Fanglei Lin, Yuri Nosochkov Vasiliy Morozov, Yuhong Zhang, Guohui Wei

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Lattice Status SuperB Project Workshop SLAC, October 6-9, 2009 Yuri Nosochkov for the SuperB Lattice Team Major recent updates by P. Raimondi and S. Sinyatkin.
Advertisements

Y. Ohnishi / KEK KEKB-LER for ILC Damping Ring Study Simulation of low emittance lattice includes machine errors and optics corrections. Y. Ohnishi / KEK.
CASA Collider Design Review Retreat HERA The Only Lepton-Hadron Collider Ever Been Built Worldwide Yuhong Zhang February 24, 2010.
SuperB Lattice Studies M. Biagini LNF-INFN ILCDR07 Workshop, LNF-Frascati Mar. 5-7, 2007.
Lattice design for FCC-ee Bastian Haerer (CERN BE-ABP-LAT, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT)) 1 8 th Gentner Day, 28 October 2015.
Present MEIC IR Design Status Vasiliy Morozov, Yaroslav Derbenev MEIC Detector and IR Design Mini-Workshop, October 31, 2011.
HF2014 Workshop, Beijing, China 9-12 October 2014 Challenges and Status of the FCC-ee lattice design Bastian Haerer Challenges.
First evaluation of Dynamic Aperture at injection for FCC-hh
JLEIC Electron Collider Ring Design and Polarization
ILC DR Lower Horizontal Emittance, preliminary study
JLEIC simulations status April 3rd, 2017
Review of new High Energy Rings
Ion Collider Ring: Design and Polarization
Large Booster and Collider Ring
Non-linear Beam Dynamics Studies for JLEIC Electron Collider Ring
First Look at Nonlinear Dynamics in the Electron Collider Ring
Electron collider ring Chromaticity Compensation and dynamic aperture
Nonlinear Dynamics and Error Study of the MEIC Ion Collider Ring
Error and Multipole Sensitivity Study for the Ion Collider Ring
Progress of SPPC lattice design
XII SuperB Project Workshop LAPP, Annecy, France, March 16-19, 2010
LHC (SSC) Byung Yunn CASA.
Collider Ring Optics & Related Issues
Negative Momentum Compaction lattice options for PS2
Comparison of NMC rings for PS2
Pulsed Sextupole Injection for Beijing Advanced Photon Source
Ion Collider Ring Chromatic Compensation and Dynamic Aperture
Towards an NMC Ring: Dispersion suppressor & long straight section
Yuri Nosochkov Yunhai Cai, Fanglei Lin, Vasiliy Morozov
RHIC Magnets for JLEIC Yuhong Zhang May 11, 2018.
Towards an NMC Ring: Dispersion suppressor & long straight section
Multipole Limit Survey of FFQ and Large-beta Dipole
Vertical Dogleg Options for the Ion Collider Ring
JLEIC Collider Rings’ Geometry Options
Progress on Non-linear Beam Dynamic Study
Feasibility of Reusing PEP-II Hardware for MEIC Electron Ring
Fanglei Lin, Andrew Hutton, Vasiliy S. Morozov, Yuhong Zhang
Update on MEIC Nonlinear Dynamics Work
JLEIC High-Energy Ion IR Design: Options and Performance
Ion Collider Ring Using Superferric Magnets
Fanglei Lin, Yuhong Zhang JLEIC R&D Meeting, March 10, 2016
Status and plans for crab crossing studies at JLEIC
Alternative Ion Injector Design
Update on study of chromaticity correction schemes for ion ring
First Look at Error Sensitivity in MEIC
Update on JLEIC Electron Ring Design
Multipole Limit Survey of FFQ and Large-beta Dipole
Fanglei Lin MEIC R&D Meeting, JLab, July 16, 2015
Compensation of Detector Solenoids
G.H. Wei, V.S. Morozov, Fanglei Lin Y. Nosochkov (SLAC), M-H. Wang
JLEIC Collider Rings’ Geometry Options (II)
Progress Update on the Electron Polarization Study in the JLEIC
Multipole Limit Survey of Large-beta Dipoles
Integration of Detector Solenoid into the JLEIC ion collider ring
Basic Error & Multipole Error for MEIC Ion Ring
G. Wei, V.S. Morozov, Fanglei Lin MEIC R&D Meeting, JLab, Oct 27, 2015
Status of IR / Nonlinear Dynamics Studies
Possibility of MEIC Arc Cell Using PEP-II Dipole
More on MEIC Beam Synchronization
JLEIC Electron Ring Nonlinear Dynamics Work Plan
Upgrade on Compensation of Detector Solenoid effects
Arc FODO Cell Inventory
Fanglei Lin JLEIC R&D Meeting, August 4, 2016
MEIC R&D Meeting, JLab, August 20, 2014
Summary of JLEIC Electron Ring Nonlinear Dynamics Studies
DYNAMIC APERTURE OF JLEIC ELECTRON COLLIDER
A TME-like Lattice for DA Studies
Error Sensitivity in MEIC
Compensation of Detector Solenoid Coherent Orbit Correction
Update on DA Studies for a TME-like Lattice
Presentation transcript:

Progress in Testing a Hybrid Multi-Bend Achromat Lattice in JLEIC Electron Ring Fanglei Lin, Yuri Nosochkov Vasiliy Morozov, Yuhong Zhang, Guohui Wei JLEIC R&D Meeting, June 29, 2017 F. Lin

Outline Motivation Brief history of Hybrid Multi-Bend Achromat (HMBA) SuperB ESRF JLEIC HMBA design option Optics Emittance Estimated circumference Chromaticity budget Summary

Motivation / Application / Potential Issues Reduce the emittance of electron beam in the JLEIC electron collider ring Small emittance => reduce beam sizes at IP => boost the luminosity Small emittance => enlarge * => reduce maximum beta functions and beam sizes at FFQs => reduce FFQs’ apertures Hybrid Multi-Bend Achromat (HMBA) lattice Philosophy : dispersion bump for efficient chromaticity correction with less and relatively weak sextupoles Small dispersion and horizontal beta function on dipoles Application : SuperB and ESRF Expected potential issues Strong arc quadrupoles Long arc length

Super B From Yuri Nosochkov based on the latest SuperB HER lattice (per M. Biagini)

From Pantaleo Raimondi at IPAC’17

ESRF From Pantaleo Raimondi at IPAC’17

JLEIC HMBA Cell 1 HMBA cell 1 : L = 37.48 m,  = 225 mrad (12.89), HMBA cell bending radius is 166.58m ( 155.45 m in the baseline and short-arc-cell lattices) Dipole: total 8 dipoles Two 4.5m, 45mrad and six 2.25m, 22.5mrad All dipoles have the same bending radius of 100m (close to 110.5m in the baseline and 98.2 in the short-arc-cell lattices) Quadrupole, total 11 quadrupoles in 6 families Four 0.3 m and seven 0.5 m Maximum strength is ~17 T/m at 5 GeV with a pole tip field 0.83 T at 5cm radius Sextupole, total 4 in 2 families Two 0.15 m and two 0.3 m Strength will be determined BPM and Correctors Three 0.05m bpms and three 0.3 m H/V correctors Phase advances are H/V : 3 / 

Cell 1 Optics (H/V : 3 / ) SF SD

JLEIC HMBA Cell 2 HMBA cell 2 : L = 29.86 m,  = 135 mrad (7.74), HMBA cell bending radius is 221.19m ( 155.45 m in the baseline and short-arc-cell lattices) Dipole: total 6 dipoles Two 4.5m, 45mrad and four 1.125m, 11.25mrad All dipoles have the same bending radius of 100m (close to 110.5m in the baseline and 98.2 in the short-arc-cell lattices) Quadrupole, total 9 quadrupoles in 5 families Four 0.3 m, four 0.5 m and one 0.7 m Maximum strength is ~18 T/m at 5 GeV with a pole tip field 0.91 T at 5cm radius Sextupole, total 4 in 2 families Two 0.15 m and two 0.3 m Strength will be determined BPM and Correctors Three 0.05m bpms and three 0.3 m H/V correctors Phase advances are adjusted in two sets H/V : 2.5 / 0.5 (90) H/V : 2.6 / 0.6 (108)

