Volume 97, Issue 5, Pages (September 2009)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Structure of the Rho Family GTP-Binding Protein Cdc42 in Complex with the Multifunctional Regulator RhoGDI  Gregory R. Hoffman, Nicolas Nassar, Richard.
Advertisements

Volume 18, Issue 2, Pages (February 2010)
Maryam Sayadi, Seiichiro Tanizaki, Michael Feig  Biophysical Journal 
T.P. Galbraith, R. Harris, P.C. Driscoll, B.A. Wallace 
Solution Structure of ZASP PDZ Domain
pH Dependence of Charge Multipole Moments in Proteins
Volume 24, Issue 7, Pages (July 2016)
Structure and Dynamics of the Membrane-Bound Form of Pf1 Coat Protein: Implications of Structural Rearrangement for Virus Assembly  Sang Ho Park, Francesca.
Olivier Fisette, Stéphane Gagné, Patrick Lagüe  Biophysical Journal 
Kristopher Josephson, Naomi J. Logsdon, Mark R. Walter  Immunity 
Volume 13, Issue 7, Pages (July 2005)
Christopher Wostenberg, W.G. Noid, Scott A. Showalter 
Volume 95, Issue 1, Pages (July 2008)
R. Elliot Murphy, Alexandra B. Samal, Jiri Vlach, Jamil S. Saad 
Volume 90, Issue 1, Pages (January 2006)
Yvonne Groemping, Karine Lapouge, Stephen J. Smerdon, Katrin Rittinger 
Volume 109, Issue 4, Pages (August 2015)
Tae-Joon Park, Ji-Sun Kim, Hee-Chul Ahn, Yongae Kim 
Volume 18, Issue 2, Pages (February 2010)
Volume 108, Issue 6, Pages (March 2015)
Volume 24, Issue 11, Pages (November 2016)
Structure and RNA Interactions of the N-Terminal RRM Domains of PTB
Volume 102, Issue 3, Pages (February 2012)
Dynamic Response of the C2 Domain of Protein Kinase Cα to Ca2+ Binding
Volume 99, Issue 10, Pages (November 2010)
Influence of Protein Scaffold on Side-Chain Transfer Free Energies
Volume 107, Issue 6, Pages (September 2014)
EPR Spectroscopy Targets Structural Changes in the E
Solution and Crystal Structures of a Sugar Binding Site Mutant of Cyanovirin-N: No Evidence of Domain Swapping  Elena Matei, William Furey, Angela M.
Volume 11, Issue 5, Pages (May 2003)
Volume 90, Issue 1, Pages (January 2006)
Volume 105, Issue 3, Pages (August 2013)
Leonardus M.I. Koharudin, Angela M. Gronenborn  Structure 
Volume 82, Issue 2, Pages (February 2002)
Nicholas J Skelton, Cliff Quan, Dorothea Reilly, Henry Lowman 
Crystal Structure of Recombinant Human Interleukin-22
Volume 8, Issue 7, Pages (July 2000)
Volume 112, Issue 1, Pages (January 2017)
Yusuke Nakasone, Kazunori Zikihara, Satoru Tokutomi, Masahide Terazima 
Volume 18, Issue 6, Pages (June 2010)
Jason P. Mulvenna, Lillian Sando, David J. Craik  Structure 
Volume 95, Issue 1, Pages (July 2008)
Solution Structure of the Cyclotide Palicourein
Comparative Molecular Dynamics Simulation Studies of Protegrin-1 Monomer and Dimer in Two Different Lipid Bilayers  Huan Rui, Jinhyuk Lee, Wonpil Im 
Volume 13, Issue 2, Pages (February 2005)
Volume 23, Issue 6, Pages (June 2015)
Volume 95, Issue 9, Pages (November 2008)
Volume 19, Issue 1, Pages (January 2011)
Structure and Topology of the Huntingtin 1–17 Membrane Anchor by a Combined Solution and Solid-State NMR Approach  Matthias Michalek, Evgeniy S. Salnikov,
Cyclic N-Terminal Loop of Amylin Forms Non Amyloid Fibers
Molecular Interactions of Alzheimer's Biomarker FDDNP with Aβ Peptide
Volume 13, Issue 7, Pages (July 2005)
Shelly Tzlil, Diana Murray, Avinoam Ben-Shaul  Biophysical Journal 
Velocity-Dependent Mechanical Unfolding of Bacteriorhodopsin Is Governed by a Dynamic Interaction Network  Christian Kappel, Helmut Grubmüller  Biophysical.
Volume 15, Issue 6, Pages (December 2001)
Structure of the Rho Family GTP-Binding Protein Cdc42 in Complex with the Multifunctional Regulator RhoGDI  Gregory R. Hoffman, Nicolas Nassar, Richard.
Min Wang, Mary Prorok, Francis J. Castellino  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 21, Issue 9, Pages (September 2013)
Volume 4, Issue 2, Pages (February 1996)
Volume 110, Issue 9, Pages (May 2016)
Volume 8, Issue 7, Pages (July 2000)
Volume 110, Issue 11, Pages (June 2016)
Volume 18, Issue 9, Pages (September 2010)
Kristopher Josephson, Naomi J. Logsdon, Mark R. Walter  Immunity 
Mechanism of Interaction between the General Anesthetic Halothane and a Model Ion Channel Protein, III: Molecular Dynamics Simulation Incorporating a.
Characterization of Structure, Dynamics, and Detergent Interactions of the Anti-HIV Chemokine Variant 5P12-RANTES  Maciej Wiktor, Oliver Hartley, Stephan.
