Volume 12, Issue 6, Pages (December 2003)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Mus81 and Yen1 Promote Reciprocal Exchange during Mitotic Recombination to Maintain Genome Integrity in Budding Yeast  Chu Kwen Ho, Gerard Mazón, Alicia.
Advertisements

DNA Replication through G-Quadruplex Motifs Is Promoted by the Saccharomyces cerevisiae Pif1 DNA Helicase  Katrin Paeschke, John A. Capra, Virginia A.
The Mre11 Complex Is Required for Repair of Hairpin-Capped Double-Strand Breaks and Prevention of Chromosome Rearrangements  Kirill S. Lobachev, Dmitry.
Volume 14, Issue 4, Pages (May 2004)
Simon W.L Chan, Jennifer Chang, John Prescott, Elizabeth H Blackburn 
Levels of Polyadenylation Factor CstF-64 Control IgM Heavy Chain mRNA Accumulation and Other Events Associated with B Cell Differentiation  Yoshio Takagaki,
MEC1-Dependent Redistribution of the Sir3 Silencing Protein from Telomeres to DNA Double-Strand Breaks  Kevin D Mills, David A Sinclair, Leonard Guarente 
Highly Transcribed RNA Polymerase II Genes Are Impediments to Replication Fork Progression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae  Anna Azvolinsky, Paul G. Giresi,
Volume 18, Issue 6, Pages (June 2005)
Volume 7, Issue 4, Pages (April 2001)
Volume 3, Issue 5, Pages (May 1999)
Volume 120, Issue 5, Pages (March 2005)
Silencing in Yeast rDNA Chromatin
Mus81 and Yen1 Promote Reciprocal Exchange during Mitotic Recombination to Maintain Genome Integrity in Budding Yeast  Chu Kwen Ho, Gerard Mazón, Alicia.
Early Replication of Short Telomeres in Budding Yeast
A DNA Damage Response Pathway Controlled by Tel1 and the Mre11 Complex
Volume 40, Issue 3, Pages (November 2010)
Marianne Bénard, Chrystelle Maric, Gérard Pierron  Molecular Cell 
Michelle Sabourin, Creighton T. Tuzon, Virginia A. Zakian 
Volume 117, Issue 4, Pages (May 2004)
Volume 17, Issue 1, Pages (January 2005)
Volume 10, Issue 2, Pages (August 2002)
Short Telomeres in Yeast Are Highly Recombinogenic
The Saccharomyces Pif1p DNA Helicase and the Highly Related Rrm3p Have Opposite Effects on Replication Fork Progression in Ribosomal DNA  Andreas S Ivessa,
Shiv I.S Grewal, Amar J.S Klar  Cell 
Volume 39, Issue 4, Pages (August 2010)
DNA Replication through G-Quadruplex Motifs Is Promoted by the Saccharomyces cerevisiae Pif1 DNA Helicase  Katrin Paeschke, John A. Capra, Virginia A.
MEC1-Dependent Redistribution of the Sir3 Silencing Protein from Telomeres to DNA Double-Strand Breaks  Kevin D Mills, David A Sinclair, Leonard Guarente 
Katsuki Johzuka, Takashi Horiuchi  Molecular Cell 
Volume 60, Issue 6, Pages (December 2015)
Sarah K. Deng, Yi Yin, Thomas D. Petes, Lorraine S. Symington 
Histone Acetylation Regulates the Time of Replication Origin Firing
Volume 7, Issue 1, Pages (April 2014)
