Section 5.4 – Nitrogen Management

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Phosphorus and Potassium CNMP Core Curriculum Section 5 – Nutrient Management.
Advertisements

Phosphorus Index Based Management Douglas Beegle Dept. of Crop and Soil Sciences Penn State University
Daily Manure Production Per Animal We have estimates of manure production –4.5 kg/day/hd for swine (liquid manure) –45-50 kg/day/hd for dairy cow (liquid)
Effects of Cover Crop Management on Corn Production Brian Jones Agronomy Extension Agent
Nutrient Management Natural Resources Conservation Service.
Livestock Manure Management – The Basics on Why and How Coordinating Manure Utilization Plans With Crop Rotations Jon Stika, Area Agronomist USDA-NRCS,
How Management Effects Nutrient and Sediment Losses Dennis FrameFred Madison Directors UW Discovery Farms Program.
Public perception of pesticides Public has a poor understanding of pesticides Public has a fear due to media and from misuse and accidents.
SPONSOR of 4R Nutrient Stewardship Program. The Nature Conservancy Teaming with the Florida agriculture industry to increase farmer profitability and.
Understanding Soil Chemistry
Nutrient Management Planning Alan Sutton Department of Animal Sciences.
Logo Certified Nutrient Management Planning7-1 Module 7: Manure Utilization By Hailin Zhang.
The Nitrogen Requirement and Use Efficiency of Sweet Sorghum Produced in Central Oklahoma. D. Brian Arnall, Chad B. Godsey, Danielle Bellmer, Ray Huhnke.
Managing Manure Nutrients for Crop Production – Using DDGS, an Agronomists Viewpoint. Joel DeJong ISU Extension Field Specialist/Crops September 27, 2006.
Managing Manure for Crop Production when Feeding DDGS Kyle Jensen ISU Extension Field Specialist-Crops.
BROUGHT TO YOU BY: BUILDING ENVIRONMENTAL LEADERS IN ANIMAL AGRICULTURE WELCOME TO MANURE MANAGEMENT JEOPARDY! Section 6 Manure Application Building Environmental.
Planning Process for CNMPs Vicki S. Anderson Resource Conservationist Natural Resources Conservation Service.
Nutrient Inventory and Storage and Handling (Planner Training) John W. Worley.
Integrating Forages into Multi-Functional Landscapes: Enhanced Soil Health and Ecosystem Service Opportunities Douglas L. Karlen USDA-ARS Presented at.
Land Treatment and the Conservation Planning Process CNMP Core Curriculum Section 3 — Land Treatment Practices.
Soil Electrical Conductivity
Soil Fertility Considerations Part of the Ruminant Livestock: Facing New Economic Realities Meetings.
 Soil Fertility  Ability of a soil to provide nutrients for plant growth  Involves storage and availability of nutrients  Vital to a productive soil.
Adjusting N:P ratios in liquid dairy manure through nitrification and chemical phosphorus removal to match crop fertilizer requirements Background Nutrient.
BROUGHT TO YOU BY: BUILDING ENVIRONMENTAL LEADERS IN ANIMAL AGRICULTURE WELCOME TO MANURE MANAGEMENT JEOPARDY! Section 1 Nutrient Management Building Environmental.
Soil Respiration Unit: Soil Science. Objectives O Define: soil respiration and soil microbes O Explain the role of soil respiration in determining soil.
Components of a Nutrient Management Plan Scott Sturgul Nutrient & Pest Management Program Soil & Water Management Farm & Industry Short Course Feb. 16,
Field Specific Decisions: N vs P CNMP Core Curriculum Section 5 – Nutrient Management.
Soil Nitrogen Unit: Soil Science.
Lecture 2. Agricultural Pollution Control in the Baltic Sea with Special Emphasis on Manure Management Prepared by Assoc. Prof. Philip Chiverton, SLU and.
Soil Bulk Density Unit: Soil Science. Objectives O Define: ammonification, available water holding capacity, nitrification, bulk density, denitrification,
Nutrient Issues Review of Nutrient Management Issues Addressed by EPA NODA for Proposed CAFO Regulations.
Nutrient content of dairy slurry Slurry nutrient variability and nutrient prices Slurry data from UW soils lab (Marshfield, WI) First year available 715.
Precision Management beyond Fertilizer Application Hailin Zhang.
Nutrient Management Planning CNMP Core Curriculum Section 4 – Nutrient Management.
Nutrient Management Summary CNMP Core Curriculum Section 5 – Nutrient Management.
MANURE MANAGEMENT PLAN SUMMARY – RATE TABLES Completing a Manure Management Plan Workshop v
Manure Management and Water Quality By Jeff Lorimor, Iowa State University, Ames 32-1.
MANURE MANAGEMENT PLAN SUMMARY – MMP NBS Completing a Manure Management Plan Workshop v
ORGANIC WINTER WHEAT. Ecological area for winter wheat in Romania.
THE NITROGEN CYCLE How are my farming practices affecting the environment & long term stability?
Integrated Nutrient Management (Nutrient Management Plan ) A Series of Lecture By Mr. Allah Dad Khan.
Bob Woods Area Extension Agronomy Specialist
Interpreting Georgia Soil Test Reports
Soil Bulk Density/Moisture/Aeration
Vermont Farmers In 2015 – 16,259 acres of cover crops planted on 1,299 fields throughout Vermont. In 2016 – 25,227 acres of cover crop planted on.
Fertility Strategies for Lean Times
Manure Management in No-till
Soil Testing and Fertiliser Application
Manure management plan summary – MMP NBs
Chapter 15 Organic Amendments.
Winter application worksheet
How High Should NUE Be, and Can Knowing Soil N Help Us Get There
Precision Nutrient Management: Grid-Sampling Basis
E.V. Lukina, K.W. Freeman,K.J. Wynn, W.E. Thomason, G.V. Johnson,
Manure management plan summary – Rate tables
Nitrogen Management Basics
Manure’s Fertility Value
Cover Crops.
Efficient farm management has always been of prime importance to farmers. It has become even more important to the economic survival of farmers in recent.
Overview of US EPA & State Manure Management Regulations
BASIC ISSUES OF MANURE MANAGEMENT: ASSIGNING MANURE SPREADING PRIORITIES RICHARD WOLKOWSKI AND KEITH KELLING DEPARTMENT OF SOIL SCIENCE UNIVERSITY OF.
Overview of US EPA & State Manure Management Regulations
Poultry Litter as Fertilizer?
The Impact of Agriculture
Components of a Nutrient Management Plan
Section 5.1 – Strategic & Annual Planning
Section 6: Record Keeping
Section 5.3 – Estimating Land Requirement
Nutrient Management Planning
Presentation transcript:

