INFORMATION SEMINAR Interreg V-A Latvia-Lithuania programme

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Belarus Denmark Estonia Finland Germany Latvia Lithuania Norway Poland Russia Sweden Transnationality and locally implemented pilot actions in the BSR.
Advertisements

DOs and DONTs Joan-Anton Carbonell Kingston University EC External Expert TEMPUS Modernising Higher Education TEMPUS INFORMATION DAY.
Regions for Economic Change | LMP Workshop 3C When exchanging is good for innovation: Experiences from the Lisbon Monitoring Platform How can INTERACT.
Technical meeting with the Regional representative offices in Brussels Brussels, 17 March 2009 The INTERACT II Programme – Knowledge Management and Capitalisation.
Submission Writing Fundamentals – Part Webinar Series Leonie Bryen.
Progress Reporting Kirsti Mijnhijmer, Joint Secretariat Lead Partner Seminar 25th March 2015, Svolvær, Norway.
CENTRAL EUROPE PROGRAMME SUCCESS FACTORS FOR PROJECT DEVELOPMENT: focus on activities and partnership JTS CENTRAL EUROPE PROGRAMME.
Application Form – Part C Kirsti Mijnhijmer, Secretariat How to Apply Seminar 4th February 2015, Copenhagen, Denmark.
ESPON 2013 Programme Info Day on New Calls and Partner Café Call for Expressions of Interest for Targeted Analyses.
Latvia–Lithuania Cross Border Cooperation Programme 2007–2013 WORKSHOP “How to prepare good application?” Joint Technical Secretariat 3rd.
TEMPUS IV- THIRD CALL FOR PROPOSALS Recommendation on how to make a good proposal TEMPUS INFORMATION DAYS Podgorica, MONTENEGRO 18 th December 2009.
This project is funded by the EUAnd implemented by a consortium led by MWH Logical Framework and Indicators.
Project Implementation Monika Balode Joint Technical Secretariat Lead Partner Seminar 16 October 2009, Šiauliai.
CENTRAL EUROPE PROGRAMME SUCCESS FACTORS FOR PROJECT DEVELOPMENT: focus on finances Partner Search Forum Poznań, Poland 16 – 17 December 2008.
Application Form Part 1, Sections 4-9 How to Apply Seminar 16 th September 2010 – Copenhagen Kirsti Mijnhijmer.
KEYWORDS REFRESHMENT. Activities: in the context of the Logframe Matrix, these are the actions (tasks) that have to be taken to produce results Analysis.
APPLICATION FORM OF ROBINWOOD SUBPROJECT SECOND STEP 1. The short listed Local Beneficiaries work together to create international partnerships and prepare.
Strategic Priorities of the NWE INTERREG IVB Programme Harry Knottley, UK representative in the International Working Party Lille, 5th March 2007.
“ BIRD Project“ 1 Broadband Access, Innovation & Regional Development” Broadband Access, Innovation & Regional Development” Project Description Ulrich.
Participation in 7FP Anna Pikalova National Research University “Higher School of Economics” National Contact Points “Mobility” & “INCO”
Evaluation Capacity building in Lithuania Presentation for Presentation for Evaluation Units Open days by Mrs. Ana Stankaitienė EU Programmes Management.
National Info Day 1st call of Interreg DANUBE 9 th October 2015 Prague.
Project preparation workshop “Bringing a transnational project to life” Project idea “Challenges and chances from Climate Change for regional and local.
Project Management Birutė Markevičiūtė Joint Technical Secretariat Lead Partner Seminar 13 October 2008, Riga.
Results Focus & Partnership Kirsti Mijnhijmer, Secretariat How to Apply Seminar 1st October 2014, Strathpeffer, Scotland.
ESPON Info Day on New Calls and Partner Café 18 May 2010 in Bruxelles Call for Proposals on Transnational Networking Activities (Projects carried through.
URBACT IMPLEMENTATION NETWORKS. URBACT in a nutshell  European Territorial Cooperation programme (ETC) co- financed by ERDF  All 28 Member States as.
Project design – Activities and partnership CENTRAL EUROPE PROGRAMME Project development seminar Prague, 1-2 February 2010 Monika Schönerklee-Grasser.
CENTRAL EUROPE PROGRAMME WORKSHOP A: Preparing an application – focus on activities and partnership Project development seminar Prague, 1-2 February.
Developing a Monitoring & Evaluation Plan MEASURE Evaluation.
NPA eMS application – Project Information Joint Secretariat 1st June 2016 – Cork, Ireland.
Steps in development of action plans ITC-ILO/ACTRAV Course A3 – Trade Union Training on Information Management for Trade Union Organization, Research.
Filippo Compagni - UK Contact Point – Atlantic Area
Sharing solutions for better regional policies European Union | European Regional Development Fund Erika Fulgenzi Policy Officer | Interreg Europe JS
Recommendations on project/action design and structure.
GENERAL INFORMATION The eMS is a monitoring system to support submission, approval, management and administration of projects in the context of Interreg.
Building an ENI CBC project
Technical Business Consultancy Project
Eija Källström, Arcada UAS, Helsinki
REPORTING THROUGH THE EMS
HIV/AIDS&AI EG Chair Dr. Ali Arsalo
Monitoring and Evaluation Systems for NARS Organisations in Papua New Guinea Day 2. Session 5. Review of the organizational strategy.
Translating ideas into proposals for action programmes
REPORTING THROUGH THE EMS
Regional Research-driven clusters as a tool for strenghthening regional economic development: the FP7 Regions of Knowledge Programme and its synergies.
GREECE-ALBANIA IPA CROSS BORDER COOPERATION PROGRAMME
Interreg V-A Romania-Bulgaria Programme
PROJECT MANUAL Galina Georgieva Project Officer
Results Focus Kirsti Mijnhijmer, Joint Secretariat
NPA eMS application – Project Information
Application Form Sections 4-9 Christopher Parker & Kirsti Mijnhijmer 28 January 2009 – Copenhagen, Denmark European Union European Regional Development.
Small Charities Challenge Fund (SCCF) Guidance Webinar
Eurostat Quality Management (in the ESS context)
NPA eMS application – Project Information
Reporting 25 April 2018.
Application Form – Part C
Evaluation plans for programming period in Poland
CENTRAL EUROPE first call for proposals
Purpose of the presentation
Helene Skikos DG Education and Culture
Good practice in preparing an application
Translating ideas into proposals for action programmes
Programme requirements
Civil Society Facility and Media Programme Call for proposals: EuropeAid/162473/DH/ACT/Multi Webinar no. 3: Preparing effective Concept Note.
Project intervention logic
Programme requirements
Interreg V-A Latvia-Lithuania programme
DG Justice and Consumers
Project intervention logic
Presentation transcript:

INFORMATION SEMINAR Interreg V-A Latvia-Lithuania programme 2014-2020 3rd Call for proposals

Why Intervention logic is needed? Project Intervention Logic Why Intervention logic is needed? To measure project’s contribution to Programme To ensure result-oriented approach To guide through the whole process – from idea to actual outputs Interreg V-A Latvia-Lithuania Programme 2014-2020 www.latlit.eu

Objectives, outputs, results etc. have to be measurable Project Intervention Logic Therefore... Project’s intervention logic has to mirror Programme’s intervention logic Objectives, outputs, results etc. have to be measurable Intervention logic applies to the whole process – from objectives to results Interreg V-A Latvia-Lithuania Programme 2014-2020 www.latlit.eu

Project Intervention Logic Project should Project should Address at least one* Programme output indicator Address one Programme priority Address one Programme priority Address one Programme specific objective Address one Programme specific objective Address one Programme result indicator Address one Programme result indicator * Several Programme output indicators can be chosen in case several output indicators are developed for a particular Programme specific objective Interreg V-A Latvia-Lithuania Programme 2014-2020 www.latlit.eu

Project Intervention Logic Project idea What are our common needs and potentials? Project Objectives&Results What do we want to change? How it will be different? Project Outputs&Indicators What do we need to deliver to obtain this change? Work plan&Budget How we will do it? What resources do we need to do this work? ! Project is created for target group/stakeholders Target size has to be set and reported! Interreg V-A Latvia-Lithuania Programme 2014-2020 www.latlit.eu