Cell 2 Optics (H/V : 2.5 / 0.5) SF SD

Cell 2 Optics (H/V : 2.6 / 0.6) SF SD

Super HMBA Cell Optics Cell 1: 3 /  Cell 2: 2.5 / 0.5

Cell w/ Phase advance (H / V) Normalized Emittance (m) 3 GeV 5 GeV 10 GeV HMBA cell 1 : 3 /  2.2 10.1 80.9 HMBA cell 2 : 2.5 / 0.5 ( and 2.6 / 0.6 ) 1.4 (1.9) 6.5 (8.7) 51.6 (69.5) HMBA cell 1 + 2 1.9 (2.1) 8.7 (9.6) 69.9 (76.6) Short FODO cell : 0.6 / 0.6 10.0 46.4 371.6 Note that: The emittance is reduced by a factor of 5 for the HMBA cell. The total emittance will be finally determined (maybe dominated) by other sections (such as dispersion suppression, SBCCs, spin rotators) if they have relatively large contribution.

Estimated Geometry Super HMBA cell : cell 1 + cell 2 Length 67.34 m, bending angle 20.63 , average arc radius 187.06 m. Estimated one arc bending angle: 20.63x(8+2) + 17 + 26.4 = 249.7 then crossing angle is 69.7 Estimated one arc length: 67.34*10 + 104*2 + 75.2*2 = 1031.8 m IF each straight is ~220m, then the total circumference will be 2.5km. 2 spin rotators 2 SBCCs Disp. Supp. for injection and matching Sextupole pairs for chromaticity compensation 2 spin rotators 2 SBCCs

Optics of HMBA and FODO Cells

Cell w/ Phase Advance H / V Chromaticity Cell w/ Phase Advance H / V Chromaticity H / V HMBA cell 1 : 3 /  -2.27 / -1.44 HMBA cell 2 : 2.5 / 0.5 ( and 2.6 / 0.6 ) -1.64 / -1.59 (-1.85 / -1.39) HMBA cell 1 + 2 -3.91 / -3.03 (-4.12 / -2.83) Short FODO : 0.6 / 0.6 -0.44 / -0.44 Chromaticities per cell: HMBA/FODO ~ 9 Number of cells per arc : HMBA/FODO ~ 10/50 = 1/5 Number of sextupoles per arc : HMBA/FODO = ((4+4)*8)/((1+1)*40) =0.8 Beta functions * dispersion at sextupole locations (assume all sextupoles have the same length): SF : HMBA/FODO ~ 0.95 SD : HMBA/FODO ~ 0.8 Total chromaticity from cells only : HMBA/FODO ~ 1.8 Total optic compensation factor : HMBA/FODO ~ 0.64 - 0.76 The sextupole strengths in the HMBA cell will be 2.4 to 2.8 times stronger than those in the FODO cell. This may induce strong nonlinear motion and limit the dynamic aperture. Need study the chromaticity compensation scheme.

Summary A Hybrid Multi-Bend Achromat (HMBA) type optics design is explored for the JLEIC electron collider ring. The result, in term of reducing the emittance, is very promising. There is about a factor of 5 reduction, comparing to a FODO cell design. It requires strong quadrupole strengths and may, very possible, end up with a large circumference. It needs a chromaticity compensation study to demonstrate an adequate dynamic aperture.

Back Up

From Yuri on Jan 31, 2017

ρ = 61.5 m ρ = 61.3 m

ρ = 74.5 m ρ = 61.3 m