Section 5.4 – Nitrogen Management Nutrient Management Section 5.4 – Nitrogen Management Adapted CNMP Core Curriculum Presented by: Roberto Maisonnave, Ag Engineer & M. Sc. International Environmental Consultant robermaison@hotmail.com www.ambientagro.com

Objectives Nitrogen will be analyzed from the environmental concerns to agronomic benefits. Nitrogen cycle: how management practices can impact its retention in the root zone for crop production.

Nitrogen in the Environment Speaker Notes: Assuming the audience is fairly well versed on the water cycle as it relates to nitrogen movement, use this slide to set the background that nitrogen can be leachable in the nitrate form, and on sandy soils can move to groundwater. In the holistic water cycle, that nitrate can come back into surface waters or contaminate wells. 10 ppm nitrate in drinking water is the health standard for groundwater. Forms of nitrogen from manure can also move via surface runoff, reaching waters of the state and causing fish kills. Either off-site movement of nitrogen forms in manure is unacceptable and a loss of nutrients for crop production. Required Course Materials:   Supplemental Resources: Suggested Learning Exercise:

NITROGEN CYCLE

Environmental Concern Air quality: ammonia (NH3) and nitrogen oxides (N2O, NO) emissions Water Quality Ground Water - Leaching Surface Water: Runoff & Tile drains

Agronomic Importance Most relevant macro-nutrient for plants Most frequently deficient nutrient in crop production N in soil solution: N-NH4 and N-NO3 Legumes can fix atmospheric N2 through microbial symbiosis (energy cost) No benefit to overuse Speaker Notes: Nitrogen management of manure may be the one positive economic AND environmental factor for a producer to realize. There is no question that nitrogen is vitally important to economic crop production. Many crops show a direct correlation between nitrogen and yields. No producer ever wants to see yellow corn. But, there is also no benefit for overusing N either via purchased fertilizer or over applications of manure. Manure nitrogen beyond the crop’s need, is a missed opportunity for that manure being used on another field, especially in times of high fertilizer prices. And it is a risk to the environment either via leaching, runoff, or volatilization. Most practices that recycle manure nitrogen to crop production are also the same practices that decrease the risk of loosing it to the environment. Odor and air emissions will be reduced with incorporation/tillage/injection; Leaching can be mitigated by reduced rates and timing; Runoff to surface waters can be reduced by rates and timing combined with conservation measures; There is a concern for manures reaching tile drains, thereby traveling directly to surface waters. Remind the audience that nutrient management inter-relates with conservation practices to mitigate losses to the environment. Examples might include cover crops to recycle nutrients over the winter, buffers to reduce runoff, tillage practices to increase residue thereby reducing erosion and or placement/tillage before, during and after manure applications. Required Course Materials: Supplemental Resources: Suggested Learning Exercise:

