Overview of the experimental setup and visual stimulus.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Demonstrations I, II, and III.

Advertisements

Degradation of MSP samples in 37°C DPBS solution.

Comparison of predicted and measured forces and moments.

Basic design concept of human mimetic humanoid.

Comparing previous simulation work with current study.

TPAD controller performance for three force components.

Cable-driven system diagram for structure matrix.

Demonstration of high-speed and precise actuation.

Three different types of transfer functions with a codomain of [0,1].

Robot surface tension experiments.

TPAD training protocol.

Examples of AEGIS autonomous target selection.

Workspace comparison of Delta robots.

Ex vivo testing of the soft robotic devices.

Group data during free walking between sessions 1 and 16.

Distribution of the number of collisions and the average closest-neighbor distance as a function of communication range and delay. Distribution of the.

Visual explanation of the interaction terms.

Visual explanation of the interaction terms.

AEGIS intelligent targeting compared with blind targeting.

Prosthesis grasping and control.

A novice user executing various subtasks from study 1.

Tukey boxplots overlaid on data points from objective and subjective measures, displaying results from study 1. Tukey boxplots overlaid on data points.

Tactile features for prosthesis perception.

The milliDelta: a millimeter-scale Delta robot.

Quasi-static and dynamic trajectories.

Online verification using reachable occupancies.

Cell viability tests. Cell viability tests. SEM images of (A) MC3T3-E1 cells and (B) MSCs on days 1, 3, and 5 of culture. (C) Survival rates of MC3T3-E1.

Overview of the key stages (sensing, perception, and interaction) during robot-assisted autism therapy. Overview of the key stages (sensing, perception,

Experimental results for tremor reduction.

Prosthesis system diagram.

SoFi system overview. SoFi system overview. (Top, left to right) Soft robotic fish and diver interface module. (Bottom, left to right) Subcomponents of.

Translation of a spherical object.

Microrobots with different cell-carrying capacities under different grid lengths (lg) and burr lengths (lb). Microrobots with different cell-carrying capacities.

Brain-computer interfaces.

Fig. 1 Examples of experimental stimuli and behavioral performance.

Schematic of experimental setup and screen captures from swimming.

Experimental setup for workspace, bandwidth, and force characterization of the milliDelta. Experimental setup for workspace, bandwidth, and force characterization.

Degradation of MSP samples in 37°C DPBS solution.

Fig. 1 Experimental apparatus used to train and test free-flying bees on their capacity to learn addition and subtraction. Experimental apparatus used.

Fig. 3 Rotation experiment, setup.

Fluorescence response of actuator.

Experimental setup. Experimental setup. (A) Chair with a human-like robotic arm on its side. (B) Ball-balancing board containing color-shape markers. (C)

Histograms showing the distribution of people with respect to their performances for the single task and multitask conditions. Histograms showing the distribution.

The two modalities for the multitask condition.

Simulation results of magnetic driving ability in hepatic artery, portal vein, and hepatic vein. Simulation results of magnetic driving ability in hepatic.

Comparison of predicted and measured forces and moments.

In vitro cell-release experiments on a glass substrate.

RAD sampler design. RAD sampler design. (A) One arm of the RAD sampler with revolute joints shown as dotted lines. A fold is initiated by rotating the.

Fig. 2 2D QWs of different propagation lengths.

Object manipulations performed by our biohybrid robots.

Overhead snapshots. Overhead snapshots. (A to E) Mark I3, robot experiments (movie S1). (F) Mark I3, simulation (movie S2, side by side with a run on the.

Results of a representative participant with multiple training sessions. Results of a representative participant with multiple training sessions. Average.

AEGIS autonomous targeting process.

Examples of organic sensing in robotics.

Fig. 1 Average contribution (million metric tons) of seafood-producing sectors, 2009–2014. Average contribution (million metric tons) of seafood-producing.

Details of seal design. Details of seal design. (A) RAD sampler (left), with close-up view (right) indicating the soft edges that form the light seal.

Fig. 6 Experimental setup and properties of the IP screen.

Discrimination accuracy across conditions.

State-of-the-art midwater sampling tools.

Kinematic and mechanical advantage trade-off study.

Characterization and optimization of the device.

The biomimetic pressure sensing ability.

Breakdown of incorrect participant responses.

Setup of the microrobot-assisted high-precision wet transfer.

Fig. 2 Comparison between the different reflective metasurface proposals when θi = 0° and θr = 70°. Comparison between the different reflective metasurface.

Robot-assisted intervention system.

Robot-initiated joint attention.

Evaluating the performance of the robotic system through comparison with human trackers. Evaluating the performance of the robotic system through comparison.

Comparison of children’s behavior between the three conditions.

Setup used in the study. Setup used in the study. A child interacts with the robot tutor with a large touchscreen sitting between them, displaying the.

Presentation transcript:

Overview of the experimental setup and visual stimulus. Overview of the experimental setup and visual stimulus. (A) SoftBank Robotics Nao humanoid robot used as confederate. (B) Overview of the participant seating arrangement. In the control condition, only the participant and experimenter were present. Participants’ judgments are collected in a clockwise order beginning with the confederates and ending with the subject. (C) Photograph of the arrangement in a real setup. (D) Example of the visual stimuli presented to participants via a computer screen. The target line is located on the left, and the three labeled comparison lines are located on the right. Participants say which of these matches the length of the target line. Anna-Lisa Vollmer et al. Sci. Robotics 2018;3:eaat7111 Copyright © 2018 The Authors, some rights reserved; exclusive licensee American Association for the Advancement of Science. No claim to original U.S. Government Works