Structural and Thermodynamic Basis for Enhanced DNA Binding by a Promiscuous Mutant EcoRI Endonuclease  Paul J. Sapienza, John M. Rosenberg, Linda Jen-Jacobson 

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 28, Issue 4, Pages (November 2007)
Advertisements

Ross Alexander Robinson, Xin Lu, Edith Yvonne Jones, Christian Siebold 
Ping Wang, Katelyn A. Doxtader, Yunsun Nam  Molecular Cell 
Volume 20, Issue 11, Pages (November 2012)
Arvin C. Dar, Michael S. Lopez, Kevan M. Shokat  Chemistry & Biology 
Volume 13, Issue 7, Pages (July 2005)
Volume 17, Issue 11, Pages (November 2009)
Beyond the “Recognition Code”
Volume 20, Issue 1, Pages (October 2005)
Volume 21, Issue 11, Pages (November 2013)
Volume 21, Issue 9, Pages (September 2013)
Structural Basis for Dimerization in DNA Recognition by Gal4
Structural Basis for the Specific Recognition of Methylated Histone H3 Lysine 4 by the WD-40 Protein WDR5  Zhifu Han, Lan Guo, Huayi Wang, Yue Shen, Xing.
Volume 24, Issue 12, Pages (December 2016)
Volume 16, Issue 10, Pages (October 2008)
Allosteric Effects of the Oncogenic RasQ61L Mutant on Raf-RBD
Volume 24, Issue 11, Pages (November 2016)
Volume 21, Issue 8, Pages (August 2013)
Structure of the Angiopoietin-2 Receptor Binding Domain and Identification of Surfaces Involved in Tie2 Recognition  William A. Barton, Dorothea Tzvetkova,
Hydration and DNA Recognition by Homeodomains
Volume 28, Issue 4, Pages (November 2007)
Volume 20, Issue 5, Pages (May 2012)
Volume 15, Issue 4, Pages (April 2007)
Volume 15, Issue 1, Pages (January 2007)
Structural Basis of DNA Loop Recognition by Endonuclease V
Volume 15, Issue 9, Pages (September 2007)
Nadine Keller, Jiří Mareš, Oliver Zerbe, Markus G. Grütter  Structure 
Volume 20, Issue 6, Pages (December 2005)
Kevin G. Hoff, José L. Avalos, Kristin Sens, Cynthia Wolberger 
Volume 25, Issue 5, Pages e3 (May 2017)
Elif Eren, Megan Murphy, Jon Goguen, Bert van den Berg  Structure 
Ross Alexander Robinson, Xin Lu, Edith Yvonne Jones, Christian Siebold 
Volume 16, Issue 10, Pages (October 2008)
Crystal Structures of RNase H Bound to an RNA/DNA Hybrid: Substrate Specificity and Metal-Dependent Catalysis  Marcin Nowotny, Sergei A. Gaidamakov, Robert.
Recognition of a TG Mismatch
Volume 21, Issue 10, Pages (October 2013)
Regulation of the Protein-Conducting Channel by a Bound Ribosome
Volume 96, Issue 7, Pages (April 2009)
Structural Insights into Ligand Recognition by a Sensing Domain of the Cooperative Glycine Riboswitch  Lili Huang, Alexander Serganov, Dinshaw J. Patel 
Qian Steven Xu, Rebecca B. Kucera, Richard J. Roberts, Hwai-Chen Guo 
Elizabeth J. Little, Andrea C. Babic, Nancy C. Horton  Structure 
Structure of the DNA-Bound T-Box Domain of Human TBX3, a Transcription Factor Responsible for Ulnar-Mammary Syndrome  Miquel Coll, Jonathan G Seidman,
Volume 14, Issue 5, Pages (May 2006)
The Structure of the Tiam1 PDZ Domain/ Phospho-Syndecan1 Complex Reveals a Ligand Conformation that Modulates Protein Dynamics  Xu Liu, Tyson R. Shepherd,
Volume 19, Issue 9, Pages (September 2011)
Volume 23, Issue 4, Pages (April 2015)
Alemayehu A. Gorfe, Barry J. Grant, J. Andrew McCammon  Structure 
Volume 25, Issue 9, Pages e3 (September 2017)
Volume 16, Issue 6, Pages (June 2008)
Volume 18, Issue 2, Pages (February 2010)
A Role for Intersubunit Interactions in Maintaining SAGA Deubiquitinating Module Structure and Activity  Nadine L. Samara, Alison E. Ringel, Cynthia Wolberger 
Volume 14, Issue 4, Pages (April 2006)
Volume 103, Issue 10, Pages (November 2012)
Volume 20, Issue 1, Pages (January 2012)
Neali Armstrong, Eric Gouaux  Neuron 
DNA Synthesis across an Abasic Lesion by Human DNA Polymerase ι
Structure of the Staphylococcus aureus AgrA LytTR Domain Bound to DNA Reveals a Beta Fold with an Unusual Mode of Binding  David J. Sidote, Christopher.
