Lithuanian case: The challenges of user friendly questionnaire and data validation Laura Perevičiūtė.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
European Union Cohesion Policy
Advertisements

Monitoring and Indicators in WORKSHOP 30 APRIL 2013 Ines Hartwig Impact Assessment & Evaluation Unit DG EMPL 1.
“MED P ROGRAMME ” Z ERO C O (2) Z ERO EMISSION CO MMUNITIES F INANCIAL MANAGEMENT SYSTEM K ICK O FF M EETING J UNE 17° 18° 2010.
1 European eGovernment Awards 2007 European eGovernment Awards 2007 Workshop for Finalists July, Brussels LIMOSA Belgium Reference project number.
28 Steps to Successful Recruitment Applications
Paulius Baniūnas Ministry of Finance of the Republic of Lithuania EU Structural Support Management Department Monitoring and Analysis Division SYSTEM OF.
Education in Hungary: challenges and recent developments Improving literacy skills across learning CIDREE Conference, Budapest Halász Gábor.
Ministry of Finance Financial management and control of the Operational Programmes, co- financed under the Structural funds and the Cohesion fund of EU.
ISS AUSTRALIA Rosa Saladino ISS Australia Legal Services.
Individual Income Tax Computation and Tax Credits
Establishing good working relations
GLOBALG.A.P. Risk Assessment On Social Practice – GRASP
LOCAL ACTION PLAN FOR EMPLOYMENT & SOCIAL INCLUSION
Structural Funds Financial Management and Control, Romania
ARC Chairperson Training

Patient Encounters and Billing Information Chapter 3
SOUTH BALTIC CROSS-BORDER CO-OPERATION PROGRAMME
The Policies and Processes of the WFME Recognition Program
Total area km2; Population ;
Experience of the Regional Labour Office in Warsaw as the beneficiary during the implementation of its own projectsFinancial Perspectives
“…to make a tangible difference to Roma people's lives”
Public Employment Service Austria
TEMPORARY RESIDENT PERMITS
Draft Guidance on designing recruitment subsidies
Getting Paid Advanced Level.
Quality Management Systems – Requirements
The careers strategy What it says, what it means and where we are going? Tristram Hooley Midlands NCOP Practitioners Conference Birmingham May 2018.
SPECIAL EDUCATION DECEMBER COUNT REPORT WEBINAR
Audit Requirements, Risk and Anti Fraud
Management Verifications & Sampling Methods
Specific objectives in
ARC Chairperson Training
Services for your Child
INTERREG IPA CBC “GREECE ALBANIA ”
Audit Requirements, Risk and Anti Fraud
Use of the business register in the Dutch labour statistics
methodology Stratified random sample of PLOs drawn from 341; PULS databases from 69 PLOs (59 of them were complete and operable); data on
REPORTING and PAYMENT (in practice)
Preschool Promise Eligibility Training
Household situation indicators – french approach (DGEFP)
Sectoral Operational Programme Human Resources Development
LIVING AND WORKING TOGETHER: INTEGRATING SYRIANS UNDER TEMPORARY PROTECTION (SuTPs) TO TURKISH ECONOMY European Union Regional Trust Fund (in Response.
Common ESF Output Indicators
Survey on representative sampling
MINISTRY OF ECONOMY AND FINANCE
Management Verifications & Sampling Methods
Kamil Valica Unit A.3 Impact Assessment and Evaluation
ESF in Poland Multi-level governance
Future Monitoring and Evaluation: Focus on results Antonella Schulte-Braucks Ines Hartwig ESF Evaluation Partnership Brussels 17 November 2011.
Common ESF Indicators in the Current Programming Period
The process of collecting data for monitoring the progress of SOPHRD related to data protection Management Authority for the Sectorial Operational Programme.
Social services for the active inclusion of disadvantaged people
Education System in Kazakhstan. Systems Kindergarten Primary school Higher secondary school Lyceums and Colleges Public Funding of Education International.
“Education and the labour market” in NewCronos
Andrew Jenkins and Rosalind Levačić
Practical Aspects and Running of the Project
State performance plan indicator 14
PATH OF DEINSTITUTIONALISATION ASOCIATIA ALTERNATIVA
RSA Update: ESS FAQ’s and Tips
Contractual and Regulatory Framework
NATIONAL AGENCY FOR EMPLOYMENT
Promotion of Active Employment Policy Measures –
Means Testing: theory and facts
self-paced eLearning series
SELECTED EXAMPLES OF NATIONAL ACTIVE LABOUR MARKET POLICIES: BELGIUM
Patient Registration and Data Entry
Eligibility Monitoring Manual
Stocktaking of Early Childhood Development (ECD)
Adding Participants.
Presentation transcript:

Lithuanian case: The challenges of user friendly questionnaire and data validation Laura Perevičiūtė

Collecting data Participant’s questionnaire form User friendliness Calculating the indicators Completeness and validation checks

Collecting data Data for output is being collected on the first day of participation Data for immediate result indicators is being collected 28 days after the end of participation Beneficiary collects the questionnaires and enters the data to IT system.

Participant’s questionnaire form Information on a project participant’s gender, status in the labour market, education and belonging to vulnerable groups General information on a project participant (name, contact information, date of birth) Start date Information on project participant’s compliance with the additional criteria

Challenge: a user friendly questionnaire Co-working with NGO‘s to make the questionnaire more understandable (especially household situation questions) A detailed guideline that helps to fill in the questionnaire Closed questions Minimize the scope of information asked Aiming to put as much burden on the IT system as possible

Employment status Employed Self employed (a footnote with examples) Employed on other grounds (employment contracts, civil servant, etc.) Unemployed 6 months 6-12 months More than 12 months Inactive Unemployed student or pupil Unemployed person who is not in education (examples)

Education status Education you already have 1 group: primary (4 grades) or lower secondary education (10 grades) 2 group:upper secondary (12 grades) or professional qualification 3 group: With tertiary education (bachelor, master, doctor degree) Without primary education( a grown up person without primary education) Your current participation in trainings At the moment participating in education programs, trainings, learning courses, etc. At the moment not participating in education programs, trainings, learning courses, etc.

Belonging to vulnerable social groups Everyone at home is unemployed Everyone at home is unemployed and there are dependent children Migrants, people with a foreign background, minorities (including marginalised communities such as the Roma) Disabled A person who doesn‘t have a home or who is at risk at losing it Single parents with dependent children A person who belong in other vulnerable groups (examples) A person who doesn‘t belong to any vulnerable group Not providing information

Challenge: a user friendly quationnaire Date of birth Unemployed for: 6 months 6-12 months More than 12 months Long term unemployed

Calculating the indicators One national level IT system managed by managing authority The micro data is being entered by the beneficiary It may be seen only by the employees of the implementing agency who are coordinating the implementation of a project – data protection issue The IT system calculates indicators: a participant is included if it matches a set of characteristics.

Example (1) Common product indicator „Above 54 years of age who are unemployed, including long-term unemployed, or inactive not in education or training“ includes all participants who match one of these sets of characteristics: Above 54 + unemployed up to 6 months Above 54+ unemployed 6 to 12 months Above 54 + unemployed more than 12 months Above 54 + inactive not in education or training

Example (2) Common product indicator „Long-term unemployed“ includes all participants who match one of these sets of characteristics: Up to 25 years old + unemployed 6 to 12 months Unemployed more than 12 months

Completeness and validation checks Who? When? What is being checked? IT system Beneficiary entering data into IT system Completeness of data Validation tests on micro level In case of erroneous data IT system informs about critical error (the data about a participant can not be saved in the system till the data is corrected. Implementing agency Payment claim check Eligibility of expenditure In case of erroneous data agency returns payment claim to beneficiary and asks to correct the data. If beneficiary does not correct the errors, expenditure may be declared ineligible. Planned on spot checks Data corresponding with the questionnaires In case of erroneous data beneficiary may be asked to correct the data. In case of infringement, expenditure may be declared ineligible and recovered. Participants are connected to expenditure eligibility. Data is being transferred to indicators only after the expenditure is verified by implementing agency Spot checks include evaluating if the data in IT system correspond with data provided in the questionnaires forms Validation tests at aggregate level are being carried out automatically by IT system Second evaluation of data completeness and validation is being implemented while writing annual implementation report

Completeness and validation checks Who? When? What is being checked? Implementing agency Unplanned on spot checks The process of collecting data from participants In case of infringement, a beneficiary may be asked to correct their procedures, a financial correction may be applied. IT system Calculating indicators Validation tests at aggregate level In case of erroneous data IT system informs implementing body about the inconsistencies of the data. If it is not an IT problem then implementing body identifies a specific project that has erroneous data and informs beneficiary about inconsistencies. Managing authority Annual implementation report Completeness of data MA informs implementing body about inconsistencies of the data. Implementing body takes actions described in the step above. Participants are connected to expenditure eligibility. Data is being transferred to indicators only after the expenditure is verified by implementing agency Spot checks include evaluating if the data in IT system correspond with data provided in the questionnaires forms Validation tests at aggregate level are being carried out automatically by IT system Second evaluation of data completeness and validation is being implemented while writing annual implementation report

To sum up Direct contact with the participant User friendly questionnaire Calculating the indicators by combining the data collected Complete and valid data ensured by different checks

Thank you for your attention