Sonita R Chada, Peter J Hollenbeck  Current Biology 

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 14, Issue 22, Pages (November 2004)
Advertisements

Madoka Suzuki, Hideaki Fujita, Shin’ichi Ishiwata  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 15, Issue 1, Pages (January 2012)
Cell-Length-Dependent Microtubule Accumulation during Polarization
Volume 81, Issue 3, Pages (February 2014)
Clathrin-Mediated Endocytosis Persists during Unperturbed Mitosis
Volume 19, Issue 11, Pages (June 2017)
History-Dependent Catastrophes Regulate Axonal Microtubule Behavior
Contact dynamics during keratocyte motility
Dynamics of interphase microtubules in Schizosaccharomyces pombe
Volume 21, Issue 24, Pages (December 2011)
Nimish Khanna, Yan Hu, Andrew S. Belmont  Current Biology 
Reconstitution of Amoeboid Motility In Vitro Identifies a Motor-Independent Mechanism for Cell Body Retraction  Katsuya Shimabukuro, Naoki Noda, Murray.
Luyuan Pan, Yong Q. Zhang, Elvin Woodruff, Kendal Broadie 
Yitao Ma, Dinara Shakiryanova, Irina Vardya, Sergey V Popov 
William M. Bement, Craig A. Mandato, Mary N. Kirsch  Current Biology 
Neuronal Polarity: Vectorial Cytoplasmic Flow Precedes Axon Formation
Volume 148, Issue 5, Pages (March 2012)
Volume 6, Issue 4, Pages (July 2013)
Volume 10, Issue 19, Pages (October 2000)
Volume 18, Issue 20, Pages (October 2008)
Wood Cell-Wall Structure Requires Local 2D-Microtubule Disassembly by a Novel Plasma Membrane-Anchored Protein  Yoshihisa Oda, Yuki Iida, Yuki Kondo,
Volume 16, Issue 22, Pages (November 2006)
Volume 22, Issue 2, Pages (January 2012)
Volume 37, Issue 2, Pages (January 2003)
Reconstitution of Amoeboid Motility In Vitro Identifies a Motor-Independent Mechanism for Cell Body Retraction  Katsuya Shimabukuro, Naoki Noda, Murray.
Cell Movement Is Guided by the Rigidity of the Substrate
Volume 22, Issue 14, Pages (July 2012)
Architecture Dependence of Actin Filament Network Disassembly
Volume 22, Issue 14, Pages (July 2012)
Volume 103, Issue 10, Pages (November 2012)
Light Regulates the Cell Cycle in Zebrafish
EB1-Recruited Microtubule +TIP Complexes Coordinate Protrusion Dynamics during 3D Epithelial Remodeling  Sarah Gierke, Torsten Wittmann  Current Biology 
Bidirectional Transport along Microtubules
Rapid Actin-Based Plasticity in Dendritic Spines
Volume 16, Issue 22, Pages (November 2006)
Massimo A. Hilliard, Cornelia I. Bargmann  Developmental Cell 
Anne Pelissier, Jean-Paul Chauvin, Thomas Lecuit  Current Biology 
Susana Gomis-Rüth, Corette J. Wierenga, Frank Bradke  Current Biology 
Gilad A. Jacobson, Peter Rupprecht, Rainer W. Friedrich 
Volume 12, Issue 4, Pages (February 2002)
Volume 16, Issue 6, Pages (June 2009)
Michael W. Gramlich, Vitaly A. Klyachko  Cell Reports 
Volume 23, Issue 8, Pages (April 2013)
Julie E. Cooke, Hilary A. Kemp, Cecilia B. Moens  Current Biology 
Glial Cells Physiologically Modulate Clock Neurons and Circadian Behavior in a Calcium-Dependent Manner  Fanny S. Ng, Michelle M. Tangredi, F. Rob Jackson 
Kinesin-5 Is Essential for Growth-Cone Turning
Marco Terenzio, Giampietro Schiavo, Mike Fainzilber  Neuron 
Volume 2, Issue 6, Pages (December 2012)
Volume 26, Issue 19, Pages (October 2016)
Kari Barlan, Wen Lu, Vladimir I. Gelfand  Current Biology 
Three-Step Model for Polarized Sorting of KIF17 into Dendrites
Measuring Actin Flow in 3D Cell Protrusions
An antagonistic relationship between myosin II and dynein controls bulk growth cone advance. An antagonistic relationship between myosin II and dynein.
Volume 86, Issue 3, Pages (March 2004)
Spatio-Temporal Regulation of Rac1 Localization and Lamellipodia Dynamics during Epithelial Cell-Cell Adhesion  Jason S. Ehrlich, Marc D.H. Hansen, W.James.
Mobility of Synaptic Vesicles in Different Pools in Resting and Stimulated Frog Motor Nerve Terminals  Michael A. Gaffield, Silvio O. Rizzoli, William.
Christina Ketchum, Heather Miller, Wenxia Song, Arpita Upadhyaya 
Human Myo19 Is a Novel Myosin that Associates with Mitochondria
Fang Du, Qing Yu, Allen Chen, Doris Chen, Shirley ShiDu Yan 
Christopher C. Quinn, Douglas S. Pfeil, William G. Wadsworth 
Control of the Initiation and Termination of Kinesin-1-Driven Transport by Myosin-Ic and Nonmuscle Tropomyosin  Betsy B. McIntosh, Erika L.F. Holzbaur,
Light Regulates the Cell Cycle in Zebrafish
Volume 23, Issue 6, Pages (May 2018)
Daniel M Suter, Andrew W Schaefer, Paul Forscher  Current Biology 
The Role of Selective Transport in Neuronal Protein Sorting
Marko Kaksonen, Yidi Sun, David G. Drubin  Cell 
Madoka Suzuki, Hideaki Fujita, Shin’ichi Ishiwata  Biophysical Journal 
Nimish Khanna, Yan Hu, Andrew S. Belmont  Current Biology 
Volume 81, Issue 3, Pages (February 2014)
Presentation transcript:

