Update on Crab Cavity Simulations for JLEIC

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Accelerator Science and Technology Centre Prospects of Compact Crab Cavities for LHC Peter McIntosh LHC-CC Workshop, CERN 21 st August 2008.
Advertisements

Study of the Luminosity of LHeC, a Lepton Proton Collider in the LHC Tunnel CERN June F. Willeke, DESY.
1 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES Considerations for Nonlinear Beam Dynamics in NSLS-II lattice design Weiming Guo 05/26/08 Acknowledgement: J. Bengtsson.
Simulation of direct space charge in Booster by using MAD program Y.Alexahin, N.Kazarinov.
Zenghai Li SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory LHC-CC13 CERN, December 9-11, 2013 HOM Coupler Optimization & RF Modeling.
DEFLECTING CAVITY OPTIONS FOR RF BEAM SPREADER IN LCLS II
Emittance Growth from Elliptical Beams and Offset Collision at LHC and LRBB at RHIC Ji Qiang US LARP Workshop, Berkeley, April 26-28, 2006.
October 4-5, Electron Lens Beam Physics Overview Yun Luo for RHIC e-lens team October 4-5, 2010 Electron Lens.
Simulation of direct space charge in Booster by using MAD program Y.Alexahin, A.Drozhdin, N.Kazarinov.
November 14, 2004First ILC Workshop1 CESR-c Wiggler Dynamics D.Rubin -Objectives -Specifications -Modeling and simulation -Machine measurements/ analysis.
SuperB Lattice Studies M. Biagini LNF-INFN ILCDR07 Workshop, LNF-Frascati Mar. 5-7, 2007.
Nonlinear Dynamic Study of FCC-ee Pavel Piminov, Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics, Novosibirsk, Russia.
Beam-Beam Simulations Ji Qiang US LARP CM12 Collaboration Meeting Napa Valley, April 8-10, 2009 Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.
Aaron Farricker 107/07/2014Aaron Farricker Beam Dynamics in the ESS Linac Under the Influence of Monopole and Dipole HOMs.
Bunch Separation with RF Deflectors D. Rubin,R.Helms Cornell University.
Beam-beam Simulation at eRHIC Yue Hao Collider-Accelerator Department Brookhaven National Laboratory July 29, 2010 EIC Meeting at The Catholic University.
1 Strong-Strong Beam-Beam Simulations Ji Qiang Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory 3 rd JLEIC Collaboration Meeting March 31 st, Jlab 2016.
Issues related to crossing angles Frank Zimmermann.
The Studies of Dynamic Aperture on CEPC
Odu/slac rf-dipole prototype
Field quality update and recent tracking results
LHC Crab Cavity Conceptual Design at SLAC
Design Fabrication and Processing Group H. Padamsee
Large Booster and Collider Ring
Non-linear Beam Dynamics Studies for JLEIC Electron Collider Ring
Developments on Proposed
Cavity-beam interaction and Longitudinal beam dynamics for CEPC DR&APDR 宫殿君
Issues in CEPC pretzel and partial double ring scheme design
First Look at Nonlinear Dynamics in the Electron Collider Ring
Optimization of CEPC Dynamic Aperture
Bunch Separation with RF Deflectors
Status of CEPC lattice design
Overview Multi Bunch Beam Dynamics at XFEL
R. Bartolini Diamond Light Source Ltd
Progress of SPPC lattice design
LHC (SSC) Byung Yunn CASA.
CEPC optics and booster optics
Kicker and RF systems for Damping Rings
Kicker specifications for Damping Rings
Sawtooth effect in CEPC PDR/APDR
Yuri Nosochkov Yunhai Cai, Fanglei Lin, Vasiliy Morozov
Crab crossing plan Optimize the crabbing system for best beam stability and minimum emittance impact Study and specify tolerances on cavity multipole components.
Progress on Non-linear Beam Dynamic Study
Update on MEIC Nonlinear Dynamics Work
MEIC New Baseline: Luminosity Performance and Upgrade Path
Main Design Parameters RHIC Magnets for MEIC Ion Collider Ring
Beam Beam effects for JLEIC
RF Parameters for New 2.2 km MEIC Design
Fanglei Lin, Yuhong Zhang JLEIC R&D Meeting, March 10, 2016
Status and plans for crab crossing studies at JLEIC
JLEIC Main Parameters with Strong Electron Cooling
Alejandro Castilla CASA/CAS-ODU
First Look at Error Sensitivity in MEIC
Fanglei Lin, Yuri Nosochkov Vasiliy Morozov, Yuhong Zhang, Guohui Wei
MEIC New Baseline: Part 7
Fanglei Lin MEIC R&D Meeting, JLab, July 16, 2015
G.H. Wei, V.S. Morozov, Fanglei Lin Y. Nosochkov (SLAC), M-H. Wang
Progress Update on the Electron Polarization Study in the JLEIC
Integration of Detector Solenoid into the JLEIC ion collider ring
MEIC New Baseline: Performance and Accelerator R&D
Status of IR / Nonlinear Dynamics Studies
More on MEIC Beam Synchronization
JLEIC Electron Ring Nonlinear Dynamics Work Plan
Upgrade on Compensation of Detector Solenoid effects
Crab Crossing Named #1 common technical risk (p. 6 of the report)
Fanglei Lin JLEIC R&D Meeting, August 4, 2016
MEIC Alternative Design Part III
A TME-like Lattice for DA Studies
3.2 km FODO lattice for 10 Hz operation (DMC4)
HE-JLEIC Luminosity Estimate
Presentation transcript:

Update on Crab Cavity Simulations for JLEIC Salvador Sosa Old Dominion University August 31st, 2017

Outline Local Scheme in JLEIC Ion Ring RF Multipoles Voltage and Phase Tolerances CBI from Cavity HOMs

Luminosity reduction due to Crossing Angle 𝜑≈12.5 𝑅 𝜑 ≈0.0797

𝜑 𝑐𝑟𝑎𝑏 =50 mrad e-beam Ion beam Initial kick: 20.82 MV W/o crabbing Initial kick: 20.82 MV Compensation kick:

Crabbing by deflecting cavity (local scheme) 𝐸 𝑏 = beam energy 𝑓 = RF frequency 𝛽 𝑐𝑟𝑎𝑏 = beta function at CC location 𝛽 ∗ = beta function at IP 𝜑 𝑐𝑟𝑜𝑠𝑠 = beam crossing angle ψ 𝐶𝐶→𝐼𝑃 =phase advance from CC to IP 𝑉 𝑐𝑟𝑎𝑏 = 𝑐 𝐸 𝑏 tan 𝜑 𝑐𝑟𝑜𝑠𝑠 2 𝑒𝜔 𝛽 𝑐𝑟𝑎𝑏 𝛽 ∗ sin ψ 𝐶𝐶→𝐼𝑃 Parameter Unit Proton Energy GeV 100 Frequency MHz 952.6 Crossing angle mrad 50 β* cm 10 βx @ crab cavity location m 400 Integrated kicking voltage MV 20.8

Baseline Collision Optics of JLEIC Ion Ring Parameter Proton Unit Energy 100 GeV Frequency 952.6 MHz Crossing angle 50 mrad β*x 0.1 m βcrabx 400 Crab voltage 19.81 MV

Ion Ring Optics with switched CCBs

Parameter Proton Unit Energy 20 (low) 60 (medium) 100 (high) GeV βcrabx 363.44 m Crab voltage 4.18 12.50 20.82 MV

Bunch matching in Ion Ring Crab OFF, initial (black) and end (red) of lattice, 1 pass, 1e5 particles Crab ON, initial (black) and end (red) of lattice, 1 pass, 1e5 particles

Crab Cavity Voltage Ramp

RF Multipoles 60 mm – 4 mm pole shift 70 mm – 5 mm pole shift

Ion Ring DA, CC Voltage Off and On

σx Flat poles Curved poles ±50σ Multipoles 1-cell 3-cell Unit 60mm b2 mT -5x10-4 -3x10-4 -8x10-9 -16.08 b3 mT/m 853.2 797.5 697.1 610 35.1 217.12 b4 mT/m2 1.55 1.2 0.92 0.63 -2x10-5 321.67 b5 mT/m3 -1.2x105 -0.44x105 -1.1x105 -5.4x105 -5.7x105 -0.8x105 DA σx ±45.9 ±46.6 ±44.1 ±47 ±30.9 ±46.2

DA limited by Final Focusing Magnets at ±15

RF Voltage Tolerances Voltage noise introduces a residual angle at IP ∆𝑉 𝑉 ≪ 𝜎 𝑥 ∗ 𝜎 𝑧 tan 𝜑 ~0.05 Voltage noise introduces a residual angle at IP 𝜎 𝑥 ∗ =1.8um, 𝜎 𝑧 =1.2 𝑐𝑚 “Crab Cavities for LHC Upgrade”, R.Calaga

RF Phase Noise Phase noise translates to a bunch offset at IP ∆𝜃≪ 𝜔 𝑅𝐹 𝜎 𝑥 ∗ 𝑐 tan 𝜑 𝑐𝑟𝑎𝑏 ~0.02 𝑟𝑎𝑑 Phase noise translates to a bunch offset at IP “Crab Cavities for LHC Upgrade”, R.Calaga

CC Impedance from HOMs ZAP and clinchor are both adequate for HOM studies Clinchor -> General beam fill pattern No Landau damping No broadband impendance HOM data for a 70mm aperture 3-cell RFD Will use this data to get a sense of LCBI and TCBI rise times

Crab Crossing Studies (Salvador) Optimize the crabbing system for best beam stability and minimum emittance impact (WEPIK044; IPAC17) Study and specify tolerances on cavity multipole components by estimating impact on the ring’s dynamic aperture  (MOPVA136,WEPIK044; IPAC17) Specify high-order mode requirements (Salvador, Todd, consider using APS code clinchor) Evaluate and optimize impedance of the crab cavities Study effects of and specify tolerances on crab cavity errors such as misalignment, amplitude and phase instability Specify requirement on the beam parameters such as maximum bunch length Complete beam dynamics simulation using an optimized field map satisfying the determined requirements

Extra Slides

General RF Properties of Cavity Designs Squashed Elliptical Single-Cell RFD Multi-Cell RFD Unit Frequency 952.6 MHz Aperture 70 mm LOM 697.6 None 757, 862 LOM Mode Type Monopole Dipole 1st HOM 1033.1 1411.5 1335 Total Vt (e/p) (per beam per side) 2.8 / 19.83 MV Vt (per cavity) 2.2 1.2 4.2 No. of cavities 2 / 9 3 / 17 1 / 5 Ep 32 41.2 49.8 MV/m Bp 104.3 103.7 101.4 mT Rs [Rres =10 nΩ & 2.0 K] 16.3 nΩ Pdiss (per cavity) 4.6 2.8 7.4 W