© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

I.1 ii.2 iii.3 iv.4 1+1=. i.1 ii.2 iii.3 iv.4 1+1=

Advertisements

I.1 ii.2 iii.3 iv.4 1+1=. i.1 ii.2 iii.3 iv.4 1+1=

and Statistics, 2016, Vol. 4, No. 1, 1-8. doi: /ajams-4-1-1

Intermediate-level learner

Research, 2015, Vol. 3, No. 6, doi: /education

Figure 3. Comparison of class performance

Table 3. Quran memorization students survey responses about App

Table 1. Sample Size No Category Sample Size (F) Percentage (%) 1

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Titratable acidity (g/100g)

Source Sum of Squares (SS) df Mean Square (MS) F p-value

Table 3. Student’s Mathematical Critical Thinking Ability Description

Teachers Response (N= 11)

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Table 8. Drawing result before game

Table 2. Showing mean and SD along with t- critical ratio

student achievement scores

Table 11. Chi-Square Analysis Based on Grade Shift for Study Group

No. 8, doi: /education Table 9. t-Test Analysis Based on Average Quiz Scores from Last Six Quizzes t-Test: Two-Sample Assuming Unequal.

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Solving Equations 3x+7 –7 13 –7 =.

in the last evaluation of the software

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Test Mean Std. Dev. Mathematics English Language

Table 1. Student’s attitude towards technology (%)

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Significant (2- tailed)

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Contrast equality of group means

Table 2. Showing mean and SD along with t- critical ratio

Number of categories that are mentioned (0% < categories < 5%)

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Table 5. Pvalues of ttests for direction a

Table 2. Test of Normality

Table 1. Population by University

Table 1. LLC Academics Outcome Report ( )

Number of questionnaires sent out

Table 6. Pvalues of ttests for direction b

Table 1. Descriptive Statistics

Training Programs in Management and Leadership

Behavioral strategies

Table 4. Summary of Multi ways ANOVA results

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

t-test for Equality of Means

95% Confidence Interval for Mean

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Table 3. Correlation of PC, MC, RC & IC at the Supervisory level

chemistry that are involved in peer group

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Table 3. (d) Summary of two way ANOVA for overall adjustment

Table 2. Sample items for measuring attitude towards e-learning

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Figure 2. MDS-T configuration for the thirteen (13) criteria (and their Place) in DPESS in Athens (NKUA) Chris P. Lamprou et al. Evaluating the effectiveness.

Category Quantity Secondary school 3 Student participant

Table 1. Sampled Size by Status and Qualification of Academic Staff

MASTERS DEGREE HOLDERS

Table 1. Illiteracy distribution by Gender and Place (No. in million)

Table 3. The Result of Post-test Data Normality Test

Table 7. The Result of T Test After Treatment

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Compressive Strength difference at 1 week (MPa)

Table 4. Correlation of PC, MC, RC & IC at the Managers level

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Table 4. Independent Samples Test Application of ICT by Gender

Table 6. Range Comparisons amongst Subgroups and grade levels

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Presentation transcript:

© The Author(s) 2014. Published by Science and Education Publishing. Table 1. Dispositional resilience and coping strategy: linear correlations for total sample (N = 183) DRS COPE I II III IV V .07 -.31** .32** .42** .11 .14 .17* .03 .06 -.01 .05 .35** -.07 -.10 Levels of significance for (*) p<.05 and (**) p<.01. DRS-I: positive attitude; DRS-II: rigidity; DRS-III: alienation COPE-I: social support; COPE-II: avoidance; COPE-III: positive reinterpretation; COPE-IV: problem solving; COPE-V: humor and turning to religion Elisabetta Sagone et al. A Correlational Study on Dispositional Resilience, Psychological Well-being, and Coping Strategies in University Students. American Journal of Educational Research, 2014, Vol. 2, No. 7, 463-471. doi:10.12691/education-2-7-5 © The Author(s) 2014. Published by Science and Education Publishing.