Iakovos Barmpadimos, André Prévôt, Johannes Keller, Christoph Hüglin

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Trends in Fog Frequency and Duration in the Southeast United States Gloria Forthun, Michael Johnson, William Schmitz, and Jim Blume Southeast Regional.
Advertisements

CO 2 monitoring and modelling across Greater London Lester Kwiatkowski.
Heather Simon, Adam Reff, Benjamin Wells, Neil Frank Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, US EPA Ozone Trends Across the United States over a.
S Larssen: PM-PP-Stockholm-Oct-2003.ppt slide 1 PM in Europe - State and past trends Emissions and concentration levels Steinar Larssen Norwegian Institute.
Halûk Özkaynak US EPA, Office of Research and Development National Exposure Research Laboratory, RTP, NC Presented at the CMAS Special Symposium on Air.
Model used in « Source Apportionment of Airborne Particulate Matter in the UK » [Stedman et al., Receptor modelling of PM 10 concentrations at a UK national.
Atmospheric conditions associated with high and low summer ozone levels in the lower troposphere over the eastern Mediterranean and ship borne observations.
Preparation of the guidelines for vehicle non-exhaust emission modelling of PM10 and PM2.5 in Latvia Aiga Kāla, Valts Vilnītis SIA Estonian, Latvian &
Source apportionment of PM in the ADMS model David Carruthers Workshop on Source Apportionment of Particulate Matter Imperial College London Friday, 23.
Indicators for policy support of atmosphere related environmental problems Robert Koelemeijer National Institute for Public Health and the Environment.
Title EMEP Unified model Importance of observations for model evaluation Svetlana Tsyro MSC-W / EMEP TFMM workshop, Lillestrøm, 19 October 2010.
WORKING GROUP I MONITORING DATA ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION TFMM Workshop, Paris, 2006, Nov 29 –Dec 1.
A One-Year Simulation of Photochemistry over Europe with a Complex Chemistry Transport Model Contribution to subproject GLOREAM and TOR2 H. Feldmann, M.
Clean air for London: ClearfLo David Green, King’s College London.
REFERENCES Maria Val Martin 1 C. L. Heald 1, J.-F. Lamarque 2, S. Tilmes 2 and L. Emmons 2 1 Colorado State University 2 NCAR.
Trend analysis: methodology
Trend analysis for HMs and POPs Applications I. Ilyin, EMEP / MSC-East.
Federal Department of the Environment, Transport, Energy and Communications DETEC Federal Office for the Environment FOEN Modelling the spatial distribution.
RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS  Most of significant trends for N are negative for all thresholds and seasons. The largest number of significant negative trends.
Observational Evidence: Ozone and Particulate Matter EMEP SB, 13 September summary Chapter 2 Kathy Law LATMOS-CNRS,
Science Investigation Discussion of Results to Date & Future Work Red Deer Particulate Matter Information Session Maxwell Mazur
SUBMICRON AEROSOL PARTICLES IN A SMALL SETTLEMENT NEAR HIGHWAY J. HOVORKA, Z. STAŇKOVÁ Institute for Environmental.
Spatial Pattern of PM2.5 over the US PM2.5 FRM Network Analysis for the First Year: July 1999-June 2000 Prepared for EPA OAQPS Richard Scheffe by Rudolf.
| Folie 1 Assessment of Representativeness of Air Quality Monitoring Stations Geneva, Wolfgang Spangl.
Satellite based versus traditional air pollution monitoring: Requirements, limitations, and chances Dominik Brunner, Christoph Hueglin, Christoph Zellweger,
© Crown copyright Met Office Estimating UK and NW European CH 4 emissions using inversion modelling Alistair Manning with thanks to Simon O’Doherty & Dickon.
Study of ambient air particulates pollutants near Taichung airport sampling site in central Taiwan Journal of Hazardous Materials 144 (2007) 492–498 Student.
OVERVIEW OF ATMOSPHERIC PROCESSES: Daniel J. Jacob Ozone and particulate matter (PM) with a global change perspective.
