0.41 Arc 2 0.03 0.26 0.23 Arc 3 0.035 0.22 0.21 Arc 4 0.044 0.24 Arc 5 0.060 0.33 0.25 Arc 6 0.090 0.58 0.31 Arc 7 0.104 0.79 0.44 Arc 8 0.133 1.21 0.57 Arc 9 0.167 2.09 0.64 Arc 10 0.194 2.97 0.95 Hall D 0.18 2.70 1.03 DBA option Damping Values are calculated at the end of each arc. Normalized emittance is beta.gamma*egeometric These calculations were checked with 3 different codes and also agree with a simpler analytical estimate (sand’s formula) which Does not take into account synch rad. Loss in quadrupoles. Sync. Rad. * Emittances are geometric † Quantities are rms

Lehman Out-Year Specs