DNA Replication through G-Quadruplex Motifs Is Promoted by the Saccharomyces cerevisiae Pif1 DNA Helicase  Katrin Paeschke, John A. Capra, Virginia A.
Neal Sugawara, Xuan Wang, James E. Haber  Molecular Cell 
CDC5 and CKII Control Adaptation to the Yeast DNA Damage Checkpoint
Histone-like TAFs Are Essential for Transcription In Vivo
Distal Sequences, but Not ori-β/OBR-1, Are Essential for Initiation of DNA Replication in the Chinese Hamster DHFR Origin  R.F Kalejta, X Li, L.D Mesner,
Regulation of Telomere Elongation by the Cyclin-Dependent Kinase CDK1
Hyunsuk Suh, Dane Z. Hazelbaker, Luis M. Soares, Stephen Buratowski 
Volume 3, Issue 4, Pages (April 1999)
Michael Kruppa, Robyn D Moir, David Kolodrubetz, Ian M Willis 
José Antonio Tercero, Maria Pia Longhese, John F.X Diffley 
Rif1 and Rif2 Inhibit Localization of Tel1 to DNA Ends
Volume 12, Issue 4, Pages (October 2003)
An AT-Rich Sequence in Human Common Fragile Site FRA16D Causes Fork Stalling and Chromosome Breakage in S. cerevisiae  Haihua Zhang, Catherine H. Freudenreich 
Volume 73, Issue 3, Pages e3 (February 2019)
Multiple Developmental Stage–Specific Enhancers Regulate CD8 Expression in Developing Thymocytes and in Thymus-Independent T Cells  Wilfried Ellmeier,
The role of the Mre11-Rad50-Xrs2 complex in telomerase- mediated lengthening of Saccharomyces cerevisiae telomeres  Yasumasa Tsukamoto, Andrew K.P Taggart,
Volume 29, Issue 3, Pages (February 2008)
Volume 42, Issue 1, Pages (April 2011)
Targeted Stimulation of Meiotic Recombination
A Suppressor of Two Essential Checkpoint Genes Identifies a Novel Protein that Negatively Affects dNTP Pools  Xiaolan Zhao, Eric G.D Muller, Rodney Rothstein 
Cdc18 Enforces Long-Term Maintenance of the S Phase Checkpoint by Anchoring the Rad3-Rad26 Complex to Chromatin  Damien Hermand, Paul Nurse  Molecular.
Volume 45, Issue 3, Pages (February 2012)
Histone H4 Lysine 91 Acetylation
Volume 30, Issue 2, Pages (April 2008)
Scott J Diede, Daniel E Gottschling  Cell 
The Meiosis-Specific Hop2 Protein of S
The Effect of Distance on Long-Range Chromatin Interactions
Alessandro Bianchi, Simona Negrini, David Shore  Molecular Cell 
Feng Xu, Qiongyi Zhang, Kangling Zhang, Wei Xie, Michael Grunstein 
Catherine Johnson, Vamsi K. Gali, Tatsuro S. Takahashi, Takashi Kubota 
Volume 9, Issue 2, Pages (February 2002)
J.Russell Lipford, Stephen P Bell  Molecular Cell 
Marianne Bénard, Chrystelle Maric, Gérard Pierron  Molecular Cell 
Simon W.-L Chan, Elizabeth H Blackburn  Molecular Cell 
Increased Recombination Intermediates and Homologous Integration Hot Spots at DNA Replication Origins  Mónica Segurado, Marı́a Gómez, Francisco Antequera 
Absence of Non-histone Protein Complexes at Natural Chromosomal Pause Sites Results in Reduced Replication Pausing in Aging Yeast Cells  Marleny Cabral,
Xiaorong Wang, Peter Baumann  Molecular Cell 
Presentation transcript:

Volume 12, Issue 6, Pages 1525-1536 (December 2003) The Saccharomyces cerevisiae Helicase Rrm3p Facilitates Replication Past Nonhistone Protein-DNA Complexes  Andreas S. Ivessa, Brian A. Lenzmeier, Jessica B. Bessler, Lara K. Goudsouzian, Sandra L. Schnakenberg, Virginia A. Zakian  Molecular Cell  Volume 12, Issue 6, Pages 1525-1536 (December 2003) DOI: 10.1016/S1097-2765(03)00456-8

Figure 1 Rrm3p Facilitates Replication Fork Movement through Centromeres, tRNA Genes, and Inactive Replication Origins DNA from asynchronous wild-type (WT) or rrm3Δ cultures was digested with restriction enzymes and analyzed by two-dimensional gel electrophoresis and Southern hybridization. (A) Schematics of the 2D gel technique: 1N, nonreplicating fragment; 2N, almost fully replicated fragment right before sister chromatids separate; P, replication pause; BU, bubble-shaped replication intermediates. (B–J) Southern blots were probed to detect the following regions (restriction enzymes and hybridization probes are noted in parentheses): (B) CEN3 (XbaI, YCL001W-B); (C) CEN4 (XbaI, YDL001W); (D) tRNAA (tA[AGC]F; BglII, HIS2); (E) tRNAY (tY[GUA]F1; EcoRV, YFR012W); (F) tRNAF (tF[GAA]F; BamHI,YFR007W); (G) ARS304 (BamHI, KAR4); (H) ARS608 (BglII, MET10); (I) HML (XhoI, YCL069W); (J) HMR (EcoRV, YCRWΔ12). Arrows indicate sites of fork pausing. BR, broken replication intermediates (Martin-Parras et al., 1992). BU (E), bubble-shaped replication intermediate arising from an active origin of replication on the DNA fragment (Brewer and Fangman, 1987). The positions of the E and I silencers at the HML and HMR loci (I and J) on the arc of forked replication intermediates are indicated. Molecular Cell 2003 12, 1525-1536DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(03)00456-8)

Figure 2 Replication of Most of the Genome Is Not Affected by Rrm3p 2D gels were used to examine DNA replication in twelve overlapping restriction fragments within a 105 kbp region of chromosome VI, starting 68 kbp from the left telomere of chromosome VI. (A) The locations of the 12 fragments are shown. Positions of tRNAs (T), active ARSs (A), CEN6 (C), and in vivo Rap1p binding sites (Lieb et al., 2001) (arrows) are indicated. Asterisks mark positions of replication pauses in rrm3Δ cells. (B) DNA from asynchronous wild-type (WT) or rrm3Δ cells was digested with the indicated restriction enzymes, analyzed by 2D gels, and probed for the indicated regions: (1) AatII, YFL030W; (2) XhoI, YFL030W; (3) HindIII, FRS2; (4) BglII, LPD1; (5) KpnI, CDC4; (6) PvuII/AflII, CDC4; (7) AflII, MSH4; (8) SacI, MSH4; (9) ClaI, DEG1; (10) XhoI, DEG1; (11) AflII/XmaI, YFR007W; (12) BglII, YFR012W. Arrows, sites of replication fork pausing; BR, broken replication intermediates; BU, bubble structures. The smaller arc of forked replication intermediates in panel 6 was probably due to a crosshybridizing fragment. Molecular Cell 2003 12, 1525-1536DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(03)00456-8)

Figure 3 Lack of Rrm3p Does Not Increase Chromosome Loss but Does Increase Interchromosomal Recombination The two copies of chromosome VII that are present in the disome strain, the genotypes of cells that undergo loss or recombination of the LYS5 bearing copy of chromosome VII, and the chromosome loss and recombination rates (± standard deviations) in wild-type and rrm3Δ cells are shown. Relevant genes are indicated by black rectangles. The difference in the chromosome loss rates between wild-type and rrm3Δ cells was not statistically significant while the difference in recombination rates is significant (p < 0.05 by the criterion of a t test). The centromere is indicated by the open circle and positions of tRNA genes on chromosome VII by vertical lines. Molecular Cell 2003 12, 1525-1536DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(03)00456-8)