Bret A. Schichtel Center for Air Pollution Impact and Trend Analysis (CAPITA) Washington University St. Louis, MO, Presented at EPA’s National Exposure.
WGE September 20111Brit Lisa Skjelkvåle Trends in precipitation chemistry, surface water chemistry and aquatic biota in acidified areas in Europe.
August 1999PM Data Analysis Workbook: Characterizing PM1 Characterizing Ambient PM Concentrations and Processes What are the temporal, spatial, chemical,
Arno Graff Susan Klose UBA-II 4.2 – Air Quality Assessment Some Aspects on Air Quality in Germany related to SOER 14th EIONET Meeting, Warsaw,
Air Quality trend analyses under EMEP/TFMM and link to EEA work Augustin COLETTE (INERIS), Chair of the TFMM/CLRTAP TFMM National Experts, CCC, MSC-E,
Causes of Haze Assessment (COHA) Update Jin Xu. Update Visibility trends analysis (under revision) Assess meteorological representativeness of 2002 (modeling.
Development and evaluation of the suspension emission model Mari Kauhaniemi Research Scientist Finnish meteorological Institute, Air Quality, Dispersion.
17 th TFMM Meeting, May, 2016 EMEP Case study: Assessment of HM pollution levels with fine spatial resolution in Belarus, Poland and UK Ilia Ilyin,
Evaluation of pollution levels in urban areas of selected EMEP countries Alexey Gusev, Victor Shatalov Meteorological Synthesizing Centre - East.
Air Quality in EEA and EECCA Europe’s Environment assessment report, th Europe’s Environment assessment report, 2007 (‘the Belgrade report’) Hans.
Daiwen Kang 1, Rohit Mathur 2, S. Trivikrama Rao 2 1 Science and Technology Corporation 2 Atmospheric Sciences Modeling Division ARL/NOAA NERL/U.S. EPA.
Impact of various emission inventories on modelling results; impact on the use of the GMES products Laurence Rouïl
Joint EMEP/WGE meeting, Geneva, 2016 Evaluation of B[a]P pollution in the EMEP region: temporal trends and spatial variability Alexey Gusev, Olga Rozovskaya,
5th International Conference on Earth Science & Climate Change
A New Method for Evaluating Regional Air Quality Forecasts
Charles University in Prague
The role of weather conditions on PM2.5 concentrations in Beijing
Air Monitoring Trends in New Jersey
Measurements of PM10 a contribution from EIONET
AIR POLLUTION AND GLOBAL CHANGE: TOWARDS AN INTEGRATED POLICY
Changes to the methodology since the NEC report #2
PM10 Ireland overall average
A. Aulinger, V. Matthias, M. Quante, Institute for Coastal Research
Alexey Gusev, Victor Shatalov, Olga Rozovskaya, Nadejda Vulyh
Alison Redington* and Derrick Ryall* Dick Derwent**
Assessment of Atmospheric PM in the Slovak Republic
10th TFMM meeting, June, 2009, France, Paris
Statistical analysis of the secondary inorganic aerosol in Hungary using background measurements and model calculations Zita Ferenczi   Hungarian Meteorological.
TFMM trend analysis: use of AirBase. Preliminary results
EEMEP ASSESSMENT REPORT
EMEP Case study: Assessment of HM pollution levels with fine spatial resolution in Belarus, Poland and UK Ilia Ilyin, Olga Rozovskaya, Oleg Travnikov.
Topic 3: Meteorology and data filtering
U.S. Perspective on Particulate Matter and Ozone
PM observations in Europe a review of AirBase information
Empa, Air Pollution/Environmental Technologies
Linking the meteorological conditions to air pollution in Italy
Trends in sulphur and nitrogen components
The EuroDelta inter-comparison, Phase I Variability of model responses
PM Trends PM10, PM2.5, PM10-PM2.5 (not possible in 90s)
PM10 trends in Switzerland using random forest models
An Overview of Europe’s Air Quality and Air Pollutant Emissions
WORK OF THE UNITED KINGDOM AIR QUALITY EXPERT GROUP (AQEG)
Presentation transcript:

Iakovos Barmpadimos, André Prévôt, Johannes Keller, Christoph Hüglin Trends and meteorological influences on PM10, PM2.5 and PMcoarse in Switzerland and in Europe Iakovos Barmpadimos, André Prévôt, Johannes Keller, Christoph Hüglin Thanks to the Federal Office for the Environment and COST