Corresponds to one Programme priority Relevant (need for intervention) Project Intervention Logic – Project idea Project idea Joint challenge Corresponds to one Programme priority Innovative Relevant (need for intervention) Interreg V-A Latvia-Lithuania Programme 2014-2020 www.latlit.eu

Programme specific objective Project Intervention Logic - Objectives For 3.1. – To improve accessibility and efficiency of social services For 3.2. - To improve living conditions in deprived communities and territories Programme specific objective Overall objective Relates to strategic aspects of the project, gives overall context on what is planned to be achieved Specific objective (up to 3) A concrete statement (measurable) giving description on what is planned to be achieved and for that requires a development and usage of project outputs Interreg V-A Latvia-Lithuania Programme 2014-2020 www.latlit.eu

S M A R T Specific Clear, concise, detailed Measurable Project Intervention Logic - Objectives S Specific Clear, concise, detailed M Measurable Quality and quantity A R T Achievable Relevant Sufficient contribution Time-related Realistic Specific time frame Interreg V-A Latvia-Lithuania Programme 2014-2020 www.latlit.eu

Project Intervention Logic - Results For 3.1. –Number of people benefiting from more accessible, efficient social inclusion measures and social services For 3.2. -Number of households not facing pollution, grime and other municipal environmental problems Programme result indicator Quantification is not a mandatory requirement Project result The immediate advantage of carrying out the project, telling us about the benefit of using the project main outputs. It should indicate the change the project is aiming for. Often materialise only after the end of the project Direct link between programme and project should be demonstrated Interreg V-A Latvia-Lithuania Programme 2014-2020 www.latlit.eu

Project Intervention Logic – main output For 3.1. – 1) Created/improved social services and infrastructure 2) Created/improved social inclusion measures For 3.2. - Number of institutions, participating in cooperation Programme output indicator/Project main output Linked to project objectives Project main output The product of the activities (tool) funded telling us what has actually been produced for the money given to the project. It contributes directly to the achievement of the project result. Is an outcome from implemented project activities, should be measurable ! NOTE: Only 1 main output directly contributing to programme can be created. No main outputs with «0»! Interreg V-A Latvia-Lithuania Programme 2014-2020 www.latlit.eu

Social inclusion as a precondition of territorial development Specific objective 3.1. Requirements for project main outputs Programme output indicator: 3.1. Created/improved social services and infrastructure Created/improved social inclusion measures Project shall specify one project main output contributing to one Programme output indicator and having the same measurement unit. It is possible to contribute to both indicators – 2 main outputs have to be created and each has to correspond to a particular Programme output indicator. Project main output: cannot be with value 0 How to calculate value: Created/improved social services and infrastructure – number of created/improved social services (identifying them) which will be implemented also after the end of the project; and number of created infrastructure objects Created/improved social inclusion measures – number of created/improved social services (identifying them) which will be implemented also after the end of the project. How to justify in report: Reporting in reports information about created/improved social services, inclusion measures and on created investment objects and attaching respective proves Interreg V-A Latvia-Lithuania Programme 2014-2020 www.latlit.eu

Social inclusion as a precondition of territorial development Specific objective 3.2. Requirements for project main outputs Programme output indicator: 3.2. Number of deprived communities participating in the regeneration activities Project shall specify one project main output contributing to Programme output indicator and having the same measurement unit Project main output: cannot be with value 0 and cannot be a deliverable How to calculate value: Deprived communities or deprived territories have to be calculated. Deprived community - group of people with a common characteristic or interest living together within a larger society (for example, unemployed, at-risk children and youth etc.). One type of group per project partner can be reported. Deprived territory – whole project partners’ territory is deprived (is not so advantageous comparing with other close territories and proven with statistical data). Justification that group/territory is deprived, has to be presented. How to justify in report: Report on activities which were planned in project for a particular deprived community/territory, providing respective proves. Interreg V-A Latvia-Lithuania Programme 2014-2020 www.latlit.eu

Programme output indicator/Project main output Project Intervention Logic – work plan For 3.1. – 1) Created/improved social services and infrastructure 2) Created/improved social inclusion measures For 3.2. - Number of institutions, participating in cooperation Programme output indicator/Project main output Project work plan The project workplan shall explain what needs to be done to deliver project main outputs and achieve project specific objectives. Work plan is divided in several work packages Activities: specific tasks performed for resources which are used. Deliverables: Result of an activity, physical evidence which has been produced through an activity Interreg V-A Latvia-Lithuania Programme 2014-2020 www.latlit.eu

Project Intervention Logic – indicators What? Why? To answer Deliverable Monitoring progress Are you doing what you planned? Output Monitoring and evaluation Do you deliver on specific objective? Results Evaluation Do outputs deliver a real benefit? Interreg V-A Latvia-Lithuania Programme 2014-2020 www.latlit.eu

Project Intervention Logic – Scheme (SO 3.1.)  Programme priority Project overall objective To create preconditions for increase of social enterprises   Project results  As a result of the project, it is expected that number of social enterprises will increase due to a created training and support network and it is expected that also number of persons with disabilities integrated in labour market will increase. PROGRAMME Programme specific objective To improve accessibility and efficiency of social services Programme result indicator Number of people benefiting from more accessible, efficient social inclusion measures and social services Descriptions of actions supported Programme output indicator Created/improved social inclusion measures Project main outputs Created 1 social inclusion measure – support for potential social entrepreneurs Project specific objective By the mid-2020 to evaluate existing social entrepreneurship support system and make recommendations for improvements By the end of 2021 to create a training and support network for potential social entrepreneurs on how to start and run social enterprise Project work plan: work packages, activities, deliverables, time plan PROJECT Interreg V-A Latvia-Lithuania Programme 2014-2020 www.latlit.eu

Shortcoming/definitions, durability Shortcoming/workplan Lessons learned the 1st Call and 2nd Call Shortcoming/Idea No proof or facts provided on project context - common territorial challenge, reason for cross-border cooperation, what innovation/ new knowledge is brought Recommendation Provide proof (statistical data, links to sources), show demand (studies, research, survey), how target group will contribute, explain and demonstrate need for cooperation and innovative/ new solutions applied Shortcoming/definitions, durability Too broad and vague definitions (objectives, results, outputs) or «copy, paste» from Programme indicators, lack of sufficient information on project durability Recommendation Tailor-made objectives, results, main outputs – but the same measurement unit as in Programme indicators has to be chosen. Clear information on durability of project activities/main outputs should be provided Shortcoming/workplan Not all activities directly contribute to achievement of main outputs; vague description of activities, not measurable deliverables, no clear demonstration of cross-border relevance of investments, too many WP Recommendation Be clear, precise, include measurement indicators, double-check logic of workplan, including timeline; create 1-2 WP Implementation and Investment; demonstrate how investments will be used by partners during and after the project Interreg V-A Latvia-Lithuania Programme 2014-2020 www.latlit.eu

Shortcoming/partnership Shortcoming/documents Lessons learned the 1st Call and 2nd Call Shortcoming/partnership Not all relevant partners are involved, project doesn’t involve direct users of project results, partnership is not balanced, responsibilities are not set. Recommendation Involve right partners, users of project results, identify responsible partners per activities, create balanced partnership – level of involvement in all aspects of the project Shortcoming/budget Too broad or too detailed descriptions, not in line with planned activities, cost-sharing Recommendation Be precise, but maintain right balance of details, cross-check with what is planned in workplan, cost-sharing is not allowed, each partner plans its own expenses. Shortcoming/documents Not all relevant documents are attached - for planned construction works, not all necessary confirmations are submitted etc. Recommendation Check Programme manual section 6.1. what documents and in what format need to be submitted together with application form Interreg V-A Latvia-Lithuania Programme 2014-2020 www.latlit.eu

Thank you for your attention Please do not hesitate to contact us for any further information or visit www.latlit.eu