Institutional Performance Program 2019 Regional Rules Seminar PLEASE TRY TO SIT AT A TABLE WHICH DESIGNATES YOUR INSTITUTION’S DIVISION
Agenda Introduction and resources: Updates to IPP data management system. Demonstration of IPP. Admissions case study. Peer group development case study. How to build a report for department/institutional leadership. Key takeaways and questions.
IPP Resources
Updates Health and safety data. Division II Proposal 2019-5. Division III Proposal 2019-4. Ability to designate/restrict access to data. Recent updates to IPP.
Case Study No. 1 Academic Admissions
Case Study No. 1: Facts Titan University is a Division I FBS institution. Titan University football staff is recruiting Ronnie “Sunshine” Bass. Rising senior at T.C. Williams High School. Holds state records for touchdown and passing yards. Is the defending state 100-meter champion. Ronnie’s academic record is as follows: 2.30 core-course GPA. 960 SAT (seven attempts).
Case Study No. 1 Questions: Is Ronnie Bass admissible? Can Ronnie be academically successful at Titan University? What do you need to know? How can IPP help you?
Case Study No. 1 How Can IPP Assist? Academic outcome data indicators. Division I Academic Progress Rate. Eligibility and retention. Graduation rates. Academic initial-eligibility. Core-course GPA. Scholastic Assessment Test score.
Case Study No. 1: How Can IPP Assist?
Case Study No. 1
Single-Year APR – Football Case Study No. 1 Single-Year APR – Football 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Titan University 939 944 917 955 915 941 All Division I 957 963 964 970 968
Eligibility Rate – Football Case Study No. 1 Eligibility Rate – Football 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Titan University 932 919 885 923 900 955 All Division I 957 959 966 970 969
Retention Rate – Football Case Study No. 1 Retention Rate – Football 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Titan University 938 962 942 974 918 914 All Division I 951 957 959 961
Discussion: What else do you need or want to know? Case Study No. 1 Discussion: What else do you need or want to know? Academic support services available for at-risk SAs? Inside and outside of athletics? Number of at-risk SAs on current team? Number of at-risk SAs currently enrolled? Current (special) admission standards for your institution? How far is Ronnie away from meeting standards?
Fiscal Management/Peer Group Comparisons Case Study No. 2 Peer Group Formation Fiscal Management/Peer Group Comparisons
Case Study No. 2: Facts D2U is a Division II public institution. Jill is D2U’s head women’s soccer coach. Hired in November 2015. D2U’s record in Jill’s first three seasons: 2016: 2-13-3 2017: 5-9-4 2018: 4-10-3
Case Study No. 2: Facts, cont. In December 2018, Jill asserts her program is underfunded. Scholarships. Coach’s salary. Recruiting budget. Jill wants to field a championship team. Does she have the necessary funding?
Case Study No. 2: Peer Group Selection Division II Women’s Soccer Teams. Division II Women’s Soccer Teams + Public Institutions. 2018 Division II Women’s Soccer NCAA Championship Field.
Case Study No. 2: Peer Group Selection STEP 2: Choose Women’s Soccer and Public Step 3: Type School Name(s) Step 1: Choose Division II
Case Study No. 2 1 3 2
Case Study No. 2 Total Scholarship Dollars – Women’s Soccer 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 D2U $297,884 $303,629 $341,880 $350,949 $262,625 $230,308 All Division II $119,600 $130,429 $138,267 $146,963 $171,165 $165,000 D2 WSO $119,830 $129,608 $139,145 $154,019 $171,889 $165,789 D2 WSO Champ. Field $122,153 $132,230 $140,036 $161,819 $193,014 $207,222 D2 WSO Public $93,304 $92,825 $98,750 $111,803 $108,950 $112,000
Case Study No. 2 Equivalencies – Women’s Soccer 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 D2U University 10 9 7 All Division II 5 6 D2 WSO D2 WSO Champ. Field D2 WSO Public
Case Study No. 2 Head Coach Compensation – Women’s Soccer 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 D2U University $53,300 $46,778 $55,824 $55,860 $58,351 $60,830 All Division II $46,737 $48,740 $52,475 $53,303 $56,266 $57,134 D2 WSO $46,390 $49,242 $52,520 $54,131 $56,503 $57,315 D2 WSO Champ. Field $57,884 $66,275 $68,650 $69,017 $70,424 $74,714 D2 WSO Public $55,793 $57,257 $61,770 $65,832 $66,118 $69,857
Case Study No. 2 Assistant Coach Compensation 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 D2U $19,682 $16,890 $20,996 $18,349 $30,021 $11,746 All Division II $8,082 $9,936 $10,718 $13,735 $13,457 $13,785 D2 WSO $8,110 $9,948 $10,806 $14,000 $13,988 $14,165 D2 WSO Champ. Field $13,253 $15,562 $14,685 $23,499 $25,123 $33,842 D2 WSO Public $9,297 $11,376 $13,035 $17,268 $16,768 $20,394
Case Study No. 2 Recruiting Expenses 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 D2U University $2,737 $3,382 $1,589 $1,581 $1,942 $812 All Division II $2,701 $2,419 $2,550 $2,562 $2,999 $3,112 D2 WSO $2,641 $2,441 $2,582 $2,586 $3,083 $3,022 D2 WSO Champ. Field $3,031 $3,315 $2,591 $2,769 $3,314 $3,978 D2 WSO Public $2,933 $2,768 $2,717 $3,061 $3,612 $3,349
Case Study No. 2 Discussion: Is head coach Jill’s assertion correct? Is her program underfunded? What other considerations are relevant for your meeting?
Case Study No. 3 IPP Reporting
Case Study No. 3 IPP Reporting Internal Reports External Reports Athletics Director President/Chancellor FAR Representatives of Athletics Interests Faculty Senate Corporate Partners Board of Trustees Alumni Groups
Case Study No. 3 IPP Reporting Discussion: Please review the case study at your tables. What is most important to your president/chancellor? What is most important to convey your priorities? What can highlight/detract from your presentation? How can IPP help?
Case Study No. 3 IPP Reporting Report for President/Chancellor: Athletics department expenses and revenues. Percentage of institutional budget. Academic outcome data. Leadership demographics.
Case Study No. 3 IPP Reporting Additional Peer Groups: Potential conference realignment. In-state competitors. National competitors. Football.
Case Study No. 3 Financial Data Indicators
Case Study No. 3 Academic Data Indicators
Case Study No. 3 Demographic Data Indicators
Questions? Jennifer Samble (jsamble@ncaa.org) Steve Clar (sclar@ncaa.org) ipp@ncaa.org
We Want Your Feedback Your input is important. Rate this session using the survey on the Regional Rules Seminar app.