Publications by Iakovos Barmpadimos Barmpadimos, I., J. Keller, D. Oderbolz, C. Hueglin, and A. S. H. Prévôt (2012) One decade of parallel fine (PM2.5) and coarse (PM10–PM2.5) particulate matter measurements in Europe: trends and variability, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 3189-3203. Barmpadimos, I., M. Nufer, D. C. Oderbolz, J. Keller, S. Aksoyoglu, C. Hueglin, U. Baltensperger, and A. S. H. Prevot (2011) The weekly cycle of ambient concentrations and traffic emissions of coarse (PM(10)-PM(2.5)) atmospheric particles, Atmospheric Environment, 45(27), 4580-4590. Barmpadimos, I., C. Hueglin, J. Keller, S. Henne, and A. S. H. Prevot (2011) Influence of meteorology on PM10 trends and variability in Switzerland from 1991 to 2008, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 1813-1835.

Aims Investigate trends and variability of PM10, PM2.5 and PMcoarse in Switzerland and in Europe for the last two decades Find out to what extend these trends are a result of meteorological variables and examine trends adjusted for meteorology See which features of meteorological variables have the largest effect on PM concentrations

Data ~10 years of daily parallel PM10, PM2.5 measurements 5 rural background EMEP sites (blue) 1 suburban background (red) 1 urban background (orange) ~10 years of daily parallel PM10, PM2.5 measurements EMEP = European Monitoring and Evaluation Programme

Methodology Statistical regression of PM concentrations versus meteorological variables Generalised Additive Models (GAM) ‘smooth’ function s

Methodology Such smooth functions were fitted for many meteorological variables.

Methodology Example: Langenbruegge/Waldhof, summer Process repeated for each size (PM10 and PM2.5), each season and for the whole-year data: Total 70 GAM

Methodology “Adjusted” PM10

GAM performance and important variables Between 50 and 65% of the observed variance was explained by GAMs Variables selected for the 7 PM2.5 GAM runs for the whole-year datasets: convective boundary layer depth wind direction wind speed season temperature Julian day precipitation previous-day precipitation

Meteorological influence on PM2.5

Meteorological influence on PMcoarse

Influence of wind direction on PM2.5

Raw and adjusted trends solid line: adjusted dash line: raw We get trends with the same confidence with less data Average trend -0.4 μgm-3yr-1 for PM10 and PM2.5 No significant trend for PMcoarse Decrease in PM10 is mostly the result of a decrease in the PM2.5 component

Data from Switzerland 13 stations of the NABEL network urban traffic urban background suburban rural highway rural lowland rural mountain (Hüglin et al., 2007)

PM10 trends in Switzerland Average trend in the 90s: -1.0 μgm-3yr-1 Average trend in the 00s: -0.6 μgm-3yr-1 Trends differ between station types Rural -0.37 μgm-3yr-1 Urban background -0.53 μgm-3yr-1 Urban street -1.2 μgm-3yr-1 blue: raw red: adjusted

The weekly cycle of PMcoarse ambient concentrations

Traffic contribution to ambient PMcoarse max conc. min conc. 70% 53% background Sunday traffic contribution (c) is 53% with 95% confidence interval 34% - 78% Weekday traffic contribution (d) is 70% with 95% confidence interval 57% - 86%

Conclusions (1) PM trends after adjustment for the effect of meteorological factors have greater level of confidence PM10 and PM2.5 decrease at several European regions (average -0.4 μgm-3yr-1) PMcoarse have no significant trend PM10 decrease at all Swiss sites (average -0.5 μgm-3yr-1), largely because of traffic The rate of decline has slowed down in the 00s compared to the 90s

Conclusions (2) PMcoarse have a pronounced weekly cycle Sunday PMcoarse traffic contribution is an estimated 53% Weekday PMcoarse traffic contribution is an estimated 70%

Important Effects of emissions on airquality trends can be detected earlier if meteorolgical adjustments are performed There should be more data on Airbase or somewhere else including both airquality and! meteorological variables.