N Agronomic Rate Concept A rate of nutrient application on a field so that the amount of nitrogen required by a crop to grow is available, but minimizes the amount of nutrients that pass through the soil below root zone into the groundwater. We can prevent leaching from happen but cannot be completely efficient about it. Soil Hydraulic Conductivity (k). Spoon feeding? Speaker Notes: TIMING OF APPLICATIONS IS CRITICAL   Required Course Materials: Supplemental Resources: Any local materials describing the nitrogen cycle could be included in the resource materials, depending on the audience’s background on this subject. Suggested Learning Exercise:

Synchronization

Farming Limitations…

Nitrogen Recommendations for Crop Production Speaker Notes: At this point, begin discussions on specific nitrogen recommendations for crop production, as the requirement of the crop is the first step in determining manure rates. Required Course Materials: State specific nitrogen recommendations for relevant crops, generally published by the Land Grant University. Supplemental Resources: There may also be relevant bulletins from the University that discuss nitrogen in general and specifically as it is applied as fertilizer and/or manure. Bulletins that discuss the various forms of nitrogen in fertilizers can be helpful to the audience’s understanding of manure as a fertilizer. Suggested Learning Exercises:

N Recommendations Traditionally, N uptake and yield Variables that define N Crop Uptake: Crop Type Potential Yield Risk of N losses Timing of N supply Soil Moisture Weather conditions during crop season Speaker Notes: Traditional soil testing measures the soil for the amounts of P, K, micronutrients, pH, etc., but not nitrogen. Nitrogen recommendations are generally based on the crop to be grown and the yield goal. High potential yielding corn will require more N than a lower yield. Corn needs more than wheat; legume plants may not require any nitrogen as they make their own. The land grant university in each state has researched the yield potential of crops and has recommendation charts that are generally accepted in each state for CNMP development. These will probably be referenced in the state NRCS 590 standard. Disclaimer: Corn will often be used as the crop to discuss Nitrogen as it is the most common across the nation. If another crop is more relevant to your area, please substitute that crop’s nitrogen requirements for your examples. Required Course Material: Supplemental Resources: Suggested Learning Exercise:

Generalized Corn Yield Response Curve to Nitrogen Economic N recommendation where yield drops off 95% of max yield. Yield 12 ton/ha 10 ton/ha 8 ton/ha 6 ton/ha 4.5 ton/ha 2.5 ton/ha Speaker Notes: This is a typical general corn crop response curve to nitrogen showing that the greatest gains in yield are from the first units of N and a point is reached where the cost of additional N does not pay off in economic yield response. This curve, in general, is similar for many crops, but is specific for each crop. Most of these crop response charts have been developed with regard to economic yields related to nitrogen inputs, not based on environmental impacts. Obviously, when the crop doesn’t respond to the extra N there is a greater risk for losing the nutrient in the environment. The maximum agronomic yield is rarely the maximum economic yield. Most economic crop response curves have been developed for 95% of maximum yield. Required Course Materials: Suggested Resource Materials: Many states will have charts specific to crops and yield goals showing nitrogen recommendations based on yield. Scanning or re-creating those charts would be a good substitute for this slide. Suggested Learning Exercise: 0 45 90 135 180 224 + Nitrogen fertilizer applied, kg/ha

Realistic Yield Potential Example of NRCS 590 standards to determine yield potential 3 out of 5 years yield is achieved 50% of the time yield can be achieved 50% of the time yield is achievable plus 10% to allow for genetic improvements Average over a number of years Etc. Speaker Notes: Since yield potential is so critical to nitrogen recommendations, establishing “realistic” yield goals is important. Several methods of establishing yield goals are mentioned on the slide. The 590 standard often references one of these as being appropriate. Some 590 standards may say to take the last 5 years of harvest records, throw out the highest and lowest yields and average the remaining 3 years of yields. Others may state that selecting the yield goal that is achievable 50% of the time; maybe plus 10% to acknowledge improvements in varieties. Whatever method is utilized, it should have a reasonable chance of being attained so nitrogen is not oversupplied. Required Course Material: Supplemental Resources: Suggested Learning Exercise:

Requirement kg N /ton grain How much N is needed? Requirement kg N /ton grain Expected Yield kg/ha Needed kg/ha Extraction kg/ha Corn 22 9.000 198 131 Wheat 30 5.000 150 99 Rice 22.2 6.000 133 88 Soybeans 80 4.000 320 240 Sunflowers 40 3.500 140 84 Speaker Notes: Since yield potential is so critical to nitrogen recommendations, establishing “realistic” yield goals is important. Several methods of establishing yield goals are mentioned on the slide. The 590 standard often references one of these as being appropriate. Some 590 standards may say to take the last 5 years of harvest records, throw out the highest and lowest yields and average the remaining 3 years of yields. Others may state that selecting the yield goal that is achievable 50% of the time; maybe plus 10% to acknowledge improvements in varieties. Whatever method is utilized, it should have a reasonable chance of being attained so nitrogen is not oversupplied. Required Course Material: Supplemental Resources: Suggested Learning Exercise:

Current and Emerging N Recommendations Nitrate-N tests Organic Matter tests Previous year manure applications Economic Rates Speaker Notes: The best corn states are using forms of Nitrate-N soil tests (generally taken to 2 foot depths) and Organic Matter soil tests to assist in making Nitrogen recommendations. As the price of corn and nitrogen fertilizer prices fluctuate, there are also economic models available to estimate Nitrogen rates. With low corn and high fertilizer prices, these economic modes will produce N recommendations that are not only economical for, but also protective of the environment.

Nitrogen Availability and Losses from Manure Manure Nitrogen Management should be profitable and Environmentally sound Speaker Notes: To fully understand how to utilize manure, and fertilizer, for that matter, an understanding of the nitrogen cycle is required. For this presentation, we will assume most people have a basic understanding, so we will concentrate on relating that knowledge to manure. Required Course Material: Supplemental Resources: Any background material that describes the N cycle would be helpful to those in the class who are not familiar with it. It is assumed that participants have a working knowledge of the N cycle and this portion will relate those principles to manure nitrogen. Suggested Learning Exercise:

Estimating Plant Available N from Manures Book Values MWPS, NRCS State Specific Tables Manure Tests Speaker Notes: One of several methods may be acceptable for estimating the plant available nitrogen from manures. They include manure testing, book values, (generally MidWest Plan Services or Natural Resource Conservation Service tables), state specific tables (often based on manure type and method of application for weather and conditions in specific locations), California has a salt index that relates to nitrogen recommendations and there are also current and emerging plant and soil testing procedures to measure nitrogen release from manures. Required Course Material: Supplemental Resources: Suggested Learning Exercise:

Strategy Estimate manure rates on best judgment Calibrate equipment to apply desired rate Take representative manure samples at time of hauling Take reputable N test in field if applicable Follow through to yields Evaluate and adjust for next season based on new manure tests and field observations. Speaker Notes: When you begin working with a producer, it may be similar to sitting in class today, you don’t have a current manure test, you cannot get one till the next time they empty the storage, but you cannot wait till then to begin laying the groundwork for the next application. The best option is to learn how to make the best judgment about estimating plant available N from a typical manure. Calibrate the equipment to deliver that rate, take a new manure sample the day the manure is hauled, conduct any in-field sampling that is recommended, follow through to determine if there are any yield losses and after evaluation of the above, use the new manure sample to recalculate, if necessary, the future manure application.   Required Course Materials: Supplemental Resources: Suggested Learning Exercise: Estimating PAN by using math and common sense is valuable. Nitrogen is too dynamic and weather depended to accept these calculated rates at face value. Nitrogen deficiency is very obvious in fields and also directly correlates to yield losses. Especially for producers just beginning to credit manure nitrogen, it is important to follow up with in-field testing, observation and yield checks. Even for experienced users, in season tests will monitor losses of nitrogen due to weather.

Estimated Plant Available N (PAN) Total N Ammonium + Organic Estimated Plant Available N (PAN) Estimating NH3 Volatilization Most States have Tables Season, weather, rain and Tº Estimating organic mineralization First year From past manure applications Speaker Notes: Manure samples are generally tested for total nitrogen. Total N is made up of ammonium N and organic N. Some labs test for ammonium and some estimate it based on manure type. If a manure sample only provides the total nitrogen and the organic nitrogen, just subtract the organic from the total and the resulting answer will be ammonium nitrogen. Our goal is to work with these two numbers and make an estimate of the plant available N. Required Course Material: Supplemental Resources: Suggested Learning Exercise:

Mineralization Factor for first year Mineralized Organic Nitrogen Source: MWPS Manure Type Manure Handling Mineralization Factor for first year Swine Fresh 0.50 Anaerobic Liquid 0.35 Aerobic Liquid 0.30 Beef Solid w/o bedding Solid with bedding 0.25 Anaerobic liquid Aerobic liquid Dairy Poultry Deep pit 0.60 Solid with litter Solid without litter Speaker notes: The Mineralization chart from Mid West Plan Services (MWPS) is one of the standards across the states. It estimates the amount of plant available nitrogen that will be mineralized from the organic portion of manure the first season after application. You can see that it is based on animal species and manure handling systems. On a manure sample, take the amount of organic N and multiply it by the estimated percent that will be mineralized the first season after application. For example, if a manure test from an earthen manure storage on a diary farm (anaerobic) indicates 20 lbs. of N in the organic form, multiply this by 30% (20 lbs. organic x 0.30 = 6 lbs mineralized nitrogen in the first season. This portion is plant available. Required Course Material: Supplemental Resources: Suggested Learning Exercise:

N Application Calculation Process (KS) Not all the potentially PAN present in the soil is reflected on nitrate content lab test: N credits must be considered as potential sources. These credits will be related to the field’s previous crop –only if a legume crop was raised- and previous year manure applications. There will also be a minor adjustment based on the soil texture.

N Application Calculation Process (KS) Credit Category Description Soil Texture Adjustment 1.0 for medium & fine textured soils 1.1 for sandy soils Previous Year Manure 50 kg/ha N credit for last year application 20 kg/ha N if occurred two years ago Previous Crop Adjustment 100 kg/ha N for Alfalfa 50 kg/ha N for Red Clover 30 kg/ha N for Soybeans 20 kg/ha N for fallow

Crop Nitrogen Requirement Equation # 1: Crop Nitrogen Requirement CNR = (YG x N Req x STA) – PCA – PYM – NST   where,  CNR: crop nitrogen requirement (kg N / ha) YG: yield goal (kg or ton / ha) N Req: Nitrogen requirement (kg N / kg or Ton Grain) STA: soil texture adjustment (no units) PCA: previous crop adjustment (kg N / ha) PYM: previous year manure application (kg N / ha) NST: nitrogen soil test value (kg N / ha) Red circle shows CREDITS

Crop Nitrogen Requirements CNR (kg/ha) = (9 ton/ha * 22 kg N/ton*1)-(20 kg N/ha)-(50 kg N/ha)-(30 kg N/ha) CNR (kg/ha) = 98 kg N/ha Credits Fine texture soil: F=1 Manure was applied last year Previous crop is Soybeans SNT reported 30 kg/ha for 0-60 cm

Effluent Application Rate ETNC (mg/L) : (N-Org * 0.33)+(N-NH4*0.25)+(N-NO3 + N-NO2) TKN: 491 mg/L N-Org: 99 mg/L N-NH4: 392 mg/L MAV (L/ha): CNR (kg N/ha)* cf /ETNC (mg/L) MAV (L/ha): (98 kg N/ha * 1.000.000) / 130 mg/L MAV (L/ha): 753.846 Max Application Rate: 75 mm-ha / ha ETNC: effluent total nitrogen concentration

Balancing Math with Common Sense Is this a good idea? Infiltration rate of soils Over application of other nutrients Field and soil conditions Environmental conditions Speaker Notes: An important point in manure applications is not only the agronomy side of rate/acre, but also the environmental side with relation to the soil’s ability to infiltrate and hold the volume of manure (water) applied. If an agronomic rate is too high for the soil to soak in and runoff occurs, then this is not the right rate. If it is so much that soil macro pores take the manure directly to the tile drain and the tile drain takes it to surface waters, then it is not the right rate. This same rate may be acceptable if it were applied in several applications over the season. But the lost opportunity of the nitrogen and the over application of other nutrients will still be a concern. So far we have been assuming that the manure can and will be N-based. As we move on to talk about phosphorus, you will learn that this isn’t always the case. But again, we start with N to see what the max rate is and then work our way down to specific needs of the farm. Required Course Material: Supplemental Resources: Suggested Learning Exercise:

How do you know if you applied the rate you intended? Calibrate! Speaker Notes: A lot of time has just been spent figuring out the plant available nitrogen. All of this hinges on either a known rate per acre of manure, or the ability to adjust the manure to a desired rate. In-field calibration cannot be stressed enough. If a producer indicates they have been applying manure at a given rate, and all the calculations hinge on this, without confirmation of the rate, assumptions could be leading to wasted time. Required Course Material: Bulletins and or websites for calibration may be provided to the audience. Supplemental Resources: Suggested Learning Exercise:

Nitrogen Management Summary Realistic crop yield expectations Accurate soil and manure tests Equipment Calibration and Timing Use common sense, field history observation, evaluation Speaker Notes: In summary, Nitrogen management requires a culmination of accurate soil testing, accurate manure sampling, calibration and common sense followed up with observation and evaluation in the field.