Figure 4 Lack of Rrm3p Activates the Intra-S Phase Checkpoint (A) Genetic interactions between RRM3 and MEC1 or RAD9. Heterozygous diploids bearing the centromere plasmid pIA20, which contains URA3, ADE3, and RRM3, were dissected, and ade2 ade3 spore clones of the indicated genotypes and carrying pIA20 were identified, streaked on nonselective media, incubated at 23° for 5 days, and then kept at 4° for 3 days to enhance color development. An ade2 ade3 cell carrying pIA20 generates red colonies; white sectors are generated by cells that lose pIA20. White sectors in red colonies indicate that cells of the indicated genotype can lose RRM3 and retain viability; mec1Δ sml1Δ rrm3Δ was the only strain tested that did not generate white sectors and did not grow on FOA plates. (B) Rad53p is hyperphosphorylated and active in rrm3Δ cells. Cell extracts were prepared from wild-type or rrm3Δ asynchronous log phase cultures in either the VPS106 or YPH499 background. Where indicated, the YPH499 wild-type strain was treated with either 0.1% MMS or 0.2 M HU, conditions sufficient to arrest cells and activate Rad53p (Sun et al., 1996). Proteins were separated in acrylamide gels, transferred to membranes, and then analyzed either by Western blotting using a Rad53p polyclonal antibody JDI47 from J. Diffley (top panel) or by an in situ Rad53p kinase assay (bottom panel) (Pellicioli et al., 1999). Molecular Cell 2003 12, 1525-1536DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(03)00456-8)

Figure 5 Replication Pausing at tRNA Genes Is Dependent upon Binding of the Transcription Complex The tRNAY gene was inserted on chromosome VI and renamed tRNAY(moved). 2D gels were used to examine replication fork progression in wild-type and rrm3Δ cells at a wild-type tRNAY(moved), tRNAY(moved) with a B block mutation that reduces TFIIIC binding ∼370-fold (Baker et al., 1986), and tRNAY(moved) in which both the normal and backup terminators were mutated, which increases the size of the transcript (Allison and Hall, 1985) (brackets, transcribed region). Arrows point to the position of the wild-type and mutant tRNAY(moved) genes on the arc of replication intermediates. Molecular Cell 2003 12, 1525-1536DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(03)00456-8)

Figure 6 ORC and Rap1p Binding at the Synthetic HMR-E Silencer Is Needed to Make Its Replication Rrm3p Dependent Replication of the HMR locus in wild-type and rrm3Δ strains in which an 868 bp fragment containing HMR-E was replaced with a 138 bp fragment that contains either the wild-type or a mutant version of the synthetic silencer (McNally and Rine, 1991). The wild-type synthetic silencer has binding sites for ORC, Rap1p, and Abf1p in the same order and spacing as at the natural E silencer. Strains used were WT or rrm3Δ versions of JRY2879 (WT synthetic silencer), JRY2881 (synthetic silencer with mutated ACS in which 8 of the 11 bases in the ORC recognition site are altered), and JRY3937 (synthetic silencer in which 2 of the 13 bases in the Rap1p recognition site are altered). Genomic DNA was cut with HindIII and analyzed by 2D gels. Positions of E and I silencers on the arc of forked replication intermediates are indicated. Molecular Cell 2003 12, 1525-1536DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(03)00456-8)

Figure 7 Deleting Sir Proteins Reduces the Need for Rrm3p in Replication of the HM Loci, Telomeres, and Inactive Replication Origins (A–F) Replication through HML. XhoI-digested genomic DNA from the indicated strains was analyzed by 2D gels using a probe for HML. The positions of the E and I silencers on the arc of forked replication intermediates are indicated. (A) and (D) are the same gels as in Figure 1I. (G–L) Replication through HMR. EcoRV-digested genomic DNA from the indicated strains was analyzed by 2D gels using a probe for HMR. (G) and (J) are the same as in Figure 1J. The positions of the E and I silencers on the arc of forked replication intermediates are indicated; bracket indicates a pause not seen in rrm3Δ cells. Longer exposures of (J), (K), and (L) are shown in the corresponding panels (M), (N), and (O). (P–U) Replication through the left telomere of chromosome III. Genomic DNA from the indicated strains was digested with SphI and analyzed by 2D gels. The position of the normally inactive ARS300 in the subtelomeric X element, 1 kbp from the chromosome end, is indicated by asterisks. The telomere is indicated by arrows. BU, bubble structures. Molecular Cell 2003 12, 1525-1536DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(03)00456-8)