Nerve Growth Factor Signaling Regulates Motility and Docking of Axonal Mitochondria  Sonita R Chada, Peter J Hollenbeck  Current Biology  Volume 14, Issue 14, Pages 1272-1276 (July 2004) DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2004.07.027

Figure 1 Unlike Mitochondria, Endosomes/Lysosomes and Vesicles Do Not Accumulate in Axons at Sites of Contact with NGF Beads R123 fluorescence in live cells shows the accumulation of mitochondria near an NGF bead (A and B) but not near a heat-denatured NGF bead (C and D). AO staining of organelles of the endocytic-lysosomal pathway (E and F) and DiOC16-staining of mainly anterograde-transported vesicles (G and H) shows that although both classes are numerous and distributed along the length of the axon, they do not accumulate in regions contacting an NGF bead. (I) Quantitative determination of density of the three types of organelles in the axon adjacent to an NGF bead. The region near the bead is shown by the black bar, and the regions 100 μm away toward the cell body and toward the growth cone are shown as gray and white bars, respectively. Unlike R123-stained mitochondria, the densities of AO- and DiOC16-positive organelles are not significantly different in the NGF-bead axon sites when compared to nonbead control regions of the axon. The scale bars represent 10 μm. Values for n Current Biology 2004 14, 1272-1276DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2004.07.027)

Figure 2 Mitochondrial Transport Behavior is Different Near NGF versus Control Beads Displacement versus time for individual mitochondria in neurons treated with NGF beads (A) or control beads (B). Movement of mitochondria in axons is saltatory with frequent stops and starts and occasionally they reverse direction. Individual mitochondria halt more frequently when they enter axon regions contacting an NGF bead versus a control bead. Positive values indicate that the location of mitochondria is on the side of the bead toward the cell body, whereas negative values are designated to mitochondria located on the side of the bead toward the growth cone. Images of R123-labeled mitochondria were acquired every 2 s for 100 s by using a cooled CCD camera as described above. Mitochondria were categorized as “moving” if they traversed at least 5 μm in either direction along the axon during the observation period. The movement of individual mitochondria was tracked using Scion Image processing and analysis software, and the displacements of mitochondria were calculated in the region of axons adjacent to either an NGF bead or heat-denatured control bead. A repeated measures logistic regression test with a compound symmetric variance-covariance matrix and F test were used to compare the percent of mitochondria that exit from the region adjacent to an NGF bead versus a control bead. Current Biology 2004 14, 1272-1276DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2004.07.027)

Figure 3 Accumulation of Mitochondria in the Region of NGF-bead Stimulation Does Not Occur in the Absence of F-actin Phase (A) and R123 fluorescence (B) images of a live neuron treated with latrunculin B. No accumulation of mitochondria is observed in regions contacting an NGF bead. (C) Quantification of relative mitochondrial fluorescence shows that in latrunculin-treated neurons, the density of mitochondria is not significantly higher in the 10 μm region of the axon adjacent to an NGF bead (black bar) than in identically-sized nonbead control regions 100 μm away toward the cell body (gray bar) or growth cone (white bar) (n = 9; paired t tests; p > 0.8). Current Biology 2004 14, 1272-1276DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2004.07.027)