Insights from Free-Energy Calculations: Protein Conformational Equilibrium, Driving Forces, and Ligand-Binding Modes  Yu-ming M. Huang, Wei Chen, Michael J.
Volume 14, Issue 12, Pages (December 2006)
T.P. Galbraith, R. Harris, P.C. Driscoll, B.A. Wallace 
A Delocalized Proton-Binding Site within a Membrane Protein
Presentation transcript:

Volume 97, Issue 5, Pages 1471-1481 (September 2009) Despite a Conserved Cystine Knot Motif, Different Cyclotides Have Different Membrane Binding Modes  Conan K. Wang, Michelle L. Colgrave, David C. Ireland, Quentin Kaas, David J. Craik  Biophysical Journal  Volume 97, Issue 5, Pages 1471-1481 (September 2009) DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2009.06.032 Copyright © 2009 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Sequence diversity of cyclotides. Panel A shows an alignment of selected cyclotide sequences divided into two subfamilies: Möbius and bracelet. The variation in sequences within each subfamily is represented in panel B, where the innermost circle shows residues that occur most often. Residue variations protrude outward as spikes. More frequently observed residues have a darker shade. Panel C shows kB1 and cycloviolacin (cO1), which belong to the Möbius and bracelet subfamilies, respectively. Panel D shows the distribution of residue types in cyclotide sequences for Möbius (left) and bracelet (right) cyclotides. The distribution of residue types at each position of an alignment, with the same numbering as in panel A, is mapped onto the cyclotide framework for Möbius and bracelet cyclotides. A box represents each position of the alignment, with the exception of cysteines, which are shown as yellow circles. Hydrophobic residues are colored green, negatively charged residues are red, positively charged residues are blue, Gly are cyan, and polar residues are gray. Residue types that occur more frequently occupy a larger area in the enclosing box. Biophysical Journal 2009 97, 1471-1481DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2009.06.032) Copyright © 2009 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Structure of cO2. Panel A shows a stereo representation of the solution structure of cO2 solved at pH 5, 30°C. Panel B highlights the secondary structure and the disulfide knot. When the pH was varied from 5 to 3, several HN and Hα chemical shifts changed significantly (>0.1 ppm), as indicated in panel C. The two residues having the largest change in HN chemical shift, Ile14 and Ser15, are involved in a hydrogen-bond network with the carboxyl of Glu6, illustrated in the inset. The large downfield shifts of these two amide signals reflect their hydrogen-bonded status; of interest, however, they mask the diagnostic value of their amide temperature coefficients for defining hydrogen bonds (Supporting Material), a trend that has been reported for peptides in general (51) and cyclotides in particular (52). Biophysical Journal 2009 97, 1471-1481DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2009.06.032) Copyright © 2009 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Titration of 0.5 mM kB2 and 2 mM cO2 with DPC, H2O (10% D2O), pH 2.8, 30°C. Chemical shift, δ, of the Hɛ1 proton of Trp23 and Trp10 of kB2 (solid squares) and cO2 (solid diamonds), respectively, are shown versus the DPC/cyclotide mole ratio. Binding curves were analyzed using the Langmuir isotherm. The diffusion coefficient, DT, of cO2 (open circles) at each titration point is shown, and the dotted line shows the extrapolation of the DT to zero detergent concentration. Biophysical Journal 2009 97, 1471-1481DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2009.06.032) Copyright © 2009 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Changes in (A) kB2 (pH 3, 40°C) and (B) cO2 (pH 5, 40°C) chemical shifts, Δδ, upon incorporation into a DPC micelle. The black and white bars for each residue denote changes in Hα and HN chemical shifts, respectively. Cys residues are circled and the loops are numbered in the leftmost plot. Biophysical Journal 2009 97, 1471-1481DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2009.06.032) Copyright © 2009 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Structure of kB2 in the DPC micelle-bound state (DPC/peptide ratio 60:1, pH 5.0, 40°C). (A) The 20 lowest-energy structures of micelle-bound kB2 are shown in blue overlaid with the structure of unbound kB2 in red (PDB ID: 1PT4). (B) A ribbon representation of the structure, highlighting the disulfide knot core. Biophysical Journal 2009 97, 1471-1481DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2009.06.032) Copyright © 2009 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 Orientation of kB2 and cO2 bound to a DPC micelle based on attenuation by doxylstearate probes. KB2 is shown in the upper row and cO2 is shown in the lower row. Either 5-doxylstearate (black circles) or 16-doxylstearate (gray squares) was added to samples containing cyclotide (1 mM, pH 3 and 40°C for kB2, pH 5 and 50°C for cO2) and DPC at a DPC/peptide ratio of 60:1. The relative cross-peaks (HN-Hα for nonproline amino acid residues and Hδ2-Hδ3 for prolines) based on 100 ms NOESY spectra are shown on the left. To the right are the binding models based on the 5-doxylstearate data. Hydrophobic residues are colored green, negatively charged residues are red, positively charged residues are blue, Gly are cyan, polar residues are white, and Cys are yellow. A dotted line represents the 20% threshold used to determine whether residues are inside or outside of the micelle, and also schematically represents the micelle surface on the right. Biophysical Journal 2009 97, 1471-1481DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2009.06.032) Copyright © 2009 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 7 Surfaces of kB1, circulin A, kB2, cO2, cycloviolacin O14, and vhr1 are presented as representatives of the Möbius and bracelet subfamilies to show the distribution of hydrophobic residues (in green). The locations of the hydrophobic patches differ between bracelet and Möbius cyclotides. Biophysical Journal 2009 97, 1471-1481DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2009.06.032) Copyright © 2009 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions