Mobility Planning for Active Transportation Infrastructure and Sustainable Communities Sustainable Development Program Kevin Kokes, AICP January 22,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
January 23, 2006 FAIRFAX COUNTY PEDESTRIAN TASK FORCE FAIRFAX COUNTY PEDESTRIAN TASK FORCE FINAL REPORT.
Advertisements

Presentation to CHA/CHIP Work Groups August 17, 2012 Meredith Bossin Planning & Development Review.
Transportation Demand Management: Transport Canada Initiatives Canadian TDM Summit, November RDIMS
[Jurisdiction’s] Draft Complete Streets Policy Resolution
 City of Mesa Council Presentation October 23, 2014.
1 City of Rapid City and Rapid City Community Planning RAPID CITY BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN MASTER PLAN in collaboration with: Kadrmas, Lee and Jackson RDG.
County Wide Active Transportation Study (CWATS) Master Plan Active Communities Summit – October 3, 2011.
Austin Strategic Mobility Plan Apr 19, 2010 Program Overview.
Safe Routes to School in the ATP Jeanie Ward-Waller Senior California Policy Manager Active Transportation Program Cycle 2 Caltrans District Workshops.
History of US Bicycle Routes In 1970’s interest in long distance bicycle travel proliferates.
DATS Bicycle Planning 2009 Bicycle Advisory Committee Kickoff Danville Area Transportation Study July 13, 2009.
Utah Collaborative Active Transportation Study.  Regional Collaboration.
Why do you need a plan for walkers? They can walk anywhere, can’t they?
Mapping the Way to Success: the Arkansas Safe Routes to School Program.
City of Leawood Bicycle Friendly Community The Year in Review.
Multimodal Corridor Plan BCC Discussion Item Transportation Planning Division August 19, 2014.
Collaboration Collaboration Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) Housing choices and opportunities Housing choices and.
TRB Transportation Planning Applications Conference Houston, Texas May 2009 Ann Arbor Transportation Plan Update-- Connecting the Land Use & Transportation.
1 Item 11: Review of Draft Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan for the National Capital Region Michael Farrell TPB Staff Presentation to the Transportation Planning.
Staying Positive: Responding to Transit Critics Eron H. Linn Federal Relations Manager Dallas Area Rapid Transit (DART) 1.
Land Use Study for the Community of Winchester July 9, 2012.
Countywide Master Plan of Transportation. Project Overview Master Plan of Transportation Purpose 2002 General Plan Guidance The Development Pattern Report.
Bike Walk Ambassador Program Workplace Outreach and Campaigns Photos and Bike Walk Ambassador Programwww.bikesbelong.org.
Dallas ICM Pioneer Site Stage 1 Lessons Learned Webinar July 24, 2008.
TM. Overview What is Safe Routes to School? The Five Es SR2S Action Plan Steps SR2S Resources
Palm Beach MPO Draft Complete Streets Policy Palm Beach MPO Draft Complete Streets Policy Advisory Committees September
The Smart Growth Strategy/ Regional Livability Footprint Project… Policies Shape Reality Alex Amoroso Principal Planner Association of Bay Area Governments.
Regional Transportation Council Mobility Plan Workshop North Central Texas Council of Governments November 12, 2015.
APA, Planning, and Health Anna Ricklin, AICP Manager, Planning and Community Health Center.
Urban Bicycle Networks Throughout Virginia I. Introduction This multimodal investment network is the incorporation of four urban bicycle studies and plans.
Shaping our Future Transportation Transportation trends Influencing trends through land use decisions Alternative futures: Base Case and Scenario Complementary.
Mell Henderson, Director of Transportation & Michael Briggs, Transportation Planner Mid-America Regional Council.
Minnesota State Planning Conference September 28, 2011.
A Strategic Agenda for Pinellas County’s Future Growth Whit Blanton, FAICP Pinellas Planning Council & Pinellas Metropolitan Planning Organization August.
2016 Active Transportation Plan Goals, Objectives & Criteria Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities Advisory Committee March 2, 2016 meeting.
Complete Streets Training Module 4a – Understanding Context.
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE MEETING 2 – TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT 12/12/2013.
Unit 1 THE TRANSPORTATION PLANNING PROCESS AND THE ROLE OF THE MPO LCTCC Educational Program.
Complete Streets Training Module 4b – Designing for All Users.
Buena Park General Plan Update Overview Presentation.
Ferndale Complete Streets Ordinance
Move New Haven Transit Mobility Study:
Safe Routes to School Getting Started Locally Safe Routes to School
Chelan County Transportation Element Update
City of New Braunfels Regional Transportation Planning Garry Ford, P.E., PTOE City Engineer June 13, 2017.
NE Pasco (The Hills) Multimodal Safety Action Plan Pasco County, FL
REGIONAL BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN PLAN
Fort Worth to Houston Corridor Expressway Concept
Built Environment and Physical Activity – updates
Reducing GHG emissions from Transportation using Smart Growth
MASTER THOROUGHFARE PLAN AND STREET DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
Plan Goals: Improve walkability and pedestrian safety Preserve and celebrate neighborhood character and sense of place Address code violations Improve.
What is the Regional Transportation Plan?
AMPO Annual Conference October 22, 2014
Complete Streets Policy + Bicycle / Pedestrian Plan
Pedestrian & Bicyclist Crash Analysis
Draft Transportation Element September 6, 2017
Transportation Makes a Difference
FHWA Bicycle and Pedestrian Program
NVTA Countywide Pedestrian Plan of July 2016
Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan Vision/Goals/Objectives
Transportation Makes a Difference
Chapter 5. The Transportation-Planning Process
The Need for Bicycle and Pedestrian Mobility
STP Shared Local Fund: Project Evaluation Criteria
Emily Guenther Zach Olson Laura Scott Cameron Wein
MPO Board Presentation
Minnesota State Planning Conference September 28, 2011
Non-Single Occupancy Vehicle (Non-SOV) Travel Performance Measure and Regional Targets Daniel Snyder - NCTCOG.
What follows after approval of Active Transportation
Presentation transcript:

Mobility Planning for Active Transportation Infrastructure and Sustainable Communities Sustainable Development Program Kevin Kokes, AICP January 22, 2018 American Council of Engineering Companies of Dallas

Sustainable Development Planning Projects Land Use-Transportation Corridor Studies (Urban Thoroughfares) Rail Station Area/ TOD Plans Infrastructure Analysis Context Sensitive Transportation Plans Form-Based Codes and Design Guidelines Downtown Plans/ Area Visioning Studies Safe Routes to Schools and Safety Plans

Planning / Designing for All Ages and Abilities (Ages 8 to 80) Children Walk Commute Adults Fitness

Evaluation and Scoring Criteria for Active Transportation Projects (2017 Transportation Alternatives Program) Category Scoring (pts) Description Regional Network Connectivity 25 Improves connectivity of Mobility 2040 regional paths and bikeways between cities and counties. Mobility 20 Improves connections and access to transit. Safety 15 Improves safety and provides facilities for pedestrians and bicyclists with a high level of comfort and suitability for users of all ages and abilities. Reducing Barriers 10 Provides safe crossing of existing travel obstacles such as major roadways, interchanges, railroads, and bodies of water. Congestion Reduction Provide alternative travel options as an option to motor vehicle trips in areas with greater opportunity for walking and bicycling Destination Density 5 Provides access to areas with a high density of major employers and destinations. Air Quality Benefits Improves air quality by supporting non-motorized facility usage. Equity Improves access to disadvantaged populations and underserved communities. Local Network Connectivity Implements locally planned priorities.

Existing/Funded Planned Total 11 miles 34 miles 45 miles

Regional Veloweb Trail Project Area Seven Participating Agencies Transportation Agencies (2):  DCTA and DART Cities (3): Lewisville, Carrollton, and Coppell Counties (2):  Denton Co. and Dallas Co. Approx. 6.5 mi. From Hebron Station to Campion Trail Additional 7.5 mi. of Trail Connections North Carrollton/Frankford DART Station, Trinity Mills DART station, and The Existing North Levee Trail Along Denton Creek in Coppell West of MacArthur Blvd.

Fort Worth to Dallas Regional Veloweb Trail Existing and Funded 17.7 miles 7.4 miles 4.5 miles 13.1 miles 10.1 miles Planned and Unfunded 5.7 miles 3.5 miles 1.5 miles 10.7 miles (Approx. $16M) unfunded Irving Arlington Grand Prairie Downtown Dallas Downtown Fort Worth

Cotton Belt Regional Veloweb Trail (12 cities in 3 counties) Grapevine to Plano: 25.5 miles Fort Worth (West of Handley Ederville Rd) to Plano: 46 miles (Existing = 11 miles, Funded = 3 miles, Planned = 32 miles)

What are Complete Streets? Multimodal Complete Streets There is no singular design prescription for Complete Streets; each one is unique and responds to its community context. Source: City of Dallas They are designed and operated to enable safe access for all users, including pedestrians, bicyclists, motorists and transit riders of all ages and abilities. Source: Smart Growth America

