Children and Networks Suha Hajyahia Tareza Haddad

What Are We Going to Talk About Today?! Overview Children awareness of online privacy risks Internet of things children’s toys Privacy concerns parents have and how can they stay sharp In conclusion

How big do you think is network use nowadays??

How about amongst children?

Rights and Ethics in a Big Data World

It’s a technological phenomenon, in so far as it can be described as: BIG DATA It’s a technological phenomenon, in so far as it can be described as: Data sets that are so large or complex that traditional data processing applications are inadequate to deal with them. The term ‘big data’ often refers simply to the use of predictive analytics, user behavior analytics, or certain other advanced data analytics methods that attempt to extract value from data, (Canavillas et al., 2016)

But, what is so special about children in particular? collecting personal details from children can be very harmful, they may grow up to find themselves harmed as adults by information collected about them before they understood the long term significance.  Other research has shown that besides children, people in their 20s and early 30s (the age of most app developers) have the least understanding of how these issues can cause long-term harm.

Digital identities and impacts over the life course Constant evolving representation of self online networks hold significant power over these identities Use of digital identity for economic purposes

Children’s understanding

Security and privacy analyses of Internet of things children’s toys

The internet of things (IoT) is the extension of internet connectivity into physical devices and everyday objects. Embedded with electronics, internet connectivity, and other forms of hardware (such as sensors), these devices can communicate and interact with others over the Internet, and they can be remotely monitored and controlled

What privacy concerns do parents have about children’s mobile apps?

Survey Questions: How well do parents know about existing privacy safeguarding tools on mobile devices, such as kids app stores or privacy permission settings? Do they find them effective? How are mobile apps installed on children’s or families’ mobile devices? What kind of technical restriction mechanisms or processes are set up by parents to protect children? What kind of privacy concerns do parents have when choosing apps for their children? How do they impact on parents’ actual choice of apps for children?

Key findings: Children’s access to apps are largely under parents’ control. Parents expressed a high level of privacy concerns, but content was still king. Children’s favorite apps are not always appropriate for their age. Parents’ level of concern increased when told about potential implications. Parents know little about kids/family app store provided by leading app markets. Parents show a good knowledge of privacy permission controls. Parents struggle with managing children’s emotions when removing inappropriate apps.

1. Children’s access to apps are largely under parents’ control

2. Parents expressed a high level of privacy concerns, but content was still king

3. Children’s favorite apps are not always appropriate for their age

4. Parents’ level of concern increased when told about potential implications

5. Parents know little about kids/family app store provided by leading app markets

6. Parents show a good knowledge of privacy permission controls

7. Parents struggle with managing children’s emotions when removing inappropriate apps

How can parents keep a eye?

Are children fully aware of online privacy risks, and how can we improve their coping ability?

Methodology Eliciting children’s responses to a collection of hypothetical scenarios that reflect different types of explicit and implicit threats to children’s qonline personal data privacy

Key findings: Children care about online privacy risks Children still need help with certain privacy risks Children’s ability to describe risks depends on their actual understanding of risks Children struggle to comprehend the implications of risks

CONCLUSION

“Children and the Data Cycle: Rights and Ethics in a Big Data World ” Gabrielle Berman & Kerry Albright. “Kid on The Phone! Toward Automatic Detection of Children on Mobile Devices ” Toan Nguyen, Aditi Roy & Nasir Memon “KOALA Project Repost 1” Jun Zhao, Ulrik Lyngs, Nigel Shadbolt Department of Computer Science University of Oxford Feb 28, 2018 REFERENCES.

“KOALA Project Report 2” Jun Zhao Department of Computer Science University of Oxford April 28, 2018 “KOALA Project Report 3” Ge Wang, Jun Zhao, Nigel Shadbolt Department of Computer Science University of Oxford January 15, 2019 Security and Privacy Analyses of Internet of Things Children’s Toys Gordon Chu, Noah Apthorpe, and Nick Feamster REFERENCES.

Thanks! Any questions?