Crystal Structures of the Thi-Box Riboswitch Bound to Thiamine Pyrophosphate Analogs Reveal Adaptive RNA-Small Molecule Recognition  Thomas E. Edwards,
Volume 19, Issue 7, Pages (July 2011)
Volume 16, Issue 3, Pages (March 2008)
Alec E. Hodel, Paul D. Gershon, Florante A. Quiocho  Molecular Cell 
Crystal Structures of RNase H Bound to an RNA/DNA Hybrid: Substrate Specificity and Metal-Dependent Catalysis  Marcin Nowotny, Sergei A. Gaidamakov, Robert.
Michael M. Brent, Ruchi Anand, Ronen Marmorstein  Structure 
Arvin C. Dar, Michael S. Lopez, Kevan M. Shokat  Chemistry & Biology 
Mark S. Dunstan, Debraj GuhaThakurta, David. E. Draper, Graeme L. Conn 
Volume 13, Issue 5, Pages (May 2005)
Peter König, Rafael Giraldo, Lynda Chapman, Daniela Rhodes  Cell 
Volume 15, Issue 4, Pages (August 2004)
Volume 20, Issue 5, Pages (May 2012)
The Structure of the MAP2K MEK6 Reveals an Autoinhibitory Dimer
Presentation transcript:

Structural and Thermodynamic Basis for Enhanced DNA Binding by a Promiscuous Mutant EcoRI Endonuclease  Paul J. Sapienza, John M. Rosenberg, Linda Jen-Jacobson  Structure  Volume 15, Issue 11, Pages 1368-1382 (November 2007) DOI: 10.1016/j.str.2007.09.014 Copyright © 2007 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Structures of Wild-Type and Mutant Endonuclease-DNA Complexes (A) DNA oligonucleotide used in crystallographic and molecular dynamics studies. The GAATTC recognition site is in red. (B) Cartoon rendering of the wild-type EcoRI-d(TCGCGAATTCGCG) complex (Grigorescu, 2003). The main domains of the two enzyme subunits are colored red (foreground) and gray (background). The arms of both subunits are in pink. The residues implicated in relaxed specificity by a genetic screen (Heitman and Model, 1990b) are rendered as sticks in the foreground subunit only. The labels identify the amino acid changes that lead to relaxed specificity. These amino acids all reside within the arms or at the junction between the arms and the main domain. (C) Superposition of the wild-type (red) and A138T (blue) X-ray models. The two structures are aligned with protein backbone, DNA all-atom, and all-nonsolvent atom root-mean-square deviations of 0.3, 0.4, and 0.8 Å, respectively. The Thr138 side chain in both subunits of the mutant is highlighted in yellow. (D and E) DNA recognition by the EcoRI extended chain motif (residues 137–142). 2Fo − Fc simulated annealing omit maps are contoured at 1.5 σ in both panels, with mesh-covering protein in red and DNA in blue. (D) Wild-type complex. (E) A138T mutant complex. Hydrogen bonds are depicted by black dashes. All hydrogen bonds made by amino acids of the extended chain motif in the wild-type model are conserved in the mutant structure. Structure 2007 15, 1368-1382DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2007.09.014) Copyright © 2007 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Effects of the A138T Mutation on Water-Mediated Contacts to Bases Flanking the GAATTC Recognition Site 2Fo − Fc simulated annealing omit maps covering the wild-type (A) and A138T (B) structures in the vicinity of G−5C−4. Maps are contoured at 1.5 σ in both panels, with mesh-covering protein in red and DNA in blue. Water molecules are shown as blue spheres and hydrogen bonds are depicted as black lines in all panels. (C) and (D) show space-filled renderings of the same views given in (A) and (B). Note the novel water-mediated interactions between Thr138 and G−5, the packing interactions of the Thr138 γ-methyl group with C−4-N4 and G−5-N7, and the absence of water41 in the mutant model. Structure 2007 15, 1368-1382DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2007.09.014) Copyright © 2007 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Water Network at the 5′ Side of the Recognition Site (A) Wild-type model. Coupling between water1, which contacts G−3 in the recognition site, and water41, which contacts the flanking base