Design Guidance NACTO Urban Bikeway Design Guide (2012) (National Association of City Transportation Officials)

Dallas Road Retrofit and Cotton Belt Trail Extension

“A true walkable radius does not typically exist.” Pedestrian and Bicycle Routes to Rail Stations Distance and gaps in the actual “Routes” to stations (walksheds) nctcog.org/RoutesToRail Barriers and Gaps in the Network Rail Station Destination 0.5 mile actual walk distance 0.5+ mile Disconnected pedestrian facility

nctcog.org/RoutesToRail

FHWA Pedestrian-Bicycle Safety Focus States and Cities States and cities with the highest pedestrian fatalities and/or fatality rates One of the questions asked to address is “how pedestrian safety became a priority” Texas and DFW are designated on the FHWA Safety Focus States and Cities with the highest pedestrian fatalities / fatality rates. For the North Texas / Dallas-Fort Worth metropolitan region – landing on the list of Focus States and Focus Cities is part of the reason for elevating the priority. This is not a good list to be ranked near the bottom. We understand this is a region-wide issue, not just the cities of DAL and FW Mapping and reviewing the crash and fatality data and seeing the locations and hot spots were issues are occurring is eye opening. Also asked to address “Ways the Agency has begun to shift attention on the issue”. Will talk today about the MPO’s efforts related to: Reviewing the data and hot spots Education /Training for key stakeholders in the region to focus on the issues Special studies – such as Safety Audit, and Pedestrian Access to Rail Stations Location of new Schools and related Policies Regional Safety Education Campaign to raise awareness MTP Priorities for addressing the safety issues and active transportation such as through funding programs. Pedestrian Fatality Rates* (Per 10K walking commuters) #41: Texas Top 50 Cities* #26: Austin #37: Houston #44: San Antonio #47: Dallas #50: Fort Worth *Source: Bicycling and Walking in the United States: 2014 Benchmarking Report

At the regional level it is important to see the pattern of crashes in the region, and common characteristics of the areas where the crashes are occurring. Mapping the location of crashes has helped to identify “hot spots” of pedestrian crash activity. This map represents the 4 largest counties by population in the MPA, with yellow representing areas of lower crash activity and the highest concentrations identified with the pink and dark blue. Tarrant County (Fort Worth) is the lower left and Dallas Co. is the lower right – will zoom in to show Dallas Co. in more detail.

At the regional level it is important to see the pattern of crashes in the region, and common characteristics of the areas where the crashes are occurring. Mapping the location of crashes has helped to identify “hot spots” of pedestrian crash activity. This map represents the 4 largest counties by population in the MPA, with yellow representing areas of lower crash activity and the highest concentrations identified with the pink and dark blue. Tarrant County (Fort Worth) is the lower left and Dallas Co. is the lower right – will zoom in to show Dallas Co. in more detail.

Safe Routes to School Plans and Infrastructure Projects Address identified barriers for students to safely and comfortably walk and bicycle to school – in combination with education, encouragement, and enforcement efforts. WHY: Improve safety Reduce traffic congestion Reduce air pollution Improve students’ mental and physical health, and foster lifelong healthy habits Promote a stronger sense of community

Education and Training Designing for Safety Workshops NCTCOG Hosts Workshops for Engineers and Transportation Planners TxDOT, City Staff, Transportation Agencies Case Study Site Visit Exercises Education and Training A significant emphasis in the region is focused on raising awareness, and bringing stakeholders together to share information and to collaborate. For roadway designers and planners throughout the region this includes workshops to explore best practices. Shift the mentality of moving more vehicles quicker through a corridor, to considering all modes of transportation equally. Often the most valuable portion of these workshops are the on-site case studies allowing the participants to experience actual conditions experienced by pedestrians, and discuss options to make improvements.

Kevin Kokes, AICP Principal Transportation Planner kkokes@nctcog Kevin Kokes, AICP Principal Transportation Planner kkokes@nctcog.org (817) 695-9275 nctcog.org/bikeped Thus, much of what we do at the MPO level is collaborate on regionally significant projects and build partnerships to implement regional goals and policies of the MTP adopted by the Regional Transportation Council. This includes training / workshops, stakeholder meetings, partnering in TOD / land use studies with local municipalities, participating in demonstration projects as models for the region, and campaigns to raise awareness and focus attention on the issues. Appreciate the opportunity to speak today and talk about active transportation planning in the Dallas-Fort Worth region. January 22, 2018 American Council of Engineering Companies of Dallas