C−4. Note that Arg200-Nɛ interacts with water1 and Arg200-NH1 with water41. Water1 is involved in similar contacts in the A138T structure. Arg200-NH1 is hydrogen bonded to Asn199 and Gly196 carbonyls (not shown). (B) A138T model. The position and contacts of water1, water74, and water149 are conserved despite the absence of water41. (C) Water oxygen to DNA functional group distances calculated over the course of a 5 ns MD simulation of the wild-type-d(TCGCGAATTCGCG) complex at 300K. The plots refer to sites occupied by water molecules in positions analogous to water41 (black) and water1 (red) in the X-ray model. The plot shows that (1) the water41 binding site occupied in the 100K model is also occupied in the 300K complex, and (2) the residence time of water41 is similar to that of a solvent molecule that is buried at the GAATTC recognition site. (D) Radial distribution functions (g[x]) for water oxygens relative to the 4-amino group of C−4. Data are from wild-type (black) and A138T (red) simulations. The A138T plot shows no peak within hydrogen-bonding distance, so this binding site is not occupied during the 300K simulation of the A138T complex. Plots (B) and (C) are for one half-site only, but results are typical of both half-sites. Structure 2007 15, 1368-1382DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2007.09.014) Copyright © 2007 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Temperature Dependence of Wild-Type and A138T EcoRI Endonuclease Binding to Specific DNA (A) van't Hoff plot showing the effect of temperature on wild-type (filled circles) and mutant (open circles) binding to 5′-GGGCGGGCGCGAATTCGCGGGCGC-3′. (B and C) Contributions to binding free energy of ΔH° and TΔS°, respectively, for wild-type (filled circles) and A138T (open circles) binding over the experimental temperature range. In (B), the error bars for ΔH° (σΔH) at a given temperature (T) were propagated from the uncertainties in the fitted values of ΔC°P (σΔC°P) and TH (σTH) according to the following:σΔH°=(ΔC°P×(T−TH))2[σΔC°P2ΔC°P2+σTH2(T−TH)2+2(σΔC°P×σTH)2ΔC°P×(T−TH)],where TH is the temperature at which ΔH°bind = 0. In (C), the error bars for TΔS° (σTΔS°) at a given temperature (T) were propagated from the uncertainties in the fitted values of ΔC°P (σΔC°P) and TS (σTS) according to the following:σTΔS°=(ΔC°P×ln(TTS))2×[σΔC°P2ΔC°P2+(σTSTTS)2(ln(TTS))2+2((σTST/TS×σΔC°P)2ΔC°P×ln(TTS))],where TS is the temperature where ΔS° = 0. See Experimental Procedures for data fitting methods. Structure 2007 15, 1368-1382DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2007.09.014) Copyright © 2007 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Effect of Flanking Sequence on First-Order Cleavage Rate Constants for an EcoRI∗ Site Bars show first-order rate constants (note log scale) for cleavage of the AAATTC site embedded in different flanking contexts. (A) k1 represents cleavage in the unmodified GAA half-site. (B) k2 represents cleavage in the modified AAA half-site. Black bars in each pair denote wild-type and open bars denote A138T. Data show means and standard deviations based on at least three independent measurements. Structure 2007 15, 1368-1382DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2007.09.014) Copyright © 2007 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 Thermodynamic Pseudocycle for the A138T Mutation The arrows denote the free energy effects of the A138T mutation on the free protein (vertical arrow left) and on the protein-DNA complex (vertical arrow right), and the relation of these to the observable binding free energy changes (horizontal arrows) for mutant and wild-type proteins. This is a “pseudocycle” because the vertical arrows do not correspond to observable physical processes. Structure 2007 15, 1368-1382DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2007.09.014) Copyright © 2007 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions